Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 03:19:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 ... 684 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Vertcoin - First Scrypt N | First Stealth Address - Privacy without mixer  (Read 1232505 times)
CoinBuzz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:28:32 PM
 #4481

Adaptive N-factor doesn't really matter for ASIC resistance, it's still about as easy to make an ASIC for...  You just put some SRAM on die and then adjust lookup_gap. ASICs should always have huge power/hashrate advantages whenever you use scrypt, unfortunately.

http://www.openwall.com/lists/crypt-dev/2013/03/21/1

All you'll end up with is a blockchain that's progressively harder to validate as time goes on, which is actually a bad thing.

Do u mean it is possible to make an ASIC device with changeable N-factor with software ??

Boris/Vertcoin, can u comment on this please

Join ASAP: FREE BITCOIN
Basnoff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:29:40 PM
 #4482

Matt Green. Vertcoin. Get it ?  Grin
Matt Green. Ok  Cool
Very good feeling.
https://www.blogger.com/profile/05041984203678598124
I like beer  Roll Eyes

There is no relation between Matt Green and Vertcoin, please don't put me in an awkward position
Who's behind Vertcoin Huh  Huh

A group of people who can actually implement groundbreaking features *and* launch all that successfully.
Good enough for me. In time we'll learn I guess.
dedicatedpoolcom
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:32:17 PM
 #4483

Guys our VTC pool is doing awesome.  BIG PAYOUTS.  If you're been unsatisfied with your pool, you should check us out.  Help with configs and tweaking for VTC?  Join ##dedicatedpool

http://dedicatedpool.com/images/logo.png

VTC.DEDICATEDPOOL.COM

Benefits of Mining on DEDICATEDPOOL.COM

  • Backups every 30 minutes of the databases and wallets to protect your mining endeavours.
  • Full 24/7 support available at admin@dedicatedpool.com
  • Mine uninterrupted - dedicated servers w/redundancy, DDoS protection.
  • Trustworthy admins who care about your experience and mining.

Server Infrastructure

  • SIX(6) SERVERS IN CLUSTER
  • DDoS protection at switch level
  • 8 Core servers, 256GB DDR3 RAM, RAID 10 SSD
  • Ramdisks, memcaches, to make things go extremely quick
TotalPanda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1012

vertex output parameter not completely initialized


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:33:04 PM
Last edit: February 08, 2014, 07:43:30 PM by TotalPanda
 #4484

Ok, I'am still a newbie in this cryptoworld  Cool.
But, I understand very well  Cool

[Joke mode] What "Vertans" think off the NxT channel ?
mattbigblue
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:39:56 PM
 #4485

Matt Green. Vertcoin. Get it ?  Grin
Matt Green. Ok  Cool
Very good feeling.
https://www.blogger.com/profile/05041984203678598124
I like beer  Roll Eyes

There is no relation between Matt Green and Vertcoin, please don't put me in an awkward position
Who's behind Vertcoin Huh  Huh

Satoshi Nakamoto.

pangu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 599


CoinMetro


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:40:24 PM
 #4486

Matt Green. Vertcoin. Get it ?  Grin
Matt Green. Ok  Cool
Very good feeling.
https://www.blogger.com/profile/05041984203678598124
I like beer  Roll Eyes

There is no relation between Matt Green and Vertcoin, please don't put me in an awkward position
Who's behind Vertcoin Huh  Huh

Satoshi Nakamoto.
+1

CoinMetro - Way Beyond the Best Crypto Exchange | 24/7 Live Support
BorisTheSpider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:45:33 PM
 #4487

Do u mean it is possible to make an ASIC device with changeable N-factor with software ??

Boris/Vertcoin, can u comment on this please

You can adjust lookup gap to compromise on memory requirements, but all you do is reduce hashrate.

It's not commercially viable to make ASICs for memory-hard algorithms, which is why we're only just starting to see them for normal Scrypt, and they are not particularly competitive with GPUs yet on a TCO basis. No-one can tell you for sure what the future will bring, but it's reasonable to expect that the more and more memory bound the algorithm, the harder it is to develop an ASIC, and that increasing memory requirements over time like Vertcoin does makes it impractical not only now, but also in the future.

TotalPanda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1012

vertex output parameter not completely initialized


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:47:13 PM
 #4488

 Grin
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto

You're kidding me, right?
quarkkid
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:49:54 PM
 #4489

Grin
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi Nakamoto

You're kidding me, right?

please tell me you are not serious, of course its not!

My reputation thread!! ...https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=419456.0
C A Ix > >   CAIx-- Xt7qWX6LTAURHZYzjenTBNfViztCz2z72U
nasone32
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:50:22 PM
 #4490

Adaptive N-factor doesn't really matter for ASIC resistance, it's still about as easy to make an ASIC for...  You just put some SRAM on die and then adjust lookup_gap. ASICs should always have huge power/hashrate advantages whenever you use scrypt, unfortunately.

http://www.openwall.com/lists/crypt-dev/2013/03/21/1

All you'll end up with is a blockchain that's progressively harder to validate as time goes on, which is actually a bad thing.

Do u mean it is possible to make an ASIC device with changeable N-factor with software ??

Boris/Vertcoin, can u comment on this please

"You just put some SRAM on die"...
it's cache, it's expensive. transistor count on litecoin ASICs is mostly due to memory. and they are barely in advantage.
double that, and you can not be competitive with gpus anymore.
you not only double the cost of each chip, but also you reduce yield for every wafer.

to be competitive also for next N number it's simply impossible. nobody would want to buy an asic "ready for the next N=12" simply because it would cost twice as much and the market is so volatile nobody know's what will happen.

OF course it's possible to do. but costs are over the sky
enerbyte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:52:14 PM
 #4491

Matt Green. Vertcoin. Get it ?  Grin
Matt Green. Ok  Cool
Very good feeling.
https://www.blogger.com/profile/05041984203678598124
I like beer  Roll Eyes

There is no relation between Matt Green and Vertcoin, please don't put me in an awkward position
Who's behind Vertcoin Huh  Huh

Satoshi Nakamoto.
+1
+1  Grin
ieatm3s
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:53:48 PM
 #4492

If I understand correctly.. When ASICS hit the market they will mine scrypt with X khash, but Vertcoin performance will be a lot less than X/2 ?
dunchy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:54:54 PM
 #4493


Quote
All you'll end up with is a blockchain that's progressively harder to validate as time goes on, which is actually a bad thing.

Anyone care to comment on this?
ieatm3s
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 07:56:36 PM
 #4494


Quote
All you'll end up with is a blockchain that's progressively harder to validate as time goes on, which is actually a bad thing.

Anyone care to comment on this?
Perhaps. If we could understand the context this statement was made in.
Vertcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:00:27 PM
 #4495


Quote
All you'll end up with is a blockchain that's progressively harder to validate as time goes on, which is actually a bad thing.

Anyone care to comment on this?

I just copied from Reddit.

[–]nasone32 2 points 2 hours ago
---i'm taking some time to answer here but note i'm not the dev--- Colin Percival talks about encryption. here Scrypt is not used strictly for encryption. it's use to make calculations "more difficult". with big Ns (like 20) you don't just add calculation difficulty. you also add verification difficulty on calculations made by others. the network becomes too slow then.
the N increase has been chosen to comply with moore's law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law
permalinkparentreportgive goldreply
[–]autowikibot 1 point 2 hours ago
Moore's law:
Moore's law is the observation that, over the history of computing hardware, the number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles approximately every two years. The law is named after Intel co-founder Gordon E. Moore, who described the trend in his 1965 paper. His prediction has proven to be accurate, in part because the law is now used in the semiconductor industry to guide long-term planning and to set targets for research and development.
The capabilities of many digital electronic devices are strongly linked to Moore's law: processing speed, memory capacity, sensors and even the number and size of pixels in digital cameras. All of these are improving at roughly exponential rates as well. This exponential improvement has dramatically enhanced the impact of digital electronics in nearly every segment of the world economy. Moore's law describes a driving force of technological and social change in the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
The period is often quoted as 18 months because of Intel executive David House, who predicted that chip performance would double every 18 months (being a combination of the effect of more transistors and their being faster).
Image from article i
Interesting: Gordon Moore | List of eponymous laws | Integrated circuit | Intel
/u/nasone32 can reply with 'delete'. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words | flag a glitch

VTC Stealth Address : vJmt8sF4iySr2RnJdZJdqk7CbJMQzwPwQwUsQwKF27qPE7qv9gfhjYqD6VapALi6jv8j6VKUvXYEto6 xmtxoq9oUyBXbV9XsYdt6sA
Please contact us via contact[at]vertcoin.org only, do not PM.
BorisTheSpider
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:21:36 PM
 #4496


Quote
All you'll end up with is a blockchain that's progressively harder to validate as time goes on, which is actually a bad thing.

Anyone care to comment on this?

This was one of the reasons the N-factor was rescheduled when the hardfork to KGW was released. We wanted to not only keep older GPUs in the game for longer, whilst still maintaining ASIC resistance, but we also wanted to leave open the option of running a full node (ie. a thick client, like the current Vertcoin-Qt) in the mid->far future on "modest" hardware.

As Vertcoin develops, one thing we are sure to see is an Electrum type SPV (simplified payment verification) wallet, in which there is no need for the client to validate the blockchain anyway, because it's done on the server, however philosophically I'm not overly keen on the idea of making this kind of thing something that most people feel the need to use because a full client is memory hungry, I'd rather it was an option but that people could still easily run a full node (to maximise decentralisation).

Yes, on a full node, the blockchain gets harder to validate as N increases, but Moores law and some awareness of history should suggest it is unlikely to be a big deal - it's like we were sat here 20 years ago talking about how by 2000 it will require a whopping 256MB of RAM to run X program, and how could anyone ever imagine having such an amount.
uswapme
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:24:51 PM
 #4497

price is getting lower because of trading bots at cryptsy. fuck that. one of them making lowball selling offers for 0.1496xxx for time to time. so price is getting lower and lower.
FreePls
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:27:58 PM
 #4498

price is getting lower because of trading bots at cryptsy. fuck that. one of them making lowball selling offers for 0.1496xxx for time to time. so price is getting lower and lower.

well but if someone is running a bot to make the price lower, that means he wants to get into that coin (cheaper)  Wink

so he wants the coin because he believes in it!

user871710
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:29:09 PM
 #4499

If I understand correctly.. When ASICS hit the market they will mine scrypt with X khash, but Vertcoin performance will be a lot less than X/2 ?
If that was true there wouldnt be need for diffrent cgminer and we could mine in just normal cgminer, but we would have half the hash.
They wont be able to mine it.
Asic is not so advanced it can do just the operation its programed for.
ieatm3s
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 08:31:20 PM
 #4500

so he wants the coin because he believes in it!

Or he is just greedy.
Pages: « 1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 ... 684 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!