|
Equate
|
 |
February 07, 2014, 08:43:06 PM |
|
I ain't selling till $1
|
|
|
|
|
jfm
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2014, 08:44:06 PM |
|
I tried the 10.9 version, didn´t work. Anyone else having problems? |
|
|
|
|
NickPortland
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 08:44:33 PM |
|
I ain't selling till $1
$1 seems very low |
Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations
*donations here*
UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
February 07, 2014, 08:46:08 PM |
|
I ain't selling till $1
$1 seems very low its for short term , I will save good chunk for long term @$10 |
|
|
|
|
Robert Lewandowski
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Bayern
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:00:28 PM |
|
I ain't selling till $1
$1 seems very low its for short term , I will save good chunk for long term @$10 Why would it go to $10, whats different about this coin |
|
|
|
|
NickPortland
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:04:26 PM |
|
I ain't selling till $1
$1 seems very low its for short term , I will save good chunk for long term @$10 How many you got stashed away atm? |
Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations
*donations here*
UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
|
|
|
|
Polly Stripe
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:11:05 PM |
|
I ain't selling till $1
$1 seems very low its for short term , I will save good chunk for long term @$10 Why would it go to $10, whats different about this coin Counter question. And why he did not go?? What is different from other startup coins from ultra?   |
|
|
|
|
|
sakr
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:11:44 PM |
|
I tried the 10.9 version, didn´t work. Anyone else having problems? I'm using it right now, what error do you get? |
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:17:59 PM |
|
I wish I was a stakeholder of 100k.  |
|
|
|
weblog
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:22:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bumface (OP)
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:37:07 PM |
|
Marketcap: 2093851.71 USD
|
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:39:38 PM |
|
I just put one of my 7970s on UTC but I'm only getting 425 kh/s. I used the same settings I get 700 kh/s everywhere else. What do I have to change in the bat file to get it back to 700 kh/s?
|
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.
Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:41:50 PM |
|
I just put one of my 7970s on UTC but I'm only getting 425 kh/s. I used the same settings I get 700 kh/s everywhere else. What do I have to change in the bat file to get it back to 700 kh/s?
its scrypt-Jane , u should probably get 550kh/s |
|
|
|
|
ReturnZero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:45:08 PM |
|
Has anyone set up UTC on BAMT or SMOS? I have my Windows rig mining it so far, but want to do the same on my other SMOS rigs as well.
|
|
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
|
February 07, 2014, 09:50:23 PM |
|
I just put one of my 7970s on UTC but I'm only getting 425 kh/s. I used the same settings I get 700 kh/s everywhere else. What do I have to change in the bat file to get it back to 700 kh/s?
its scrypt-Jane , u should probably get 550kh/s Any way to get it higher? Why use something that limits the hashrate? |
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.
Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
vvvortex
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 10:12:01 PM |
|
I just put one of my 7970s on UTC but I'm only getting 425 kh/s. I used the same settings I get 700 kh/s everywhere else. What do I have to change in the bat file to get it back to 700 kh/s?
its scrypt-Jane , u should probably get 550kh/s Any way to get it higher? Why use something that limits the hashrate? Because the devs want this coin to be something that stays within the reach of cpu/gpu miners, rather than those with the resources to buy $20k+ worth of ASIC miners to dominate minting. IMO of course. vvvortex |
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
February 07, 2014, 10:14:40 PM |
|
Any way to get it higher? Why use something that limits the hashrate?
550KH/s from a 280x is excellent. Most people only get around 500 KH/s. It's actually better getting lower hash rate than other Scrypt-based coins. Means you are using less power and generating less heat mining scrypt-jane. It also means you don't have to compete with ASICs due out soon. UTC is currently more profitable currently than ALL coins on coinwarz. That's all that matters at the end. |
|
|
|
laterbreh
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2014, 10:23:13 PM |
|
Any way to get it higher? Why use something that limits the hashrate?
550KH/s from a 280x is excellent. Most people only get around 500 KH/s. It's actually better getting lower hash rate than other Scrypt-based coins. Means you are using less power and generating less heat mining scrypt-jane. It also means you don't have to compete with ASICs due out soon. UTC is currently more profitable currently than ALL coins on coinwarz. That's all that matters at the end. +1 |
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 07, 2014, 10:25:48 PM |
|
Any way to get it higher? Why use something that limits the hashrate?
550KH/s from a 280x is excellent. Most people only get around 500 KH/s. It's actually better getting lower hash rate than other Scrypt-based coins. Means you are using less power and generating less heat mining scrypt-jane. It also means you don't have to compete with ASICs due out soon. UTC is currently more profitable currently than ALL coins on coinwarz. That's all that matters at the end. I get the same power draw on Jane and regular scrypt. How do you conclude that? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jarod1231
|
|
February 07, 2014, 10:34:15 PM |
|
Any way to get it higher? Why use something that limits the hashrate?
550KH/s from a 280x is excellent. Most people only get around 500 KH/s. It's actually better getting lower hash rate than other Scrypt-based coins. Means you are using less power and generating less heat mining scrypt-jane. It also means you don't have to compete with ASICs due out soon. UTC is currently more profitable currently than ALL coins on coinwarz. That's all that matters at the end. I get the same power draw on Jane and regular scrypt. How do you conclude that? Same here... using a P3 kill-a-watt... pulling 480W from wall on scrypt... 480W from wall on scrypt-jane |
|
|
|
|
