skribnod
Member
 Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 10, 2014, 02:08:13 AM |
|
Hmmm...after 24 hours of mining it decided to ban a miner running 500khs? It didn't have any bad shares or rejected shares showing at the time of the ban.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
bumface (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 02:19:52 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
tabnk
|
|
February 10, 2014, 02:23:08 AM |
|
In 2 days, price will be $3.5 per UTC.  |
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
February 10, 2014, 03:09:41 AM |
|
ultra.nitro.org is accepting registrations again?
It's got like 70% of the network hash rate. Scary.
|
|
|
|
|
tabnk
|
|
February 10, 2014, 03:27:31 AM |
|
UTC Price up again  . |
|
|
|
|
|
degenorate
|
|
February 10, 2014, 03:29:57 AM |
|
Minepools is back up and has been working perfectly. we will be implementing and switching to a new server soon with better protection. thank you for all that has stuck with us and we invite anyone to join us. Looking forward to getting back to where we were. We will continue to offer the best service we possible can. Fees are set to .5% indefinitely. THank you
Join Now!!!!
ultra.minepools.us , #minepools
|
|
|
|
|
skribnod
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2014, 03:40:33 AM |
|
Just noticed .11 diference between by and sell price of UTC, that seems like quite a bit compared to the other cryptos. Good though, maybe miners will hold thier coins and prices will climed higher.
|
|
|
|
|
busoni
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Owner of Poloniex
|
|
February 10, 2014, 03:53:40 AM |
|
If someone wants to send 1 UTC so I can test deposits and withdrawals, I'll put this up on Poloniex. Address: URd73srMBXFYdLP98hJP4ev9mLDHVwGJBn
|
Poloniex.com - Fast crypto exchange with margin trading, advanced charts, and stop-limit orders
|
|
|
skribnod
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2014, 03:59:06 AM |
|
Is there any benefit to mining on a more populated server? Do you get more coins mining on the higher hash sites?
|
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
February 10, 2014, 04:02:24 AM |
|
If someone wants to send 1 UTC so I can test deposits and withdrawals, I'll put this up on Poloniex. Address: URd73srMBXFYdLP98hJP4ev9mLDHVwGJBn
Ooh. If I wasn't at work, I would have sent it to you. So it'll be up on your exchange soon?  |
|
|
|
|
degenorate
|
|
February 10, 2014, 04:04:41 AM |
|
Is there any benefit to mining on a more populated server? Do you get more coins mining on the higher hash sites?
It honestly depends on how much hashrate you have. IF you dont have much hashrate, the benefit is that you will hit blocks more often. But you will not get more coins. You will get smaller portions. IF you have a huge hashrate, joining a smaller pool might be beneficial because you will get alot more coins per block. Try ultra.minepools.us  |
|
|
|
|
laterbreh
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2014, 04:07:59 AM |
|
Is there any benefit to mining on a more populated server? Do you get more coins mining on the higher hash sites?
The larger the pools hashrate that faster coins are found, but the smaller the payouts. Conversely, a pool with smaller hashrates, are going to find blocks a little less quicker, but your payouts will be larger. It is up to you which pool you like. Its a matter of preference |
|
|
|
skribnod
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2014, 04:15:44 AM |
|
Is there any benefit to mining on a more populated server? Do you get more coins mining on the higher hash sites?
The larger the pools hashrate that faster coins are found, but the smaller the payouts. Conversely, a pool with smaller hashrates, are going to find blocks a little less quicker, but your payouts will be larger. It is up to you which pool you like. Its a matter of preference Thanks, it just seemed that when Leetpool went down and i switched to nitropool i found more coins in shorter period of time. I should have timed it but i didn't think it would make difference. |
|
|
|
|
michaela_elise
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 04:29:18 AM |
|
anyone know whats up with utc.pool.pm? The block stats have been stuck showing the same data for like 1.5 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stewart2012
|
|
February 10, 2014, 04:49:37 AM |
|
need to add --failover-only end of line ? It can go anywhere after the pool entries. In fact you don't "have" to add it, but many do. You could have it in the middle though, doesn't matter: This is my config for 7950's failover is in the middle |
|
|
|
|
|
tabnk
|
|
February 10, 2014, 04:57:33 AM |
|
UTC is getting lot of traction from community. NET HASH @ 4.X GH/s. Price up too. Congratulation to all and we are moving UP UP UP |
|
|
|
|
Ruckster2010
Member
Offline
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2014, 05:01:26 AM |
|
anyone know whats up with utc.pool.pm? The block stats have been stuck showing the same data for like 1.5 hours.
Not sure, mining numbers are still rolling though. |
|
|
|
laterbreh
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2014, 05:04:46 AM |
|
Could the crons be stuck?
|
|
|
|
|
Protagonus
|
|
February 10, 2014, 05:07:21 AM |
|
need to add --failover-only end of line ? It can go anywhere after the pool entries. In fact you don't "have" to add it, but many do. You could have it in the middle though, doesn't matter: This is my config for 7950's failover is in the middle If you list multiple pools, it will switch to them either way. For a better description; Might as well hear it "from the horses mouth" so to speak. The Dev for CGminer The normal failover mechanism in cgminer will allow some work to go to the backup pools if there is a delay in getting work from the primary pool you have set. This can be as much as 10% if the pool has latency issues. It then only fails to the backup pool if the primary pool stops giving work for 1 minute. failover-only does not change the failover mechanism, but it does not allow work to go to the backup pools unless the primary pool has failed completely for at least a minute. It then will switch to the backup pool. If cgminer considers a pool dead or down, it tries to contact that pool 1 minutely.
hope this helps |
|
|
|
|
|
stewart2012
|
|
February 10, 2014, 05:15:06 AM |
|
need to add --failover-only end of line ? It can go anywhere after the pool entries. In fact you don't "have" to add it, but many do. You could have it in the middle though, doesn't matter: This is my config for 7950's failover is in the middle If you list multiple pools, it will switch to them either way. For a better description; Might as well hear it "from the horses mouth" so to speak. The Dev for CGminer The normal failover mechanism in cgminer will allow some work to go to the backup pools if there is a delay in getting work from the primary pool you have set. This can be as much as 10% if the pool has latency issues. It then only fails to the backup pool if the primary pool stops giving work for 1 minute. failover-only does not change the failover mechanism, but it does not allow work to go to the backup pools unless the primary pool has failed completely for at least a minute. It then will switch to the backup pool. If cgminer considers a pool dead or down, it tries to contact that pool 1 minutely.
hope this helps thanks alot my brother ... very helpful . |
|
|
|
|
|
