[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[TanteStefana]

Uhh, far as I can tell by reading the thread SuchPool was the last major pool to patch this issue. Lotterymining, Coinmine, and the official pool have been OK for a couple of days now.

Haters gon' hate!

I was giggling when I saw the post (I think they missed the previous posts and didn't realize there was a problem until the developers contacted them)  But I wasn't going to say anything.

But then my husband made a comment that made me laugh really hard.  And Suchpool, I really don't mean this about you, but if you go back a week or so, there was a poster, who apparently posts everywhere as if he knows everything, and another member who identified the guy as having this ... syndrome or something.  I forgot the name, but basically it's when a person has the illusion of competence

I figure 90% of the guys I used to work with had this syndrome, ROFL

ah, it's the Dunning–Kruger effect!  ROFL, I'm sure ALL of you have worked with one of these types! 

[1714772570]

1714772570

[eizh]

Uhh, far as I can tell by reading the thread SuchPool was the last major pool to patch this issue. Lotterymining, Coinmine, and the official pool have been OK for a couple of days now.

Haters gon' hate!

I was giggling when I saw the post (I think they missed the previous posts and didn't realize there was a problem until the developers contacted them)  But I wasn't going to say anything.

But then my husband made a comment that made me laugh really hard.  And Suchpool, I really don't mean this about you, but if you go back a week or so, there was a poster, who apparently posts everywhere as if he knows everything, and another member who identified the guy as having this ... syndrome or something.  I forgot the name, but basically it's when a person has the illusion of competence

I figure 90% of the guys I used to work with had this syndrome, ROFL

ah, it's the Dunning–Kruger effect!  ROFL, I'm sure ALL of you have worked with one of these types!  

There are many kinds of illusory superiority: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority

The one I mentioned is Dunning-Kruger: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

edit: Whoops, you did remember.

[InternetApe]

Hey Evan - Is it Dark Gravity Well or Dark Gravity Wave - Here you said Wave, on twitter you said Well.

Its DarkGravityWave sorry I miss typed it.

[chaeplin]

Looks like testnet is on block 126 now.

160 now. two miner.  You and me.

[chaeplin]

Hey Evan - Is it Dark Gravity Well or Dark Gravity Wave - Here you said Wave, on twitter you said Well.

Soruce

Code:

unsigned int static DarkGravityWave(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock) {

[Anon136]

how do you defend against attackers who try to DOS by requesting to be part of a joined transaction but then fail to sign off on the transaction? This is the big problem with coinjoin that prevents it from scaling well. have you guys solved it somehow?

[philipmicklon]

how do you defend against attackers who try to DOS by requesting to be part of a joined transaction but then fail to sign off on the transaction? This is the big problem with coinjoin that prevents it from scaling well. have you guys solved it somehow?

There is a penalty for leaving the connection before the darksend completes.

[eduffield]

Hey Evan - Is it Dark Gravity Well or Dark Gravity Wave - Here you said Wave, on twitter you said Well.

Wave, I don't control the twitter account. That's ape

[eduffield]

Looks like testnet is on block 126 now.

160 now. two miner.  You and me.

Just you now, I'm going back to mainnet   

[eduffield]

I just open sourced the custom stratum server and hashing algo for running a pool. This has the recent hashing exploit fixed and quick banning for misconfigured users.
 
https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin-stratum
https://github.com/evan82/xcoin-hash

[chaeplin]

I just open sourced the custom stratum server and hashing algo for running a pool. This has the recent hashing exploit fixed and quick banning for misconfigured users.
 
https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin-stratum
https://github.com/evan82/xcoin-hash

I have updated https://github.com/chaeplin/p2pool-drk
- darkcoin_hash removed, use xcoin-hash
- subsidy func moved to https://github.com/chaeplin/SUBSIDY_FUNC

[eduffield]

Apparently the block explorer isn't updating and I calculated the target block using that, so it's much sooner. Sorry about that. All of the main pool have updated already. Please update asap!

[sdersdf2]

Why should there exist such a manipulation @ anonymousxx

There can be various reasons. The first assumption would be that someone wants to buy it very low and then manipulate or let it grow naturally upwards and make a lot of money. It's most likely as simple as that. Other than that you can have competitors drive down your price pretty effectively. But there is clearly manipulation as you can see in my gif.

Did this effect supply or just the distribution of supply? In other words, is there a greater supply of DRK coin than there would otherwise be as a result of this, or just a different distribution of ownership than there'd otherwise be? If the first, is this what's been depressing the price?

Seperately, is that overhead supply of coins from the coins-e and mining-pool hack attack exhausted yet?

Hopeful that DRK's price will get back to its potential once these issues are cleared (it was headed well above 20 before all this), but when do people think that will be? After DarkSend is out of beta?

[chaeplin]

Apparently the block explorer isn't updating and I calculated the target block using that, so it's much sooner. Sorry about that. All of the main pool have updated already. Please update asap!

p2pool owner, hurry up ~~~

update needed.
- darkcoind


not necessarily.
- p2pool-drk ( web front fix )
- p2pool python-hash ( changed to xcoin-hash )
- p2pool subsidy python ( updated )



--
4 node darkcoind updated, p2pool-dark not changed.

asia01, asia02, uswest01, uswest02 ( mine.nu )


If there is p2pool node which not maintained, I will update p2pool/networks.py IDENTIFIER and PREFIX.

[anonymousxx1503]

Updated to DGW wallet - Sad to see no denominate and darksend since it's not the new BETA with DGW.

[aatom]

How config HD7850 for mine drk??

I always have more and more HW

Can somebody help me ~~~

[smns]

How config HD7850 for mine drk??

I always have more and more HW

Can somebody help me ~~~

Config for 7850:
sgminer.exe --kernel darkcoin --gpu-engine 1200 --gpu-memclock 1225 --gpu-memdiff 0 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-vddc 1.170 --worksize 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 6016 -g 4 --intensity 18

PHM-sgminer 4.1.0

[chompyZ]

Updated to DGW wallet - Sad to see no denominate and darksend since it's not the new BETA with DGW.

I must have missed something in the logic -
Does everyone need to upgrade the wallet due to the implementation of DGW into the protocol???

[goin2mars]

does anyone have good config settings for r9 290?

been looking all over but can't seem to find any settings for it.

there is a list on darkcointalk.org

Juste burn one R9 290. Never find good setting for this one.
i have better mh/s with R9  280X than 290X and 290.

push coreclock to 1140-1170 and memclock 1250

I cant go over 980 for coreclock

Do they actaully run stable with an OC on the core and stock clock on the memory? Any time I've tried I usually try to OC both to some extent and it always bluescreens or crashes the driver. Even with core at stock and only a memory OC. I was going to try OC'ing just the core next and hold the mem in the 1250-1260 range next but I've been busy for the last couple weeks so I've just been running stock everything.

I meant 1040 CC 1250 MC 24550 TC I 20 r9 290 sapp hawaii pro

Yeah, all mine are ASUS . . mix of reference and the Direct CU2. I like the non-reference asus . . they run about 10-12C cooler than the reference asus. Probably not as cool as the sapp though.

But either way I've just been running them all at 947 core 1250 mem . . dont really see much effect on TC with this coin so not gonna list mine . . . and xI 555 based on the dev's own usage of that difficulty.

What kind of hashes are you seeing? Mine start aroun 2.3-2.4M and drop to 2.0-2.1 after time.

I'd love to see better stable speeds, but don't really want to spend another night messing with settings right now . . and won't want to for at least a week or two.

As i tel before one of my 290 OC memory burn on card with -I 20  coreclock 980 and memclock 1250. Temp at 66°C.

I have one more 290 OC just out of the box. I dont want burn it before i know how to setting them.

Yeah I hear ya. I almost burned a card before . . but it was because i used powered risers from multiple power supplies and hooked them up wrong . . while at the same time overclocking meadium to heavily with scrypt mining. Luckily I only destroyed a couple DVI ports on the card (melted traces), the fan can't be sensed in speedfan now . . not sure what that's about, and the risers themselves are clearly burned plus the mobo had a few pcie ports that don't work anymore due to 850w being directly pushed through the pcie ports. But overall the card itself is happy and has been running for weeks now. I'm guessing it survived because it's meant to handle around ~300w of power . . so in comparison to the motherboard that usually runs around 70w it at least had a chance.

Since then I've just played it safe and run them at the stock 947/1250 AMD clocks and an xintensity of 555. The only thing I changed was the intensity when I switched to sgminer. I'd like to push it further, but I think I've already used up any extra lives the card already had and I don't really want to find out with the new cards.

Edit: on a different note . . I just found the same testnet block on two different computers. Any takers on which one gets orphaned?

I give a try with your setting. Looks good ATM.
GPU 0:  65.0C 2559RPM | 2.026M/2.030Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.025/m xI:555

Do you already try update bios ?
I read alot, but not try yet.
Its look like for 290 and 290X oc to have over volt...

Do you mean unlock the 290 to a 290x? No. I looked into it, but none of my cards are unlockable based on the hawaiiinfo file I came across on Techpowerup (think this is where it was).

Because of that, I haven't played with the voltages with these cards. From what I've read, most people are trying to undervolt them in order to pull the best hash/watt ratio because it's less than the 280x . . while some are looking to do heavy overclocking.

With the stock core and mem clocks, you won't need to mess with the voltage for stability . . although it would be nice to pull it down a bit for power savings. But with this coin, I'm not all that worried about power right now.

Unless you mean there's a different bios?

I undervolt 280X for lite, come back to stock bios for DRK. Im near 2300 kh/s sable for 1 week.

Look at this for 290 and 290X :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=442852.0

let me know what you think about this.

2300 for a 280x? That's awesome. I wish I could get at least that with a 290.

Does your 280x go to 2500 or 2600 at startup and then move down to 2300 after a couple minutes? My 290s all start at about 2500 then move down to 2000 to 2100. Someone's probably asked this but the thread's getting big now.

Looking at that thread I'm trying to figure out why people are trying to keep the 290 cards so cold . . these things don't mind being as close to 95C as possible at all. I saw one person in there mentioning broken fans on a card that's released only a few months ago . . just seems like the fans are being over-used is all. But I guess I can understand with the heavy overclocks I see in most of the posts, and the general consensus that it will lead to longer component life even though that seems counterproductive to me b/c the dead fans.

Running at stock clocks the engine throttles automatically anyways so it never gets too hot anyways unless you force it. One of the big reasons I like the stock clocks. It's been a few months since I've OC'd these cards so I can't remember if the engine throttles automatically with an OC or not.

Anyways, the best I got to so far was around 1100 engine and 1500 memory, with an intensity between 21-22 . . tc was a wierd number I can't remember but spend hours tuning in (then lost after a rogue PSU decided to fry my pcie slots and hard drive . . wrote it down somewhere though so I'll find it when I go back to tuning.) and the hashes were pushing 980 before sick/crash so I'm pretty sure the ASUS bios already in these cards is not holding them back much . . but it still looks like it would definitely be worth a shot to try something else.

Maybe I can get the same kind of hashes on a lower clock and it'll be stable? Do the modified/Stilts bioses give voltage control to non-x cards?

The best stable pairs I found were 947/1250, 975/1250, 1000/1500, 1050/1450, 1075/1470 in increasing number of hashes and decreasing amount of confidence I had in the stability of the card. After putting the intensity higher . . I found 32765 TC to be not the best value anymore so I pushed it up the some number I forgot.

I'm definitely thinking that with the decreased temps with this algorithm, the 290's can be pushed pretty far. Thanks for the link to the thread, I think I'm going to try a different bios this weekend or next and compare to what I'm getting now.

[goin2mars]

Updated to DGW wallet - Sad to see no denominate and darksend since it's not the new BETA with DGW.

I must have missed something in the logic -
Does everyone need to upgrade the wallet due to the implementation of DGW into the protocol???

Yes, it's a hard fork.