|
Kai Proctor
|
|
March 30, 2014, 01:53:16 PM |
|
Right, thanks for the advice guys, now running my 270s at I13, 1070/1480, gpu threads 2, tc 6336, and powertune 20 just for voodoo purposes. Sitting nice and stable so far getting 1.25MH each @ 54C, ~5MH total. The almost identical box sat next to it mining vert is at 64-69C each card at 975/1250.
Plenty of Accepteds scrolling by down below, but the top line showing Accepted shares only incrementing very slowly?
Mined a mighty 1.5 DRK so far in 8 hours or so. Hopefully this rate will increase a bit with PPLNS.
Yeah accepts are low (since it must work through all the 11x before one accept is done?) as long as your WU is at around 0.018 ish ? What happened to Suchpool ? I got 1.3Mh/s with my E7 but now the rate is only 0.3MH/s. Why do acceptes so low? Maybe you have to switch to stratum2.suchpool.pwIf you can't connect using stratum1.suchpool.pw, please use stratum2.suchpool.pw. Miners from Europe can now use stratum-eu.suchpool.pw! Or it's this : all stats fixed but MPOS still output a fraction of real # of accepted shares and don't report real worker hash... should be fixed in some hours! everything in the backend work perfetly, payout etc, MPOS IS LYING, gonna teach him how to tell the truth!
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
March 30, 2014, 01:58:21 PM |
|
Clone = identical copy, not "based-on but different in this/that way" / "inspired-by" / "evolution of" etc. Some people simply don't understand the definition.
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:00:45 PM |
|
Clone = identical copy, not "based-on but different in this/that way" / "inspired-by" / "evolution of" etc. Some people simply don't understand the definition. yeah, thats why i wrote what i wrote on that site besides, a clone is something where i just change a few parameters and the name, not add extra stuff, or upgrade something to become better and why start from sratch when the base system functions fully as it should, and you expect to add features to it. starting from scratch = adding up to a year or more, in pure development, without knowing if its going to be a success, then its better to evolve from where we are
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:08:44 PM |
|
Clone = identical copy, not "based-on but different in this/that way" / "inspired-by" / "evolution of" etc. Some people simply don't understand the definition. yeah, thats why i wrote what i wrote on that site besides, a clone is something where i just change a few parameters and the name, not add extra stuff, or upgrade something to become better and why start from sratch when the base system functions fully as it should, and you expect to add features to it. starting from scratch = adding up to a year or more, in pure development, without knowing if its going to be a success, then its better to evolve from where we are Yep... opensource and building upon prior work go hand in hand.... an innovative altcoin can use prior code and also contribute new code. A clonecoin is more of a leech to the ecosystem - doesn't really offer anything.
|
|
|
|
fpmk
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:09:24 PM |
|
When I tried to compile source code in my Linux (centos), I got such errors.
In file included from xcoin.c:25: x6/jh_sse2_opt64.h:32: error: redefinition of typedef â x5/defs_x5.h:5: note: previous declaration of â was here x6/jh_sse2_opt64.h:33: error: redefinition of typedef â x5/defs_x5.h:6: note: previous declaration of â was here xcoin.c: In function â: xcoin.c:97: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type make[2]: *** [minerd-xcoin.o] Error 1
Can anybody help?
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:11:08 PM |
|
When I tried to compile source code in my Linux (centos), I got such errors.
In file included from xcoin.c:25: x6/jh_sse2_opt64.h:32: error: redefinition of typedef â x5/defs_x5.h:5: note: previous declaration of â was here x6/jh_sse2_opt64.h:33: error: redefinition of typedef â x5/defs_x5.h:6: note: previous declaration of â was here xcoin.c: In function â: xcoin.c:97: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type make[2]: *** [minerd-xcoin.o] Error 1
Can anybody help?
Are you running 32 bit? If yes, it won't run.
|
|
|
|
DuvajBalone
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:11:26 PM |
|
Will there be better(faster) optimized GPU miner, or current one is already max optimized?
|
|
|
|
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:13:19 PM |
|
Will there be better(faster) optimized GPU miner, or current one is already max optimized?
there is proberly room for more optimization, but i have no clue on what or where
|
node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
|
|
|
Just4andy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:14:32 PM |
|
real anonymous and x11, strong dev. will take a very successful coin.
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:29:37 PM |
|
Bitcoin at $450? OMG! This is just about the best time to prepare to launch DarkSend. * Bitcoin at lows, so people looking for growth. * ZeroCash doing a big launch of their whitepaper ( ) in May. * Anoncoin / ZeroCoin testing their coin ready for launch in next few weeks. * DarkWallet still being pushed by Cody Wilson. Lets start gearing up some social media talk and get the anticipation going.
|
|
|
|
AngusCanine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1001
To weird to live To rare to die
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:32:57 PM |
|
stupid question but how do I back up the wallet data from the old wallet ?
NOT STUPID at all!!! Very important to know how to back up your wallet, you could lose all your coin if you don't!!! Two ways. 1. With your wallet open, go to the menu File => Backup Wallet. Choose a location to save it and give it a name, I usually use the type of coin "Darkcoin_wallet.dat" 2. With the wallet closed, go to your wallet folder, in Windows, it's in C:/Users/AppData/Roaming/Darkcoin/ Find the wallet.dat file and copy it then save to another location. In Ubuntu at least, it's in your home file, hidden (so choose show hidden) and is called .darkcoin. To restore a wallet, you can just load and sync a wallet, then replace the wallet.dat file with the one you saved so when I back up the old xcoin wallet I need to find it in c: the copy it and add it to the new darkcoin wallet folder(anywhere in folder?) im trying to get 222 coins sent from old wallett new wallet So you have two distinct versions of "wallet.dat" ? One with the "old" address and one with the new ? And you have transferred 222 DRK from the old to the new one ? yes exactly
|
|
|
|
Kai Proctor
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:44:45 PM Last edit: March 30, 2014, 03:03:02 PM by Kai Proctor |
|
stupid question but how do I back up the wallet data from the old wallet ?
NOT STUPID at all!!! Very important to know how to back up your wallet, you could lose all your coin if you don't!!! Two ways. 1. With your wallet open, go to the menu File => Backup Wallet. Choose a location to save it and give it a name, I usually use the type of coin "Darkcoin_wallet.dat" 2. With the wallet closed, go to your wallet folder, in Windows, it's in C:/Users/AppData/Roaming/Darkcoin/ Find the wallet.dat file and copy it then save to another location. In Ubuntu at least, it's in your home file, hidden (so choose show hidden) and is called .darkcoin. To restore a wallet, you can just load and sync a wallet, then replace the wallet.dat file with the one you saved so when I back up the old xcoin wallet I need to find it in c: the copy it and add it to the new darkcoin wallet folder(anywhere in folder?) im trying to get 222 coins sent from old wallett new wallet So you have two distinct versions of "wallet.dat" ? One with the "old" address and one with the new ? And you have transferred 222 DRK from the old to the new one ? yes exactly 1. Save the two somewhere with distinct names e.g. "wallet-old.dat" and "wallet-new.dat". 2. Put a copy of your new wallet ("wallet.dat") in the folder ./AppData/Roaming/Darkcoin/ 3. Download the newest client on http://darkcoin.io/4. Run it and let it update the blocks
|
|
|
|
fpmk
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:49:06 PM |
|
When I tried to compile source code in my Linux (centos), I got such errors.
In file included from xcoin.c:25: x6/jh_sse2_opt64.h:32: error: redefinition of typedef â x5/defs_x5.h:5: note: previous declaration of â was here x6/jh_sse2_opt64.h:33: error: redefinition of typedef â x5/defs_x5.h:6: note: previous declaration of â was here xcoin.c: In function â: xcoin.c:97: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type xcoin.c:112: warning: right shift count >= width of type make[2]: *** [minerd-xcoin.o] Error 1
Can anybody help?
Are you running 32 bit? If yes, it won't run. No, it's x64 bit. I can install cpuminer on my Ubuntu 12.04LTS correctly. However, I have the same problems on my Fedora and Centos.
|
|
|
|
vertoe
|
|
March 30, 2014, 03:01:42 PM |
|
Clone = identical copy, not "based-on but different in this/that way" / "inspired-by" / "evolution of" etc. Some people simply don't understand the definition. Quarkcoin is clearly a clone of Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
Sawedoff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2014, 03:09:53 PM |
|
Looking to add Darkcoin as a withdraw option on http://gptnow.comIf anyone has a stockpile and would like to donate a small amount, it will help me get this option started. This could drive some more interest for DarkCoin. Xf9t2HeykconjkJXtv73JbzdKRKz5297dS
|
|
|
|
agx.io
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2014, 03:26:03 PM |
|
You asked. We listened. Lots of upgrades to Austin Global Exchange launched overnight. Faster trades. Faster page loads. Fewer clicks. Intuitive layout. More markets. Dynamic content. Integrated chat. And more! You can also earn 1% trading bonuses on VC, NOBL, and DGB! Reach out to us, social@agx.io, if you're a developer wanting to sponsor a 1% trading promo on another coin. We're always looking for great partners. Check out agx.io to trade DRK/BTC, learn more about the 1% promo, and see what we've been working on! - The Austin Global TeamFind us at: agx.io bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507474 bitcointalk handles: "agx.io," "AustinGlobal" twitter.com/AustinGlobalX austinglobal.tumblr.com
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 30, 2014, 03:43:43 PM |
|
Clone = identical copy, not "based-on but different in this/that way" / "inspired-by" / "evolution of" etc. Some people simply don't understand the definition. Quarkcoin is clearly a clone of Bitcoin almost all are, except a few - but even their ideas are from bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 30, 2014, 03:56:21 PM |
|
I don't do spam...but as I spent so much time mining litecoin and seeing the devs ignore the people that made it popular and go down the corporate centralization route....I made an exception
|
|
|
|
tifozi
|
|
March 30, 2014, 04:07:22 PM |
|
New experimental feature for http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/: "Guesstimated Wallets"The blockchain is used to try and make educated guesses about which addresses belong to a wallet (as you may have many addresses in a user's wallet, most of them being throwaway "change" addresses). It won't find all the addresses of a given wallet (can't), but should provide extra info about address cross-dependencies. This is very experimental, and not maintained in real-time (so only for older transactions and blocks), and probably buggy to some extent. I may also hard reset & rebuild the data occasionally as I experiment with new stuff. That said the TOP 5 rich list for addresses gives 144327 XgV8FpC6Rh... 118622 XtrmiNg6bgS... 108423 XfXtF8w18d... 104409 Xnn3Wnd6W... 100005 XuYz59bMPr... but the TOP 5 rich list for guesstimated wallets gives 499678 XdWdQXiC8... 144327 XgV8FpC6R... 120009 XtrmiNg6bg... 104409 Xnn3Wnd6... 100005 XuYz59bM... From the look of it, XdWdQXiC8 is the wallet of an exchange (haven't bothered to lookup which, but if you find your withdrawal or deposit address in there, you'll know which it is). Also XtrmiNg6bg may have a second address with more than 1386 DRK in it. Anyway, have a look at your address(es), and let me know if it's complete bull or if there is some shred of correctness to the guesstimations If there is, I'll integrate it more. I'm not sure exactly how yet, but this can probably be tied to a variant of blockchain.info's taint analysis. Nice, linked! Great info! Is it possible to list Top 100 addresses?
I'll look into it. Was planning to eventually have a full ranking table and the ranking available in the address pages. That said ranking isn't real-time at the moment, it's only updated every few hours. wow! great work! All I will say is that your guesstimations look legit So I also tested this out in a couple of different wallet files with multiple addresses and it does look very legit. This will be a solid test for when transactions become mainstream via DarkSend. We shouldn't be able to guesstimate who is doing what, where and why.
|
|
|
|
|