[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Mountaineeer]

I would actually like to see a formal date for master node payments. It is behind schedule now. Stuff happens, I get it, I'm in tech myself....however you should have a goal for anticipated completion. If it needs to move to the right again for good reason that is fine, but any project should have a plan and attempt to stick to it.

[RUEHL]

Are you abercro**** on the trollbox ?

Yes, sir. 

[oblox]

I would actually like to see a formal date for master node payments. It is behind schedule now. Stuff happens, I get it, I'm in tech myself....however you should have a goal for anticipated completion. If it needs to move to the right again for good reason that is fine, but any project should have a plan and attempt to stick to it.

End of June.

[Kai Proctor]

I would actually like to see a formal date for master node payments. It is behind schedule now. Stuff happens, I get it, I'm in tech myself....however you should have a goal for anticipated completion. If it needs to move to the right again for good reason that is fine, but any project should have a plan and attempt to stick to it.

End of June.

+
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-delayed-to-late-june.1154/

[slapper]

Are you abercro**** on the trollbox ?

Yes, sir.  

Ok. Just wanted to give a heads up to troll-patrol guys  

abercrombie:
Seems as if DoRK is a Westerner coin, particularly the United States. It rose this morning and seems to be weakening as the daytraders on the East Coast are starting to call it a day.

[darkota]

Are you abercro**** on the trollbox ?

Yes, sir.  

Ok. Just wanted to give a heads up to troll-patrol guys  

abercrombie:
Seems as if DoRK/ is a Westerner coin, particularly the United States. It rose this morning and seems to be weakening as the daytraders on the East Coast are starting to call it a day.

He doesn't realize that the entire Bitcointalk.org's population is mostly from the United States....

[Ignition75]

Getting close to taxation guidance in Australia

https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-australian-tax-office-release-234032044.html

I am going to ask the ATO for a separate tax form for each one of my alts...

Then if I get Audited I will move everything into Bumbacoin and redirect them to the BumbaCoin ANN...

[chaeplin]

added : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7259577#msg7259577
Analyzing XC mixer transaction by spamming.

[coins101]

This is very interesting right here

Maybe Evan or InternetApe could talk and offer him to be part of the code audit after RC4. He is very interested in anonymity and for sure we can get a very valued an unbiased analysis from him.

He reads this thread all the time (Hi Chris  ) The only downside is that he mines, or used to mine, Anoncoin.  Still, he would be a good code auditor.

But this code audit thing, it is necessary, but it really is only a temporary issue.

The nature of open source code is that every man and his cat will be going through the code.  The competition will be there first - these guys are where the code auditing feedback really counts because they will get the biggest megaphone to shout down the DRK one if there are problems, and keep deadly quiet except for the instamine FUD if there is nothing but sweetness, light and kick-ass code kung-fu from Evan-san.

[coins101]

Getting close to taxation guidance in Australia

https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-australian-tax-office-release-234032044.html

I would read it, but Australia tax rules: really?

Couldn't you find a link to a buxom-blonde-blue eyed- bomb-shell, with tightly configured hips, wrapped around a surfboard; possibly with a darkcoin or bitcoin tattoo on her left buttock? Sorry chaps, drifted off to crypto fantasy land there for a second.

[Artoodeetoo]

Any chance you lot can find Chaeplin some code DRK code fixing role? There are surely plenty of items to keep him busy... He has failed miserably at FUDing the XC thread all night so maybe you can keep him busy here? Not sure he has any talent but if you could make him feel wanted we would all be most grateful.

Alternatively please just send him on a fishing trip

https://twitter.com/chaeplin

[coins101]

Any chance you lot can find Chaeplin some code DRK code fixing role? There are surely plenty of items to keep him busy... He has failed miserably at FUDing the XC thread all night so maybe you can keep him busy here? Not sure he has any talent but if you could make him feel wanted we would all be most grateful.

Alternatively please just send him on a fishing trip

https://twitter.com/chaeplin

If you think its FUD, I would be interested to see an audit by independents. I know that there were some early attempts, but you know, without labouring the point, code auditors.

[insion]

http://coinexc.org/markets/drkbtc
http://coinexc.org/markets/drkltc
We are a new exchange in China now, has been added drk tests.

[yetiripper]

Hey guys, potential investor here but I have some questions first...


I would like to know when your anonymous functions will be fully operational and stable, and I would like to know that there is definitely progress in your work.  I can't just take your word for it, I'm sure you understand.  Lots of scammers out there... you know how it is.

Also I need to see the source code for proof.  I understand that the checkblock function can still cause major forking issues and I want to make sure that has been cleared up aside from disabling it.

[Artoodeetoo]

Hey guys, potential investor here but I have some questions first...


I would like to know when your anonymous functions will be fully operational and stable, and I would like to know that there is definitely progress in your work.  I can't just take your word for it, I'm sure you understand.  Lots of scammers out there... you know how it is.

Also I need to see the source code for proof.  I understand that the checkblock function can still cause major forking issues and I want to make sure that has been cleared up aside from disabling it.

+1

Also maybe offer of a bounty once the code is published to see if it can be cracked.

Also can someone confirm, is DRK actually anonymous at all?

[ddink7]

Hey guys, potential investor here but I have some questions first...


I would like to know when your anonymous functions will be fully operational and stable, and I would like to know that there is definitely progress in your work.  I can't just take your word for it, I'm sure you understand.  Lots of scammers out there... you know how it is.

Also I need to see the source code for proof.  I understand that the checkblock function can still cause major forking issues and I want to make sure that has been cleared up aside from disabling it.

Then wait a few months, and come back when the source code is open.

[yetiripper]

Hey guys, potential investor here but I have some questions first...


I would like to know when your anonymous functions will be fully operational and stable, and I would like to know that there is definitely progress in your work.  I can't just take your word for it, I'm sure you understand.  Lots of scammers out there... you know how it is.

Also I need to see the source code for proof.  I understand that the checkblock function can still cause major forking issues and I want to make sure that has been cleared up aside from disabling it.

I want the answer directly from the dev, not some random person.

[Artoodeetoo]

Hey guys, potential investor here but I have some questions first...


I would like to know when your anonymous functions will be fully operational and stable, and I would like to know that there is definitely progress in your work.  I can't just take your word for it, I'm sure you understand.  Lots of scammers out there... you know how it is.

Also I need to see the source code for proof.  I understand that the checkblock function can still cause major forking issues and I want to make sure that has been cleared up aside from disabling it.

Then wait a few months, and come back when the source code is open.

Sounds like a scam, why the wait? Has there been any peer review of the code by an external source?

[videos4pictures]

Hey guys, potential investor here but I have some questions first...


I would like to know when your anonymous functions will be fully operational and stable, and I would like to know that there is definitely progress in your work.  I can't just take your word for it, I'm sure you understand.  Lots of scammers out there... you know how it is.

Also I need to see the source code for proof.  I understand that the checkblock function can still cause major forking issues and I want to make sure that has been cleared up aside from disabling it.

I want the answer directly from the dev, not some random person.

do your own damn research next time:
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-delayed-to-late-june.1154/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/masternode-payments-and-beyond.921/#post-5578

[Icebucket]

Hey guys, potential investor here but I have some questions first...


I would like to know when your anonymous functions will be fully operational and stable, and I would like to know that there is definitely progress in your work.  I can't just take your word for it, I'm sure you understand.  Lots of scammers out there... you know how it is.

Also I need to see the source code for proof.  I understand that the checkblock function can still cause major forking issues and I want to make sure that has been cleared up aside from disabling it.

Lots of answers to many questions http://wiki.darkcoin.eu/wiki/FAQ
Edit: also If you want to ask the dev something try https://darkcointalk.org