thelonecrouton
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 04:57:00 PM |
|
No idea what you're saying, but karma's a bitch, eh ebolajax, you worthless sack of shit.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
toknormal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:06:36 PM |
|
And why are you so focused on your 4 hour charts if you are in DRK long term?...It's people like you and your deceitfulness that disgusts me. My "deceitful self" takes delight in the 4-hour chart for the same reason that people go to football matches instead of just reading the result in a newspaper  I've noticed your partial to a bit of spectator sport yourself (when your not busy being it)..... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=726101.msg8220636#msg8220636  Nice |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:10:12 PM |
|
Worthless
Who gives a shit... this is the DRK thread. |
|
|
|
|
cypherpunkrock
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:10:46 PM |
|
No reason to start yet another troll war imo. SDC and CN coins have chosen different route than DRK, they rely on hiding the mixing in the blockchain encrypted, whereas DRK removes the mixing from the blockchain altogether. Because we don't know the future (possible math breakthroughs, quantum computers) we can't say with total confidence which approach is better. Both are very likely good enough for the foreseeable future. Some super smart people (like AnonyMint) claim that keeping the anonymity off the chain is the way to go though. So what we have left that will make a coin stand out (or sit down), is adoption, usability (how well it actually works), PoW vs PoS aspects, other features (like instant transactions), investment opportunities (like masternode rewards and other potential services running on top of them) and lots of other things. One good thing DRK has going for it is that it has had its pumps and dumps and distributions, and is quite mature already. Monero for example is generating so many coins every day that the market can't simply absorb that amount, hence the downtrend. And the young (compared to DRK) PoS coins have the distribution that you would imagine them to have. Eek, I just looked at SDC's distribution... out of 6,445,964 SDC, 6,130,331 is held by the top 72 addresses. I would assume address 1 is an exchange so excluding that, 83% is held by few. I'll pass. I would assume the top three addresses are Bittrex, Polo and Cryptsy and that would mean that the distribution is spread to much more than 72 different addresses. Look at the tech being developed at Shadow: Zk, mobile apps, lite wallet, html interface, sdk, decentralized marketplace.. Can you blame anyone for buying up as much as they can? I personally don't see it as a negative. If you're able to see the value in the project's development, then there's nothing negative about picking up a large stake in a promising privacy project. Darkcoin devs saw the value and wanted to pick up the entire stake  If anything it gives the project stability when privacy advocates are supporting the project vs pump and dump groups. Shadow, like DRK, is a long term project that shares similar privacy goals and is just getting started. |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:14:49 PM |
|
No reason to start yet another troll war imo. SDC and CN coins have chosen different route than DRK, they rely on hiding the mixing in the blockchain encrypted, whereas DRK removes the mixing from the blockchain altogether. Because we don't know the future (possible math breakthroughs, quantum computers) we can't say with total confidence which approach is better. Both are very likely good enough for the foreseeable future. Some super smart people (like AnonyMint) claim that keeping the anonymity off the chain is the way to go though. So what we have left that will make a coin stand out (or sit down), is adoption, usability (how well it actually works), PoW vs PoS aspects, other features (like instant transactions), investment opportunities (like masternode rewards and other potential services running on top of them) and lots of other things. One good thing DRK has going for it is that it has had its pumps and dumps and distributions, and is quite mature already. Monero for example is generating so many coins every day that the market can't simply absorb that amount, hence the downtrend. And the young (compared to DRK) PoS coins have the distribution that you would imagine them to have. Eek, I just looked at SDC's distribution... out of 6,445,964 SDC, 6,130,331 is held by the top 72 addresses. I would assume address 1 is an exchange so excluding that, 83% is held by few. I'll pass. I would assume the top three addresses are Bittrex, Polo and Cryptsy and that would mean that the distribution is spread to much more than 72 different addresses. Look at the tech being developed at Shadow: Zk, mobile apps, lite wallet, html interface, sdk, decentralized marketplace.. Can you blame anyone for buying up as much as they can? I personally don't see it as a negative. If you're able to see the value in the project's development, then there's nothing negative about picking up a large stake in a promising privacy project. Darkcoin devs saw the value and wanted to pick up the entire stake  If anything it gives the project stability when privacy advocates are supporting the project vs pump and dump groups. Shadow, like DRK, is a long term project that shares similar privacy goals and is just getting started. The difference is that all generation for future coins happens from a select few vs DRK's POW miners. DRK is no savior with it's issues with the instamine, but it also had about 2 months of stagnant price action as those coins continued to be distributed. The distribution is no where near ideal in SDC for it to be a viable candidate for mass-adoption even with all the developments. Distribution could change over time (no argument there) but you will not see me throwing a penny at it with the overwhelming majority held by few and nearly all future coins being generated by the same few. |
|
|
|
|
|
drkwarrior
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:20:04 PM |
|
Worthless
Who gives a shit... this is the DRK thread. yea i know this is the drk thread and im the drk warrior ;-) |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:21:57 PM |
|
Worthless
Who gives a shit... this is the DRK thread. yea i know this is the drk thread and im the drk warrior ;-) So keep your shitcoins out of here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
cypherpunkrock
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:28:39 PM |
|
No reason to start yet another troll war imo. SDC and CN coins have chosen different route than DRK, they rely on hiding the mixing in the blockchain encrypted, whereas DRK removes the mixing from the blockchain altogether. Because we don't know the future (possible math breakthroughs, quantum computers) we can't say with total confidence which approach is better. Both are very likely good enough for the foreseeable future. Some super smart people (like AnonyMint) claim that keeping the anonymity off the chain is the way to go though. So what we have left that will make a coin stand out (or sit down), is adoption, usability (how well it actually works), PoW vs PoS aspects, other features (like instant transactions), investment opportunities (like masternode rewards and other potential services running on top of them) and lots of other things. One good thing DRK has going for it is that it has had its pumps and dumps and distributions, and is quite mature already. Monero for example is generating so many coins every day that the market can't simply absorb that amount, hence the downtrend. And the young (compared to DRK) PoS coins have the distribution that you would imagine them to have. Eek, I just looked at SDC's distribution... out of 6,445,964 SDC, 6,130,331 is held by the top 72 addresses. I would assume address 1 is an exchange so excluding that, 83% is held by few. I'll pass. I would assume the top three addresses are Bittrex, Polo and Cryptsy and that would mean that the distribution is spread to much more than 72 different addresses. Look at the tech being developed at Shadow: Zk, mobile apps, lite wallet, html interface, sdk, decentralized marketplace.. Can you blame anyone for buying up as much as they can? I personally don't see it as a negative. If you're able to see the value in the project's development, then there's nothing negative about picking up a large stake in a promising privacy project. Darkcoin devs saw the value and wanted to pick up the entire stake If anything it gives the project stability when privacy advocates are supporting the project vs pump and dump groups. Shadow, like DRK, is a long term project that shares similar privacy goals and is just getting started. The difference is that all generation for future coins happens from a select few vs DRK's POW miners. DRK is no savior with it's issues with the instamine, but it also had about 2 months of stagnant price action as those coins continued to be distributed. The distribution is no where near ideal in SDC for it to be a viable candidate for mass-adoption even with all the developments. Distribution could change over time (no argument there) but you will not see me throwing a penny at it with the overwhelming majority held by few and nearly all future coins being generated by the same few. SDC has been stable in price for the last 4 months.. with similar price stagnation to DRK. Take a look at the charts you'll see the early adopters dumped a long time ago and the coins have been changing hands since. The difference between the stagnant periods between the two projects is that Shadow has effectively had zero media attention outside of a few mentions. Only recently people have started to pay attention to it. It's safe to say that it's still in the stealth phase. |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:30:39 PM |
|
No reason to start yet another troll war imo. SDC and CN coins have chosen different route than DRK, they rely on hiding the mixing in the blockchain encrypted, whereas DRK removes the mixing from the blockchain altogether. Because we don't know the future (possible math breakthroughs, quantum computers) we can't say with total confidence which approach is better. Both are very likely good enough for the foreseeable future. Some super smart people (like AnonyMint) claim that keeping the anonymity off the chain is the way to go though. So what we have left that will make a coin stand out (or sit down), is adoption, usability (how well it actually works), PoW vs PoS aspects, other features (like instant transactions), investment opportunities (like masternode rewards and other potential services running on top of them) and lots of other things. One good thing DRK has going for it is that it has had its pumps and dumps and distributions, and is quite mature already. Monero for example is generating so many coins every day that the market can't simply absorb that amount, hence the downtrend. And the young (compared to DRK) PoS coins have the distribution that you would imagine them to have. Eek, I just looked at SDC's distribution... out of 6,445,964 SDC, 6,130,331 is held by the top 72 addresses. I would assume address 1 is an exchange so excluding that, 83% is held by few. I'll pass. I would assume the top three addresses are Bittrex, Polo and Cryptsy and that would mean that the distribution is spread to much more than 72 different addresses. Look at the tech being developed at Shadow: Zk, mobile apps, lite wallet, html interface, sdk, decentralized marketplace.. Can you blame anyone for buying up as much as they can? I personally don't see it as a negative. If you're able to see the value in the project's development, then there's nothing negative about picking up a large stake in a promising privacy project. Darkcoin devs saw the value and wanted to pick up the entire stake If anything it gives the project stability when privacy advocates are supporting the project vs pump and dump groups. Shadow, like DRK, is a long term project that shares similar privacy goals and is just getting started. The difference is that all generation for future coins happens from a select few vs DRK's POW miners. DRK is no savior with it's issues with the instamine, but it also had about 2 months of stagnant price action as those coins continued to be distributed. The distribution is no where near ideal in SDC for it to be a viable candidate for mass-adoption even with all the developments. Distribution could change over time (no argument there) but you will not see me throwing a penny at it with the overwhelming majority held by few and nearly all future coins being generated by the same few. SDC has been stable in price for the last 4 months.. with similar price stagnation to DRK. Take a look at the charts you'll see the early adopters dumped a long time ago and the coins have been changing hands since. The difference between the stagnant periods between the two projects is that Shadow has effectively had zero media attention outside of a few mentions. Only recently people have started to pay attention to it. It's safe to say that it's still in the stealth phase. Again, the issue has more to do with a select few controlling nearly all the future coin generation. The two really need to be separate. Under those circumstances, there is no appeal even with what future developments are in the pipeline. I'm sure I'm not the only one that sees this as a huge issue that your coin will need to overcome. Having said all that, please leave the DRK thread as the DRK thread and continue your SDC discussion in your respective thread. |
|
|
|
|
GhostPlayer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:30:49 PM |
|
LOOOL you guys read this ?? Can you believe this guy?! LOOL I dont know what on earth you're trying to accomplish, but its a total fail. I've been in DRK since very very early, April '14. I dont claim anything except I will not let go of you, because you're the lowest form of scum I've ever encountered in my life. You have zero scruples and dont deserve 1 second of attention from this community. I will continue to call you names, just like you continually tried to defame DRK with nothing but blatant lies and FUD. You cephalopod. |
|
|
|
|
DonQuijote
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:31:08 PM |
|
Wrong thread guy, this thread is darkcoin |
THE INGENIOUS GENTLEMAN DON QUIXOTE OF LA MANCHA |
|
|
aleix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1779
Merit: 1100
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:31:58 PM |
|
 Sorry i couldn't resist |
|
|
|
|
|
salmion
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:32:30 PM |
|
SDC just smells like Cloak to me. I might well be wrong and hope all who invest do well but for me.. no thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
DonQuijote
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:34:19 PM |
|
No reason to start yet another troll war imo. SDC and CN coins have chosen different route than DRK, they rely on hiding the mixing in the blockchain encrypted, whereas DRK removes the mixing from the blockchain altogether. Because we don't know the future (possible math breakthroughs, quantum computers) we can't say with total confidence which approach is better. Both are very likely good enough for the foreseeable future. Some super smart people (like AnonyMint) claim that keeping the anonymity off the chain is the way to go though. So what we have left that will make a coin stand out (or sit down), is adoption, usability (how well it actually works), PoW vs PoS aspects, other features (like instant transactions), investment opportunities (like masternode rewards and other potential services running on top of them) and lots of other things. One good thing DRK has going for it is that it has had its pumps and dumps and distributions, and is quite mature already. Monero for example is generating so many coins every day that the market can't simply absorb that amount, hence the downtrend. And the young (compared to DRK) PoS coins have the distribution that you would imagine them to have. Eek, I just looked at SDC's distribution... out of 6,445,964 SDC, 6,130,331 is held by the top 72 addresses. I would assume address 1 is an exchange so excluding that, 83% is held by few. I'll pass. Me too, they want too many %... |
THE INGENIOUS GENTLEMAN DON QUIXOTE OF LA MANCHA |
|
|
qwizzie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:55:42 PM |
|
guys if you have a problem with someone just put that person on ignore and move on, i dont want to see this forum get
derailed by constant bitching and accussations about things that people did in the past... frankly its killing the mood on
this forum.
|
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
|
|
|
TanteStefana2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:58:58 PM |
|
Seriously guys, is this thread going to go back into the gutter again? Can't you just ignore him? Especially, toknormal, please don't quote the troll, even if you feel the need to comment, just don't quote him. A lot of us don't want to see it and have him on ignore. I understand if you feel you need to comment so people understand he's a troll but please refrain from quoting Thanks |
Another proud lifetime Dash Foundation member My TanteStefana account was hacked, Beware trading "You'll never reach your destination if you stop to throw stones at every dog that barks."Sir Winston Churchill BTC: 12pu5nMDPEyUGu3HTbnUB5zY5RG65EQE5d |
|
|
DonQuijote
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
|
|
November 17, 2014, 05:59:41 PM |
|
|
THE INGENIOUS GENTLEMAN DON QUIXOTE OF LA MANCHA |
|
|
qwizzie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
|
|
November 17, 2014, 06:00:33 PM |
|
|
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
|
|
|
|
