Lol you're talking as if I could just decided and start forking the network..
You could, or you could be coerced into doing so, or for example some employee at the datacentre could be bribed into restarting your pool servers with malicious code replacing your existing code, etc.
Are you aware you need at LEAST 51% to do that? Are you aware that i'm nowhere near that 50%?
You are wrong. Less that 51% still causes problems, >51% just guarantees success.
If anything, we help the darkcoin blockchain stay strong against 40gh/s hammers moving around such as waffle and god knows what other pools (the unknowns). I doubt its the p2pool at 1% of the hash who will protect it from any fork.
As of right now, we have a use wether you like it or not.
I have never questioned your personal integrity, I am merely pointing out your vulnerability, which is a vulnerability to everyone who owns DRK.
You can keep whining, this won't make us go away nor help your cause. In society, you sometimes have to work with other peoples towards greater good, which you're not.
You and moli can keep bitching about me all day long on IRC, ditto.
You're biting the hand that feeds you at the moment, yet again.
You don't feed anyone but yourself. If you cared about the security of the blockchain, you wouldn't be running a centralised pool.
None of your points stands yet because since the beginning we have been supportive and complying with the darkcoin community to all extents. If you are to pick a target, at LEAST pick up some that is not trustworthy or not cooperating as much as they should be. We're always one of the fastest, if not the fastest pool to upgrade it's daemons at every update.
I don't think my point has been understood by you, much less addressed. You are in denial about the basic risk that you pose to the network.
Edit; crouton you the almighty, why don't you just come up with the code to make the standard pools p2pool? I'm all ears, bring it we'll try it
Here you go:
https://bitbucket.org/dstorm/p2pool-drk.git 
- let me know when you're done, I'll point my rigs your way.
I know very well you can't be satistisfied, hence I won't be loosing my time trying. It's just not worth it. If I do it myself, it'll be because I have the time to and the will, not because you dictate me to do so.
I am not in denial, just there is worse things to attend for now. Like that darksend flaw, for example.
And I don't feed anyone but myself? You gotta be joking right? lol. You're just full of it, I am not interested in dealing with your kind of people. I have had other members contacting me privately to talk about solution, and I am fully happy to discuss with them. With you, it's kind of one sided and you're close minded, hence we won't ever reach agreement.
Stop having me loose my time with your rants, you remind me of Alex Jones.
I welcome anybody (as long as its not a crouton sock puppet account!) to come discuss with me possible solutions and ideas to make mining better. I am opened to suggestions and help to integrate a peer to peer approach to the pool, I am just not willing to do it just because seniorita crouton orders me to
In greater words, get lost crouton. To the rest of the community, your suggestions are very welcomed! I'm not the ruthless poolop that crouton claims I am.
EDIT: Hey crouton, by the way.. it's hosted by ourself in our own cabinet with our own feeds.. At the ISP where I work at.. so that employee at the datacenter? It's me.
