Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 02:50:42 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 »
  Print  
Author Topic: MultiBit  (Read 282691 times)
OmegaStarScream
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
August 15, 2015, 07:22:19 PM
 #1641

Hi there Jim , Are you planning to do this or you are totally against the BitcoinXT ? : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1153684.0

1481122242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481122242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481122242
Reply with quote  #2

1481122242
Report to moderator
1481122242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481122242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481122242
Reply with quote  #2

1481122242
Report to moderator
1481122242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481122242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481122242
Reply with quote  #2

1481122242
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
jim618
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708



View Profile WWW
August 16, 2015, 08:59:47 AM
 #1642

Hi OmegaStarScream,

We quite like Bitcoin XT as we think the block size needs to increase.

As to what will happen if/ when there is a hardfork:

Currently MultiBit Classic and HD both will follow the chain with the most work done in it.
Thus in a hardfork all the existing MultiBit code will follow the 'winner'. This is how the normal one or two block forks (that occur reasonably frequently) get resolved so it should just be the same but on a larger scale.

Both MultiBit Classic and HD connects to Bitcoin Core and XT happily and they should work correctly with larger blocks. The bloom filtered blocks Core/ XT send back to MultiBit are the same - MultiBit is agnostic about connecting to Core or XT.

Thus at the moment we don't think we will have to make any code changes because of a block size increase/ hardfork

There is also a checkpoint file in MultiBit that is used to speed up wallet replays. That specifies which is the 'correct' block header every 2000ish blocks. After a fork that file will specify the block header in the 'winning' fork. That'll be a couple of weeks after a fork occurs so it should be cut and dried then.

Jim

MultiBit HD   Lightweight desktop client.                    Bitcoin Solutions Ltd   Bespoke software. Consultancy.
lunarboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 544



View Profile
August 18, 2015, 09:18:30 PM
 #1643



Any plan to introduce a promt for sliding competitive fees?

September could be an awkward month otherwise http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/coinwallet-plans-bitcoin-dust-attack-september-create-30-day-transaction-backlog-1515981

nikona
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


View Profile
August 18, 2015, 09:28:59 PM
 #1644

Hey jim, was wondering if you had any updates on the issue here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43616.msg11313861#msg11313861

I still do get it occasionally.
jim618
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2015, 09:34:06 AM
 #1645



Any plan to introduce a promt for sliding competitive fees?

September could be an awkward month otherwise http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/coinwallet-plans-bitcoin-dust-attack-september-create-30-day-transaction-backlog-1515981



Yeah we have a version 0.5.19 in the works with a fee slider (it's the MultiBit HD fee slider, backported).
I saw that article too.

MultiBit HD   Lightweight desktop client.                    Bitcoin Solutions Ltd   Bespoke software. Consultancy.
jim618
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2015, 09:35:32 AM
 #1646

Hey jim, was wondering if you had any updates on the issue here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43616.msg11313861#msg11313861

I still do get it occasionally.

Yes, most of the time restarting MultiBit fixes this as it retransmits the transaction.

MultiBit HD   Lightweight desktop client.                    Bitcoin Solutions Ltd   Bespoke software. Consultancy.
pawel7777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092


View Profile
August 19, 2015, 10:59:03 AM
 #1647



Any plan to introduce a promt for sliding competitive fees?

September could be an awkward month otherwise http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/coinwallet-plans-bitcoin-dust-attack-september-create-30-day-transaction-backlog-1515981



Yeah we have a version 0.5.19 in the works with a fee slider (it's the MultiBit HD fee slider, backported).
I saw that article too.

Nice.

Could you bump this thread when 0.5.19 is released?

IanFoxley
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
August 25, 2015, 07:44:12 AM
 #1648

Hi Guys.

Question

I am using still old version of Multibit Version 0.5.18 and recently I am getting payments with the following error message.

This transaction is not standard and should be not be trusted.

I emailed the support of where I get the payouts from and they told that they recently started using Bitcoin XT.

So is this error just related to this?

I am going to upgrade my wallet soon so I guess this might not be an issue.

Just putting it out there anyway.

Ian


Tstar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


View Profile
August 25, 2015, 08:13:35 AM
 #1649

why do we have to synchronize multibit everytime we open it ,i dont get the point involved in it Huh
and plus it would be better if there were names to the wallet's.
jim618
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708



View Profile WWW
August 25, 2015, 11:38:00 AM
 #1650

You can minimise the amount of synchronising by never closing the wallet using the 'File | Close wallet' option. If you simply close the app then when you restart it will just sync from the last block it knew about.

The wallets DO have names. In MultiBit Classic you can click on the name of the wallet in the list of wallets and simply type in the name you want.

In MultiBit HD the sync is simpler as you don't have the 'open/close' wallet paradigm and you have both a wallet name and (longer) comment field.

MultiBit HD   Lightweight desktop client.                    Bitcoin Solutions Ltd   Bespoke software. Consultancy.
tspacepilot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


I will write code in exchange for bitcoins.


View Profile
August 25, 2015, 02:35:10 PM
 #1651

Hi Guys.

Question

I am using still old version of Multibit Version 0.5.18 and recently I am getting payments with the following error message.

This transaction is not standard and should be not be trusted.

I emailed the support of where I get the payouts from and they told that they recently started using Bitcoin XT.

So is this error just related to this?

I am going to upgrade my wallet soon so I guess this might not be an issue.

Just putting it out there anyway.

Ian
That is an interesting little message.  As far as I understand it, even if the transaction was mined with an XT node, as long as you keep an eye on the blockchain and can see that the chain has not forked (with your transaction in the wrong chain) for several blocks, you shouldn't have to worry about a double-spend attempt.  The original Satoshi whitepaper has a bunch of info on just how increasingly difficult it is to try to double-spend with each successive confirmation (NB: it's pretty hard!).

z0n0
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 670


View Profile
August 27, 2015, 04:31:54 PM
 #1652

Anyone else having problems with password?
It says wrong password when I want to send - is there a way I can recheck the password?
OmegaStarScream
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770



View Profile
August 27, 2015, 04:38:01 PM
 #1653

Anyone else having problems with password?
It says wrong password when I want to send - is there a way I can recheck the password?

Check this page out : https://multibit.org/en/help/v0.5/help_lostOrForgottenPassword.html All you need to know is here .
Quote
If you have really, truly lost or forgotten your password and you only have encrypted wallets, then it is likely that you have lost access to your bitcoin. There is absolutely no way that the MultiBit team can possibly recover them.

You should keep the encrypted files safe just in case inspiration strikes. Never delete a private key, just archive it safely


z0n0
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 670


View Profile
August 27, 2015, 04:44:30 PM
 #1654

Anyone else having problems with password?
It says wrong password when I want to send - is there a way I can recheck the password?

Check this page out : https://multibit.org/en/help/v0.5/help_lostOrForgottenPassword.html All you need to know is here .
Quote
If you have really, truly lost or forgotten your password and you only have encrypted wallets, then it is likely that you have lost access to your bitcoin. There is absolutely no way that the MultiBit team can possibly recover them.

You should keep the encrypted files safe just in case inspiration strikes. Never delete a private key, just archive it safely


fuck me Sad
the thing is i'm 99,9% i didn't forget it, cuz I have it written on paper
z0n0
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 670


View Profile
August 27, 2015, 04:52:58 PM
 #1655

The removal of the password failed. The error was "Could not decrypt bytes". --------> that's worng pasword or something else?
I'm using 0.5.18 version
nikona
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


View Profile
August 27, 2015, 09:37:10 PM
 #1656

Hey jim, was wondering if you had any updates on the issue here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43616.msg11313861#msg11313861

I still do get it occasionally.

Yes, most of the time restarting MultiBit fixes this as it retransmits the transaction.

Thanks for the answer. Also can you address the first issue as well ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43616.msg11230732#msg11230732
f3tus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208


View Profile
August 28, 2015, 08:24:51 AM
 #1657

The removal of the password failed. The error was "Could not decrypt bytes". --------> that's worng pasword or something else?
I'm using 0.5.18 version
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=813278.0
RustyNomad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile WWW
August 28, 2015, 08:29:27 AM
 #1658

Are there any plans in the works for MultiBit to support multiple account on a Trezor?

If not mistaken it currently still just support the first account in a wallet. I have 4 accounts in my wallet on the Trezor and because of this cannot use MultiBit but would like to.
jim618
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708



View Profile WWW
August 28, 2015, 10:02:19 AM
 #1659

Hi Rusty,

Unfortunately no - we are expecting only to be able to support the first account going forward.
This is for reasons to do with how we bloom filter the data coming from Bitcoin Core/ XT nodes. There is a more technical description of why in the blog article here:

https://multibit.org/en/help/hd0.1/how-spv-works.html

It's the section: Bloom filtering and single HD account support


It's one of the limitations of connecting directly to the Bitcoin Core/ XT nodes that there isn't a practical way round, IMHO.

Jim

MultiBit HD   Lightweight desktop client.                    Bitcoin Solutions Ltd   Bespoke software. Consultancy.
RustyNomad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile WWW
August 28, 2015, 10:06:20 AM
 #1660

Hi Rusty,

Unfortunately no - we are expecting only to be able to support the first account going forward.
This is for reasons to do with how we bloom filter the data coming from Bitcoin Core/ XT nodes. There is a more technical description of why in the blog article here:

https://multibit.org/en/help/hd0.1/how-spv-works.html

It's the section: Bloom filtering and single HD account support


It's one of the limitations of connecting directly to the Bitcoin Core/ XT nodes that there isn't a practical way round, IMHO.

Jim


Thanks for the reply and the link, missed it somehow when I was on the site.

I now understand the reasons why only the first account is supported.
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!