📡SCIENTIFICCOIN - BlockShow Oscar Winner🎓+ Invest in scientific discoveries 👓

[cevap]

thats definitely right thing to do. but you know people, if you warn and tell the risks about keeping token in an exchange, they will listen you and say emmm whatever (%90 percent)

I think more and more people, especially those that are for some time in crypto already, decide against storing their tokens on exchanges, especially after multiple stories when accounts got hacked or exchanges had glitches etc.

[Jepli]

The project is interesting but I do not see the team implementing the ICO plan. In the field of science it will be harder to attract than the big investors. And in the current bearish trend is a good idea will be difficult to implement.

If I'm not mistaken, the team did not implement an ICO rather they chose a private sale scheme to generate funds.

[maurobiasolo]

most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

For ICO's tokens I prefer to store it all at myetherwallet and use the other wallet that feels more secure to store the mighty bitcoin and ethereum. I never put my tokens on exchage unless I want to sell it directly.

I'm on the same path...

[levyashin]

most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.

[loup]

most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.

Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.

[ParRus]

most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.

Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.

They constantly expand token list with each update, but it seems to me that there will be such an opportunity only for the basic altcoins.

[Amelie Poulain]

So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.

But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.

[pynetx]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

[faunkuan]

hii

[belechau]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

[cevap]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

[belechau]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends

[king_of_alts]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends

Maybe they negotiate prices with each investor in private.

[Frank37]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends

Maybe they negotiate prices with each investor in private.

But its hard to get trust then.

[maurobiasolo]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

I understand ... My only problem of understanding is actually related to the script, because in traditional ICOS we have the information of each step, each discount, each value, already in private sale, the investment rounds and token unit values are not previously informed, and we do not know when the current round ends

Maybe they negotiate prices with each investor in private.

But its hard to get trust then.

Hi, our conditions are very clear.
The token price is now 0.6$ and is going up to 1.5$ by Feb '19. In case you are a bigger investor we can offer a slightly different deal including shares of our company.

[maurobiasolo]

me too. i have a small budget for high potential icos. most of my crypto friends do so don't shut them up from the picture

It all depends upon the business model and the Scientificcoin's model is somewhat different from mainstream ICOs.

You are not alone in this, unfortunately, those of us who are looking for projects with great potential to apply small amounts, are victims of the bear market, because in opportunities like this, we can not participate, since it is not a conventional ICO, and if back to large investments

But I think that some projects including the scientificcoin don't have a min investment limit, so you could theoretically contact the team in order to figure out if you could invest or not.

Just to be clear: we have accepted an investment of 200$ last week.

[loup]

So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.

But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.

Indeed, having many investors mean a lot of transfers what means they will need a lot of gas to make them.

[maurobiasolo]

So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.

But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.

Indeed, having many investors mean a lot of transfers what means they will need a lot of gas to make them.

By the way, this is a contingent issue: when we will switch to our proprietary blockchain, we won't be capped by Ethereum gas fee

[aveon]

So about the dividends, what will you do for the tokens on the exchanges.

Will you just blacklist that addresses or will the exchanges get the dividends which i think not fair.

i like dividend giving projects. what i dont like is projects giving dividends to exchange account so hopefully team will make a wise choice in here.

Do you mean people storing their tokens on the exchange or the tokens owned by the exchange? Why shouldn't they get dividends?

No, people storing tokens on exchange.

Like etherdelta or binance. You are storing them on exchange. But if they send eth to that address, you won't get it. The exchange will get more eth and it is not fair in my opinion.

That's why, typically, dividends are never sent to exchanges (and it's not a good practice to store tokens in exchanges)

Yeah, i thought so.

Also storing tokens on exchanges isn't a good idea but lots of people doing so.

tey do it cause its simple, one account for all asset.
but, if their account got hacked, everything will end.

But from other hand, if the dividends will be transferred to eth wallet, this will be a large commission for gas, and will be need to monitor these tokens holders.

Indeed, having many investors mean a lot of transfers what means they will need a lot of gas to make them.

By the way, this is a contingent issue: when we will switch to our proprietary blockchain, we won't be capped by Ethereum gas fee

I still do not understand why gas is so high, I would say unreasonably high comparing to BTC. It should be a lot lower to compete in the market.

[loup]

most of the people dont have a ledger for storing. and yeah most of the people are storing them in an exchange hoping for to catch that pump time.

Ledger can't support every token. So it is not a viable way for multi token holders.

Indeed, Ledger is a good way of storing tokens but doesn't work with every token. So most of people need another storing system.

They constantly expand token list with each update, but it seems to me that there will be such an opportunity only for the basic altcoins.

Yes , the list is getting bigger but new projects like this will have to wait a long time before being listed there.