[ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.

[betiteh0777]

Ok, so I just did check dashboards for the coins I'm mining at the moment and, as was mentioned before, there's a problem with reported hash rates. On the site it says ~55MH/s, but ccminer reports ~70MH/s (the same I had with NiceHash). So which one is correct ?

Same here:
Mining vertcoin only (without autoswitches) with ccminer:
Pool reports ~25% lower hashrate than ccminer on average  (monitored over 3 days).
Average amount of coins mined daily is also ~25% lower than predicted by different calculators (WhatToMine, coinwarz).

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.
I'll report back in a week

Spare your time on Mona here - its just the same.....online hashrate never catches up with the miner hashrate even if you let is go for 2-3days -no difference, still the same.......somewhere in between 20-40% hashrate goes somewhere else....

[crypper]

Ok, so I just did check dashboards for the coins I'm mining at the moment and, as was mentioned before, there's a problem with reported hash rates. On the site it says ~55MH/s, but ccminer reports ~70MH/s (the same I had with NiceHash). So which one is correct ?

Same here:
Mining vertcoin only (without autoswitches) with ccminer:
Pool reports ~25% lower hashrate than ccminer on average  (monitored over 3 days).
Average amount of coins mined daily is also ~25% lower than predicted by different calculators (WhatToMine, coinwarz).

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.
I'll report back in a week

Spare your time on Mona here - its just the same.....online hashrate never catches up with the miner hashrate even if you let is go for 2-3days -no difference, still the same.......somewhere in between 20-40% hashrate goes somewhere else....

Is it for Lyra2 only (as admins claim) or for other algos too? How about equihash?
Edit: please share your experience: algo/coin, set up, observations. Thanks

[betiteh0777]

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.

Bad approach. If you want to compare 2 pools, you have to mine in parallel. Otherwise, the results are not comparable as the net difficulty in 4-6 days can be completely different from days 1-3!

You are right, I have not considered difficulty  change.
I'll do next: I'll run two instances of ccminer with 2 GTX 1070 each: 1. MPH, 2. Suprnova
24 h should be enough to make conclusions.

Please keep us updated on your test
Thanks

Sure, I'm already running the test. I'll update you tomorrow.
It would be nice if someone else could also run a similar test just to get statistics. As admins mentioned earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4840), this is a known issue, but some users do not experience it.
I'm using tpruvot ccminer 2.2 and 372.54 nvidia driver. I wonder if it can be miner/driver versions dependent.

I have tested suprnova it worked out immediately - online pool hashrate catched up the miner speed for 1min after launched!!! Then even surpassed a little and after that it went equal with the miner speed

I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017

Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....

[Minerdc]

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.

Bad approach. If you want to compare 2 pools, you have to mine in parallel. Otherwise, the results are not comparable as the net difficulty in 4-6 days can be completely different from days 1-3!

You are right, I have not considered difficulty  change.
I'll do next: I'll run two instances of ccminer with 2 GTX 1070 each: 1. MPH, 2. Suprnova
24 h should be enough to make conclusions.

Please keep us updated on your test
Thanks

Sure, I'm already running the test. I'll update you tomorrow.
It would be nice if someone else could also run a similar test just to get statistics. As admins mentioned earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4840), this is a known issue, but some users do not experience it.
I'm using tpruvot ccminer 2.2 and 372.54 nvidia driver. I wonder if it can be miner/driver versions dependent.

I have tested suprnova it worked out immediately - online pool hashrate catched up the miner speed for 1min after launched!!! Then even surpassed a little and after that it went equal with the miner speed

I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017

Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....

What algo are you mining?
Do you see the correct profitability?

[crypper]

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.

Bad approach. If you want to compare 2 pools, you have to mine in parallel. Otherwise, the results are not comparable as the net difficulty in 4-6 days can be completely different from days 1-3!

You are right, I have not considered difficulty  change.
I'll do next: I'll run two instances of ccminer with 2 GTX 1070 each: 1. MPH, 2. Suprnova
24 h should be enough to make conclusions.

Please keep us updated on your test
Thanks

Sure, I'm already running the test. I'll update you tomorrow.
It would be nice if someone else could also run a similar test just to get statistics. As admins mentioned earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4840), this is a known issue, but some users do not experience it.
I'm using tpruvot ccminer 2.2 and 372.54 nvidia driver. I wonder if it can be miner/driver versions dependent.

I have tested suprnova it worked out immediately - online pool hashrate catched up the miner speed for 1min after launched!!! Then even surpassed a little and after that it went equal with the miner speed

I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017

Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....

Please update us with the results after 24h. Immediate hashrate is meaningless

[betiteh0777]

-a lyra2z

OK will do inform how it goes tomorrow

[crypper]

-a lyra2z

OK will do inform how it goes tomorrow

Can you do Lyra2Rev2 instead (vertcoin, monacoin)? This is the one we are having problems with at the moment.

[icmanik]

hello there could you anyone help me how to setup Antminer D3 on different altcoin? Multipool my antminer rejected all shares

[TheHypnoToad]

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.

Bad approach. If you want to compare 2 pools, you have to mine in parallel. Otherwise, the results are not comparable as the net difficulty in 4-6 days can be completely different from days 1-3!

You are right, I have not considered difficulty  change.
I'll do next: I'll run two instances of ccminer with 2 GTX 1070 each: 1. MPH, 2. Suprnova
24 h should be enough to make conclusions.

Please keep us updated on your test
Thanks

Sure, I'm already running the test. I'll update you tomorrow.
It would be nice if someone else could also run a similar test just to get statistics. As admins mentioned earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4840), this is a known issue, but some users do not experience it.
I'm using tpruvot ccminer 2.2 and 372.54 nvidia driver. I wonder if it can be miner/driver versions dependent.

I have tested suprnova it worked out immediately - online pool hashrate catched up the miner speed for 1min after launched!!! Then even surpassed a little and after that it went equal with the miner speed

I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017

Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....

Hi, how are you viewing your hashrate on the pool? I've just starting mining lyra2v2 and wanted to check it's working ok.

Sorry if this is such as n00b question, I've checked the MPH FAQ, my balance page is blank, and am out of ideas  

EDIT: Ok, I've waited a little longer now and some vertcoin ia showing up in my balance, it would still be nice to view the hashrate somehow.

[wizmanza]

getting timeouts on hub.miningpoolhub.com:17018 - any issues?

[paulpoco]

At 1st set "Auto Exchange" to BTC.
At present time don't have enough for withdrawal.

Now changed to "Auto Exchange" to LTC.
Too soon to see any LTC.

Question - those BTC that have already been "Auto Exchanged", can they be "Auto Exchanged" to LTC?  Or do I need to let the BTC balance get large enough to make a withdrawal?  I.e.  so that the 0.0003 BTC fee isn't the same as my balance?

[freofreo]

Hi, how are you viewing your hashrate on the pool? I've just starting mining lyra2v2 and wanted to check it's working ok.

Sorry if this is such as n00b question, I've checked the MPH FAQ, my balance page is blank, and am out of ideas  

For hash rate, look at the left menu, click on the coin you are mining then click on dashboard.
Total balances update is kinda slow. Account information on each coin's dashboard is much faster.

 

[flowerpower84]

Hi to all!
I have a Baikal Giant X10 miner and I need to set the starting difficulty for my worker that use Mining Pool Hub.
I see on my Baikal miner webpage this value for Diff1=4234.626709
What is this value? The difficulty used by my miner?
I don't have found my worker difficulty value on Mining Pool Hub web site.
If the Diff1 value is my woker difficulty, what I need to set in the password field (in the pool connection string) to set my starting difficulty?
Thank you in advance!

[freofreo]

At 1st set "Auto Exchange" to BTC.
At present time don't have enough for withdrawal.

Now changed to "Auto Exchange" to LTC.
Too soon to see any LTC.

Question - those BTC that have already been "Auto Exchanged", can they be "Auto Exchanged" to LTC?  Or do I need to let the BTC balance get large enough to make a withdrawal?  I.e.  so that the 0.0003 BTC fee isn't the same as my balance?

There's no menu on BTC wallet to move credits to auto exchanged. I think BTC are for withdrawal only.

[Christopher761]

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.

Bad approach. If you want to compare 2 pools, you have to mine in parallel. Otherwise, the results are not comparable as the net difficulty in 4-6 days can be completely different from days 1-3!

You are right, I have not considered difficulty  change.
I'll do next: I'll run two instances of ccminer with 2 GTX 1070 each: 1. MPH, 2. Suprnova
24 h should be enough to make conclusions.

Please keep us updated on your test
Thanks

Sure, I'm already running the test. I'll update you tomorrow.
It would be nice if someone else could also run a similar test just to get statistics. As admins mentioned earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4840), this is a known issue, but some users do not experience it.
I'm using tpruvot ccminer 2.2 and 372.54 nvidia driver. I wonder if it can be miner/driver versions dependent.

I have tested suprnova it worked out immediately - online pool hashrate catched up the miner speed for 1min after launched!!! Then even surpassed a little and after that it went equal with the miner speed

I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017

Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....

If it ain't broke....

Seriously, if you have a 100 card server farm, you should leave it alone for now.  And then on a separate test machine with one card in it, you can play around with bios mods, new drivers (or block chain drivers) etc.  When you get the test bench running the way you want it, and if there is a statistically significant gain, then start porting the changes to your the rest of your rigs.

Otherwise, sit back, and monitor it.  Things will change all on their own, and everything will start crashing, without you changing anything. 

I had a rig running equihash mining zec on nanopool.  Dialed in the afterburner settings.  Everything was fine.  Left town for a 5 day trip, and everything crashed on day one.

By the way, I hate the way Microsoft updates production machines while they are working.  Next, I hate that afterburner doesn't necessarily restart the fan settings.  Sigh...

[flowerpower84]

New Baikal miner settings.

Please modify pool order for better efficiency. It's not mandatory but recommended.

1. Set each algo and server info in this priority order.
As x11 and qubit is mostly selected as profitable algo, it should be more efficient for pool and miner.

1 - x11 : stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12007
2 - qubit : stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12014
3 - quark : stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12015
4 - x13 : stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12008
5 - x15 : stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12009



2. Set "ASIC Baikal - Quark, Qubit, x11, x13, x15" at Hub worker page.
https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=account&action=hubworkers


3. You can also set some coin (like Bitcoin) at Auto Exchange page to get all coins exchanged. (optional)
https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=account&action=autoexchange

Hi to all!
With this settings I can use the Auto Switch feauture of Mining Pool Hub?
With only one worker and Auto Switch feauture I can mine multi coins or I can mine the same coin with multi algorithms?
Thank you in advance!

[betiteh0777]

-a lyra2z

OK will do inform how it goes tomorrow

Can you do Lyra2Rev2 instead (vertcoin, monacoin)? This is the one we are having problems with at the moment.

Sure will switch to Lyra2Rev2 coin and see how it goes on Suprnova....so far Lyra2z is stable with online hashrates near to equal the miner hashrate

https://s19.postimg.org/y9huiyrcj/Capture2.jpg

[betiteh0777]

What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.

Bad approach. If you want to compare 2 pools, you have to mine in parallel. Otherwise, the results are not comparable as the net difficulty in 4-6 days can be completely different from days 1-3!

You are right, I have not considered difficulty  change.
I'll do next: I'll run two instances of ccminer with 2 GTX 1070 each: 1. MPH, 2. Suprnova
24 h should be enough to make conclusions.

Please keep us updated on your test
Thanks

Sure, I'm already running the test. I'll update you tomorrow.
It would be nice if someone else could also run a similar test just to get statistics. As admins mentioned earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4840), this is a known issue, but some users do not experience it.
I'm using tpruvot ccminer 2.2 and 372.54 nvidia driver. I wonder if it can be miner/driver versions dependent.

I have tested suprnova it worked out immediately - online pool hashrate catched up the miner speed for 1min after launched!!! Then even surpassed a little and after that it went equal with the miner speed

I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017

Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....

Hi, how are you viewing your hashrate on the pool? I've just starting mining lyra2v2 and wanted to check it's working ok.

Sorry if this is such as n00b question, I've checked the MPH FAQ, my balance page is blank, and am out of ideas  

EDIT: Ok, I've waited a little longer now and some vertcoin ia showing up in my balance, it would still be nice to view the hashrate somehow.

https://s19.postimg.org/xl900a0f7/Capture5.jpg

[chiggx]

Which miner is more efficient for Nvidia cards, Multipool miner, Awesome miner of Nemosminer? MPH's FAQ has all 3 but it does not indicate which may be better than the other or better suited for each architecture

[betiteh0777]

Which miner is more efficient for Nvidia cards, Multipool miner, Awesome miner of Nemosminer? MPH's FAQ has all 3 but it does not indicate which may be better than the other or better suited for each architecture

I doubt any multi-miner which automatically switch altcoins to btc on small portions will be efficient with current btc fees......for example today, I needed 200USD cash out from my exodus btc wallet and been asket 45usd transfer fees ------->>>>>> tahts insane!!