Atexor
Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 10
|
|
December 11, 2017, 08:44:32 PM |
|
Everything is done in batches. The pool is one huge wallet and when it reaches a certain amount of coins they are sent to an exchange (Bittrex, Yobit or Poloniex), sold then return to the pool as the new coin. You can keep track of it here as it can take many hours: https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=account&action=balancesPS. Coins in the credited column are never sent to the exchange. Coins in brackets are unconfirmed, right? By the way - do you know what could be a reason with big discrepancy which I described above? Bad pool luck? As I see miningpoolhub is second the largest pool for Monacoin with 0.9gh/s (first is suprnova with 1.5gh/s). Luck shouldn't be for us so aggressive, but even assuming that case, on that pool we should earn more coins because tyhere are less miners to divide earnings ebtween them.
|
|
|
|
aaronsace
|
|
December 11, 2017, 08:51:01 PM Last edit: December 11, 2017, 09:27:15 PM by aaronsace |
|
Everything is done in batches. The pool is one huge wallet and when it reaches a certain amount of coins they are sent to an exchange (Bittrex, Yobit or Poloniex), sold then return to the pool as the new coin. You can keep track of it here as it can take many hours: https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=account&action=balancesPS. Coins in the credited column are never sent to the exchange. Coins in brackets are unconfirmed, right? By the way - do you know what could be a reason with big discrepancy which I described above? Bad pool luck? As I see miningpoolhub is second the largest pool for Monacoin with 0.9gh/s (first is suprnova with 1.5gh/s). Luck shouldn't be for us so aggressive, but even assuming that case, on that pool we should earn more coins because tyhere are less miners to divide earnings ebtween them. Yes, the pool has no control over that as it's the coin networks themselves that have to confirm it. The pool is working great; finding regular blocks and maintaining 100% luck: https://monacoin.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocksIf you are getting severely less over a few days running then try a different miner. The pool can only distribute what is found and can only accept what shares you send to it. If there was a problem with the pool then some miners would be getting paid say twice as much and others half as much because everything that is found is distributed back out.
|
|
|
|
Atexor
Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 10
|
|
December 11, 2017, 09:22:21 PM |
|
I'll try with ccminer (downloaded by your tool) although theretically (palgin/truvot) it has lower hashrate or maybe excavator gives fake-hashrate. Maybe it's the reason. It's worth checking. If I can say somethng that instant changing miners until we don't remove files on folder "Miners" is really strange. By the way I've prepared a little dark theme for Stylish/Stylus for pool for those who likes dark themes for everything. I know about addons that do this things but they do this in a ugly way. https://userstyles.org/styles/152737/dark-mining-pool-hub
|
|
|
|
jb7032
|
|
December 11, 2017, 09:30:41 PM |
|
Everything is done in batches. The pool is one huge wallet and when it reaches a certain amount of coins they are sent to an exchange (Bittrex, Yobit or Poloniex), sold then return to the pool as the new coin. You can keep track of it here as it can take many hours: https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=account&action=balancesPS. Coins in the credited column are never sent to the exchange. Coins in brackets are unconfirmed, right? By the way - do you know what could be a reason with big discrepancy which I described above? Bad pool luck? As I see miningpoolhub is second the largest pool for Monacoin with 0.9gh/s (first is suprnova with 1.5gh/s). Luck shouldn't be for us so aggressive, but even assuming that case, on that pool we should earn more coins because tyhere are less miners to divide earnings ebtween them. Yes, the pool has no control over that as it's the coin networks themselves that have to confirm it. The pool is working great; finding regular blocks and maintaining 100% luck: https://monacoin.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocksIf you are getting severely less over a few days running then try a different miner. The pool can only distribute what is found and can only accept what shares you send to it. If there was a problem with the pool then some miners would be getting paid say twice as much and others half as much because everything that is found is distributed back out. I am still having issues it seems only with my larger rigs running SMOS. I have had 140MH pointed at Lyra2v2 for the past 8 hours and yet that worker doesnt show up under either Mona or Vert. My slower windows pc's with 1 or 2 cards all seem to show up just fine. Is there a way I can confirm my miners work is actually being counted?
|
|
|
|
aaronsace
|
|
December 11, 2017, 09:34:26 PM |
|
Everything is done in batches. The pool is one huge wallet and when it reaches a certain amount of coins they are sent to an exchange (Bittrex, Yobit or Poloniex), sold then return to the pool as the new coin. You can keep track of it here as it can take many hours: https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=account&action=balancesPS. Coins in the credited column are never sent to the exchange. Coins in brackets are unconfirmed, right? By the way - do you know what could be a reason with big discrepancy which I described above? Bad pool luck? As I see miningpoolhub is second the largest pool for Monacoin with 0.9gh/s (first is suprnova with 1.5gh/s). Luck shouldn't be for us so aggressive, but even assuming that case, on that pool we should earn more coins because tyhere are less miners to divide earnings ebtween them. Yes, the pool has no control over that as it's the coin networks themselves that have to confirm it. The pool is working great; finding regular blocks and maintaining 100% luck: https://monacoin.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocksIf you are getting severely less over a few days running then try a different miner. The pool can only distribute what is found and can only accept what shares you send to it. If there was a problem with the pool then some miners would be getting paid say twice as much and others half as much because everything that is found is distributed back out. I am still having issues it seems only with my larger rigs running SMOS. I have had 140MH pointed at Lyra2v2 for the past 8 hours and yet that worker doesnt show up under either Mona or Vert. My slower windows pc's with 1 or 2 cards all seem to show up just fine. Is there a way I can confirm my miners work is actually being counted? If your windows PC is showing but your other rig is not then I would think there is a problem with your rig. https://monacoin.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=account&action=workershttps://vertcoin.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=account&action=workers
|
|
|
|
jb7032
|
|
December 11, 2017, 09:48:33 PM |
|
I am using ccminer-tpruvot-v2.1 and my config is -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17018 -u User.Worker -p x and this is what im seeing in the mining app. Based on my earnings I feel like its working but I cant confirm. Any insight would be helpful. Not trying to be a pain just trying to get my rigs to play well with your site and confirm it's working as expected.
[2017-12-11 22:45:58] accepted: 1968/1968 (diff 2.359), 140.71 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 22:45:59] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.80 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:45:59] GPU #4: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.76 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:45:59] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.73 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:00] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.32 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:02] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 22.74 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:02] accepted: 1969/1969 (diff 0.808), 140.71 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 22:46:03] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.81 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:03] accepted: 1970/1970 (diff 0.643), 140.71 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 22:46:10] lyra2v2 block 1186560, diff 74414.404 [2017-12-11 22:46:27] GPU #1: 1956 MHz 246.63 kH/W 94W 49C FAN 50% [2017-12-11 22:46:27] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.74 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:27] accepted: 1971/1971 (diff 1.148), 140.70 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 22:46:39] GPU #4: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.75 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:39] accepted: 1972/1972 (diff 0.625), 140.71 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 22:46:40] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.83 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:41] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.32 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:41] GPU #5: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.11 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:41] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 22.97 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:58] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.70 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:46:58] GPU #2: 1927 MHz 248.24 kH/W 95W 59C FAN 50% [2017-12-11 22:47:10] GPU #4: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.66 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:47:10] GPU #0: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.85 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:47:12] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.30 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:47:12] GPU #5: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.09 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:47:13] GPU #3: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 22.95 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:47:21] GPU #1: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.13 MH/s [2017-12-11 22:47:21] accepted: 1973/1973 (diff 1.478), 140.72 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 22:47:28] GPU #2: Zotac GTX 1060 6GB, 23.77 MH/s Close
|
|
|
|
manicdan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 11, 2017, 10:06:50 PM |
|
I'll try with ccminer (downloaded by your tool) although theretically (palgin/truvot) it has lower hashrate or maybe excavator gives fake-hashrate. Maybe it's the reason. It's worth checking. If I can say somethng that instant changing miners until we don't remove files on folder "Miners" is really strange. By the way I've prepared a little dark theme for Stylish/Stylus for pool for those who likes dark themes for everything. I know about addons that do this things but they do this in a ugly way. https://userstyles.org/styles/152737/dark-mining-pool-hubhttps://i.imgur.com/sYLWQrX.pngI just installed this, I do like having the page darker, less eye strain when I check my balances before going to bed. The Dashboard page has grey text though for the hashrates, can we lighten that up a little?
|
|
|
|
btc2017btc2017
Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 10
|
|
December 11, 2017, 10:08:46 PM |
|
withdrawing frequently means more fees to you. Hi This is miningpoolhub operator1. Sorry for late reply. I am receiving hundreds of emails, skype chats these days. Also bitcointalk, reddit posts are growing rapidly. I've replied to all email questions.Pardon me, I can't answer all questions posted in community too. I've found that I can't move pool forward if I reply all community posts. There's many requests like coin addition, feature improvements to do. I hope expert members to help new members each other. Please contact me via contact@miningpoolhub.com email if you need my private advice or immediate service faults like account problem, or pool errors. I can't handle all general mining questions and settings, pool usage questions. 2. Here's my task list I'm focusing. - one page miner dashboard will come soon. - ETN or new profitable coin addition - improve FAQ page and texts all over the pool to guide new miners. I would like to add small explanation popup text all over the website. 3. Thank you for your trust, and patience during the previous 80 minutes of website crash. I've been running pool for almost 4 years but such long emergency crash didn't happen. I had really tough day too. I understand you worry about your coins regarding the hack. I recommend you to withdraw coins periodically. I don't mean that pool will be hacked, but pool is not intended for wallet service. Some coin pools can be closed if mining is meaningless too. Keep your precious coin in your pocket.
|
|
|
|
aaronsace
|
|
December 11, 2017, 10:10:38 PM |
|
withdrawing frequently means more fees to you.
No, you pay the fee: "A 0.0003 BTC TX fee will apply" Keep as much in the pool as you are willing to lose vs paying more transaction fees.
|
|
|
|
Atexor
Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 10
|
|
December 11, 2017, 10:19:03 PM |
|
I just installed this, I do like having the page darker, less eye strain when I check my balances before going to bed.
The Dashboard page has grey text though for the hashrates, can we lighten that up a little?
Thanks, fixed. Offtopic: btw. I can recommend you f.lux program (or inbuild windows 10 but it's more poor). It helps in the evenings before go bed by reducing blue light from your display.
|
|
|
|
ma3leemz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 11, 2017, 10:49:57 PM |
|
don't know what went wrong but my musicoin mining went off track for the past 6 hours on the dashboard. Though my miner was showing steady shares and speed - is this an issue on your side and will these 6 hours eventually show up
|
|
|
|
salfter
|
|
December 11, 2017, 10:59:57 PM |
|
By the way, I hate the way Microsoft updates production machines while they are working. Next, I hate that afterburner doesn't necessarily restart the fan settings. Sigh...
That's why you don't use Windows on mining rigs.
|
|
|
|
Jamessuperfun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
December 11, 2017, 11:01:16 PM Last edit: December 11, 2017, 11:16:55 PM by Jamessuperfun |
|
don't know what went wrong but my musicoin mining went off track for the past 6 hours on the dashboard. Though my miner was showing steady shares and speed - is this an issue on your side and will these 6 hours eventually show up I had lots of Music on my Balance page, but now it's set to 0, and my auto exchange (BTC) hasn't gone up by close to that value. Maybe there are issues with Music right now? Edit: Just came through as BTC
|
|
|
|
lolmining
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 11, 2017, 11:53:25 PM Last edit: December 12, 2017, 12:10:08 AM by lolmining |
|
.......................... I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017
Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....
Sorry for my $0.02: you are using wrong miner and wrong driver. Therefore you are loosing approximately 18+% of hashing power and profit (according to my calculations). You have to use ccMiner 2.2 fork by Nanashi Meiyo-Meijin For MonaCoin Mining miner: just download it and rename to ccminer-x64.exe if necessary (f.e. minerwatcher.com service which I use requires it). Driver also should be the latest: 388.59 gives the most hashrate in Lyra2re2 I've seen so far. Video with old standard miner and older driver. As you can see with PL 100 GPU 100 RAM 770 hashrate never goes above 287MHs Right now with latest drivers and 2-2fork miner and PL 95GPU 100 RAM 700I got 353MHs. Think about it. [2017-12-11 17:59:56] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.99 MH/s [2017-12-11 17:59:57] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.80 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #4: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.55 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.29 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.94 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:08] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.59 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:09] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.43 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:13] GPU #4: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.31 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:13] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.73 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:14] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.61 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:21] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.31 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:21] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.49 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:22] accepted: 176/176 (diff 1.528), 353.37 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 18:00:22] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.64 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:22] accepted: 177/177 (diff 3.568), 353.40 MH/s yes! Dashboard reports even more: https://imgur.com/a/SpWDR
|
|
|
|
Cryptographertm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 12:15:55 AM |
|
so i guess my small amount of coin will be marooned on.. wherever it is indefinitely. I really dont have much hashrate, but I have <50 sia i auto exchanged for DGB. Im assuming theres no too many people doing that. So by what I've heard, if its not popular, there wont be much volume. and without the volume, MPH doesnt care enough to make the transfer happen.
|
|
|
|
Cryptographertm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 12:21:15 AM |
|
.......................... I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017
Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....
Sorry for my $0.02: you are using wrong miner and wrong driver. Therefore you are loosing approximately 18+% of hashing power and profit (according to my calculations). You have to use ccMiner 2.2 fork by Nanashi Meiyo-Meijin For MonaCoin Mining miner: just download it and rename to ccminer-x64.exe if necessary (f.e. minerwatcher.com service which I use requires it). Driver also should be the latest: 388.59 gives the most hashrate in Lyra2re2 I've seen so far. Video with old standard miner and older driver. As you can see with PL 100 GPU 100 RAM 770 hashrate never goes above 287MHs Right now with latest drivers and 2-2fork miner and PL 95GPU 100 RAM 700I got 353MHs. Think about it. [2017-12-11 17:59:56] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.99 MH/s [2017-12-11 17:59:57] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.80 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #4: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.55 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.29 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:01] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.94 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:08] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.59 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:09] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.43 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:13] GPU #4: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.31 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:13] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.73 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:14] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.61 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:21] GPU #3: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 70.31 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:21] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 73.49 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:22] accepted: 176/176 (diff 1.528), 353.37 MH/s yes! [2017-12-11 18:00:22] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 69.64 MH/s [2017-12-11 18:00:22] accepted: 177/177 (diff 3.568), 353.40 MH/s yes! Dashboard reports even more: https://imgur.com/a/SpWDR^ I went to check out this guys link, tons of comments saying they were hacked for ethereum just doing a public service post here. read that page before DLing whatever hes saying.
|
|
|
|
lolmining
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 12:27:16 AM |
|
^ I went to check out this guys link, tons of comments saying they were hacked for ethereum
I dont mine ethereum.
|
|
|
|
Infpwnz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 01:09:58 AM |
|
I'm getting really bad stats on BTG.
My hashrate is 2030kh/s
Whattomine says i should be getting 0.057 BTG day and I'm only getting 0.047
anyone else have issues with BTG pool?
|
|
|
|
Cryptographertm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 01:59:05 AM |
|
^ I went to check out this guys link, tons of comments saying they were hacked for ethereum
I dont mine ethereum. well you might want to remove that link so no one else clicks it.
|
|
|
|
lolmining
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2017, 02:02:50 AM |
|
well you might want to remove that link so no one else clicks it.
I will not. Miner is working just fine.
|
|
|
|
|