How will bounties do without Bounty Hunters?

[timberfox]

I think they're just going to be airdrops, that's all.
Although this method is not so effective, but it is quite subjective.

[1714876274]

1714876274

[1714876274]

1714876274

[1714876274]

1714876274

[1714876274]

1714876274

[1714876274]

1714876274

[dobolspeed3]

I think that can happen, many projects without a successful bounty campaign. Not just one project, but a lot has happened. It's usually when you get paid from a bounty campaign. And immediately sell it, I don't think it can be blamed. Because everyone certainly needs income from a bounty campaign.

[Naughty Princess]

in my opinion, it cannot run and achieve success without hunters because the project requires hunters to promote and disseminate information about their projects to the community and investors.

Bounty project cannot be known on the market if it is not advertise by the bounty hunters. Using a campaign, the team won't introduced the project but focus only on the development and bounty hunters are the one who responsible to support the project to attract the investors which will also help for the development of the projects.

[clololck]

The bounty hunter will not disappear. If a project cannot find a bounty hunter to promote it, it will not succeed. Only the bounty hunter who disappears when ICO disappears. This may be a very good income for people in third world countries.

[zcashplan]

Bounty hunters are a profession that will not disappear in the short term. It is important to know that although they earn very little, they may have been able to get enough food and clothing. When the ICO disappears, the bounty hunter will disappear.

[mr.Belyavski]

No matter how hard one condemns the hunters for their bounty, it’s still not enough for anyone to do the ICO without their help. My opinion is that the development of participation in the bounty occurs gradually in such a way as to improve conditions for both hunters and for all ICO projects.

[Ruffian1314]

I don't think it will run without the hunters. Bounty campaigns needs bounty hunters to do the tasks and they will be paid accordingly to the efforts they have made so its non of their business if the hunters will sell the tokens immediatle or not because there are no rules for that.

[fortelen]

It could have been, with many that do it for however many of those who rely solely on airdrop becomes difficult to believe. This is certainly due to their own airdrop indeed many containing scams and of course, see this would be a bad thing for the project. If projects want to succeed then indeed need effort and bounty became the most powerful way. the bounty will help marketing in many things and it gives a good effect to the project running.

[maculeth]

no, the bounty can't run without a bounty hunter. so it's only natural that the bounty hunter immediately sells their tokens after getting it, and that is fair. let this cooperation continue because all are mutually beneficial.

[Nggedebus]

I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?

Sorry, but i think this is a silly question.
Whats the point in opening bounty but not hoping for bounty hunter join the bounty.
Perhaps you have to change your question, Can a project run without opening a bounty campaign or something like that.

[krishnaverma]

I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?


 

No bounty can exists without hunters. But the current shift is to find hunters who are contributing good quality posts here. Earlier the criteria was based just on rank which was independent of merits. Now we have merits to reward users who are making good posts. Campaigns are more benefited by such users.

[disbil]

I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?


 

No bounty can exists without hunters. But the current shift is to find hunters who are contributing good quality posts here. Earlier the criteria was based just on rank which was independent of merits. Now we have merits to reward users who are making good posts. Campaigns are more benefited by such users.

Indeed, that is something like a singe package that can't be separated.
When ever a project opening a bounty, then automatically the bounty hunter will come to join.

[VclDm]

I think it's hard to do, because ICO campaigns always need bounty hunters, who always give ICO plenty of visitors to their site, and many have invested in bounty information. Hunter supply and spread.

[Applechild]

No campaign can be effective without the active participation of the bounty hunters, i think this mouse cat play will continue between the bounty hunters and project owners because both try to out smart each other, this will continue until there is some kind of strict rules or escrow service between them.

exactly but people are making it look as if hunters are so needy that they cant survive without hunting. i believe we are all doing one thing or the other to making a living before the birth of bounty. i am not also ignoring the fact that bounty hunting has brought about extra ways of using creativity and hard-work to earn extra cash. thanks to this forum for that.

[tins]

in my opinion, it cannot run and achieve success without hunters because the project requires hunters to promote and disseminate information about their projects to the community and investors.

Let me list you some examples such as GXchain, Loopring, Theta Token and many other projects that have succeeded without bounty. Bounty is just one part of helping people know their projects or projects that are not potential, they need bounty.

[ForTheAzerot]

in my opinion, it cannot run and achieve success without hunters because the project requires hunters to promote and disseminate information about their projects to the community and investors.

Let me list you some examples such as GXchain, Loopring, Theta Token and many other projects that have succeeded without bounty. Bounty is just one part of helping people know their projects or projects that are not potential, they need bounty.

It is clear that large companies do not need bounty hunters, investors already know about them and over time I think that the number of companies that will refuse such advertising will only increase.

[Abuchi2]

Bounty hunters are the main people that spread it out to everyone Like on social media and people will no about them but without bounty hunters it will be hard for people to no about them.

[Galley]

Bounty hunter can not have a significant impact on the development of the project. Increasingly depends on the efforts of the team itself and the capabilities of the project to become a competitive product. The bounty hunter has too few tokens to drastically influence the situation.

[5thFear]

Well, the bounty hunters are the lifeline of any ICO. Without bounty hunters, the ICO won't get their token circulated and also then they have to pay for the marketing. And still they won't get the kind of marketing the bounty hunters do for them. Bounty hunters usually have the crypto related community as their followers who are looking for good investment opportunities and in this way the bounty hunters guide those investors to the ICOs.

[ElnurBash]

I have read many posts condemning the impatience of bounty hunters who sell off rewards as soon as it is received.
My question is, can bounties run and achieve success on their own without Hunters?


 

of course a lot of things depend on people whp are participating in them and bounty will never stop in my opnion