🔥🔥🔥 BC.GAME - CASINO AND SPORTSBOOK | 200% BONUS - PROMO CODE #BCLCFC 🔥🔥🔥

[JollyGood]

When BC.Game partnered with Leicester City they leaped forward on to a new level of serious business and as you stated, their are well recognised. If they bring their name in to disrepute they will also bring the name of Leicester City down with them therefore they will have to be careful how they approach any scam allegation.

I agree there are some members that are deliberately posting for nefarious reasons and motives (not just here but generically in various threads) but if evidence is provided, they are investigating. Some of those investigations can be concluded fairly quickly but some do take time.

I think it is a good sign for the team as they are now a well-recognized online crypto casino. They are doing something right which has led to others, bombarding this thread with negative issues. Most of them are genuine but some of them are trying their level best to degrade the casino with false replies without providing any proof.

[Numeral]

JollyGood, every major betting company will have negative reviews due to their huge customer base. In principle, experienced clients of betting companies understand this and calmly react to some small friction between business representatives and bettors.

In terms of service quality, sometimes it is impossible to make everything always perfect. But I think we can all agree that any company should strive to create the most positive image of the company. 

[shasan]

Exactly, constructive criticism is something to make a site better, not put them on the spot.
When players have obvious problems with the site why shouldn't it be allowed to name these problems and discuss them. We are not in North Korea or whatever where you are not allowed to speak your mind.
This 1 person here that ALWAYS has to take it to a personal level. No clue about the site but defending it blindly and not acknowledging the smallest problems is just ridiculous. Using the site is essential to have an own opinion. Without this experience but saying it's all not true is straight up hypocrisy.
I made good use of the ignore button for this individual, and life is much better.
eeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Happy to see that other users not only made the SAME experience but also talk about it here. Guess when not "only me" (and 50% of people on the BC discord channel) has this problem it gets more real, hahaha. Anyway, being in a sig campaign should not mean blindly attacking people that point out flaws and ignoring obvious things that don't go well. Other people from this campaign can take constructive criticism as well, I don't know why it must be this way? Just sad.

When there is a problem whether for gambling or anything else, it should be addressed and solved the problem after addressing the problem. I agree with you regarding the signature campaign anyone should not attack anything/any site before checking the evidence and getting                                                                                     

[famososMuertos]

::/Yo//:::

Things haven't gone well this week... but at least for a micro stakes player, I've been able to hit Coco several, Coco please! improve that hunt... I'm saving this terrible week, by the prize from the event sponsored by bc.game 🔥 BC.Game ⚽ Cross League Goal Madness ⚽ Discussion Thread

I think so, I have a formal complaint against the lizard and sometimes Mario, it is rare that Mr. Mario appears and not Coco...

Anyway, Good Luck!

[nelson4lov]

~Snipped
At a first glance:  PSG, Liverpool, Bayern and Real Madrid have favorable matches.

The only team that didn't win was PSG. I'm beginning to have doubts about their team despite the fact that they have won some of their games but the performances haven't been very convincing. I will probably skip PSG on my future parlays. There are no UCL fixtures  this week only Europa league games.

Overall, not a bad weekend but breakeven won't cut it for me.

[Pumared]

~Snipped
At a first glance:  PSG, Liverpool, Bayern and Real Madrid have favorable matches.

The only team that didn't win was PSG. I'm beginning to have doubts about their team despite the fact that they have won some of their games but the performances haven't been very convincing. I will probably skip PSG on my future parlays. There are no UCL fixtures  this week only Europa league games.

Overall, not a bad weekend but breakeven won't cut it for me.

The championship has just started, it is not yet possible to judge all the teams well, there were difficult clashes in the Champions League, but there is still a lot to happen. Bayer itself won by 9 goals, but the other team is still in the running.

[logfiles]

The only team that didn't win was PSG. I'm beginning to have doubts about their team despite the fact that they have won some of their games but the performances haven't been very convincing. I will probably skip PSG on my future parlays. There are no UCL fixtures  this week only Europa league games.

Overall, not a bad weekend but breakeven won't cut it for me.

Even last season. PSG was so unreliable on European stage despite having the gems in Kylian Mbappé and Dembélé. Got disappointed in them a couple of times before I completely gave up on including them in any of my bets.
Now that Mbappé isn't there anymore, I think their level of unreliability has just gotten worse. It's a wise decision to completely avoiding including them in your near future parleys.

[nelson4lov]

~Snipped
I will probably skip PSG on my future parlays. There are no UCL fixtures  this week only Europa league games.

Overall, not a bad weekend but breakeven won't cut it for me.

The championship has just started, it is not yet possible to judge all the teams well, there were difficult clashes in the Champions League, but there is still a lot to happen. Bayer itself won by 9 goals, but the other team is still in the running.

Yes, I get your point. Season is still early but PSG didn't bring enough reinforcement after losing their best player to real Madrid. Last season, I stopped including Man Utd and Chelsea on my betslips and my win rate went up. When a teams gets inconsistent, it becomes a problem to predict it.
 

The only team that didn't win was PSG. I'm beginning to have doubts about their team despite the fact that they have won some of their games but the performances haven't been very convincing. I will probably skip PSG on my future parlays. There are no UCL fixtures  this week only Europa league games.

Overall, not a bad weekend but breakeven won't cut it for me.

Even last season. PSG was so unreliable on European stage despite having the gems in Kylian Mbappé and Dembélé. Got disappointed in them a couple of times before I completely gave up on including them in any of my bets.
Now that Mbappé isn't there anymore, I think their level of unreliability has just gotten worse. It's a wise decision to completely avoiding including them in your near future parleys.

Without any doubt. PSG was much better to predict when they had the likes of Cavani, Ibrahimovic or even recent years when they had Neymar, Mbappe and Messi upfront. They have had some good wins so far but I'm not convinced. Might just keep an eye on it and decide later.

[TheUltraElite]

In principle, experienced clients of betting companies understand this and calmly react to some small friction between business representatives and bettors.

Most of them dont want to change the status quo, if they are partnered with a company, unless something huge happens, they would usually not break contract. Unlike what followership people put up while being hothead.

If we make a chart to indicate posts/threads created for malicious intent/no-proof accusations the top casinos and those running successful campaigns at the present time will top those numbers. This indicates that the people who do this have a clear goal in mind. Attempt to gaslight the image of reputed casinos and extort them.

[khaled0111]

If we make a chart to indicate posts/threads created for malicious intent/no-proof accusations the top casinos and those running successful campaigns at the present time will top those numbers.

There are two main reasons why most of the scam accusations/complaints are against the well known casinos: the first is that thoss casinos have a large customer base, so it’s normal to see some unsatisfied customers. After all, you can’t please everyone no matter what you do.
The second is that scammers and extortionists prefer targeting well-established businesses, for obvious reasons.

Regardless of the reason, a successful casino will know how to deal with such a situation and make the best out of it.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

If we make a chart to indicate posts/threads created for malicious intent/no-proof accusations the top casinos and those running successful campaigns at the present time will top those numbers.

There are two main reasons why most of the scam accusations/complaints are against the well known casinos: the first is that thoss casinos have a large customer base, so it’s normal to see some unsatisfied customers. After all, you can’t please everyone no matter what you do.
The second is that scammers and extortionists prefer targeting well-established businesses, for obvious reasons.

Regardless of the reason, a successful casino will know how to deal with such a situation and make the best out of it.

Well I wouldn't say most are against the bigger casinos actually. I would rather say it's 50/50.
There are plenty of accusations against some bs small casinos because often enough these newbie small places actually do scam and there is nothing we can do about it. 
Also, the accusations against bigger sites we see here are only posted here because these casinos have ANN threads and signature campaigns running. So if somebody is unhappy with the way the communication is going with the site they google where else they can get help from. And that's how they find this forum.
But yeah, often enough casinos also get targeted, like beginning of the year by the guy I posted here Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2024 Q1) [MODERATED] 🤨🔬 .
He made several accusations against BC from multiple accounts about always different things. He was an obvious scam artist and I was happy when he finally got exposed and he never showed up again.

[Pumared]

If we make a chart to indicate posts/threads created for malicious intent/no-proof accusations the top casinos and those running successful campaigns at the present time will top those numbers.

There are two main reasons why most of the scam accusations/complaints are against the well known casinos: the first is that thoss casinos have a large customer base, so it’s normal to see some unsatisfied customers. After all, you can’t please everyone no matter what you do.
The second is that scammers and extortionists prefer targeting well-established businesses, for obvious reasons.

Regardless of the reason, a successful casino will know how to deal with such a situation and make the best out of it.

In these moments, the good guys end up paying for those who go down the wrong path. While some have legitimate problems, others create alts just to create chaos in the topics, making it seem to other members that it is a very messy casino and that it is not worth registering. I believe that people create accounts here for faster help, but there are others that are just alts wanting to cause chaos.

[tabas]

JollyGood, every major betting company will have negative reviews due to their huge customer base. In principle, experienced clients of betting companies understand this and calmly react to some small friction between business representatives and bettors.

I agree, the loyal and experienced ones who are chill and don't have any problem at all will continue doing their bets. Although they're not ignored but as long as they have no problems and no concerns at all, they won't be moved by those reviews that have something to do with the platform.

In terms of service quality, sometimes it is impossible to make everything always perfect. But I think we can all agree that any company should strive to create the most positive image of the company. 

Even the best casinos like bc.game, can't please every customer despite of doing everything to give the best gambling experience. There will always be complaints and no casino can skip that.

[famososMuertos]

::///:::

BC.Game | Genoa & Juventus ⚽️ 28 September
BC.Game |Osasuna & Barcelona ⚽️ 28 September
BC.Game | Arsenal & Leicester ⚽️ 28 September
BC.Game | Bavaria & Bayer ⚽️ 28 September
BC.Game | Real Madrid & Alaves ⚽️ 24 September
BC.Game | Stuttgart & Borussia ⚽️ 22 SeptemberfM
BC.Game | Inter & Milan ⚽️ 22 Septemberinspace!
BC.Game |Leicester & Everton⚽️ 21 Septembersompitonov!!


^{Total: Congratulations to September winners...!}
:://:::

I think this cycle of winners should close on 24 Sept. but hey, I'm on the winners list, so I can't help but boast about my consecutive week with a prize, the first for the Pool, and now for the prediction contest... it prizes boosted increase the size of the bets.
^{Thanks... includes the Pool organizer @darbitmobilerecovery , icopress , inpace, bc.game}

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Since a somebody here always wants proves for bugs, how about this one with the not working live stats at originals.

https://streamable.com/wntohh

Before the update it also didn't work properly but at least once you clicked on the live stats tab it started "recording" your session, also when you closed it and reopened it the "software" was still counting your games, wins and losses. It should always count all your bets so you have an overview how much you lost so far and how the win loss distribution looks like. If you don't see your statistics it is a big disadvantage for the player because it's easy to lose track.
Now after the update weeks ago it still doesn't start counting unless you click on it, then it starts but once you close it it doesn't count again and resets to 0, which is total nonsense.
By the way, any other reputable site starts the live starts from the first bet you are making , whether you click on the live stats tab or not, it automatically starts. And it surely doesn't reset the stats to 0 once you close it. And people do close it because it's straight up in the way.

Several people reported this many times and nothing was fixed for a long time.

And this is not blackmailing or any other bs a certain person always tries to draw here, just a prove of a bug that never gets fixed.

[ryzaadit]

Even the best casinos like bc.game, can't please every customer despite of doing everything to give the best gambling experience. There will always be complaints and no casino can skip that.

Yaps, and to be honest none of you guys needed to defend the feedback platform. Perhaps just leave the jobs to"BC.GAME" for receive and response good or negative feedback they must take it. IMO, these kinds of discussions is not gonna being discussed really long (If you guys just leave it to BC.GAME). It's quite simple:
- Some random or user telling feedback about the software, system or other.
- BC. Game receive the feedback.
- Response to the person: "Thanks for the feedback, blah blah (something like customer template service).
- Then, the discussion ended.


Just take the example of Stake.com thread, there always user telling a bad or negative post, but usually just gonna last around 2-3 post and then move one. Since you guys not official team from BC.GAME, not an obligation to responded those (especially for feedback platform). This discussion is being discussed over and over again cause you guys responded to those post while usually are gonna to end more faster by just responded to "Thanks, sorry for the unconvinced and we gonna address these feedback to our department developer for fixing in next update".

[Knight Hider]

I won 50$ free bonus code. I won 140$ with it. I withdrew 10$, now it wants KYC. I can't do that.
I consider the 130$ a loss and the 10$ a win.

[xLays]

I won 50$ free bonus code. I won 140$ with it. I withdrew 10$, now it wants KYC. I can't do that.
I consider the 130$ a loss and the 10$ a win.

What. Where you get this 50$ free bonus code? You won in bitcointalk contest sponsored by bc.game?

You successful withdraw the 10$ then you tried the remaining balance to withdraw and now you can't withdraw because they asking for KYC? Is this what you mean? Any reason why you can't do KYC? And since you can't do KYC why you can consider it loss, when you can pass it anytime the KYC when you provide the right documents?

[Knight Hider]

I won 50$ free bonus code. I won 140$ with it. I withdrew 10$, now it wants KYC. I can't do that.
I consider the 130$ a loss and the 10$ a win.

What. 1. Where you get this 50$ free bonus code? You won in bitcointalk contest sponsored by bc.game?

2. You successful withdraw the 10$ then you tried the remaining balance to withdraw and now you can't withdraw because they asking for KYC? Is this what you mean? 3. Any reason why you can't do KYC? And since you can't do KYC why you can consider it loss, when you can pass it anytime the KYC when you provide the right documents?

1. Yes
2. Yes
3. I never do KYC, none of anyone's business

[AHOYBRAUSE]

I won 50$ free bonus code. I won 140$ with it. I withdrew 10$, now it wants KYC. I can't do that.
I consider the 130$ a loss and the 10$ a win.

What. 1. Where you get this 50$ free bonus code? You won in bitcointalk contest sponsored by bc.game?

2. You successful withdraw the 10$ then you tried the remaining balance to withdraw and now you can't withdraw because they asking for KYC? Is this what you mean? 3. Any reason why you can't do KYC? And since you can't do KYC why you can consider it loss, when you can pass it anytime the KYC when you provide the right documents?

1. Yes
2. Yes
3. I never do KYC, none of anyone's business

Unless they have a strong indication you are multi-accounting there should be no such thing as requesting KYC after using a freebie that was won in a contest here. I don't know if we had any case like this before actually but obviously they can always ask for KYC according to their terms. They have the right to do that of course.
If it's the right thing to do is a different question since people in a crypto forum obviously might value their anonymity.
In case other people will be asked to do KYC as well (like I said, I didn't read this before until now) this might impact the amount of people entering these contests since if using the winnings results being asked to go through KYC might make the whole thing less interesting for certain people.
Would be interesting to know if you are an existing customer or only regged because of the contest.