Blackjack.fun |SLOTS|SPORTS|ESPORTS| JACK Token

[sujonali1819]

70% Rakeback is now activated. This will last for an hour so make sure to make a bet as mich as possible. Good luck folks! See you there.

Yes, It's now there, and this will run for 1 hour between 14:00 CET to 15:00 CET. But the first day it was run for 2 hours



Some new updates that happened recently are, the landing page is now looking so nice. The 20% Rakeback is now working well. It's crediting the user's wallet automatically after the cut-off time, but what do you think is better? crediting the rakeback automatically to the user's wallet or user able to claim it manually from the rakeback page?

[dimonstration]

It's crediting the user's wallet automatically after the cut-off time, but what do you think is better? crediting the rakeback automatically to the user's wallet or user able to claim it manually from the rakeback page?

For me it’s manually claim for the rakeback on the rakeback page is more appropriate since user can check how much they earn and store it safe first so that they will not spent if they are currently doing gambling. Also making it automatically credited the moment player place a bet is a cool feature too for a better tracking on rakeback earned.

[Wind_FURY]

70% Rakeback is now activated. This will last for an hour so make sure to make a bet as mich as possible. Good luck folks! See you there.

Yes, It's now there, and this will run for 1 hour between 14:00 CET to 15:00 CET. But the first day it was run for 2 hours



Some new updates that happened recently are, the landing page is now looking so nice.

The graphics in the landing-page looks like BlackJack.Fun is planning to launch its own NFT collection. Am I right?

 

The 20% Rakeback is now working well. It's crediting the user's wallet automatically after the cut-off time, but what do you think is better? crediting the rakeback automatically to the user's wallet or user able to claim it manually from the rakeback page?

For me it doesn't matter, but it would probably better to be credited the rakeback every 30 days, during the end of the month to have something to expect, and welcome in our balance every month. I believe users would have a tendency to manually claim, then gamble with them as soon as they can if given that choice, which might also make them feel less willing to play next time if they also lose the rakeback.

[sujonali1819]

It's crediting the user's wallet automatically after the cut-off time, but what do you think is better? crediting the rakeback automatically to the user's wallet or user able to claim it manually from the rakeback page?

For me it’s manually claim for the rakeback on the rakeback page is more appropriate since user can check how much they earn and store it safe first so that they will not spent if they are currently doing gambling. Also making it automatically credited the moment player place a bet is a cool feature too for a better tracking on rakeback earned.

Yeah, I think so, If the player can see how much they are getting rakeback it's really good for the player and the platform, otherwise there is no motivation if the player doesn't see how much they are getting.

 

The graphics in the landing-page looks like BlackJack.Fun is planning to launch its own NFT collection. Am I right?

I don't think so. or I don't know yet if they have any plan to launch the NFT collection

[dimonstration]

For me it doesn't matter, but it would probably better to be credited the rakeback every 30 days, during the end of the month to have something to expect, and welcome in our balance every month. I believe users would have a tendency to manually claim, then gamble with them as soon as they can if given that choice, which might also make them feel less willing to play next time if they also lose the rakeback.

Cashback is usually have this kind of duration since it’s the percentage on the amount of loss done by the player. Rakeback is just part of the house edge and that’s is just so small to be hold for 30 days.

@Sujonali, is there plan to have another cashback event but this time for all players including low bankroll. The last event focus only on whales but I remember last time that Blackjack.fun has some deposit bonus event based on tier that varies wagering requirements. Maybe this time the new cashback event will have a tier that varies the percentage based on the user bankroll/loss value.

[len01]

-snip

Some new updates that happened recently are, the landing page is now looking so nice. The 20% Rakeback is now working well. It's crediting the user's wallet automatically after the cut-off time, but what do you think is better? crediting the rakeback automatically to the user's wallet or user able to claim it manually from the rakeback page?

although some people differ I prefer claiming manually from the rakeback page. because if the rakeback is credited automatically in the user's wallet, I can't see how much total rakeback I got from my multiple bets.
actually it is more effective if it is credited automatically, not wasting time bothering to claim the manual, but for me claiming the manual can make a gambler know whether the rakeback given by the casino is correct. because usually sometimes there are systems that go wrong and make rakeback not the same as what we bet on certain bets

[Maus0728]

Heya! I've been thinking to participate in becoming a ninja investor which means I needed to deposit some money out of my pocket. With that, I also want to take advantage of the 200% initial deposit bonus? Do you have any tips to claim the bonus with the least possible risk?

Plus, can someone explain how this works?

"Wager will be counted for the bets which have more than 31% win or lose."

Thank you!!

[Fivestar4everMVP]

70% Rakeback is now activated. This will last for an hour so make sure to make a bet as mich as possible. Good luck folks! See you there.

Yes, It's now there, and this will run for 1 hour between 14:00 CET to 15:00 CET. But the first day it was run for 2 hours



Some new updates that happened recently are, the landing page is now looking so nice.

The graphics in the landing-page looks like BlackJack.Fun is planning to launch its own NFT collection. Am I right?

 

I highly doubt they have any plans of launching their own NFT collection in the future, but then, i agree with you, those graphics on the landing page will give some new visitors the impression that blackjack also have an NFT project on or coming in the future.

Had it been that NFTs are still trending like they were 1 or 2 years ago, i think it would have been a great idea for them to venture into it, with the kind of community blackjack on this forum and even outside this forum, i personally think their success in NFTs will come pretty easy.

[sujonali1819]

Heya! I've been thinking to participate in becoming a ninja investor which means I needed to deposit some money out of my pocket. With that, I also want to take advantage of the 200% initial deposit bonus? Do you have any tips to claim the bonus with the least possible risk?

Plus, can someone explain how this works?

"Wager will be counted for the bets which have more than 31% win or lose."

Thank you!!

You can claim the first deposit bonus with that. But you have to wager it with only the deposited money means you can not wager with the bonus money which will be credited to you as first deposit bonus. To know more about it please read here: https://blackjack.fun/campaign/first-deposit

"Wager will be counted for the bets which have more than 31% win or lose."

Some people try to abuse the wagering contest by playing Plinko, roulette, etc games where if you want you can easily wager with max draw bet. Why they applied these rules so that people can not abuse it. Btw it means if your game result wins/lose of more than 31% the bet will not be counted for the wager.  for example, if you make a 1$ bet and you win a 1.3x / 0.70x multiplier it will not be counted, But if the result is a 1.34x / 0.66x  multiplier it will be counted for the wager.

[klidex]

If Ninja Investor is used to be able to risk money by investing in casino bankrolls with the aim of having passive income, then if the price of cryptocurrency decreases, we will also lose money with the funds we save in the bankroll, which must be in the form of certain crypto.

The "For more information" section has already mentioned that your funds aren't tied up to the casino's bankroll, which means that your money is unaffected regardless of whether someone wins or loses big time. Thus, your money will grow over time depending on how long you've staked it.

Of course, whenever crypto goes south, you'd definitely expect the value to go down as well, but not the quantity of your investment. So overall, there is really nothing to worry about losing your investment in the long run, except how blackjack.fun will handle the security of your funds, as you are expected to give them your money without having access to your private keys.

Yes, thanks in advance and I already know about the information as you said because some time ago I read it in its entirety.
And it turns out that some of my friends have already used this feature and they told me it's pretty good and can be relied on.

By making a deposit there and leaving the funds stored so that we don't need to use these funds, will it be able to provide benefits in the future because you said that this was an opportunity for us.
To be honest, I have never used the Ninja Investor feature myself so I don't really know about it, but I was curious so I wanted to try it because some people say that the Ninja Investor feature is actually quite good.
Maybe tomorrow or in the next few days I will try to use it to be able to prove for myself whether it is true that this feature can be relied on and can provide profit opportunities for its use there.

Although your post is an obvious spam post for signature campaign quota, I will answer you the Ninja investor feature since I’m using it before when it was new release. It’s a staking which you will invest your money on the casino bankroll in exchange for passive income. It’s like a DeFi inside the casino but the only difference was you are investing on bankroll.

I already forgot this feature and I thought all the slot is already full a long time ago since the announcement banner is not on the front page.

Actually this is not a spam post because to be able to fulfill my signature campaign, but I am posting it here to find out some information that I haven't got.
I'm asking you because I'm interested and want to try the Ninja Investor feature but I don't know much information about it.
If Ninja Investor is used to be able to risk money by investing in casino bankrolls with the aim of having passive income, then if the price of cryptocurrency decreases, we will also lose money with the funds we save in the bankroll, which must be in the form of certain crypto.

Actually everything is plain and simple if you click the ninja investor banner to check the content that’s I made such comment to you. If you are really sincerely asking then I think an apology from me is inevitable. This is just a plain and simple staking to earn passive profit like DeFi, You don’t any risk on losing money on this investment and the only thing you should worry is if the casino stop operating while you have an active investment. But investment scheme on Ninja investor program is purely a passive income in exchange for borrowing your money to use in the bankroll.


2 hours to go for the Blackjack.fun party? Am I right with the time zone?

OK, I can see and understand what you mean.
But what actually happened before was I really really intended to ask for information before I read it.
Yes, it's true that neither I nor anyone else will be worried if the casino stops operating when I or several people have an active investment in it, but we can limit the time we invest in casinos so that this doesn't happen to us.

[Beparanf]

Some people try to abuse the wagering contest by playing Plinko, roulette, etc games where if you want you can easily wager with max draw bet. Why they applied these rules so that people can not abuse it. Btw it means if your game result wins/lose of more than 31% the bet will not be counted for the wager.  for example, if you make a 1$ bet and you win a 1.3x / 0.70x multiplier it will not be counted, But if the result is a 1.34x / 0.66x  multiplier it will be counted for the wager.

Does a draw on house blackjack is not counted for a rakeback? So this means that all games that resulted to draw regardless of the winning percentage of that game will be not qualified for rakeback right?

Is there a page available to read the ToS of the rakeback system? Honestly it’s very hard to compute those eligible rakeback percentage once you are on the actual game. Is there a game available which those game result percentage ignored?

[sujonali1819]

Some people try to abuse the wagering contest by playing Plinko, roulette, etc games where if you want you can easily wager with max draw bet. Why they applied these rules so that people can not abuse it. Btw it means if your game result wins/lose of more than 31% the bet will not be counted for the wager.  for example, if you make a 1$ bet and you win a 1.3x / 0.70x multiplier it will not be counted, But if the result is a 1.34x / 0.66x  multiplier it will be counted for the wager.

Does a draw on house blackjack is not counted for a rakeback? So this means that all games that resulted to draw regardless of the winning percentage of that game will be not qualified for rakeback right?

Is there a page available to read the ToS of the rakeback system? Honestly it’s very hard to compute those eligible rakeback percentage once you are on the actual game. Is there a game available which those game result percentage ignored?

As I remembered it was counted for the wagering contest. So if it is counting for the wagering contest then yeah it also should be counted for the rakebake, and the 50% house edge will be counted for the rakeback.

You are right, it's really hard to know the game house edge % without a list. I will suggest them to add it. And if you are looking for a game that is out of 33% result rules, it could be only house blackjack.

[redsun114]

It's crediting the user's wallet automatically after the cut-off time, but what do you think is better? crediting the rakeback automatically to the user's wallet or user able to claim it manually from the rakeback page?

For me it’s manually claim for the rakeback on the rakeback page is more appropriate since user can check how much they earn and store it safe first so that they will not spent if they are currently doing gambling. Also making it automatically credited the moment player place a bet is a cool feature too for a better tracking on rakeback earned.

Manual claiming is what I often see the most but if they can do it automatically then that would be interesting too. If we want to track how much rakeback we earned, I think we can always check that in the transaction history. I guess each casino has this feature as it was important. Having a manual rakeback has its advantage, and that is the same as what you said. A user can choose to not claim it for a while if it's still small. Actually, this is what I am doing now.

I also practice to not look at my rakeback too often because if I do, I got tempted on claiming it and then busting it out instantly. Also, not checking it often will give the illusion that your rakebacks are growing faster.

[Dewi Aries]

Manual claiming is what I often see the most but if they can do it automatically then that would be interesting too. If we want to track how much rakeback we earned, I think we can always check that in the transaction history.

This suggestion is already on the list and the team is working on this feature , yesterday the admin has confirmed it
I'm guessing before March it will be available I know they have a reliable team like the recently updated interface looks more attractive.

[Mahdirakib]

I think rakeback will be a permanent loyalty bonus system or at least for a long time. And for the deposit bonus, I'm not sure how long this will be. I will ask them about it and update this post.

Any update about these? I won't update the deposit bonus information in my thread if it is offered for a short period of time. But I will update the rakeback information in the table soon.

Some new updates that happened recently are, the landing page is now looking so nice.

This one is looking pretty cool. I was impressed by watching those new banners at Blackjack.fun. It won't be bad to restart the signature campaign in the forum for a few weeks with those cool avatars. What does Blackjack.fun team think about it?

[sujonali1819]

I think rakeback will be a permanent loyalty bonus system or at least for a long time. And for the deposit bonus, I'm not sure how long this will be. I will ask them about it and update this post.

Any update about these? I won't update the deposit bonus information in my thread if it is offered for a short period of time. But I will update the rakeback information in the table soon.

Some new updates that happened recently are, the landing page is now looking so nice.

This one is looking pretty cool. I was impressed by watching those new banners at Blackjack.fun. It won't be bad to restart the signature campaign in the forum for a few weeks with those cool avatars. What does Blackjack.fun team think about it?

Sorry for the delay. As I got a answer from the tesm that there is a big chance that the 20% rakeback will last long. And I have also asked them to about the first deposit bonus, they told me that this will be running for Good. So I think it also could  be a long term. But yes ofcorse platform could change their mind anytime anyways according situation.

For the marketting campaign, maybe this can also be reopened in near future. But there is no exact date yet.

[Wind_FURY]

For me it doesn't matter, but it would probably better to be credited the rakeback every 30 days, during the end of the month to have something to expect, and welcome in our balance every month. I believe users would have a tendency to manually claim, then gamble with them as soon as they can if given that choice, which might also make them feel less willing to play next time if they also lose the rakeback.

Cashback is usually have this kind of duration since it’s the percentage on the amount of loss done by the player. Rakeback is just part of the house edge and that’s is just so small to be hold for 30 days.

@Sujonali, is there plan to have another cashback event but this time for all players including low bankroll. The last event focus only on whales but I remember last time that Blackjack.fun has some deposit bonus event based on tier that varies wagering requirements. Maybe this time the new cashback event will have a tier that varies the percentage based on the user bankroll/loss value.

My suggestion for how to make the wagering requirements more "equitable" for whales and plebs, plus the casino, is to release the bonus/cashback at some amount, for example $0.01 per some amount of wagers, in this example let's say $5.00. That's only 0.2% of the $5.00, which is the total wagered in the example.

It will encourage the users to play more, and more consistently to clear the bonus, than discourage the player from clearing the bonus, making him/her either play somewhere else, or stop entirely.

[dimonstration]

My suggestion for how to make the wagering requirements more "equitable" for whales and plebs, plus the casino, is to release the bonus/cashback at some amount, for example $0.01 per some amount of wagers, in this example let's say $5.00. That's only 0.2% of the $5.00, which is the total wagered in the example.

It will encourage the users to play more, and more consistently to clear the bonus, than discourage the player from clearing the bonus, making him/her either play somewhere else, or stop entirely.

Agree on this. As pleb gambler, I understand and support this kind of idea to encourage plebs to pursue claiming bonus because the current wagering requirements is so high and plebs will not gonna extend their budget just to claim that.

Btw is there a news regarding the duration if this locked bonus? Having time duration will give the bonus system a major turn off since they already increased it to x70 if I remember correctly. Also do you already claimed your locked bonus before with x40 wagering requirements. I think it already grows a lot since Bitcoin price increase.

[Maus0728]

Btw it means if your game result wins/lose of more than 31% the bet will not be counted for the wager.  for example, if you make a 1$ bet and you win a 1.3x / 0.70x multiplier it will not be counted, But if the result is a 1.34x / 0.66x  multiplier it will be counted for the wager.

Okay?

So, let's say for example, the wager is counted when I am playing a coin toss which have the probability of winning the bet of 50%? So for the DICE game ^{(does blackjack offer any DICE game?)}, the slider should have more than 31% of winning probability whether it is "rolllover" or "roll-under"?

And since there is no minimum bet required, does that mean I can bet as low as possible with more than 31% of winning probability?

[Dewi Aries]

Okay?

So, let's say for example, the wager is counted when I am playing a coin toss which have the probability of winning the bet of 50%? So for the DICE game ^{(does blackjack offer any DICE game?)}, the slider should have more than 31% of winning probability whether it is "rolllover" or "roll-under"?

And since there is no minimum bet required, does that mean I can bet as low as possible with more than 31% of winning probability?

Except for in house games all bets will be counted including wins and losses also for slots games as far as I know all are counted
only live games require a 30% win to be counted as a wager there are also some other games like Dice , France roulette basically a game that has a 50:50 chance of winning, unfortunately the explanation about this is not posted on their blog we found out about this via chat room.