Which is better ICO, STO Or IEO ?

[redsun114]

I guess this topic has been discussed many times, to me all are the same, it is just an upgrade as far as am concern. Investors have lost hope in ICO, so dev and team coming up with another way of attracting investors in the form of STO and IEO.

How come all of them be called the same models if they are upgraded forms of each other? I do not think they are all same and this is because a flaw in ICO was covered by STO which had been more compliant to regulations. IEO have been yet more successful for their exchange deal with the fundraising and not the project team which focus on the project improvement.

[joseyphil82]

ICO ,STO and IEO are all good ways to gather funds for a project ,what matters is how good the project is ,and the teams how serious are they ,there are few steps that always leads to better result when raising funds

[ashaksagnis]

STO and IEO will be better and STO is more secured. That gives at least some guarantee that you will not be scamed.

[Stanlo]

I prefer IEO over others because it tackles scammers off and ICO and STO can't do that ,thanks to popular exchanges though ,I think  they are more careful which project to promote

[welovedcrypto]

IEO is best but ICO is also best if legitness of team is proved. IEO is hosted on exchanges where tokensale owners has to pay fees (in some cases fees are too much high). And ICO are completed without any extra charge for ICO team.

[uniquark]

STO and IEO will be better and STO is more secured. That gives at least some guarantee that you will not be scamed.

STO is still a method of selling tokens from the team, so it is still risky for investors. The only current IEO is that investors make sure they are not cheated, but still have the potential to lose money if they invest in IEO at small exchange.

[smyslov]

What do you think, IEO better than ICO or STO or they are just the same with only difference in system?

They are all crowdfunding platform, ICO was the first to come but with so many fail ICO, STO and IEO are launches, which offers a good and safe place to invest, of the three IEO and STO are going to stay and ICO will soon vanish, because of so many scammers launching in ICO.

[ManoPrimitiva]

I think it depends completely in the project planning and goals.

• ICO is the base and best option for those who do not intend to get their coin/token listed right away; for example, if some project runs a plan such as the EOS ICO, that was one year long and dynamic price.
• IEO offers a more comfortable option if the project looks to list right away and does not want to engage in KYC protocols, since the exchange will be doing such task.
• STO is only in the case of security token base projects, and it differs from the other two.

In my opinion, non is better than the other, they just serve different purposes.

[rapsa2018]

Many of ico just change on their minds and taking up for giving for their tokens sale to offer other exchanges and making an ieo. Lot of bounties making ieo so its a good decission.

[bittick]

What do you think, IEO better than ICO or STO or they are just the same with only difference in system?

They are all crowdfunding platform, ICO was the first to come but with so many fail ICO, STO and IEO are launches, which offers a good and safe place to invest, of the three IEO and STO are going to stay and ICO will soon vanish, because of so many scammers launching in ICO.

Well it really seems that people are switching over to IEO didnt it? I mean it is obvious when someone given the option to choose safer way of investing while not givung away anything in compensation that easily a win for the investors.

[Remainder]

Many of ico just change on their minds and taking up for giving for their tokens sale to offer other exchanges and making an ieo.

That is because they realize that ICO is not viable anymore, there is only a few percentage of success for ICO now.

Lot of bounties making ieo so its a good decission.

Even if they are adopting the IEO, they still need the bounty hunters to promote the project.
Good project like harmony had bounty even if it was in the Binance Launchpad and it's a guaranteed success if you are in Binance.

[Nickz46]

Due to process and to their objective is the same. The only advantage of IEO is that they are the one reviewing the project and investors are relief this way since they aren't gonna be scared to invest in random platform cause exchange will be the one at fault if they introduced a scam project. But Id still hope STO and ICO will work out more into ots goodness since it was started like we used to.  Maybe time will tell again when will be thr trust to the ICOs will return for many investors. But for me, cryptomarket was really huge for all investors to have a good investment because there's a lot of projects in here like the dencoin that can give them also a good future investments like we always wanted.

[reynald70]

I personally like the IEO rather than the ICO for now, because the IEO is more convenient and safer to invest, especially the IEO at the large Binance market, because so far the IEO at Binance has always been good and has never disappointed.

[airdagon]

For now, I think IEO is the best, because almost all IEOs have benefited crypto investors, maybe later there will only be IEO and STO because their quality is better than ICO

[mackstuart]

To date, the most successful attraction of funds is of course the exchange placement of IEO coins,  but do not forget about the ICO is also a very successful tool for raising funds!

[Karlinz]

IEO's wouldn't have been successful if they weren't better, so far most fund raisings have been made through IEO's than ICO's recently, this is because they provide a certain level of security and confidence among investors and thereby making it possible for investors to have some trust in investing with them. At least the funds are protected through escrow exchanges and no longer directly into the developers account.

[levvv]

What do you think, IEO better than ICO or STO or they are just the same with only difference in system?

I think they are same, but IEO is more safe than common ICO or STO.
In IEO that launched by top exchanges, im sure it has passed many requirements before it listed.

[drumamat]

What do you think, IEO better than ICO or STO or they are just the same with only difference in system?

In principle, the end result is the same everywhere.But let's say, I have never participated in STO.Also, at the moment I do not even know where to trade this type of tokens.Perhaps because of this, few people invest in STO.

[escalante28]

In my humble opinion, the best way to invest is in STO because STO is much safer than ICO since they comply with securities laws and they are also backed underlying asset, while IEO main advantages are trusted but full of hype so that they can push their native token.
In long term investment still, STO is the best but if you need an instant profit then go for IEO.

ICO is a thing that you don't have to think about, its history can make you decide immediately. LOL.

[santouao]

We have own opinions about this topic but for me it depends in the quality of the project and its products,so i will not lloking if what fundraising they do as strategies in making funds but the matter is how good the project is to attract investors and to make sure that they will have the profits in the investments they invest.