SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[Iamtutut]

More fun...

[Iamtutut]

I dug up a little more, it's so much fun...

Yep, a dead Dave Kleiman was able to send emails to Craiggy, this is a miracle !!

[JayJuanGee]

I dug up a little more, it's so much fun...

Yep, a dead Dave Kleiman was able to send emails to Craiggy, this is a miracle !!

If possible, you should attempt to cite the source of that information, Iamtutut (and maybe links, too), or else say that you do not know the source or that you do not have any links.  It should be easy for anyone to verify the accuracy of what you posted and maybe even to build upon the information to any extent feasible.  I know that we might not have access to all of the information and sometimes even you might be getting the information from other incomplete sources, but if we have that information, we should provide it when posting.

I am thinking that the latest post is from portions of the affidavit of Andreas Antonopolis.. but I might be wrong.. I cannot tell from your post.

[Hueristic]

If possible, you should attempt to cite the source of that information, Iamtutut (and maybe links, too), or else say that you do not know the source or that you do not have any links.  It should be easy for anyone to verify the accuracy of what you posted and maybe even to build upon the information to any extent feasible.  I know that we might not have access to all of the information and sometimes even you might be getting the information from other incomplete sources, but if we have that information, we should provide it when posting.

I am thinking that the latest post is from portions of the affidavit of Andreas Antonopolis.. but I might be wrong.. I cannot tell from your post.

I googlefu'd this but thats as far as i'm looking.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/

It looks like the noose around craigies neck is tightening.

[JayJuanGee]

If possible, you should attempt to cite the source of that information, Iamtutut (and maybe links, too), or else say that you do not know the source or that you do not have any links.  It should be easy for anyone to verify the accuracy of what you posted and maybe even to build upon the information to any extent feasible.  I know that we might not have access to all of the information and sometimes even you might be getting the information from other incomplete sources, but if we have that information, we should provide it when posting.

I am thinking that the latest post is from portions of the affidavit of Andreas Antonopolis.. but I might be wrong.. I cannot tell from your post.

I googlefu'd this but thats as far as i'm looking.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/

It looks like the noose around craigies neck is tightening.

Yep it is probably from one of those documents that is linked in those court documents.... I am not sure which one of the documents either from Iamtutut's post.

[Iamtutut]

If possible, you should attempt to cite the source of that information, Iamtutut (and maybe links, too), or else say that you do not know the source or that you do not have any links.  It should be easy for anyone to verify the accuracy of what you posted and maybe even to build upon the information to any extent feasible.  I know that we might not have access to all of the information and sometimes even you might be getting the information from other incomplete sources, but if we have that information, we should provide it when posting.

I am thinking that the latest post is from portions of the affidavit of Andreas Antonopolis.. but I might be wrong.. I cannot tell from your post.

I googlefu'd this but thats as far as i'm looking.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/

It looks like the noose around craigies neck is tightening.

Yep it is probably from one of those documents that is linked in those court documents.... I am not sure which one of the documents either from Iamtutut's post.

That's the very source, I only quote the documents sourced from the case.

Screens come from several docs, eg:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.547.0.pdf
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.548.3.pdf

[Iamtutut]

If possible, you should attempt to cite the source of that information, Iamtutut (and maybe links, too), or else say that you do not know the source or that you do not have any links.  It should be easy for anyone to verify the accuracy of what you posted and maybe even to build upon the information to any extent feasible.  I know that we might not have access to all of the information and sometimes even you might be getting the information from other incomplete sources, but if we have that information, we should provide it when posting.

I am thinking that the latest post is from portions of the affidavit of Andreas Antonopolis.. but I might be wrong.. I cannot tell from your post.

I googlefu'd this but thats as far as i'm looking.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/

It looks like the noose around craigies neck is tightening.

Gold and diamonds mine found.

[BitcoinFX]

"... Craig Wright 2019                                                                  

"Satoshi Nakamoto was me, David Kleiman & David Rees."

Craig Wright 2020

"Satoshi Nakamoto was me, Donald Lynam & Gareth Williams." ..."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1267963994842767360



...



 

...snip...

hv keeps on lying and bullshiting

Justice Bruce Reinhart:
"Particularly given my prior finding that Dr. Wright has produced forged documents in this litigation, I decline to rely on this kind of document, which could easily have been generated by anyone with word processing software and a pen."

...snip...

Or perhaps it was a pencil ...

"Craig Wright - The $1,200 pencil

Did this anecdote make its way to the BSV community already? And @PeterMcCormack's counsel might prepare for this stunning evidence also!

From "Craig Wright: The Man Who Didn't Invent Bitcoin" - @GQMagazine Nov 2016

https://www.gq.com.au/entertainment/tech/craig-wright-the-man-who-didnt-invent-bitcoin/news-story/d17a269e4b2aeb331dad51e1c3e2d7cf "



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1252494392214073344

 

...

"And last but not least, another dead person is introduced in the #Faketoshi saga: David Reese.

In this article Craig talked about David Reese' role.
https://finder.com/dr-craig-wright-explains-the-origins-of-bitcoin-full-interview

End."

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1263974135136497668

...

The Finer Points of David Rees...
- https://youtu.be/KabOfnbS4TQ

 

Complete and utter total 'madness' !


In other news ...

@coinyeezy demonstrates that Twetch is in fact crypto-fascist, in a single tweet!

"if you want free speech then pay for it"
- https://twitter.com/coinyeezy/status/1266290136301498368

 

...

- https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=crypto-fascist

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto-fascism

"Usage ...

... In colloquial use, crypto-fascism can sometimes describe the means through which cryptofascists engage in public discourse, using methods that would not explicitly reveal their nature, while still supporting their goals through dog-whistle politics or by attempting to engage in conversations that are critical to their beliefs. This is done with the intent to shift the focus away from criticism, often onto some minor detail or tangent. [citation needed] ..."

 

To all Twetch users: Freedom of Speech isn't free if you have to pay to speak and/or be incentivized to be heard.

[Iamtutut]

This where I got these screenshots:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.549.0.pdf pages 24 & 25

[xtraelv]

I'm a bit sad he hasn't come after me or other Bitcointalkers yet -- what are we, chopped liver? This is his forum, after all (supposedly).

My bet is there are peops here who could put him away for a long time and he knows it.

I think he has bigger problems.

No statute of limitations on indictable offenses in New South Wales / Australia.

[BitcoinFX]

"Arrest these clowns, already ..." - SWIM

...

"Somewhere deep in the woods of Slovenia . . .

@PuhekR, CSW + red shoes"
- https://twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1235261228903211011



...

"Yes CSW now has red shoes."
- https://twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1235207889406570496

[Iamtutut]

This one describes him better.

[Last of the V8s]

why do they all have to be so uncertain of their sexuality? tiny cox i guess

[Cryptotourist]

why do they all have to be so uncertain of their sexuality? tiny cox i guess

[Should really make a meme about this.]

Backstage:



https://www.xnxx.com/video-jmyo715/girls_humiliate_your_tiny_penis_with_countdown_

[Iamtutut]

Our favorite fraud and his Australian tax rebate issues...
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.547.7.pdf (p11)


Conclusion:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.547.6.pdf

[BitcoinFX]

" ... Interviewer: "Hey Craig, how do you explain the 145 addressed that signed "Craig is a fraud" last week ?"

Craig: " No message was signed, you can't sign anonymously - you have to have an identity to sign....key don't count..I gotta go...be" ... "
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1268366834287312897

- https://youtu.be/PHBrodzl5qY?t=5103

...

Craig Wright says anyone that thinks his credibility is now in tatters “doesn’t understand digital signatures at all”
- https://twitter.com/Cointelegraph/status/1268395563042701312

‘No Message Was Signed’: Craig Wright Refutes Tulip Trust Fabrication
- https://cointelegraph.com/news/no-message-was-signed-craig-wright-refutes-tulip-trust-fabrication

 

...

"Dear @Cointelegraph
I've updated the thumbnail art to your recent article. Kindly update the article with this on your website and social media channels.
Thanks,
BitcoinMemeHub"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1268404628019798016



 

...

"... Get tomorr' on the phone ..."
- https://youtu.be/5JhKWFxLhKo?t=182


"self professed #Satoshi - inventor of Bitcoin - gives evidence in Florida court that he used an iPhone in 2006.  the first model was commercially released at the end of June 2007 "
- https://twitter.com/afentis/status/1268806894245818369



...

"June 29, 2007 that was.

Not really a surprise though, Craig Wright has his channels to use things like Microsoft patches, email programs like Bitmessage etc days, weeks or months before release."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1268857685736390656



...

"By the way, let it be known that the first iPhone was only released in Australia (where Craig Wright lived in these years) in July 2008.

https://twitter.com/SkiveTM/status/1268876736223199232 "

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1268950006553329666

...

"From a quick google search it gets even worse


11th july 2008! "
- https://twitter.com/SkiveTM/status/1268876736223199232

 

[gentlemand]

Craigy's legal failure rate keeps up its 100% record.



https://twitter.com/hodlonaut/status/1269999617413984261

This is only regarding jurisdiction and so is only the beginning of this particular failure but my spidey senses are telling me what the likelihood of the outcome will be...

Come on Craiglets, PLEASE show us one instance where he actually succeeded. I'm getting desperate now.

And more winning here - https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1269990321355730949

[JayJuanGee]

Come on Craiglets, PLEASE show us one instance where he actually succeeded. I'm getting desperate now.

And more winning here - https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1269990321355730949

I am no fucktwat supporter, but he has succeeded in keeping a bunch of dimwits following him and keeping a scam alive for many years... including forking off and maintaining some value in the market cap.  I don't know if he is making any money in regards to how much capital he has had to inject or if might have a way to exit scam with any profits (sure that is future versus past)... .

If he ends up in jail that should not be considered profitable, but I doubt that we know enough about his personal finances or how much debt he might be running to hold up various smoke and mirror appearances in order that dimwits filled with hopium are going to continue to prop up his ongoing scam project.. or maybe he can stack away some of the float, too.

[gentlemand]

I am no fucktwat supporter, but he has succeeded in keeping a bunch of dimwits following him and keeping a scam alive for many years... including forking off and maintaining some value in the market cap.  I don't know if he is making any money in regards to how much capital he has had to inject or if might have a way to exit scam with any profits (sure that is future versus past)... .

You are correct but I was thinking more along the lines of actual achievements beyond conning and lying as I'm a real old fuddy duddy and call that type of behaviour real success.

I've no doubt he'll come out with far more money than he went in with but that'll mean he's still the same piece of excrement he was before he turned up in Bitcoinland and defecated on our laps.

[BitcoinFX]

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear ...

"..."In response to each exposed forgery or lie, [Wright] produces another three to take their place."

Nailed it! That's our guy! ..."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1270283818713395200



 

BSV = REKT

¯\_(ツ)_/¯    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

#WeAreAllHodlonaut

...

Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

...

Jamie T - Sticks 'n' Stones (Official Video)
- https://youtu.be/r9APEZMeH0o