Bitcoin Forum
September 21, 2019, 02:25:12 PM *
News: If you like a topic and you see an orange "bump" link, click it. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 [659] 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 ... 726 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs  (Read 1256279 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 26, 2015, 10:09:43 AM
 #13161

Edit: They have ramped up mining power by over 350% between Q1 and Q2, so clearly things are happening.

To 140k revenue in 3 months, while also losing 1.3 million in 3 months. They've lost 14 million since starting, never ever made a profit.

1569075912
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569075912

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569075912
Reply with quote  #2

1569075912
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1569075912
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569075912

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569075912
Reply with quote  #2

1569075912
Report to moderator
1569075912
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569075912

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569075912
Reply with quote  #2

1569075912
Report to moderator
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 26, 2015, 12:02:13 PM
 #13162

To 140k revenue in 3 months, while also losing 1.3 million in 3 months. They've lost 14 million since starting, never ever made a profit.

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
August 26, 2015, 12:13:46 PM
 #13163

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 26, 2015, 12:29:24 PM
 #13164

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

If you just want the raw financials they're here, p&l, balance sheet and cash flow: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=btcs. In the 3 months to March 2015 they had $38,000 revenue while their costs were $3,380,000.

p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 26, 2015, 12:39:59 PM
 #13165

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

Ah, you were referring to BTCS - for a moment there I thought you meant SP-Tech - my bad  Wink
Minor Miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 27, 2015, 10:34:06 PM
 #13166

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

Ah, you were referring to BTCS - for a moment there I thought you meant SP-Tech - my bad  Wink

Dogie;

Can you summarize this company and what it has to do with Spons?   Sorry I am out of loop.


.
                                    ▄███▄
                                    █████▄
            ▄███▄                  ▄████▀██▄▄
            █████▄                ██▀      ▀██▄
            ▀███▀██▄▄            ██▀         ▀██▄████▄                 ▄███▄
                   ▀▀██▄▄       ██▀            ▀██████▄               ▄█████
                       ▀▀██▄▄█████▄             ▀████▀██▄▄          ▄██▀███▀
                           ▀███████               ██   ▀▀███▄    ▄██▀▀
                           ▄███████▄              ██       ▀███▄██▀
▄███▄                    ▄██▀▀███▀▀██▄▄           ██          ▀██▄
██████▄▄              ▄▄██▀          ▀██▄         ██            ▀██▄
▀███▀ ▀▀██▄▄   ▄▄████████              ▀▀██▄      ██              ▀█▄
          ▀▀██▄█████████▌                 ▀██▄▄   ██               ▀██
             ▐██████████                    ▀████████▄               ██▄
              ██████████▄                     ▐███████▄               ████▄
             ▄█████████▀██▄▄ ▄▄▄▄      ▄▄▄▄████████████               █████
            ▄██▀ ▀▀▀▀    ▀▀███████▄████▀▀▀▀▀    ████████▄              ▀▀▀
           ▄██              ██████▀               ▀▀▀▀ ▀██▄
        ▄████               ▀████▀                       ▀████▄
        █████                                              ████
         ▀▀▀                                                ▀▀
.
ShareMeAll
●    A ONE-STOP    ―――――――――――――――   ●  ●  ●  ●
OMarketplace For Sharing EverythingO
.
.
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀  █████
████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
████████████████▄▄██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀████████▀▀
Unacceptable
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 27, 2015, 10:46:26 PM
 #13167

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

Ah, you were referring to BTCS - for a moment there I thought you meant SP-Tech - my bad  Wink

Dogie;

Can you summarize this company and what it has to do with Spons?   Sorry I am out of loop.


I believe BTCS is buying & hosting the majority (if not all) of the next gen miners from SPT  Roll Eyes

"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole."  -Raylan Givens
Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be
"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan Smiley
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
August 27, 2015, 10:50:24 PM
 #13168

Can you summarize this company and what it has to do with Spons?   Sorry I am out of loop.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=521520.msg11222700#msg11222700

Arlington, VA – (Marketwired – April 28, 2015) – Bitcoin Shop, Inc. (OTCQB: BTCS) (“BTCS” or the “Company”), a blockchain technology company that engages in transaction verification services, announced today that it has signed a Letter of Intent (“LOI”) to merge with Spondoolies-Tech Ltd (“Spondoolies”), a digital currency server manufacturer.

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 27, 2015, 11:45:04 PM
 #13169

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

Ah, you were referring to BTCS - for a moment there I thought you meant SP-Tech - my bad  Wink

Dogie;

Can you summarize this company and what it has to do with Spons?   Sorry I am out of loop.

tldr they signed a letter of intent to merge [buy and integrate] Spondoolies with various terms, such as a 3 year exclusivity agreement on Spondoolies products, the transfer of staff (Guy, the CFO etc). BTCS made a small % purchase of Spondoolies stock in order to give them enough cash to tide them over while the formalities get done. Either party could theoretically cancel the transaction although there are some pretty harsh cancellation terms. For example, if Spondoolies wanted to "be bought out" by someone else, BTCS would be due $1M IIRC.

The thing is, BCTS don't appear to have enough cash to make this deal work at the crazy valuation they previously put on Spondoolies even if it was a falsely high one. It appears that they were hoping to raise even more money (on top of the $15M they've burnt through), or issue a tonne of shares. Either way, Spondoolies owes me money and isn't paying.

vpn1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 28, 2015, 12:36:25 AM
 #13170

Second miss-step this time with irrevocable repercussions. First was that failed attempt to sponsor the Russian character and his Havelock IPO where checks and balances were not in place.

The second and now catastrophic is this BCTS bullshit. Having dealt with them before at the top level, I can assure there exists a slimy rot, slick fast car salesman aspect to their operation. In other words, big hat no cattle.

They early on tested the waters in acquiring used Spondoolies - other machines, saturating these and other forums with marked shills and 'established' traders in used equipment's.  All under the pretense of buying your used equipment outright. At the end of the day the sales pitch would be after an agreed price was set and sales mechanism, to introduce the highfalutin "CEO" penny stock company man you dawdle and hum and hawed like he was some sort of mega business man, only to turn around at the end of the day to offer shares in his make believe company for the hardware you have. Not a penny to their name. Trade your hardware for their shit shares.

Guy is unfortunately and fortunately a straight shooter yet naïve. They are in going to be in a world of hurt getting wrapped up in this educated penny stock company. All goodwill, honesty and all straight shooting will go crooked. In fact I would bet money the silence you see right now is Spondoolies sitting around their conference table saying "is he a drayer or what"/:



Searing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1187


Clueless!


View Profile
August 28, 2015, 05:36:21 AM
 #13171

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

Ah, you were referring to BTCS - for a moment there I thought you meant SP-Tech - my bad  Wink

Dogie;

Can you summarize this company and what it has to do with Spons?   Sorry I am out of loop.

tldr they signed a letter of intent to merge [buy and integrate] Spondoolies with various terms, such as a 3 year exclusivity agreement on Spondoolies products, the transfer of staff (Guy, the CFO etc). BTCS made a small % purchase of Spondoolies stock in order to give them enough cash to tide them over while the formalities get done. Either party could theoretically cancel the transaction although there are some pretty harsh cancellation terms. For example, if Spondoolies wanted to "be bought out" by someone else, BTCS would be due $1M IIRC.

The thing is, BCTS don't appear to have enough cash to make this deal work at the crazy valuation they previously put on Spondoolies even if it was a falsely high one. It appears that they were hoping to raise even more money (on top of the $15M they've burnt through), or issue a tonne of shares. Either way, Spondoolies owes me money and isn't paying.

owes you money? if it is not in a NDA or something could you elaborate? If this is not to personal a guestion..if so disregard it.    ... (after seeing KNC go from a good company in 2013 to the dark side ie NUN to PORN STAR in a flash ethics wise... in 2014...kinda concerned about spondoolies falling to the zombie ASIC apocalypse due to greed as well ..probably not but just saying) Smiley

Try out www.synchro.net An 'Old School' BBS (Bulletin Board System) works on Win /10/8/7 and Linux!
Three-minute install. The last upgrade was Jan 1st, 2019. I think you will be impressed with this project!
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 28, 2015, 08:58:50 AM
 #13172

Can you provide proof/links that verify this statement?
See the financial statements section of their SEC filing (also referenced in the article); http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1436229/000149315215003734/form10-q.htm#a_002

Ah, you were referring to BTCS - for a moment there I thought you meant SP-Tech - my bad  Wink

Dogie;

Can you summarize this company and what it has to do with Spons?   Sorry I am out of loop.

tldr they signed a letter of intent to merge [buy and integrate] Spondoolies with various terms, such as a 3 year exclusivity agreement on Spondoolies products, the transfer of staff (Guy, the CFO etc). BTCS made a small % purchase of Spondoolies stock in order to give them enough cash to tide them over while the formalities get done. Either party could theoretically cancel the transaction although there are some pretty harsh cancellation terms. For example, if Spondoolies wanted to "be bought out" by someone else, BTCS would be due $1M IIRC.

The thing is, BCTS don't appear to have enough cash to make this deal work at the crazy valuation they previously put on Spondoolies even if it was a falsely high one. It appears that they were hoping to raise even more money (on top of the $15M they've burnt through), or issue a tonne of shares. Either way, Spondoolies owes me money and isn't paying.

owes you money? if it is not in a NDA or something could you elaborate? If this is not to personal a guestion..if so disregard it.    ... (after seeing KNC go from a good company in 2013 to the dark side ie NUN to PORN STAR in a flash ethics wise... in 2014...kinda concerned about spondoolies falling to the zombie ASIC apocalypse due to greed as well ..probably not but just saying) Smiley

I'm sure it is within a NDA.  Sadly some information that is not made public is due to them.   They are a pain.  I suggest anyone avoid NDA's at all costs.

I can say I don't have one with SP so I'm just speculating here.   But most likely Dogie would like to tell us much more, but cannot due to an NDA.
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
August 28, 2015, 10:02:05 AM
 #13173

I'm pretty sure dogie had posted some minor details, but either that's deleted, or edited away.  I only remember because I thought "... why hasn't Bicknellski commented on this yet?", and it's then that I realized Bick had not been around for a while.

Anyway, you can still piece together a few things:
I'm owed $134.50 in commission for a couple of sales while running their signature but because I signed up to the hardware option he's not prepared to offer me it in btc or cash even though there isn't a hardware option and probably never will be.

Its a shame, I'm owed at least 400x more than you and still also $0 from them.
400 * $134.50 = $53,800.  And they say there's little profit in Bitcoin

dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 28, 2015, 02:07:24 PM
 #13174

I'm pretty sure dogie had posted some minor details, but either that's deleted, or edited away.  I only remember because I thought "... why hasn't Bicknellski commented on this yet?", and it's then that I realized Bick had not been around for a while.

Anyway, you can still piece together a few things:
I'm owed $134.50 in commission for a couple of sales while running their signature but because I signed up to the hardware option he's not prepared to offer me it in btc or cash even though there isn't a hardware option and probably never will be.

Its a shame, I'm owed at least 400x more than you and still also $0 from them.
400 * $134.50 = $53,800.  And they say there's little profit in Bitcoin

As I've said in other threads, its far more money than Bitmain has ever, ever, ever paid and yet the trolls will claim I'm biased against Spondoolies because Bitmain contracted me for work Roll Eyes. Its also worth noting that both CanaanCreative and Bitmain paid their invoices on time, Spondoolies has not paid a penny.

Its not under NDA (both a non confidential activity and pre-exists the NDA which was signed for a very specific purpose). tldr they received a huge sale from my affiliate link, retrospectively changed the terms from a much higher tiered commission rate down to a flat %, then retrospectively changed the amount to be store credit, both of which breached their original agreement. The ~$50k is just what they admit to (but won't pay).

Tigggger
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1082
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 28, 2015, 04:24:39 PM
 #13175

Its not under NDA (both a non confidential activity and pre-exists the NDA which was signed for a very specific purpose). tldr they received a huge sale from my affiliate link, retrospectively changed the terms from a much higher tiered commission rate down to a flat %, then retrospectively changed the amount to be store credit, both of which breached their original agreement. The ~$50k is just what they admit to (but won't pay).

That's pretty scummy of them, 50k is surely worth involving lawyers.

notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 28, 2015, 04:33:08 PM
 #13176

Its not under NDA (both a non confidential activity and pre-exists the NDA which was signed for a very specific purpose). tldr they received a huge sale from my affiliate link, retrospectively changed the terms from a much higher tiered commission rate down to a flat %, then retrospectively changed the amount to be store credit, both of which breached their original agreement. The ~$50k is just what they admit to (but won't pay).

That's pretty scummy of them, 50k is surely worth involving lawyers.

Yea but were talking international laws.   Will be a pricey battle and lawyers don't come cheap.  And add a specialization of international sounds like a pricey case.

But holy cow on amount.   Did you use links that you can show all this or counting on Spondoolies on data?
edgar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 28, 2015, 07:06:56 PM
 #13177

Some of you may recall how long and exhausting it was for me to squeeze a few shekels out of them.

Genuinely sorry for dogie, cant see them coughing up even a % of that much ever if not by now.


dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1119


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
August 28, 2015, 08:48:50 PM
 #13178

Its not under NDA (both a non confidential activity and pre-exists the NDA which was signed for a very specific purpose). tldr they received a huge sale from my affiliate link, retrospectively changed the terms from a much higher tiered commission rate down to a flat %, then retrospectively changed the amount to be store credit, both of which breached their original agreement. The ~$50k is just what they admit to (but won't pay).

That's pretty scummy of them, 50k is surely worth involving lawyers.

Yea but were talking international laws.   Will be a pricey battle and lawyers don't come cheap.  And add a specialization of international sounds like a pricey case.

But holy cow on amount.   Did you use links that you can show all this or counting on Spondoolies on data?

They locked me out of the system when they went through they "disown dogie he's bad for bitcoin" phase, as if I was the bad guy. [Because I asked for payment and was refused]. They've sent plenty of data, there is no question from either side that they owe a commission for this (and lots of other) sales. This is with the manually set 5%, but I was actually on a tiered commission as follows:



Code:
    5% for conversions of up to $100,000 in one quarter
    10% for conversions between $100,000 and $500,000 in one quarter
    15% if you cross the $500,000 bar in one quarter

Approaching June 2014 I had met the first $100k of sales, and so was already on the 10% rate. The actual commission for that sale is therefore $96,100, which along with lots of smaller ones exceeds $100,000 that is unpaid.

quakefiend420
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 28, 2015, 11:21:10 PM
 #13179

Its not under NDA (both a non confidential activity and pre-exists the NDA which was signed for a very specific purpose). tldr they received a huge sale from my affiliate link, retrospectively changed the terms from a much higher tiered commission rate down to a flat %, then retrospectively changed the amount to be store credit, both of which breached their original agreement. The ~$50k is just what they admit to (but won't pay).

That's pretty scummy of them, 50k is surely worth involving lawyers.

Yea but were talking international laws.   Will be a pricey battle and lawyers don't come cheap.  And add a specialization of international sounds like a pricey case.

But holy cow on amount.   Did you use links that you can show all this or counting on Spondoolies on data?

They locked me out of the system when they went through they "disown dogie he's bad for bitcoin" phase, as if I was the bad guy. [Because I asked for payment and was refused]. They've sent plenty of data, there is no question from either side that they owe a commission for this (and lots of other) sales. This is with the manually set 5%, but I was actually on a tiered commission as follows:



Code:
    5% for conversions of up to $100,000 in one quarter
    10% for conversions between $100,000 and $500,000 in one quarter
    15% if you cross the $500,000 bar in one quarter

Approaching June 2014 I had met the first $100k of sales, and so was already on the 10% rate. The actual commission for that sale is therefore $96,100, which along with lots of smaller ones exceeds $100,000 that is unpaid.

Wow, I'd be suing them if I were you.
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 29, 2015, 01:36:10 AM
 #13180

Its not under NDA (both a non confidential activity and pre-exists the NDA which was signed for a very specific purpose). tldr they received a huge sale from my affiliate link, retrospectively changed the terms from a much higher tiered commission rate down to a flat %, then retrospectively changed the amount to be store credit, both of which breached their original agreement. The ~$50k is just what they admit to (but won't pay).

That's pretty scummy of them, 50k is surely worth involving lawyers.

Yea but were talking international laws.   Will be a pricey battle and lawyers don't come cheap.  And add a specialization of international sounds like a pricey case.

But holy cow on amount.   Did you use links that you can show all this or counting on Spondoolies on data?

They locked me out of the system when they went through they "disown dogie he's bad for bitcoin" phase, as if I was the bad guy. [Because I asked for payment and was refused]. They've sent plenty of data, there is no question from either side that they owe a commission for this (and lots of other) sales. This is with the manually set 5%, but I was actually on a tiered commission as follows:



Code:
    5% for conversions of up to $100,000 in one quarter
    10% for conversions between $100,000 and $500,000 in one quarter
    15% if you cross the $500,000 bar in one quarter

Approaching June 2014 I had met the first $100k of sales, and so was already on the 10% rate. The actual commission for that sale is therefore $96,100, which along with lots of smaller ones exceeds $100,000 that is unpaid.

Wow, I'd be suing them if I were you.

A lawyer is going to take a good chunk chances are though.  And I still think dealing with international will eat up cash even quicker on the lawsuit.

But now I can see why Guy and Dogie had words a few times.  That is a lot of cash.
Pages: « 1 ... 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 [659] 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 ... 726 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!