Bitcoin Forum
July 19, 2018, 10:19:21 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 [695] 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs  (Read 1249422 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 27, 2016, 06:20:17 PM
 #13881

Did you get anything out of them yet, apart from the occasional patronizing quip?

We filed at the Kiryat Gat Miagistrates Court on the 11th Jan, served to their lawyers (who rejected it) shortly after, and again by registered mail on 18th Jan. They've yet to file a response. The case is open to the public which means anyone can request documents from it, and although there isn't a public case docket I can post the documents on here and give a rough translation from Hebrew. I'll transfer these to a scam accusation eventually.

Thanks for translation or I would have been lost.   What is expected time frame with it being a international case?     

I was curious if it is a long drawn out process if they don't settle, or if it is half decent on time.
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. Server-assisted clients like blockchain.info rely on centralized servers to do their network verification for them. Although the server can't steal the client's bitcoins directly, it can easily execute double-spending-style attacks against the client.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1531995561
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531995561

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531995561
Reply with quote  #2

1531995561
Report to moderator
1531995561
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531995561

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531995561
Reply with quote  #2

1531995561
Report to moderator
1531995561
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1531995561

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1531995561
Reply with quote  #2

1531995561
Report to moderator
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1050


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2016, 07:33:00 PM
 #13882

Did you get anything out of them yet, apart from the occasional patronizing quip?

We filed at the Kiryat Gat Miagistrates Court on the 11th Jan, served to their lawyers (who rejected it) shortly after, and again by registered mail on 18th Jan. They've yet to file a response. The case is open to the public which means anyone can request documents from it, and although there isn't a public case docket I can post the documents on here and give a rough translation from Hebrew. I'll transfer these to a scam accusation eventually.

Thanks for translation or I would have been lost.   What is expected time frame with it being a international case?     

I was curious if it is a long drawn out process if they don't settle, or if it is half decent on time.

International doesn't change much, it'll still be 2 years. They had their chance to settle during several months of negotiations in which they did nothing, so now they'll have to explain to the judge why they're just ignoring a debt.

klondike_bar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1001

ASIC Wannabe


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 04:36:36 PM
 #13883

Date Registered:    Today at 15:17:58
Last Active:    Today at 15:33:22

Just as bad reading comprehension as your main accounts. The amounts on the receipt (from the court) are for court fees AND security of costs. Neither of which are an "expense" or attract VAT.
mad dog, name calling will not mask your humongous stupidity. The receipt is from your lawyer, not from court.
Post here the receipt from court as well.
a new account. man, this guy has time on his hands!

24" PCI-E cables with 16AWG wires and stripped ends - great for server PSU mods, best prices https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563461
No longer a wannabe - now an ASIC owner!
Spondoolies-Tech
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


It was fun while it lasted


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 07:52:52 PM
 #13884

I'm getting tired of this kinder garden playground posts.
Will remove posts tomorrow.

We released the following miners only when we were operational: SP10, SP20, SP30, SP31 and SP35.
If you see anything else offered online, it's a scam.
We designed but never completed the SP50
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1050


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 08:12:59 PM
 #13885

[There was a long conversation here with someone who was creating lots of accounts to spam. His accounts were nuked and so I've deleted my posts as they are no longer required.]

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1288


Disclaimer: Author Long BTC


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2016, 06:37:19 PM
 #13886

Memory bound hashing is very good suggestion: https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo

Does this mean that satoshi has been exploring cuckoo hashing?

WBF1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 418
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 30, 2016, 07:01:22 PM
 #13887

Selling my SP20E miners. Details here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1346627.0

Anonymous, no-registration, no-frills BCH Mining - http://luckypool.co - Get Lucky Today!
Tupsu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1003



View Profile
February 01, 2016, 11:52:07 AM
 #13888

I'm getting tired of this kinder garden playground posts.
Will remove posts tomorrow.


Please start of all posts from not nice Dogie's posts.

Spondoolies-Tech
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


It was fun while it lasted


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 12:56:36 PM
 #13889

I'm getting tired of this kinder garden playground posts.
Will remove posts tomorrow.


Please start of all posts from not nice Dogie's posts.
While he is wasting his money and sue us, I'm not going to engage him or touch his posts.
Let him dig his own hole.

We released the following miners only when we were operational: SP10, SP20, SP30, SP31 and SP35.
If you see anything else offered online, it's a scam.
We designed but never completed the SP50
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 01, 2016, 01:10:26 PM
 #13890

I'm getting tired of this kinder garden playground posts.
Will remove posts tomorrow.
Please start of all posts from not nice Dogie's posts.
While he is wasting his money and sue us, I'm not going to engage him or touch his posts.
Let him dig his own hole.

It's only a waste because you're broke. OTOH, maybe he'll do the community a service and tip you over the edge so people can move on.

You had good products, too bad you couldn't treat people in a way that inspired confidence from investors.

"I predict the Internet will soon go spectacularly supernova and in 1996 catastrophically collapse." - Robert Metcalfe, 1995
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1050


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 01:28:19 PM
 #13891

While he is wasting his money and sue us

Wouldn't your time be better spent doing CEO things, like, I don't know, instructing your junior solicitor how best to explain to the judge why you:
   a. feel you can just ignore your debts despite $m of fresh cash injections
   b. allegedly trade while insolvent
   c. continue to make decisions not in the best interest of your company - as per turning away millions in sales and investments
   d. shouldn't have your debts attached to your remaining assets
   e. shouldn't be personally included as a defendant?

p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 01, 2016, 02:25:32 PM
 #13892

I'm getting tired of this kinder garden playground posts.
Will remove posts tomorrow.


Please start of all posts from not nice Dogie's posts.
While he is wasting his money and sue us, I'm not going to engage him or touch his posts.
Let him dig his own hole.

TBH I don't see any of his (or his sidekicks) posts thanks to the ignore button, but it does make the thread untidy & difficult to have any meaningful conversation when faced with a wall of red "this user is ignored" text amongst the intelligent conversation/questions.
Moderators should move their spam to the scam section where it belongs & as forum rules require, but in the meantime I suggest thread readers report them as off-topic spam & click the ignore button if Spondoolies don't want to delete them.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1050


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
February 01, 2016, 02:33:30 PM
 #13893

+1

You do realise you're quoting Matthew Pattemore, the guy who just the other day spammed this thread with 10 different accounts? You sure do pick your partners well.

Spondoolies-Tech
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


It was fun while it lasted


View Profile WWW
February 03, 2016, 03:03:06 PM
 #13894

Congratulations to Adam Back and Blockstream for completing $55M round A. Amazing.

Guy

We released the following miners only when we were operational: SP10, SP20, SP30, SP31 and SP35.
If you see anything else offered online, it's a scam.
We designed but never completed the SP50
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1063


View Profile
February 03, 2016, 05:28:11 PM
 #13895

Congratulations to Adam Back and Blockstream for completing $55M round A. Amazing.

Guy

Blockstream/Core to Classic: I raise you 55 mil...
Classic.....
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1002


View Profile
February 03, 2016, 07:23:55 PM
 #13896

Congratulations to Adam Back and Blockstream for completing $55M round A. Amazing.

Guy

Blockstream/Core to Classic: I raise you 55 mil...
Classic.....

Well Classic is just another dead fork and it was dead before its inception because they will never have the army of bright heads that are in Core. And that applies to most of the forks past and future. We are kinda stuck with Core. I started to learn the subtle difference between Core and the rest of the forks and I'm happy with the Core even if I don't totally agree with their roadmap or decisions, but I am sure that they are currently on the right track.

iCEBREAKER is a troll! He and cypherdoc helped HashFast scam 50 Million $ from its customers !
H/w Hosting Directory & Reputation - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622998.0
Spondoolies-Tech
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


It was fun while it lasted


View Profile WWW
February 03, 2016, 09:06:25 PM
 #13897

Congratulations to Adam Back and Blockstream for completing $55M round A. Amazing.

Guy

Blockstream/Core to Classic: I raise you 55 mil...
Classic.....

Well Classic is just another dead fork and it was dead before its inception because they will never have the army of bright heads that are in Core. And that applies to most of the forks past and future. We are kinda stuck with Core. I started to learn the subtle difference between Core and the rest of the forks and I'm happy with the Core even if I don't totally agree with their roadmap or decisions, but I am sure that they are currently on the right track.
+2

We released the following miners only when we were operational: SP10, SP20, SP30, SP31 and SP35.
If you see anything else offered online, it's a scam.
We designed but never completed the SP50
klondike_bar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1001

ASIC Wannabe


View Profile
February 04, 2016, 07:09:15 PM
 #13898

Congratulations to Adam Back and Blockstream for completing $55M round A. Amazing.

Guy

Blockstream/Core to Classic: I raise you 55 mil...
Classic.....

Well Classic is just another dead fork and it was dead before its inception because they will never have the army of bright heads that are in Core. And that applies to most of the forks past and future. We are kinda stuck with Core. I started to learn the subtle difference between Core and the rest of the forks and I'm happy with the Core even if I don't totally agree with their roadmap or decisions, but I am sure that they are currently on the right track.
+2

I think its good to have alternative clients though that enable a way to 'vote' on changes in a real way (rather than in reddit and forums with no real polling methods). AFAIC, I want classic to succeed in creating a fork (or at least signalling >50% hashrate support as a signal to core devs that perhaps segwit alone isnt sufficient) to a simple 2MB blocksize and otherwise identical to BTC-Core (0.12 or anything that comes after)

besides a modest 30-50% space gain through segwit that takes a few months to really be noticed, i think we will start seeing a lot of full blocks and rising fees soon. at this point, fees are already moving above what spam transactions would pay, and if this continues it will start to push out microtransactions and make important transactions more costly. without a maxblocksize increase at that point, it basically forces bitcoin users into blockstream-designed sidechains under imposed economic conditions, rather than through appealing natural improvements/benefits that the blockchain cant provide (like 1min validation)

ps: whats up with the SP50? back when it announced (sept?) it sounded like it was weeks away from preliminary results and maybe a few months from Q1 sales. At this point theres been no real news and it could be vaporware for all we know. whens tapeout, if not the first prototype?

24" PCI-E cables with 16AWG wires and stripped ends - great for server PSU mods, best prices https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563461
No longer a wannabe - now an ASIC owner!
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1002


View Profile
February 04, 2016, 08:08:03 PM
 #13899

I was in the Gavin-train for a good period of time, but recently I have come to the conclusion that I was a bit wrong and that the Core is currently on the right track. This doesn't mean that I will support them no matter what, but trying to find out if my choice is good or not I am constantly trying to find a weak spot by asking myself questions and then searching for the answer. I will apply that to your post too in order to have some constructive discussion.

Core working on the code doesn't mean only power to do whatever they want. They are also responsible and accountable if something goes wrong. If we get to a point where the blocks are always full it is their responsibility to manage that situation. If they will not be able or if they won't do anything then everyone else will simply fork the code, change the blocksize limit to whatever they agree upon as long as it is bigger than 1MB and they will do anything in their power to continue using bitcoin the same way as they did before. Remember that it only takes one single line to change the blocksize and that is something that everyone can do so we don't depend on Core to do that.
The rage will start from the normal users who will simply reduce their number of transactions and that will impact everyone. If everyone will be impacted by the reduced number of transactions then they will take measures and the easiest way is to simply fork the Core software, bump the blocksize limit with one single line of code.

I think its good to have alternative clients though that enable a way to 'vote' on changes in a real way (rather than in reddit and forums with no real polling methods). AFAIC, I want classic to succeed in creating a fork (or at least signalling >50% hashrate support as a signal to core devs that perhaps segwit alone isnt sufficient) to a simple 2MB blocksize and otherwise identical to BTC-Core (0.12 or anything that comes after)
How would voting work? Based on what? Are we able to have a fraud proof voting system?

besides a modest 30-50% space gain through segwit that takes a few months to really be noticed, i think we will start seeing a lot of full blocks and rising fees soon. at this point, fees are already moving above what spam transactions would pay, and if this continues it will start to push out microtransactions and make important transactions more costly. without a maxblocksize increase at that point, it basically forces bitcoin users into blockstream-designed sidechains under imposed economic conditions, rather than through appealing natural improvements/benefits that the blockchain cant provide (like 1min validation)

I have learned that the wheels of change from an ecosystem move slower and slower directly proportional with its size. Since bitcoin is today much bigger than it was 5 years ago it will take a bit of time for the wheels to turn when blocks will be full and the fees will start to rise. Fortunately we already have a solution to that here and now (SegWit) which also opens the door for new improvements and buys us time in order to deploy a bigger and more complex solution (like the hardfork).

iCEBREAKER is a troll! He and cypherdoc helped HashFast scam 50 Million $ from its customers !
H/w Hosting Directory & Reputation - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622998.0
Spondoolies-Tech
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


It was fun while it lasted


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2016, 11:19:39 AM
 #13900

Congratulations to Nimrod Lehavi and Simplex team Smiley

http://www.coindesk.com/israeli-bitcoin-startup-raises-7m-in-series-a-round/

Buying Bitcoins will become much easier. Awesome company.

We released the following miners only when we were operational: SP10, SP20, SP30, SP31 and SP35.
If you see anything else offered online, it's a scam.
We designed but never completed the SP50
Pages: « 1 ... 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 [695] 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!