The return of ICOs

[asriloni]

but the problem is that ICO's reputation has been negatively viewed by most investors and their communities. Hundreds of ICO projects only benefit themselves by deceiving their victims through funding at ICO. I think what needs to be done first is to restore the trust of investors and their communities.

The trusted ico can recover the reputation of ico that has already ruined by the scammers but it can be done when this ico came from the trusted team and backed by so many big parties. AFAIK there were some icos were sold instantly too and that means the chance will always there.

[1713579313]

1713579313

[1713579313]

1713579313

[1713579313]

1713579313

[mandor]

Guys, do you think that ICOs could make a come back? I do and here is why. Every year dozens of companies raise money in Silicon Valley for startups, many pre revenue. Also, with the economy injured from nCov19, it would make sense to allow for new economies. This would include letting new startups in Blockchain raise money, and imo if they are well vetted, and trusted by the community, they should be allowed to raise money. What do you think?

I think ICO is not a bad thing if it is managed by good people. However, since a lot of fraud occurred at ICO, investors have switched to IEO. Before 2018, there was no IEO, maybe there was but not as excited as now. But ICO is the success of all projects, and we can now see tokens in many exchanges. I think for the time being it is very difficult to develop ICO.

ICO reputation has been threatened and most who manage ICO are is the scammers and that it's makes many investors no longer trust ICO. IEO is now a good solution because the level of fraud is very small and makes many investors comfortable or safe. the ICO heyday is over and I think it's possible will not to come back again. it's just in my opinion and correct my words if I'm wrong.

[BigBos]

but the problem is that ICO's reputation has been negatively viewed by most investors and their communities. Hundreds of ICO projects only benefit themselves by deceiving their victims through funding at ICO. I think what needs to be done first is to restore the trust of investors and their communities.

you are right. if there is a sale that is well known or back in popularity at the moment, I'm sure it's IEO, not ICO. Well, we know that the advantages of IEO are more than ICO, and the market is also quite clear. however, quite a lot of people have been disappointed with ICO, and when ICO returns, I think investors will still think hard to invest there.

[huu78]

Guys, do you think that ICOs could make a come back? I do and here is why. Every year dozens of companies raise money in Silicon Valley for startups, many pre revenue. Also, with the economy injured from nCov19, it would make sense to allow for new economies. This would include letting new startups in Blockchain raise money, and imo if they are well vetted, and trusted by the community, they should be allowed to raise money. What do you think?

I see very good if like that, but who will verify them? can it be trusted too? now again the hype is also token ICOs like in 2018 back then only now with the uniswap platform.
I'm sure there are also many scammers there because there are so many tokens they make and auto listings on Uniswap. still, we must be careful in taking investment steps, do not let our money be given to scammers.

[osasshem]

At the time when ICOs was the order of the crypto day, that was when geniue projects comes in and end successfully, but when the projects became too many that one can hardly see the good from the bad, it started wearing down. Lots of investors who lost their money at the end of the day will not even look at the idea of ICO. I am an altcoin enthusiast, but worked with lots of these ICOs without receiving my pay at the end. IEO is now more safer to all, mostly, the investors. Thanks.

[elyas772]

I think 95% of them are scams. It's literally free money to those creating them. Have there been a few decent ones here and there? Sure. But I stopped touching them for the most part in 2017. I find most people make money as soon as they end up on exchanges and everyone tries to sell before everyone else. That's not an investment, its just poorly executed arbitrage.

[RenBct]

IEO basically replaced ICO. So, for me I don't mind if ICO will have a come back. But personally. If it did, I would still prefer IEO projects because I feel safer with it compared to ICO.

[Spaffin]

I read an article that shows the indicators of attracting funds to the cryptocurrency market from August 2013 to March 2020 with the help of ICO and IEO and this is $ 33 billion that startup developers managed to attract. And only $ 4.7 billion was collected for the period 2019-2020. I have been interested in this issue recently and therefore drew attention to the Bloomchain study, which stated that the ICO share has increased slightly in recent years: 76% instead of 70% a quarter earlier. But IEO has a drop rate from 30% to 24% in the same period. Based on this data, I believe that icon still has prospects, although interest in this has declined slightly.

[memed97]

IEO basically replaced ICO. So, for me I don't mind if ICO will have a come back. But personally. If it did, I would still prefer IEO projects because I feel safer with it compared to ICO.

Everyone obviously will not mind if the ICO can return, but to return the ICO seems to have been very difficult because people's trust in ICO is gone and you even say you prefer IEO on the grounds that you feel safer compared to ICO.

[makishart]

IEO basically replaced ICO. So, for me I don't mind if ICO will have a come back. But personally. If it did, I would still prefer IEO projects because I feel safer with it compared to ICO.

IEO offers a better thing than ico. IEO will be listed on the exchange site who have been launching it and ico needs to apply manually to be listed on the exchange site and i know that if you still prefer IEO rather than ICO caused by this thing but we should not underrated the ico too.

[trauchot]

Investors already know that investing in ICOs is too huge risk and therefore only small part of experienced investors invest in cryptocurrency companies that conduct ICOs, most of the new investors who invest in ICOs are most likely newcomers, so I don’t think that we need cryptocurrency companies that conduct ICOs but not IEOs.

[riso2015]

ICO reputation has been threatened and most who manage ICO are is the scammers and that it's makes many investors no longer trust ICO. IEO is now a good solution because the level of fraud is very small and makes many investors comfortable or safe. the ICO heyday is over and I think it's possible will not to come back again. it's just in my opinion and correct my words if I'm wrong.

Agree, I also think ICO won't come back again, Because investors no longer trust ICO projects. So I think it will be useless if there are projects will make an ICO again. They will only waste their time and money because the IEO project is here to bring convenience for investors.

[Skinny48]

Guys, do you think that ICOs could make a come back? I do and here is why. Every year dozens of companies raise money in Silicon Valley for startups, many pre revenue. Also, with the economy injured from nCov19, it would make sense to allow for new economies. This would include letting new startups in Blockchain raise money, and imo if they are well vetted, and trusted by the community, they should be allowed to raise money. What do you think?

Im saying this on behalf of many investors in crypto space today, ICO rekt many and the door to ICO was shut forever, it ain't coming back again pal, let's talk about IEO and DEFi projects because I believe that's where the real money is right now

[tvplus006]

ICO reputation has been threatened and most who manage ICO are is the scammers and that it's makes many investors no longer trust ICO. IEO is now a good solution because the level of fraud is very small and makes many investors comfortable or safe. the ICO heyday is over and I think it's possible will not to come back again. it's just in my opinion and correct my words if I'm wrong.

To conduct an IEO, the initial capital or the presence of an investor in the project is required. And the better the exchange, the more money is required to conduct it. Therefore, many companies conduct ICO to collect the necessary amount for conducting an IEO.

[Botnake]

ICO reputation has been threatened and most who manage ICO are is the scammers and that it's makes many investors no longer trust ICO. IEO is now a good solution because the level of fraud is very small and makes many investors comfortable or safe. the ICO heyday is over and I think it's possible will not to come back again. it's just in my opinion and correct my words if I'm wrong.

To conduct an IEO, the initial capital or the presence of an investor in the project is required. And the better the exchange, the more money is required to conduct it. Therefore, many companies conduct ICO to collect the necessary amount for conducting an IEO.

That seems to be the new trend now, the process is longer and it's like a per stage crowdfunding as they need to be successful in ICO first before they can proceed into IEO. In IEO it does not mean the project would succeed as the price might dump when listed in exchange whether from a big or small exchange, but of course for big exchange there's a better chance but it's up to the project if they are willing to gamble for that as once it failed to attract investors and price will dump at the opening of trading, most likely it will be hard for a project to recover as they don't have the confidence of the investors.

[Galley]

The departed, most likely not to return. The ICO has completely exhausted itself, along with the hopes of investors that they placed on it. The development of the crypto industry is very rapid, therefore, new paths are needed that are difficult but paved, so there will be no return.

[Twinkledoe]

The departed, most likely not to return. The ICO has completely exhausted itself, along with the hopes of investors that they placed on it. The development of the crypto industry is very rapid, therefore, new paths are needed that are difficult but paved, so there will be no return.

I have the same sentiments towards this crowdsourcing saga. There's no going back to where scammers got a hold a huge amount of money leaving disheartened investors. But there are still few projects trying to handle their respective ICOs. But I doubt they will ever reach their targets. They will be lucky if they can hit their soft caps. So for these developers, they need to find more solid sources of funds if they indeed want their project realized.

[istiak2277]

IEO getting more and more popular nowadays. People are not willing to invest in any project that won't give investors guaranteed to exchange their token in the market. Thats why people like IEO because its gives them guarantee of listing token in that exchange that IEO will be available. So technically IEO and ICO are almost the same so I think We do not need ICO as long as IEO can do that same task.

[Coin BTC]

Guys, do you think that ICOs could make a come back? I do and here is why. Every year dozens of companies raise money in Silicon Valley for startups, many pre revenue. Also, with the economy injured from nCov19, it would make sense to allow for new economies. This would include letting new startups in Blockchain raise money, and imo if they are well vetted, and trusted by the community, they should be allowed to raise money. What do you think?

Do investors still trust ICO?
If investors still believe in ICO, I think ICO will run well. The process of project success depends on the investor. Public trust is very important for crypto. Because crypto investment is not a real investment, like people investing in gold, and apartments or real estate.
Why Bitcoin really maintains its reputation or public trust. Because when they created Bitcoin, it was very difficult for them to gain public trust. It's not as easy as people now invest in Bitcoin.
Unfortunately crypto developers are currently throwing away something valuable, that is trust.

[kayvie]

In my opinion, if you really want to develop it seriously, then I think ICO will return as before. therefore I think they should really do a new breakthrough on the ICO so that they can be trusted again as before.

That's true, however, the problem is whether the investors will also return or will start to put their trust again in ico. Even if ico will make a serious project and they really put their effort into it, if investors will not trust it then there is no chance for the ico to return in this field.