The return of ICOs

[qigong13]

Investing in ICOs is suicide, don't waste money on these projects.

Unless you really have an insider's coming from the team who are developing this project, or being part of private investor just need some luck that the team will enlist the project so whatever happened you'll have the chance to still earned.

That sounds even shadier if ICOs allow a circle of insiders who gets and know more than average investors. Ever think about you got played by ICO with 'you're the vip so don't worry' ploy?

[Script3d]

Investing in ICOs is suicide, don't waste money on these projects. I believe that they will never succeed in this market and after being listed in the exchange, the price will definitely drop many times.

I believed some of the projects will survive and be successful in this market. I understand why would you say that because most of the projects are just scam or cash grab for the developers, that doesn't mean all of the project are scam.

[Pecunia non olet]

If you look at the statistics 99% of all ICOs are not profitable or scams. So if 1 ICO from 100 is profitable, then you need at least 100x profit from it. Think about it, now it doesn´t make a sense to invest into ICOs, wait for better market sentiment and then you will see the true ICO power.

[omnik]

Investing in ICOs is suicide, don't waste money on these projects. I believe that they will never succeed in this market and after being listed in the exchange, the price will definitely drop many times.

It's not true as that depends how the personality can try to handle it. Remember everyone should always DYOR to make sure they will not invest in the scam project. There was a lot of successful icos and ieos.
That meant the possibility to get the trusted one will always there

[hwteeer]

Exchange listing basically makes sense. Cause the more advanced exchange is, the more carefully tokens are chosen. I would say that as for advanced and worthwhile solutions I am only following Centric with their CNR and CNS tokens. Guys are bringing first of its kind dual crypto-currency payment network and CNS token will be listed on Bittrex on 28 of July. Of course, you should better check the website joincentric.com, cause guys bring uniqueness onto the field

[inoes]

No matter how good it is, what makes me pessimistic about ICO is "there is no 100% guarantee to enter the market". different from IEO which is guaranteed to be listing. if it is associated with a pandemic now surely people choose which is more certain to be profitable than trying luck.

[novaprime]

No matter how good it is, what makes me pessimistic about ICO is "there is no 100% guarantee to enter the market". different from IEO which is guaranteed to be listing. if it is associated with a pandemic now surely people choose which is more certain to be profitable than trying luck.

I agree with you. ICO investments can never be sure of anything because risks can happen at any time. I usually do not care about this type of investment because the risk is huge and I do not dare to be sure of anything when investing. However, the current market is starting to get better than before, so this is a good time for you to consider and be able to make a good profit.

[Retainly_Collie]

No matter how good it is, what makes me pessimistic about ICO is "there is no 100% guarantee to enter the market". different from IEO which is guaranteed to be listing. if it is associated with a pandemic now surely people choose which is more certain to be profitable than trying luck.

Only scammer create ICO projects at the moment, for new projects I believe they will try to go to IEO even if it is a small exchange in this market.

[ancafe]

No matter how good it is, what makes me pessimistic about ICO is "there is no 100% guarantee to enter the market". different from IEO which is guaranteed to be listing. if it is associated with a pandemic now surely people choose which is more certain to be profitable than trying luck.

I understand what you mean. most investors feel the same way, and even some of them don't trust IEO either. however, to this day ICO still exists, it's just that people's trust in it has faded very much, and it's hard to return it again.

[riso2015]

Since there is still a lot of fraud in the cryptocurrency market and there is no control over new projects, so that the developments bear at least some responsibility to investors, no one will repeat the mistakes of 2016 and 2017, risking their own funds. If investors have at least some guarantees, then the ICO may have certain prospects, but there is no such process today.

just forget about ICO and avoid it, I personally am also not interested in ICO anymore after many ICO scams have appeared, and make investors and communities no longer trust

That's right, I see investors or users this forum no longer trust ICO project, They already have IEO projects can be trusted, So even though there is a good ICO project which has a great team, I think the project will remain quiet. We are all fed up with ICO project.

[Moyna Akter]

Each system has its advantages and disadvantages, but comparative analysis is the key to choosing the right one. Although the ICO was once considered a common practice, various forms of fraud and deception gradually led to the invention of the IEO, and through it projects now raise the funds they need. However, I do not think that investors will be interested in re-investing in ICO, so the chances of ICO returning are very low.

[GatotKaca]

Each system has its advantages and disadvantages, but comparative analysis is the key to choosing the right one. Although the ICO was once considered a common practice, various forms of fraud and deception gradually led to the invention of the IEO, and through it projects now raise the funds they need. However, I do not think that investors will be interested in re-investing in ICO, so the chances of ICO returning are very low.

Your reasoning is very precise I think, of course investors don't want to be fooled repeatedly in ICO, ICO is already very bad in the eyes of investors and of course investors will prefer IEO of the ICO

[Lantind]

Each system has its advantages and disadvantages, but comparative analysis is the key to choosing the right one. Although the ICO was once considered a common practice, various forms of fraud and deception gradually led to the invention of the IEO, and through it projects now raise the funds they need. However, I do not think that investors will be interested in re-investing in ICO, so the chances of ICO returning are very low.

Yes, investors will not be interested anymore to reinvest in ICO, because they have also found better than ICO and have felt a lot of disappointment about the fraud that had happened in ICO in the past, so because of this ICO has been very difficult to return like the old days.

[lienfaye]

Each system has its advantages and disadvantages, but comparative analysis is the key to choosing the right one. Although the ICO was once considered a common practice, various forms of fraud and deception gradually led to the invention of the IEO, and through it projects now raise the funds they need. However, I do not think that investors will be interested in re-investing in ICO, so the chances of ICO returning are very low.

Investors from past failed ICOs already learned their lesson and I think even ICOs make a comeback it might hard to convince the investors to trust and engage themselves again. If you experience getting scam or lose your hard earned money then you're wiser now to not trust easily and only invest to a reliable investment.

[suryana]

I understand what you mean. most investors feel the same way, and even some of them don't trust IEO either. however, to this day ICO still exists, it's just that people's trust in it has faded very much, and it's hard to return it again.

I think the current project developer don't make more ICO projects, because that would only be a failed project. Investors or public Crypto have no longer trusted in ICO projects since 2018, where in that year there many scams on ICO projects. Currently IEO project is better than ICO, but we also have to choose IEO project on the top Exchange.

[nutriagrigia]

Each system has its advantages and disadvantages, but comparative analysis is the key to choosing the right one. Although the ICO was once considered a common practice, various forms of fraud and deception gradually led to the invention of the IEO, and through it projects now raise the funds they need. However, I do not think that investors will be interested in re-investing in ICO, so the chances of ICO returning are very low.

Investors from past failed ICOs already learned their lesson and I think even ICOs make a comeback it might hard to convince the investors to trust and engage themselves again. If you experience getting scam or lose your hard earned money then you're wiser now to not trust easily and only invest to a reliable investment.

there is nothing really reliable in the cryptocurrency market. any investment in this market is very risky. now the ICO market is beginning to recover and many investors are already making good money

[TopT3ns]

Investors have lost faith in the ICO, which is why we see IEO at the moment. It is much better and safer than an ICO, I think you should not waste your time with an ICO because no project will really succeed in this form.

although like that not all IEOs can become a place for safe investment because some cases of IEO in some new exchange sites cannot be profitable and sometimes there is also a scam, the point is when you want to participate in an IEO then you have to find a trusted exchange place like Binance exchange .

[Janus101]

Guys, do you think that ICOs could make a come back? I do and here is why. Every year dozens of companies raise money in Silicon Valley for startups, many pre revenue. Also, with the economy injured from nCov19, it would make sense to allow for new economies. This would include letting new startups in Blockchain raise money, and imo if they are well vetted, and trusted by the community, they should be allowed to raise money. What do you think?

I read your post again but still don't see why ICO ever comeback as a way to raise money in crypto when right now, IEO work better that it. If they have all the advance well-vetted and trusted by the community then maybe but IEO still a preference for many of us now.

[MainIbem]

Projects are raising money successfully using IEO, if you don't know well ICO was ruined because of many exit scam that happened two years ago, we still have good investors on big exchanges, I don't see any reason to keep hoping for ICO to make a come back.

Without a doubt, it is the number of scams in ICO that made it fizzle out. However, it will take a very long time to get back investor confidence to ICO. But the switch to IEO is really providing another option for projects to raise funds.

[cengat]

Investors have lost faith in the ICO, which is why we see IEO at the moment. It is much better and safer than an ICO, I think you should not waste your time with an ICO because no project will really succeed in this form.

I'm not sure that ICOs are dead forever, but they surely are for now.
Perhaps as time will pass, scammers will forget about ICOs, but real developers won't quit it and investors eventually will come back to it too