|
Equate
|
 |
April 04, 2014, 03:50:08 PM |
|
Lets see how long it will take. |
|
|
|
|
gitrix
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
April 04, 2014, 05:05:39 PM |
|
Strong developer support is evidence of the superiority of Many coins. The more active the developers, the more likely that cryptocurrency is to succeed. I agree with this. Developers are important because they are key to providing the infrastructure around a coin, allowing greater levels of adoption and ease of use. They also allow greater incentive to adopt the coin through the provision of important goods and services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
April 04, 2014, 06:10:37 PM |
|
Strong developer support is evidence of the superiority of Many coins. The more active the developers, the more likely that cryptocurrency is to succeed. I agree with this. Developers are important because they are key to providing the infrastructure around a coin, allowing greater levels of adoption and ease of use. They also allow greater incentive to adopt the coin through the provision of important goods and services.
My understanding is that the dev is temporarily unavailable and that a team under his supervision is being assembled as we speak. |
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
April 04, 2014, 06:56:23 PM |
|
Someone on the french forum about mining i come from run some tests with a simple rig setup, with 2 x R9 280X All tests ran with the same frequency etc.. Each algo can be optimized, but for comparison, it's good. Power at the wall: Idle
80-90w
scrypt
550W - 2 x 720khs
Scrypt-N
537W - 2 x 350khs
Scrypt-jane
485W- 2 x 133khs
Groestl
271W - 2 x 7 025khs
Myr-G
295W - 2 x 9 920khs
skein
440 W - 2 x 212 500khs
Keccak
430W - 2 x 316 000khs
X11
285W - 2 x 2 080khs Result : Groestl is the most gpu friendly algo, for power, temp and noise, even better than X11  a little tuning on one of mine: 4 R9 280x + 1 x 7950. 3 R9 are overclocked at 1250MHz, the 4th at 1150MHz - 1.2v The 7950 runs at 1100MHz - 1.15v Memory for all 4 run at 1000MHz Look at the temp (scrypt : between 75 to 83°C) sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-04-04 20:27:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):38.01M (avg):37.30Mh/s | A:2108 R:0 HW:0 WU:136.074/m
ST: 1 SS: 40 NB: 18 LW: 1538 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to Pool 0 (stratum) diff 0.000 as user azhago.2
Block: 244150fe... Diff:101 Started: [20:44:59] Best share: 4.35K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 45.0C 3366RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:29.886/m I:24
GPU 1: 45.0C 3258RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:28.166/m I:24
GPU 2: 48.0C 3337RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:33.747/m I:24
GPU 3: 48.0C 3233RPM | 7.392M/7.378Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:20.878/m I:19
GPU 4: 38.0C 5277RPM | 5.845M/5.835Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:23.396/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[20:45:30] Accepted 0958aa9c Diff 27/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:45:38] Accepted 0eb6b909 Diff 17/0.000 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[20:45:39] Accepted 1dbce2e6 Diff 0.000/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:45:41] Accepted 181052de Diff 10/0.000 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[20:45:45] Accepted 05700585 Diff 47/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:45:49] Accepted 131f1947 Diff 13/0.000 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[20:45:50] Accepted 06b61d40 Diff 38/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:45:54] Accepted 307ecd9e Diff 1.35K/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:46:02] Accepted 10c2d09e Diff 15/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:46:04] Accepted 126ecee9 Diff 13/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
|
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
 |
April 04, 2014, 07:03:51 PM |
|
Someone on the french forum about mining i come from run some tests with a simple rig setup, with 2 x R9 280X All tests ran with the same frequency etc.. Each algo can be optimized, but for comparison, it's good. Power at the wall: Idle
80-90w
scrypt
550W - 2 x 720khs
Scrypt-N
537W - 2 x 350khs
Scrypt-jane
485W- 2 x 133khs
Groestl
271W - 2 x 7 025khs
Myr-G
295W - 2 x 9 920khs
skein
440 W - 2 x 212 500khs
Keccak
430W - 2 x 316 000khs
X11
285W - 2 x 2 080khs
Result : Groestl is the most gpu friendly algo, for power, temp and noise, even better than X11 a little tuning on one of mine: 4 R9 280x + 1 x 7950. 3 R9 are overclocked at 1250MHz, the 4th at 1150MHz - 1.2v The 7950 runs at 1100MHz - 1.15v Memory for all 4 run at 1000MHz Look at the temp (scrypt : between 75 to 83°C) |
|
|
|
cyghfer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
April 04, 2014, 07:06:13 PM |
|
Someone on the french forum about mining i come from run some tests with a simple rig setup, with 2 x R9 280X All tests ran with the same frequency etc.. Each algo can be optimized, but for comparison, it's good. Power at the wall: Idle
80-90w
scrypt
550W - 2 x 720khs
Scrypt-N
537W - 2 x 350khs
Scrypt-jane
485W- 2 x 133khs
Groestl
271W - 2 x 7 025khs
Myr-G
295W - 2 x 9 920khs
skein
440 W - 2 x 212 500khs
Keccak
430W - 2 x 316 000khs
X11
285W - 2 x 2 080khs Result : Groestl is the most gpu friendly algo, for power, temp and noise, even better than X11 a little tuning on one of mine: 4 R9 280x + 1 x 7950. 3 R9 are overclocked at 1250MHz, the 4th at 1150MHz - 1.2v The 7950 runs at 1100MHz - 1.15v Memory for all 4 run at 1000MHz Look at the temp (scrypt : between 75 to 83°C) sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-04-04 20:27:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):38.01M (avg):37.30Mh/s | A:2108 R:0 HW:0 WU:136.074/m
ST: 1 SS: 40 NB: 18 LW: 1538 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to Pool 0 (stratum) diff 0.000 as user azhago.2
Block: 244150fe... Diff:101 Started: [20:44:59] Best share: 4.35K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 45.0C 3366RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:29.886/m I:24
GPU 1: 45.0C 3258RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:28.166/m I:24
GPU 2: 48.0C 3337RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:33.747/m I:24
GPU 3: 48.0C 3233RPM | 7.392M/7.378Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:20.878/m I:19
GPU 4: 38.0C 5277RPM | 5.845M/5.835Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:23.396/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[20:45:30] Accepted 0958aa9c Diff 27/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:45:38] Accepted 0eb6b909 Diff 17/0.000 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[20:45:39] Accepted 1dbce2e6 Diff 0.000/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:45:41] Accepted 181052de Diff 10/0.000 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[20:45:45] Accepted 05700585 Diff 47/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:45:49] Accepted 131f1947 Diff 13/0.000 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[20:45:50] Accepted 06b61d40 Diff 38/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:45:54] Accepted 307ecd9e Diff 1.35K/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:46:02] Accepted 10c2d09e Diff 15/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:46:04] Accepted 126ecee9 Diff 13/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
Amazing, this is exactly what we need. We need to make this known to the rest of the community pronto! |
|
|
|
|
|
Ilan1
|
|
April 04, 2014, 07:41:22 PM |
|
Someone on the french forum about mining i come from run some tests with a simple rig setup, with 2 x R9 280X All tests ran with the same frequency etc.. Each algo can be optimized, but for comparison, it's good. Power at the wall: Idle
80-90w
scrypt
550W - 2 x 720khs
Scrypt-N
537W - 2 x 350khs
Scrypt-jane
485W- 2 x 133khs
Groestl
271W - 2 x 7 025khs
Myr-G
295W - 2 x 9 920khs
skein
440 W - 2 x 212 500khs
Keccak
430W - 2 x 316 000khs
X11
285W - 2 x 2 080khs Result : Groestl is the most gpu friendly algo, for power, temp and noise, even better than X11 a little tuning on one of mine: 4 R9 280x + 1 x 7950. 3 R9 are overclocked at 1250MHz, the 4th at 1150MHz - 1.2v The 7950 runs at 1100MHz - 1.15v Memory for all 4 run at 1000MHz Look at the temp (scrypt : between 75 to 83°C) sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-04-04 20:27:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):38.01M (avg):37.30Mh/s | A:2108 R:0 HW:0 WU:136.074/m
ST: 1 SS: 40 NB: 18 LW: 1538 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to Pool 0 (stratum) diff 0.000 as user azhago.2
Block: 244150fe... Diff:101 Started: [20:44:59] Best share: 4.35K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 45.0C 3366RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:29.886/m I:24
GPU 1: 45.0C 3258RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:28.166/m I:24
GPU 2: 48.0C 3337RPM | 8.036M/8.035Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:33.747/m I:24
GPU 3: 48.0C 3233RPM | 7.392M/7.378Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:20.878/m I:19
GPU 4: 38.0C 5277RPM | 5.845M/5.835Mh/s | R: 0.0% HW:0 WU:23.396/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[20:45:30] Accepted 0958aa9c Diff 27/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:45:38] Accepted 0eb6b909 Diff 17/0.000 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[20:45:39] Accepted 1dbce2e6 Diff 0.000/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:45:41] Accepted 181052de Diff 10/0.000 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[20:45:45] Accepted 05700585 Diff 47/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:45:49] Accepted 131f1947 Diff 13/0.000 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[20:45:50] Accepted 06b61d40 Diff 38/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:45:54] Accepted 307ecd9e Diff 1.35K/0.000 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[20:46:02] Accepted 10c2d09e Diff 15/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[20:46:04] Accepted 126ecee9 Diff 13/0.000 GPU 0 at Pool 0
Amazing, this is exactly what we need. We need to make this known to the rest of the community pronto! I can only get 6.4 Mh/s from my R9 280's what are your settings? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ilan1
|
|
April 04, 2014, 08:31:27 PM |
|
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
April 04, 2014, 09:07:20 PM |
|
For the 8MHs'R9 280X :
GPU @ 1250MHz / 1.2v
Gpu mem @ 1000
-I 24 -w 256 -g 1 --thread-concurency 8192
Some cards have better results with -I 19 or I 20
I don't think thread concurrency is usefull btw, but i always put it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ilan1
|
|
April 04, 2014, 09:24:10 PM |
|
For the 8MHs'R9 280X :
GPU @ 1250MHz / 1.2v
Gpu mem @ 1000
-I 24 -w 256 -g 1 --thread-concurency 8192
Some cards have better results with -I 19 or I 20
I don't think thread concurrency is usefull btw, but i always put it.
That's great, thanks I will give it a try. |
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
April 04, 2014, 11:23:22 PM
Last edit: April 04, 2014, 11:38:25 PM by child_harold |
|
Since Groestl is Austrian hash and hard to pronounce I might simply refer to it as Hashcoin or perhaps as a doff of the cap to Adam Back, Hashcash  |
|
|
|
|
verdun2003
|
|
April 05, 2014, 12:19:21 AM |
|
Groestl is the most energy efficient algo out there, and it's worth... 15K usd market cap right now? Mining like a boss.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
April 05, 2014, 12:21:14 AM |
|
If you're looking for a reliable, fair Pool: https://grs.suprnova.ccStill lots of free slots for miners, hop in, we're finding blocks on a regular basis and got all the Googles. Our Daemon is patched against the various fake share attacks, You really get What You mine. Still 0 % Fee ! |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
srcxxx
|
|
April 05, 2014, 05:35:38 AM |
|
Hi!
I'm in the final stages of setting up another GRS pool, but I have a problem that I'm hoping you could help me with. Since you have obviously fixed it, as your pools are working.
ocminer, I believe you were asking this same question.
I'm getting these errors:
2014-04-05 01:26:54,034 DEBUG DBInterface # run_import_thread current size: 0
2014-04-05 01:26:54,089 INFO block_updater # Checking for new block.
2014-04-05 01:26:54,097 INFO block_updater # New block! Prevhash: 00000000003b34833c5c17bdd4bc7d5011843e08dcc4cfb6d6538c6499459885
2014-04-05 01:26:54,098 DEBUG block_updater # Next prevhash update in 5.000 sec
2014-04-05 01:26:54,098 DEBUG block_updater # Merkle update in next 59.999 sec
2014-04-05 01:26:54,100 DEBUG bitcoin_rpc_manager # Check Height -- Current Pool 0 : 19433
2014-04-05 01:26:54,102 DEBUG block_template # Got To Block_template.py
2014-04-05 01:26:54,102 DEBUG block_template # Got To Block_template.py
2014-04-05 01:26:54,103 DEBUG coinbasetx # Got to CoinBaseTX
2014-04-05 01:26:54,103 ERROR template_registry # [Failure instance: Traceback: <type 'exceptions.ValueError'>: invalid address
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:1095:gotResult
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:1082:_inlineCallbacks
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:362:callback
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:458:_startRunCallbacks
--- <exception caught here> ---
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py:545:_runCallbacks
/root/stratum-mining/lib/template_registry.py:142:_update_block
/root/stratum-mining/lib/block_template.py:62:fill_from_rpc
/root/stratum-mining/lib/coinbasetx.py:40:__init__
/root/stratum-mining/lib/coinbaser.py:76:get_script_pubkey
/root/stratum-mining/lib/util.py:269:script_to_address
]
2014-04-05 01:26:54,107 INFO coinbaser # Coinbase address '***hidden***' is valid
2014-04-05 01:26:54,108 DEBUG coinbaser # Address = ***hidden***
2014-04-05 01:26:54,108 DEBUG coinbaser # PubKey = ***hidden***
2014-04-05 01:26:54,108 DEBUG coinbaser # Is Compressed = True
2014-04-05 01:26:54,108 DEBUG coinbaser # Account =
Any help is much appreciated! Can even pay in GRS for the solution.
I assume that this where it breaks:
d = address_to_pubkeyhash(addr)
if not d:
raise ValueError('invalid address')
(ver, pubkeyhash) = d
return b'\x76\xa9\x14' + pubkeyhash + b'\x88\xac'
PS: I modified the quark hash python to use Groest hash function and also changed diff1 to 0x0000ffff00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000:
elif settings.COINDAEMON_ALGO == 'quark':
diff1 = 0x0000ffff00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
verdun2003
|
|
April 05, 2014, 10:12:33 AM |
|
Guys,
it seems to me that dwarfpool pays more than cpupool per mghs, did you guys came to the same conclusion based on your tests?
|
|
|
|
gitrix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
April 05, 2014, 10:43:14 AM
Last edit: April 05, 2014, 10:59:03 AM by gitrix |
|
To Boost the Coin we need Somme bounty. the construction of coin is unfair ,decreasing 6% every week "so fast: 78%  in one Year & 22% in 9 years " what new miner think  !!!! with all Altcoin every day miners don't thinks to much they do Sommes calculations & next >>>> coin >>>> all miner love to be in 78% !! we need to exploit that. want to see a new currency with a real value. |
|
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
April 05, 2014, 10:58:05 AM |
|
We need a bounty for press article too. I can give some GRS myself for it (5K), but we will need more
Article on coindesk, crypto mining blog etc.. would be a great start
focused on algo, or the benefices of mining it (heat, power consumption etc) -- (or both!)
My english is not very good, so if someone wish to write it..
|
|
|
|
gitrix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
April 05, 2014, 11:01:01 AM |
|
I can give some GRS tooo!!! i love the coin!! ""i am very small miner like many other"
|
|
|
|
|
|
child_harold
|
|
April 05, 2014, 11:12:01 AM |
|
We need a bounty for press article too. I can give some GRS myself for it (5K), but we will need more
Article on coindesk, crypto mining blog etc.. would be a great start
focused on algo, or the benefices of mining it (heat, power consumption etc) -- (or both!)
My english is not very good, so if someone wish to write it..
Would be happy to help with this. PM me |
|
|
|
|
