1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts

[dunfida]

I do agree with you when it is 1xbit, which is true that they are looking shadier everyday. However, I do not agree that everyone who wears a signature has to defend the place they carry the signature neither, I could like a place and someone else may not, I do not need to defend them though, they should defend themselves as much as they can, we are getting paid as signature carriers to post, and I can post to places that has to nothing to do with my signature and I would say that it would definitely be paid as well, so why go defend them? This guy definitely did that, I am not arguing about that, he is caring their signature and getting paid so he is defending them, not a smart move in the long run of course, but it would seem that he thinks it is good for today.

In any case, I would not defend a bad place, and I would get out of signature as soon as I get paid as well if I believe it is bad, but even if I believe it is good, I am not going to go around defending them, promote? Sure.

In 1xbit participant's case of getting negative trust have reason why they received a negative trust or negative feedback from DT. First is, 1xbit have many accusations in this forum which is enough to tell everyone one that it is not trusted and having a bad service to their users. Second, signature campaign in this forum is a promotional type. Why did I say that?. You are paid to post in any board wearing their signature which shows what site, product, projects you are advertising or promoting. There you have your answer why participants that wear 1xbit signature have negative trust or feedback.

Even just using up your common sense then you can directly able to find the reason on why people had promoted or joined the signature got painted red into their feedbacks.
Scams on this forum is never been tolerated or highly frown upon on this place and its just normal that DT's would normally have this kind of view and would really give
that feedback which i do see for it to be worth of or it is really just right to do so.

[1714220480]

1714220480

[1714220480]

1714220480

[1714220480]

1714220480

[rodskee]

I do agree with you when it is 1xbit, which is true that they are looking shadier everyday. However, I do not agree that everyone who wears a signature has to defend the place they carry the signature neither, I could like a place and someone else may not, I do not need to defend them though, they should defend themselves as much as they can, we are getting paid as signature carriers to post, and I can post to places that has to nothing to do with my signature and I would say that it would definitely be paid as well, so why go defend them? This guy definitely did that, I am not arguing about that, he is caring their signature and getting paid so he is defending them, not a smart move in the long run of course, but it would seem that he thinks it is good for today.

In any case, I would not defend a bad place, and I would get out of signature as soon as I get paid as well if I believe it is bad, but even if I believe it is good, I am not going to go around defending them, promote? Sure.

In 1xbit participant's case of getting negative trust have reason why they received a negative trust or negative feedback from DT. First is, 1xbit have many accusations in this forum which is enough to tell everyone one that it is not trusted and having a bad service to their users. Second, signature campaign in this forum is a promotional type. Why did I say that?. You are paid to post in any board wearing their signature which shows what site, product, projects you are advertising or promoting. There you have your answer why participants that wear 1xbit signature have negative trust or feedback.

Even just using up your common sense then you can directly able to find the reason on why people had promoted or joined the signature got painted red into their feedbacks.
Scams on this forum is never been tolerated or highly frown upon on this place and its just normal that DT's would normally have this kind of view and would really give
that feedback which i do see for it to be worth of or it is really just right to do so.

you forgot to mention that This scam site signature campaign is one of the highest paying campaign now so accounts joined care nothing about their reputation as long as they are gaining So Decent money .

they will realize this mistake once this campaign ends and when they cannot join another projects because of their paints .

[nakamura12]

you forgot to mention that This scam site signature campaign is one of the highest paying campaign now so accounts joined care nothing about their reputation as long as they are gaining So Decent money .

they will realize this mistake once this campaign ends and when they cannot join another projects because of their paints .

Many people don't care if it is the highest paying campaign or not. As long as it is a scam or having a bad reputation then that means they will get red trust no matter how high or low the payment is. They can earn decent money but will they be able to join another campaign once 1xbit campaign ends. Mentioning the 1xbit being the highest won't do good at all because there might be a group of people who will join because of it.

[Haunebu]

They can earn decent money but will they be able to join another campaign once 1xbit campaign ends. Mentioning the 1xbit being the highest won't do good at all because there might be a group of people who will join because of it.

The 1xbit campaign manager has been less lenient in recent times and is only focusing on selecting participants without any negative feedback. Also, it seems like they are carefully paying participants based on their post quality.

Basically, a scam site like 1xbit isn't throwing away their money due to which their shills are working harder to defend them though it's all pointless in my opinion.

[Masplanc]

Nice development, despite passed impression about 1xbit. 1xbit still growing rapidly

[1xbit_official]

Because when someone posts a negative against you, they have enough evidence to prove that you are trying to cheat with that user. So try to do business in the right way, then no one will say anything negative against you.

Any business has negative against them.
But when we speak about evidence - we didn't see something more than screenshots of bets placed, or screenshots of deposits - which proves only what is shows.

We don't see a way when a person would get banned, if he has 1 account and just plays at 1xBit, without implementing different kinds of winning schemes.

Does your defense doesn't have anything to do with the fact that you're using their signature? Because that's hypocritical if you think about it.

Due to the same logic - any non-1xBit signature wearer in this thread just tries to get rid of the competitor.

Scams on this forum is never been tolerated or highly frown upon on this place

As well as an accusation never requires to be proved to be supported, it seems.
As well as DT always do research and never follow their intentions before putting a trust reply.
This list can be way longer.

Even if I'm being accused that I violated any rule, 1xbit violated before not closing my account on my request so it makes no sense sorry.

After placing a bet on 1xBit, you consent to the ToS. It is said that there is an availability of account closure after player's request, but requests require time to be processed, and this time is not specified.

On this screenshot, you've asked for the account closure during a deposit being processed, which is technically impossible.

Deposit issues are solved by the security and support teams, not the block one.
In addition, this email is not listed on the contact list of 1xBit: https://1xbit.com/information/contacts/

We unsure where did you get it from, but such a request shouldn't be processed by block department, and response time of this email is not regulated.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

[Questat]

Nice development, despite passed impression about 1xbit. 1xbit still growing rapidly

We can't deny that, but they should clean their reputation in the forum so they will succeed more in the future. Some had said that 1xbit is a scam site and it would really affect the decision of the new gamblers if they see this kind of review, I just hope they would really answer and correct all the active scam accusations against them.

[1xbit_official]

Premiere League
Chelsea vs Liverpool

A tough game coming up this weekend!

Post predictions for this game and win 1 mBTC! -> post

[kontrakwel]

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account, and refuses to credit the account. The winnings were 100% fair.
This is just a scam site which dont pay winners.
Account id: 252045431

[1xbit_official]

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

[kontrakwel]

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

[Erdogan]

Nice development, despite passed impression about 1xbit. 1xbit still growing rapidly

We can't deny that, but they should clean their reputation in the forum so they will succeed more in the future. Some had said that 1xbit is a scam site and it would really affect the decision of the new gamblers if they see this kind of review, I just hope they would really answer and correct all the active scam accusations against them.

When you look at the comments, 90% of those who accuse 1xBit of being a scam website have not played on this site even once. Almost everyone who slanders 1xBit is suck puppet that wear an advertisement for a competing casino or bookmaker in their signature. Think for yourself whether such people can be credible.

[MonsterV]

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

This proves again that 1xbit is just scamming and scamming, and it continues.
I also want to point out to people that 1xcorp n.v. does not exist anymore. According to Wikipedia, 1xcorp is the owner of 1xbit.
Which means that 1xbit is at this moment illegally running their website. I advise people not to deposit here.

What bothers me a lot is that 1xbit_official writes that there are many cases "Solved"
Well, the definition of Solved in their opinion is refund the deposit, and just void all the winnings.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

[nakamura12]

The 1xbit campaign manager has been less lenient in recent times and is only focusing on selecting participants without any negative feedback. Also, it seems like they are carefully paying participants based on their post quality.

Basically, a scam site like 1xbit isn't throwing away their money due to which their shills are working harder to defend them though it's all pointless in my opinion.

Once that participant accepted by the campaign manager then it is possibly get red tag by a DT. The campaign did mentioned that they only accept those who doesn't have negative trust and it is okay when that participant got red tag after joining the campaign. I would say it so myself that it's pointless to do it. No matter how many times they do it once a site's reputation goes bad it remains bad unless the matter is resolved.

[Haunebu]

When you look at the comments, 90% of those who accuse 1xBit of being a scam website have not played on this site even once. Almost everyone who slanders 1xBit is suck puppet that wear an advertisement for a competing casino or bookmaker in their signature. Think for yourself whether such people can be credible.

You are literally a brainless hypocrite. I find it hilarious that someone like you who scammed some other person for a small amount has the audacity to question someone else's credibility. Absolute weirdo!

That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.

Exactly. They keep scamming gamblers and try and make themselves look legit by returning their deposits. The messed up part is the fact that some gamblers still continue investing big amounts of money like@kontrakwel in this scam site.

Also, shills like @Erdogan are fools are actively advertising this site in order to lure in more gamblers from this forum. Despicable stuff!

[Erdogan]

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

This proves again that 1xbit is just scamming and scamming, and it continues.
I also want to point out to people that 1xcorp n.v. does not exist anymore. According to Wikipedia, 1xcorp is the owner of 1xbit.
Which means that 1xbit is at this moment illegally running their website. I advise people not to deposit here.

What bothers me a lot is that 1xbit_official writes that there are many cases "Solved"
Well, the definition of Solved in their opinion is refund the deposit, and just void all the winnings.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

I guess you haven't paid attention to details and are driven by a general aversion to 1xBit driven by people who work for competing casinos (look on signatures)
If you look at this situation, you will see that the player broke the rules, received a deposit refund and in addition it all happened in December 2020, i.e. 9 months ago.

[Lanatsa]

I do agree with you when it is 1xbit, which is true that they are looking shadier everyday. However, I do not agree that everyone who wears a signature has to defend the place they carry the signature neither, I could like a place and someone else may not, I do not need to defend them though, they should defend themselves as much as they can, we are getting paid as signature carriers to post, and I can post to places that has to nothing to do with my signature and I would say that it would definitely be paid as well, so why go defend them? This guy definitely did that, I am not arguing about that, he is caring their signature and getting paid so he is defending them, not a smart move in the long run of course, but it would seem that he thinks it is good for today.

In any case, I would not defend a bad place, and I would get out of signature as soon as I get paid as well if I believe it is bad, but even if I believe it is good, I am not going to go around defending them, promote? Sure.

In 1xbit participant's case of getting negative trust have reason why they received a negative trust or negative feedback from DT. First is, 1xbit have many accusations in this forum which is enough to tell everyone one that it is not trusted and having a bad service to their users. Second, signature campaign in this forum is a promotional type. Why did I say that?. You are paid to post in any board wearing their signature which shows what site, product, projects you are advertising or promoting. There you have your answer why participants that wear 1xbit signature have negative trust or feedback.

Even just using up your common sense then you can directly able to find the reason on why people had promoted or joined the signature got painted red into their feedbacks.
Scams on this forum is never been tolerated or highly frown upon on this place and its just normal that DT's would normally have this kind of view and would really give
that feedback which i do see for it to be worth of or it is really just right to do so.

you forgot to mention that This scam site signature campaign is one of the highest paying campaign now so accounts joined care nothing about their reputation as long as they are gaining So Decent money .

they will realize this mistake once this campaign ends and when they cannot join another projects because of their paints .

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

[Naficopa]

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

It is true that I became interested in the 1xbit platform due to the launched signature campaign. We all have to admit that the rates are high and surely many users are thinking about whether to risk a red trust.
However, I don't have to pretend that my positive opinion is based on something unreal. Every day I look at the comments of players about 1xBit and from what I can see, complaints are very rarely. Certainly there is not more complaints than in the case of other major casinos and bookmakers.

[Desmong]

When you look at the comments, 90% of those who accuse 1xBit of being a scam website have not played on this site even once. Almost everyone who slanders 1xBit is suck puppet that wear an advertisement for a competing casino or bookmaker in their signature. Think for yourself whether such people can be credible.

You are literally a brainless hypocrite. I find it hilarious that someone like you who scammed some other person for a small amount has the audacity to question someone else's credibility. Absolute weirdo!

That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.

Exactly. They keep scamming gamblers and try and make themselves look legit by returning their deposits. The messed up part is the fact that some gamblers still continue investing big amounts of money like@kontrakwel in this scam site.

Also, shills like @Erdogan are fools are actively advertising this site in order to lure in more gamblers from this forum. Despicable stuff!

I don't blame you because you are such an ignorance person that need to get a life...are you doing this because you are being paid just to make posts for your campaign or you just want to make common sense. Can you afford to write all these shits without being paid? Now you are the biggest hypocrite.

Haunebu please go get a job that could pay you reasonable money rather than coming here to make noise when we all know that you are being paid to act as if you care. Ensure you get your weekly penny and smile to heavens!

[nakamura12]

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.