1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts

[Naficopa]

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

[1714196140]

1714196140

[nakamura12]

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

Did I ever mention that users with negative trust are not accepted in 1xbit?. What about the users who supported 1xbit in their previous signature campaign?. I never mentioned that the rule about users who have negative trust is implemented at the start of the campaign. It is about what rules they implemented at this time. I'm sure you know that since you are a supporter of 1xbit, you even wear a 1xbit signature.

[Naficopa]

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

Did I ever mention that users with negative trust are not accepted in 1xbit?.

I'm the one who says that participants with negative trust are no longer accepted, it was only at the beginning.

What about the users who supported 1xbit in their previous signature campaign?.

There was a previous 1xBit signature campaign? I do not know about that.

I never mentioned that the rule about users who have negative trust is implemented at the start of the campaign. It is about what rules they implemented at this time. I'm sure you know that since you are a supporter of 1xbit, you even wear a 1xbit signature.

Of course, I know the current rules, because as you noticed, I am a participant in the 1xBit signature campaign. That is why I am explaining them to you.

[bitterguy28]

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

I did not see this happened , that the supporters of Adkinsbet was removed in the second week? they gladly accepted them at first and then abandoning after their "Great Service"?
But my question is <Why does the Spreadsheet is Hidden? why not broadcast the whole set of participants now ?
anyway this does not concerns us anymore because everyone that wears 1xbit signature was being tagged accordingly. no matter if campaign participants or not.

[Naficopa]

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

I did not see this happened , that the supporters of Adkinsbet was removed in the second week? they gladly accepted them at first and then abandoning after their "Great Service"?
But my question is <Why does the Spreadsheet is Hidden? why not broadcast the whole set of participants now ?
anyway this does not concerns us anymore because everyone that wears 1xbit signature was being tagged accordingly. no matter if campaign participants or not.

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3


Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

[nakamura12]

There was a previous 1xBit signature campaign? I do not know about that.

As far as I remember, there is a discussion that those who promote scam/shady sites are getting negative trust. You can search it here in this forum. I don't know the rest if they really got red trusted just like the supporters of adkinsbet and yobit. I wouldn't say it if I haven't know that 1xbit have previous signature campaign.

[Reatim]

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3


Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

If the team did not accept those members from the beginning ? i believe that this will not go this far from bashing and complications .
because they have been warned about those adkinsbet Army of shill but instead of disregarding their application , the 1xbit team accepts them all and this made the issue more questionable in the whole forum.

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

[Haunebu]

I don't blame you because you are such an ignorance person that need to get a life...are you doing this because you are being paid just to make posts for your campaign or you just want to make common sense.

Hilarious. I pity shills like you who possess below average debating skills. It's ignorant(Not ignorance). Tip: Improve your grammar and debating skills fool!

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

They don't have a future in my opinion. Their reputation went down the drain a long time back and they are trying their best to keep their business afloat in various ways(Advertising in this forum etc).

[Chato1977]

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

Did I ever mention that users with negative trust are not accepted in 1xbit?. What about the users who supported 1xbit in their previous signature campaign?. I never mentioned that the rule about users who have negative trust is implemented at the start of the campaign. It is about what rules they implemented at this time. I'm sure you know that since you are a supporter of 1xbit, you even wear a 1xbit signature.

you guys are getting out of topic , it is the victims claims is our concern here and not about that signature campaign or other advertising they are having here.

instead let us push things for the sake of the victim from scamming and not the not related topics like this.

[Naficopa]

There was a previous 1xBit signature campaign? I do not know about that.

As far as I remember, there is a discussion that those who promote scam/shady sites are getting negative trust. You can search it here in this forum. I don't know the rest if they really got red trusted just like the supporters of adkinsbet and yobit. I wouldn't say it if I haven't know that 1xbit have previous signature campaign.

I found old signature campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1656122.0
But I can not find thread with that discussion. Thank you if anyone can provide the link.

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3


Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

If the team did not accept those members from the beginning ? i believe that this will not go this far from bashing and complications .
because they have been warned about those adkinsbet Army of shill but instead of disregarding their application , the 1xbit team accepts them all and this made the issue more questionable in the whole forum.

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

I know it's a bit weird, but it's possible the manager didn't check exactly what the Adkinsbet case was about. I didn't know about the whole situation with Adkinsbet either. It is true that these accounts should not be accepted from the beginning, but it is good that this situation is finally settled.

It is obvious that everyone is closely watching what is happening with 1xBit. I would like these people to speak objectively about this situation and not to shout accusations based on the past, which at this point has nothing to do with the current situation of 1xBit.

[kontrakwel]

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

This proves again that 1xbit is just scamming and scamming, and it continues.
I also want to point out to people that 1xcorp n.v. does not exist anymore. According to Wikipedia, 1xcorp is the owner of 1xbit.
Which means that 1xbit is at this moment illegally running their website. I advise people not to deposit here.

What bothers me a lot is that 1xbit_official writes that there are many cases "Solved"
Well, the definition of Solved in their opinion is refund the deposit, and just void all the winnings.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

They still did not solve my case, and the 550 mbtc is still missing in my account.
Its just a scam, nobody should deposit here!!!!
I did not violate any terms, that is just made up by 1xbit because they dont want to pay me.

[Reatim]

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3


Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

If the team did not accept those members from the beginning ? i believe that this will not go this far from bashing and complications .
because they have been warned about those adkinsbet Army of shill but instead of disregarding their application , the 1xbit team accepts them all and this made the issue more questionable in the whole forum.

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

I know it's a bit weird, but it's possible the manager didn't check exactly what the Adkinsbet case was about. I didn't know about the whole situation with Adkinsbet either. It is true that these accounts should not be accepted from the beginning, but it is good that this situation is finally settled.

Well he should have pay attention because from the very beginning of the campaign thread creation it was already mentioned about those gangs , and obviously seeing their
trust history is an obvious violators.

but of course that is past that needs not to talk anymore .

It is obvious that everyone is closely watching what is happening with 1xBit. I would like these people to speak objectively about this situation and not to shout accusations based on the past, which at this point has nothing to do with the current situation of 1xBit.

While i understand your concern  mate about being objective in pointing issue, yet we cannot blame them because the team yet doing no expected action towards the
claimants instead continue denying about their funds.

anyway it is not ours to be feeling bad because we are not the victim here.

[Haunebu]

It is obvious that everyone is closely watching what is happening with 1xBit. I would like these people to speak objectively about this situation and not to shout accusations based on the past, which at this point has nothing to do with the current situation of 1xBit.

Nonsense. Stating that the past accusations have nothing to do with the current state of 1xbit is absurd and dumb. Open your eyes instead of covering them up because of your earnings from their ongoing signature campaign.

@kontrakwel just posted below your post claiming that he lost 550 mbtc which is a huge amount. This is just one among many recent scam accusations against this scam site.

[sepata123]

Buen dia,
Independiente de todos los comentarios feos que veo acerca de 1xbit considero que es el mejor situo beting que existe, no hay ninguno igualmente , los pagos sson rapidos, el sistema es fluido y amigable y hay gran variedad de opciones para bet

Good day
Regardless of all the ugly comments that I see about 1xbit, I consider it to be the best betting site that exists, there is none like it, the payments are fast, the system is fluid and friendly and there are a wide variety of options to bet

[sepata123]

I believe that 1xbit is the better place to bet

[kontrakwel]

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

This proves again that 1xbit is just scamming and scamming, and it continues.
I also want to point out to people that 1xcorp n.v. does not exist anymore. According to Wikipedia, 1xcorp is the owner of 1xbit.
Which means that 1xbit is at this moment illegally running their website. I advise people not to deposit here.

What bothers me a lot is that 1xbit_official writes that there are many cases "Solved"
Well, the definition of Solved in their opinion is refund the deposit, and just void all the winnings.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

They still did not solve my case, and the 550 mbtc is still missing in my account.
Its just a scam, nobody should deposit here!!!!
I did not violate any terms, that is just made up by 1xbit because they dont want to pay me.

They scammed me for 550 mbtc, and refuse to pay me.

[Desmong]

I don't blame you because you are such an ignorance person that need to get a life...are you doing this because you are being paid just to make posts for your campaign or you just want to make common sense.

Hilarious. I pity shills like you who possess below average debating skills. It's ignorant(Not ignorance). Tip: Improve your grammar and debating skills fool!

Do you think I have the time in debating with you bloody fool. If not that you are not irresponsible, would you come to this thread and be posting rubbish as if you damn fucking care about this entire forum as a whole.
Let me advice you boy, try as much to look for a common thread where you can complete your weekly posts, not coming here to grow your tiny muscles that gat no cells in it. In case you don't have a job, kindly hit me up on my dm maybe I can show you some love... I'm not as bad as you could think boy!

[shasan]

I believe that 1xbit is the better place to bet

You are right in regarding that you are a scammer too. Otherwise, you wont give a certificate lie this. 1xbit is a proven scammer which is showing on the profile of 1xbit official bitcointalk forum. So, you are the alternative account of 1xbit, right?

[kontrakwel]

1xbit does not solve cases, they just void all the winnings from your account and give you the refund back, if you are lucky.
This is a 100% way of scamming people and stealing. If you win, they void all your winnings.

[macedounius]

Even if I'm being accused that I violated any rule, 1xbit violated before not closing my account on my request so it makes no sense sorry.

After placing a bet on 1xBit, you consent to the ToS. It is said that there is an availability of account closure after player's request, but requests require time to be processed, and this time is not specified.

On this screenshot, you've asked for the account closure during a deposit being processed, which is technically impossible.

Deposit issues are solved by the security and support teams, not the block one.
In addition, this email is not listed on the contact list of 1xBit: https://1xbit.com/information/contacts/

We unsure where did you get it from, but such a request shouldn't be processed by block department, and response time of this email is not regulated.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

Are you kidding me?
This email (block@1x-bit.com) is security that told me to contact to have my account closed due addiction.
As you can see here:
https://i.imgur.com/AuFswR3.png


So yeah I was being forwarded and ignored.
Look at this:
https://i.imgur.com/iFR8JC8.png

What is the next lie?
Block@1x-bit.com is my invention?

If you couldn't close my account you could at least limit my stakes to 0mBT, couldn't you?

Isn't this unethical? You know you could and you should have done more. Don't you have any goodwill gesture?