AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Dr.Lender3]

People are definitely embarrassed when they're caught, but you're a little different. Beware of mental illness.

CryptopreneurBrainboss should kick your ass.

At least his contribution is better than yours. lol..
CryptopreneurBrainboss is well aware of this post, cause someone already mentioned him previously..
This thread is created to correct people's behaviour, not ruin their reputation and contribution.. so CryptopreneurBrainboss is wise enough what he should do and what he should not.

You don't need to spam on forum by making unnecessary posts everywhere. I could see you already posted this matter in another place where you should not be posting.

I used the detector mentioned previously, but nutildah if I'm not mistaken. Is it accurate? That's something I'm not familiar with, and I'm taking this findings with a grain of salt. However, there's definitely a discrepancy between your newer and your older posts. Is it 100% AI? That's something no one can say with 100% confidence, but are you using some kind of software/platform you name it, certainly yes. I'm not straight-up accusing you, but it's no secret that your posts do look suspicious, and with your recent ones not being detected by AI, it looks like a red-flag.

Yeah, i also read his recent posts, those are cool and very good,, i didnt find any AI detection on his recent posts...

if he corrected himself, then it is the main goal of this thread..
I really appreciate his contribution on the forum and hope he will never use Ai, transalator or Grammarly from now on..

Good Luck Alex077, hope brainboss will consider your case closely and give you another chance..

[Dropsera]

People are definitely embarrassed when they're caught, but you're a little different. Beware of mental illness.

CryptopreneurBrainboss should kick your ass.

At least his contribution is better than yours. lol..
CryptopreneurBrainboss is well aware of this post, cause someone already mentioned him previously..
This thread is created to correct people's behaviour, not ruin their reputation and contribution.. so CryptopreneurBrainboss is wise enough what he should do and what he should not.

You don't need to spam on forum by making unnecessary posts everywhere. I could see you already posted this matter in another place where you should not be posting.

I used the detector mentioned previously, but nutildah if I'm not mistaken. Is it accurate? That's something I'm not familiar with, and I'm taking this findings with a grain of salt. However, there's definitely a discrepancy between your newer and your older posts. Is it 100% AI? That's something no one can say with 100% confidence, but are you using some kind of software/platform you name it, certainly yes. I'm not straight-up accusing you, but it's no secret that your posts do look suspicious, and with your recent ones not being detected by AI, it looks like a red-flag.

Yeah, i also read his recent posts, those are cool and very good,, i didnt find any AI detection on his recent posts...

if he corrected himself, then it is the main goal of this thread..
I really appreciate his contribution on the forum and hope he will never use Ai, transalator or Grammarly from now on..

Good Luck Alex077, hope brainboss will consider your case closely and give you another chance..

Sorry, buddy, is that your account?

Oops, you're an expert.
Some bounty posts have been edited.

I'm useless here.
https://hostmeme.com/uploads/1756450391_35a449.jpg

[adam.sandler]

User : stuff0577

1.

While it's tempting to look for the next big thing when BTC slows down, jumping into new coins on Binance just because they’re “new” can be risky. Many of them pump due to hype and listings, then fade out just as fast. Instead, look for strong fundamentals: real use case, active dev team, community traction, and tokenomics that make sense.

Also, don’t sleep on Bitcoin and Ethereum. A short-term dip doesn’t mean long-term weakness. BTC has done this for over a decade. Dips followed by new highs. ETH too, especially with increasing L2 adoption and real-world applications growing.

If you’re set on exploring, consider diversifying into projects with solid ecosystems. Maybe something in AI, RWA, or DePIN sectors, which have seen increasing attention. Just don’t FOMO into the first green candle.

And always remember: extra cash ≠ throwaway cash. Still invest wisely.  

gptzero : 100٪
copyleaks: 100٪
sapling: 100٪


2.

It’s undeniable that stablecoins like USDT and USDC have greatly contributed to Ethereum’s utility and daily transaction volume. Especially in DeFi, where they serve as the primary unit of account and settlement. But to say Ethereum would be worthless without them seems like an exaggeration.
Ethereum’s value isn’t solely tied to stablecoins. It's about programmable money and the flexibility of smart contracts. Even without stablecoins, ETH powers a wide ecosystem. From NFTs and DAOs to rollups, gaming, and more. In fact, some L2s like Arbitrum and Base are gaining traction precisely because of ETH’s versatility, not just stablecoin settlement. Also, banning a stablecoin like USDT wouldn’t "ban" Ethereum. Tether or Circle could be pressured to freeze assets or comply with regulations, but Ethereum remains a decentralized global platform. These tokens are contracts on Ethereum.  not Ethereum itself.  And while Bitcoin L2s with stablecoin-like instruments would be a great evolution (e.g. Fedimint, Lightning-issued stable assets), they’re not as flexible or mature yet.
In short: stablecoins boosted Ethereum’s usage, yes. but ETH is still standing on its own innovation.

gptzero : 100٪
phrasly : 100%
sapling: 97.1٪
copyleaks: 91٪


3.

This really hits on the core frustration many retail traders feel. Trying to make sense of a market that often behaves irrationally, with bots front-running, influencers shilling, and sudden dumps wiping out solid-looking setups. The idea of letting randomness take the wheel is definitely provocative, and in some cases might even outperform retail “analysis” during hype cycles.

That said, while random baskets might give exposure to unexpected moonshots, they also expose you to a lot of garbage. Without filtering for dev activity, tokenomics, or even basic red flags, you risk bag-holding projects that were never meant to survive.

I get the appeal of throwing darts when the game feels rigged. But in the long run, filtering for fundamentals, narrative strength, or even just active devs gives you a better edge than pure chance.

Use randomness for fun or experimentation, but don’t build your whole strategy on it… or stay away from it.

gptzero : 100٪
copyleaks : 100٪
the-ghost-ai : Your text was detected as AI.


4.

People throwing out "$100 XRP" predictions really need a basic lesson in market caps and supply math.
A $6T+ market cap for XRP would mean it’s worth more than the entire crypto market right now — and that’s assuming zero dilution, no black swan events, and full global adoption. Not impossible in theory, but definitely detached from current reality.

XRP has utility, yes — but utility alone doesn’t pump a token 200x without major catalysts.
And let’s not forget, it’s already been around for over a decade. If it were going to be “the chosen one,” wouldn’t it have shown stronger signs by now?

That said, people can believe what they want. Some are bagholding, some are trading the hype, and some just like the logo. But let’s stay grounded in math, not hopium.

gptzero : 100٪
the-ghost-ai : Your text was detected as AI.
phrasly : 100%


5.

Great points raised here. I lean toward a hybrid approach. I stake a portion of my SOL  but I'm cautious about diving into every shiny restaking farm that pops up with 100% APR banners and cartoon frogs.

Before I park SOL on any new protocol, I ask: Do I understand how this works? Do I know who's behind it? Can I afford to lose it all? If not, I treat it like a casino, not an investment.

The truth is, some of these DeFi farms are like dating apps. Looks promising at first, but rug pulls are always a swipe away.

That said, if you’re tired of DeFi drama and want to bet on something more transparent, try your luck on SolBetX
solbetx.com

Bet wisely… or just stake and chill  

gptzero : 100٪
sapling: 100٪
the-ghost-ai : Your text was detected as AI.




I don't know if I'm guessing right or not! But I think this account has been sold
According to his previous posts like this one he wrote in 2023:

Hi Good day.. Woodcoiners we are proud to introduce https://mylogstore.com/ where you can buy woodcoin merchandise.. Please do check it out.. logs are accepted.. thanks...

The writing style is consistent with his previous posts (in my opinion)

But after almost 2 years his writing style has changed and he has started advertising instead of using artificial intelligence. His first post after 2 years =

Live Now – Join the Action

 

Experience SolBetX live: https://solbetx.com

Guidelines

Legal Notice:

 

Please play responsibly. Ensure that using SolBetX is legal in your jurisdiction.

Technical Note:

 

You can run the front-end locally via our GitHub repo.  
All data is stored on-chain. The smart contract is immutable, non-upgradable, and irreversible.  
There is no backend server — only Solana nodes.

---

Built on Truth. Powered by the People. Just 3% fuels it all.

[nutildah]

I don't know if I'm guessing right or not! But I think this account has been sold

Yep, definitely appears to be sold or hacked. Pretty much all of their posts written this year use AI, including the ANN of their SolBetX project they are centered on. In that thread, its likely AI posts won't be removed. But they have been posting in plenty of other areas, and those posts should be removed. For instance:

I don’t know about the stats, but I definitely stick longer with casinos that don’t nickel-and-dime me on withdrawals. If you’re already taking my money at the roulette table, at least let me leave without charging a toll at the door.

Fee-free withdrawals feel like a small "thank you" for playing. But if you're slapping a 50k sat fee when the mempool's empty? Come on now, that’s just greedy.

Smart casinos cover the network fee and probably make it back from happier, more loyal users who keep coming back.

Any casino reps wanna spill the tea on what works best?

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

[Ultegra134]

Another newbie using AI. It seems that he's using a combination of methods or is polishing his texts with humanizers or AI, as some posts show high traces of AI, in both GPTZero, Sapling.ai and Phrasly, but Copyleaks doesn't detect anything major. There's certainly AI involved in a large number of his posts. He has also created a decent number of posts already.

User: pancelot

Post 1.

Personally, I'm not an entrepreneur, but if I were, I would still support the use of Bitcoin as an alternative transaction method. I believe Bitcoin offers flexibility, transparency, and efficiency across borders, which could be valuable additions to the business world. However, this must be considered rationally, considering the current situation. High price volatility, unstable or inadequate regulation, and limited widespread market acceptance make Bitcoin more suitable as a complement (for now), rather than a primary replacement for cash or conventional payment systems. With this approach, I believe Bitcoin can still be utilized as a tremendous opportunity for business development, without ignoring the realities of the challenges.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 90% Mixed, edited by AI

Post 2.

I agree with this view that bankroll management is not a good strategy. Its primary function is simply to protect against sudden losses, but to make them more manageable. However, it won't significantly improve the odds. As long as the expected value remains negative, the end result will remain the same, ultimately eroding capital.
On the other hand, I believe strategy is what truly determines the direction of our game. This involves analyzing opportunities, utilizing information, and understanding situations to create an advantage. Therefore, without an approach, bankroll management will only prolong playing time without changing the outcome.

In other words, I believe bankroll management is important for developing discipline and self-control, but it cannot stand alone. Sustainability is possible if it is combined with a strategy that provides a mathematical and logical basis for winning.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 95% Mixed, edited by AI

Post 3

I actually feel that if a major country forces Bitcoin mining to use only solar energy, it would seem more like political intervention than a concrete solution. As we know, Bitcoin is inherently energy-neutral; miners will always choose the most efficient and cheapest energy sources, and the global trend is already moving towards renewable energy without regulatory pressure.

This kind of regulation would actually reduce competitiveness for miners in the country that created the regulation because solar energy is not yet stable across the region. As a result, many miners would migrate to other countries with more liberal regulations, where the Bitcoin network would still operate normally thanks to its difficulty adjustment mechanism.

This means that Bitcoin cannot be weakened by unilateral regulations alone. Instead, this kind of regulation would demonstrate the resilience of this network, which always finds its own way out, while also emphasizing that Bitcoin is far stronger than any political or regulatory intervention.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI

[nutildah]

Here's a 2018 account that came back to life after a nearly 4-year absence to start threads with the help of AI.

sohidulsk99

He only has 7 posts since 2021 but they are all AI-generated. Here's 5 of them:

#1

I think the idea of Bitcoin as protection against economic collapse is both interesting and complex. On one hand, Bitcoin provides something traditional finance cannot: a decentralized and borderless asset that cannot be printed or inflated at will. For individuals living in countries with high inflation or strict capital controls, Bitcoin has already served as a lifeline.

On the other hand, during global crises, we often see Bitcoin’s price move down together with stocks and other risk assets. This suggests that in the short term, it may not act as a “perfect hedge” but more like a highly volatile alternative asset.

Perhaps the real protective value of Bitcoin is not in short-term price stability, but in the long-term guarantee that its supply cannot be manipulated by governments or central banks. If the traditional financial system keeps moving towards more debt and money printing, then over time, Bitcoin could indeed stand out as a form of digital protection.

The real question might not be “can Bitcoin save us from collapse today?” but “how much stronger will Bitcoin become after each crisis exposes the weaknesses of fiat money?

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated


#2

It is indeed fascinating that Satoshi mined over a million Bitcoins yet never moved them. This act alone separates him from almost every other figure in the history of finance and technology.

In many ways, the untouched coins are more than just a mystery — they serve as a symbol. They remind us that Bitcoin was not created for personal gain but for a larger vision of financial freedom and decentralization.

If Satoshi had spent or cashed out those coins, the narrative of Bitcoin might have been very different. Instead, by walking away, he ensured that the focus remained on the technology itself, not on the creator.

Sometimes I wonder:
👉 If one day those coins were ever moved, would it weaken Bitcoin’s legend, or would it make the network stronger by proving that even Satoshi must ultimately rely on the same rules as everyone else?

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated


#3

Bitcoin was designed to be censorship-resistant, but governments still have power to regulate exchanges, restrict banks, and control internet infrastructure.

It makes me think:

If several major countries coordinated a strict ban, would Bitcoin transactions still remain strong through peer-to-peer networks?

Could users shift more toward decentralized exchanges and privacy tools if regulations become too harsh?

Or would such actions simply push Bitcoin underground, similar to how some banned technologies still survive?


👉 I am curious about the community’s thoughts — would Bitcoin survive and adapt under a global ban scenario, or would adoption slow down significantly?

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated


#4

Thanks for sharing the full list of matches, it looks like a very competitive week.

From my side, a few games stand out:

Liverpool vs Watford → Liverpool at home is usually very strong, so I think this should be a safe pick.

Feyenoord vs PSV → This one feels tricky, because both teams are in good form. For me it looks like a game where both teams could score.

Arsenal vs Manchester City → Probably the most exciting match of the list. City has the quality, but Arsenal at home with their current form can make it difficult. I wouldn’t be surprised if it ends in a draw.


Overall, I think making a multi-leg parlay this week will be tough because too many close games are on the list. Safer picks might be Liverpool and PSG, but the rest look unpredictable.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated


#5

Bitcoin’s base layer is designed with limited block size and block interval to maintain decentralization and security. However, this also creates scalability challenges when transaction demand increases.

Layer 2 solutions such as the Lightning Network are often considered the best approach to scale Bitcoin without compromising its fundamental principles. Yet, questions remain:

Can Lightning (or other Layer 2 protocols) eventually handle the majority of Bitcoin transactions securely?

What are the technical limitations that still need to be solved (e.g., routing, liquidity, channel capacity)?

If Layer 2 becomes the main medium for transactions, will the base layer primarily serve as a settlement layer, similar to how central banks handle reserves?


I am curious to know the community’s technical perspective on whether Bitcoin’s long-term transaction scalability will depend mostly on Layer 2 solutions, or if significant base layer changes may still be necessary in the future.

Sapling: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

[Ultegra134]

Here's a 2018 account that came back to life after a nearly 4-year absence to start threads with the help of AI.

sohidulsk99

He only has 7 posts since 2021 but they are all AI-generated. Here's 5 of them:

I believe I've found a similar case as well. Older posts are shit and totally random, but new ones look polished compared to the old ones. It seems that they're using a paraphraser because some posts initially aren't detected as AI.

User: daxkie

Post 1.

I’m with the younger crowd on this one. Keeping money in the bank feels pointless, interest rates are a joke, and inflation eats the rest. Bitcoin gives us an option that actually feels alive, not stuck. It’s not just about quick profits either, it’s about having control and knowing our money isn’t just sitting there doing nothing. That’s why so many of us are drawn to it.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI

Post 2.

Bitcoin has definitely shown it can be more than just a passing trend, but completely replacing fiat is another story. Fiat currencies aren’t just about payments, they’re tied to how governments manage economies, debts, and policies. That’s not something they’ll easily give up. What Bitcoin can do is offer an alternative system one that’s borderless, transparent, and free from central authority. For people in unstable economies, that already makes BTC more attractive than their local fiat. But for daily transactions and stability, fiat still has the upper hand. So in my view, it’s less about BTC replacing fiat and more about both co-existing: fiat for mainstream use, BTC as digital gold and a financial safety net. The real question is how much space governments are willing to give Bitcoin as it keeps growing.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI

Post 3.

You’re right that most people today don’t dive into the whitepaper or care who Satoshi is they just buy, sell, and hope for profit. But I don’t think that automatically means the origin won’t matter later. Think of it like the internet. Most users don’t know who Vint Cerf or Tim Berners-Lee are, but their stories still shape how universities, books, and even documentaries explain the internet’s importance. Bitcoin might follow the same path day-to-day users won’t care, but the history will keep inspiring builders, developers, and educators. So maybe the majority won’t care, but the right minority (innovators, teachers, policymakers) will. And that might be enough to keep Bitcoin’s origin alive across generations.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 0% AI

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie bitbuzz001? His post is short and he's just starting, but this screams chatbot verbal diarrhea:

You make a great point! The fact that nodes follow the chain with the most work helps prevent censorship. Miners must balance regulatory pressures while keeping the network healthy, which adds complexity to their decisions. It raises interesting questions about how this affects broader Bitcoin adoption. What do you think?

[Free Market Capitalist]

What's the verdict on Newbie bitbuzz001? His post is short and he's just starting, but this screams chatbot verbal diarrhea:
...

ZeroGPT gives me a 50% AI result, so he could have tweaked what was generated or used a humanizer. But it could also be a (half) false positive. Two other detectors ask me to add more text in order to proceed. With only two posts in its post history, it's too early to tell.

[Satofan44]

What's the verdict on Newbie bitbuzz001? His post is short and he's just starting, but this screams chatbot verbal diarrhea:

You make a great point! The fact that nodes follow the chain with the most work helps prevent censorship. Miners must balance regulatory pressures while keeping the network healthy, which adds complexity to their decisions. It raises interesting questions about how this affects broader Bitcoin adoption. What do you think?

100% AI, no real person writes using this "—" and with such sentence structure. It is one of those things that ChatGPT does very commonly.

Well said — Bitcoin’s journey really shows how much it’s about conviction and long-term belief, not just price swings.

[Ultegra134]

100% AI, no real person writes using this "—" and with such sentence structure. It is one of those things that ChatGPT does very commonly.

Well said — Bitcoin’s journey really shows how much it’s about conviction and long-term belief, not just price swings.

That's what I've also said, no actual person uses it on an average forum. If I'm honest, I don't even know how to type it on the keyboard myself, except for the regular hyphen (-). However, in many cases it's inconclusive to make the assumption that it's AI, because as I've also mentioned in a previous reply, the dash is often used by grammar correctors such as Grammarly or Quillbot. Thus, even though it does look suspicious, it's not necessarily a red flag, it depends on the user, their posting history, habits etc.

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie Assiduous? I noticed this post on the tech board, but I think this is even more obvious chatbot verbal diarrhea:

There are several facts that make it clear that Salomon Brothers is no longer under Citigroup.

The mentioned website is neither official nor authentic. There are many reasons to be suspicious about it. Even though the salomonbros website looks official, the domain was only registered recently, in 2023. A quick check shows that Scam Detector has given this site a score of 48.9/100, which means caution is needed when dealing with it. Although the site displays an official-looking address under the name “Salomon Brothers Inc.,” this does not prove that it is part of Citigroup.

Salomon Brothers was originally a powerful investment bank on Wall Street, founded in 1910. Later, in 1997, it became part of Travelers Group, and from there it was merged into Citigroup. However, in 2003, the Salomon Brothers brand name was formally discontinued within Citigroup.

Therefore, as of today, there is no active or functional unit under the name Salomon Brothers that belongs to Citigroup.

[nutildah]

What's the verdict on Newbie Assiduous? I noticed this post on the tech board, but I think this is even more obvious chatbot verbal diarrhea:

Classic AI BS. But I can see how it could be debatable as some of his older posts seem AI but are actually just bad.

Crypto analyst Josh said in his latest analysis that Bitcoin is still showing a short-term bearish signal.

Good 'ol Josh.

It seems like it may be an instance of someone using an AI translation method as some post analysis results come back as "mixed" in GPTZero.

In any case, the example brought up by LoyceV is definitively AI:


#1

There are several facts that make it clear that Salomon Brothers is no longer under Citigroup.

The mentioned website is neither official nor authentic. There are many reasons to be suspicious about it. Even though the salomonbros website looks official, the domain was only registered recently, in 2023. A quick check shows that Scam Detector has given this site a score of 48.9/100, which means caution is needed when dealing with it. Although the site displays an official-looking address under the name “Salomon Brothers Inc.,” this does not prove that it is part of Citigroup.

Salomon Brothers was originally a powerful investment bank on Wall Street, founded in 1910. Later, in 1997, it became part of Travelers Group, and from there it was merged into Citigroup. However, in 2003, the Salomon Brothers brand name was formally discontinued within Citigroup.

Therefore, as of today, there is no active or functional unit under the name Salomon Brothers that belongs to Citigroup.

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 80% AI generated

This is just about the only one that is purely AI, thus far.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Can I ask the moderators who checked this report why it came out as "bad"?

Corruption has always been one of the biggest challenges in Nigeria. From missing funds in government projects to shady deals in public offices, it seems money often disappears without accountability.

Some people argue that Bitcoin and blockchain technology could help reduce corruption, since every transaction is permanently recorded on a public ledger. This means funds could be tracked openly, making it harder for politicians or agencies to hide stolen money.

But on the other hand, others believe that corrupt officials will always find ways around the system, and that the government itself may even resist Bitcoin adoption if it threatens their control over the financial system.

So my question is this: Do you think Bitcoin can truly reduce corruption in Nigeria’s financial system, or is this just wishful thinking? And if yes, how do you see it being implemented in real life?

Would love to hear the community’s thoughts.

gptzero -100% AI generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: 100%
isgen.ai 100%
https://developers.sber.ru/portal/products/gigacheck - AI Content
quillbot.100%

I would understand if the post was controversial in defining the spelling of AI, but here all the detectors unanimously write that it is AI.

[Lucius]

Can I ask the moderators who checked this report why it came out as "bad"?
~snip~

I doubt you'll get an answer this way - the only way is to try to contact the moderator responsible for the board the post is on or a global mod. The matter seems quite clear, so I assume that it may be a mistake on the part of the moderator who is the handle report. It usually happens to me that the post gets deleted and the report marked as bad, but the person who does the work can make mistakes.

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie shitposter dayhappy?

Armory uses strong encryption that resists simple hacks. Unfortunately, no standard program exists for safely guessing missing letters in such a scenario, but you could explore custom scripts or consult Bitcoin recovery experts, though success isn't guaranteed and may involve risks.

Based on the data at hand, the founders and investors behind Delta Exchange—Balani, Gupta, and venture firms like Coinbase Ventures—have no ties whatsoever to the 2018 Deltaexchange project. There’s no overlap in names, profiles, or funding trails. Delta Exchange stands as project, zeroed in on centralized trading, whereas Deltaexchange 2018 was DeFi DEX.

Failure is a natural part of trading and personal growth, and it should not discourage you from trying again. Success in trading involves wisdom, experience, and some luck, but no one can predict outcomes perfectly or avoid setbacks permanently.

In the modern world, access to information and audiences has really lowered the barriers to starting many projects, so creativity and the ability to find non-standard solutions are often more important than large financial investments. Social networks and online platforms allow you to quickly declare yourself and attract support, which makes resourcefulness a key factor in success.

However, money remains an important tool for growing and scaling the business - it allows you to invest in quality, advertising and team expansion. Therefore, while creativity and resourcefulness can lead to wealth, the availability of start-up capital greatly speeds up the process and expands opportunities.

[Ultegra134]

What's the verdict on Newbie shitposter dayhappy?

Seems like AI diarrhea. I'm reporting every single one of his posts, all are made with AI, some just appear undetected due to their length. Anything less than 100 words sometimes isn't as accurate, especially if he has fiddled with the writing of the posts to make them appear more "human". The use of hyphen also gives it away, and perhaps he's writing small one to two liner posts on purpose. A smaller post written by AI doesn't immediately catch your attention compared to a wall of text. Hopefully, he's nuked.

Good catch!

Post 1.

Based on the data at hand, the founders and investors behind Delta Exchange—Balani, Gupta, and venture firms like Coinbase Ventures—have no ties whatsoever to the 2018 Deltaexchange project. There’s no overlap in names, profiles, or funding trails. Delta Exchange stands as project, zeroed in on centralized trading, whereas Deltaexchange 2018 was DeFi DEX.

Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Phrasly: 100% AI

Post 2.

In the modern world, access to information and audiences has really lowered the barriers to starting many projects, so creativity and the ability to find non-standard solutions are often more important than large financial investments. Social networks and online platforms allow you to quickly declare yourself and attract support, which makes resourcefulness a key factor in success.

However, money remains an important tool for growing and scaling the business - it allows you to invest in quality, advertising and team expansion. Therefore, while creativity and resourcefulness can lead to wealth, the availability of start-up capital greatly speeds up the process and expands opportunities.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Phrasly:100% AI

[lovesmayfamilis]

If I'm not mistaken, this user was already in this thread? However, some posts still scream about the use of AI.

There are several reasons why nodes might not be synchronizing or could be rejecting your connection. Some nodes might be offline or experiencing technical issues. They might be running outdated or incompatible software versions. Firewalls or network restrictions can block incoming connections. Some nodes are “pruned” and don’t store the full blockchain history, which limits synchronization. Temporary network problems or attacks like DDoS can cause disruptions. Also, some nodes intentionally reject unknown connections for security reasons.

gptzero -100% AI generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: 100%
isgen.ai 100%
https://developers.sber.ru/portal/products/gigacheck - AI Content
quillbot.100%

Bet Builder can be an interesting tool, but it should be used with caution. The smartest approach is to focus on matches with a clear favorite and logical connections between markets, like the winner and total goals. Adding too many options, like cards or corners, often reduces the chances of winning and feels more like gambling than a well-thought-out prediction. Used selectively and with proper analysis, it can offer better odds than a single bet, but it’s not a replacement for a well-researched wager.

gptzero -100% AI generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: 100%
isgen.ai 100%
https://developers.sber.ru/portal/products/gigacheck - AI Content
quillbot.100%

Although the idea of combining Blockchain + KYC to prevent gambling addiction is innovative, it carries significant risks. Primarily, there is the issue of privacy and personal data protection, as a global database of self-exclusion users could be misused. Additionally, accurately identifying addiction through wallet activity may be unreliable and could result in errors, blocking regular players. Finally, there is still the possibility of circumventing the system through alternative identities or intermediaries

gptzero -100% AI generated
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: 100%
isgen.ai 100%
https://developers.sber.ru/portal/products/gigacheck - AI Content
quillbot.100%

[nutildah]

If I'm not mistaken, this user was already in this thread? However, some posts still scream about the use of AI.

Pretty old fashioned, just feed the post you are replying to as a prompt and copy/paste the output. No humanizer or manual changes, just straight AI shitposting. I can see the owner isn't a native English speaker but I don't think its cool to just substitute original thought for AI.

Here's one more:

A return to gambling after a period of abstinence can be attributed to various factors, including stress, boredom, emotional distress, exposure to triggers such as advertisements or gambling apps, and a lack of social support. Even after a prolonged period without gambling, encountering these triggers can reignite the desire to gamble.

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quillbot: 100% of text is likely AI


I ran a few other posts and they come back like this in GPTZero:



This suggests they are using AI to do at least some translation, which is why I'm hesitant to tag them.

[the rise]

If I'm not mistaken, this user was already in this thread? However, some posts still scream about the use of AI.

Pretty old fashioned, just feed the post you are replying to as a prompt and copy/paste the output. No humanizer or manual changes, just straight AI shitposting. I can see the owner isn't a native English speaker but I don't think its cool to just substitute original thought for AI.

Here's one more:

A return to gambling after a period of abstinence can be attributed to various factors, including stress, boredom, emotional distress, exposure to triggers such as advertisements or gambling apps, and a lack of social support. Even after a prolonged period without gambling, encountering these triggers can reignite the desire to gamble.

Copyleaks: 100% AI generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
Quillbot: 100% of text is likely AI


I ran a few other posts and they come back like this in GPTZero:



This suggests they are using AI to do at least some translation, which is why I'm hesitant to tag them.

if he was innocent then he would not have deleted his post