AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[TypoTonic]

Newbie account registered on May 2021, woke up recently and started posting using AI.
User: Jeorgejs

Code:

12/16/2025 3:38:59 PM	woke up
12/16/2025 4:32:18 PM	Profile woke up	New post

Why selling Bitcoin is the right choice here because the child at risk is an emergency, not a financial optimization problem, selling Bitcoin gives immediate, no-strings-attached cash but
borrowing adds delay, stress, and uncertainty
debt pressure can make a dangerous situation worse,
you can rebuild investments later; you cannot undo harm.

After the emergency
When things are stable, you can:
Rebuild savings
Reinvest slowly

Create a real emergency fund so this never happens again
Many strong, responsible people have had to liquidate assets in crises.
What defines you is not holding Bitcoin — it’s protecting someone who depends on you.

GPTZero - 79% AI generated
Copyleaks - 100% AI generated
Sapling - 100% Fake
StealthWriter - 86% AI generated
Originality.ai - 100% AI generated

Imagine a world where every purchase, from coffee to bus tickets, requires a smartphone and internet. Sounds convenient—but it leaves millions behind.

First, accessibility. Cash is universal. Not everyone has smartphones, internet, or digital skills. Rural communities, the elderly, and low-income populations rely on cash. Without full access, Bitcoin cannot serve everyone.

Second, privacy. Cash transactions are anonymous and untraceable. Bitcoin, even though it’s pseudonymous, records every transaction on a public ledger. For many, privacy matters—and cash delivers it.

Third, reliability. Cash works without electricity, internet, or technology. In disasters or outages, digital currencies fail. Cash keeps the economy moving when everything else stops.

Finally, legal recognition. Cash is legal tender, backed and accepted by governments worldwide. Bitcoin is not universal and faces regulatory uncertainty. Governments are unlikely to remove cash entirely.

In short, Bitcoin is exciting and innovative—but it cannot replace the accessibility, privacy, reliability, and trust that cash provides. Instead, cash and digital money will coexist, each serving a vital role in our economy.

GPTZero - 93% Mixed
Copyleaks - 100% AI generated
Sapling - 100% Fake
ZeroGPT - 95.78% AI
StealthWriter - 94% AI generated
Originality.ai - 100% AI generated

For me wearing a mask before claiming a lottery prize is important for safety.

A lottery win can attract unwanted attention from strangers and scammers.
By wearing a mask, I protect my identity and my family while I take time to make responsible decisions.
Privacy helps me stay focused and safe during a life-changing moment.

A mask is not about hiding—it’s about protecting my future.

GPTZero - 100% Mixed
Copyleaks - 100% AI generated
Sapling - 100% Fake
QuillBot - 100% AI generated
ZeroGPT - 100% AI
StealthWriter - 80% AI generated

Bitcoin’s fall below $86,000 (per source word) isn’t just macro selling — it’s collateral damage from a broader tech/AI market freakout, and that reveals the uncomfortable truth:

Crypto isn’t the uncoupled hedge asset people pretend — it’s now just another lever for AI-driven liquidity flows.

Some whales treat Bitcoin like a leveraged tech bet, not digital gold — selling BTC when tech sentiment shifts.

Hard truth:
Bitcoin is no longer trading as an independent asset.
It’s trading like leveraged tech beta.

GPTZero - 70% Mixed
Copyleaks - 100% AI generated
Sapling - 100% Fake
StealthWriter - 80% AI generated

[xmrhopium]

Here we're again busting some weekly payout AI writer aka "bitzizzix" a forum "Hero Member" promoting BC.Game with verbal AI diarrhea.

I believe @bitzizzix seriously thinks putting some sort of emoji(s) into a post at either mid or end stops anyone from noticing it was written by some kinda AI, damn it  .

also tagging Little Mouse here as a side note to take a look.

for the ref.

Post:1

Congratulations on your win, achieving a 20x rollover, a feat only a few gamblers achieve. It was your lucky night, and when luck is on your side, the game becomes even more exciting and fun, and you finally achieved it.
And I've only experienced this once before, when I received a bonus from bc.game with a 25x rollover requirement, but it was an experience that's hard to replicate.
And if you can achieve a 50x rollover, that's incredible.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Originality aI: 100% Confident that's AI
Sapling AI:100% AI

Post:2

In fact, Bitcoin would still be popular and would continue to be so even without a movie about it or Satoshi, because everyone already knows and believes in the stories that have existed throughout its history. As long as the movie doesn't deviate from the story and history, I don't think there's any harm in watching it.
Since the stories that made it popular are often adapted into films, this has become a common practice, and this positive impact can make Bitcoin more widely known, especially to those who are unfamiliar with it, or even unfamiliar with it at all.
The same goes for movies based on true stories that are adapted into films, which can help those who were previously unaware become aware.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Originality aI: 100% Confident that's AI
Sapling AI:100% AI

Post:3

It all depends on your friend's purpose for borrowing money. Unless absolutely necessary, it's best not to lend money. It's also important to assess their character and personality, as not all friends are the same. Some are responsible and keep their promises, while others aren't.
So, if a friend wants to borrow money from me and I know their personality and genuinely need it, I'll probably lend it to them. If it's not so urgent and there are other ways to get it, I might ignore it and perhaps just give them a small amount, just to be helpful.

Money issues can sometimes be problematic in any relationship, and in general, problems with repayment or promises have the potential to cause tension, rifts, awkwardness, and even end a relationship. But it all depends on who we lend money to. And when a relationship changes, it's not always about the desire to repay, but more about shame or feeling bad about not having the money. While it takes time, some people will eventually repay. And if not, that's a risk we have to face, and the most important thing is that we have good intentions and will surely get it back in other ways, or even more. And make it an experience so that it doesn't happen again, especially we have to know his tracks and personality.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Originality aI: 100% Confident that's AI
Sapling AI:100% AI

Post:4

We can't repeat it, and everything will eventually become as you mentioned due to population growth and ruralization, which have the potential to change modern lifestyles due to regional or local developments over time. Furthermore, both ruralization and urbanization have played a role in this change, limiting the space for independent gardening or livestock farming. As most city dwellers or newcomers seek rural areas to settle, and those who migrate back after success or have enough money to build homes in their villages, all this causes rice paddies, plantations, and other empty plots to slowly disappear into homes or buildings.
I think it's a natural occurrence that everything will eventually become as you mentioned, and it will remind them of those times, or when they were children, remembering that everything they needed could be obtained without having to buy it. And as they get older, circumstances change, and what they need, especially the basic necessities available at that time, can be obtained without having to buy it. And now, as adults, everything must be purchased, even at high prices.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Originality aI: 100% Confident that's AI
Sapling AI:100% AI

[AI Buster]

A newbie made 21 posts in a single day.
Taurox

I’ve seen similar cases before. Usually it turns out the backup used was a “watching-only” or paper backup missing the encrypted private root. Armory will still say “Wallet Successfully Restored” because from its POV, the wallet structure is valid — just not spendable. Sadly, that message is misleading for newcomers

stealthwriter = 67% AI-Generated
sapling = 99.5% Fake

From what I’ve seen, the shift around mid to late 20s is less about adolescence and more about refining decision-making. Fewer reckless moves, more calculated ones. That feels like progression within adulthood rather than an extension of adolescence, but the terminology seems to depend on which angle you look at

sapling = 100% Fake
stealthwriter = 100% AI-Generated

[HustleZ]

This Newbie And Alt account of CamilaStar is Using Ai to post And Also got 6 Merits From its Alt. This account Vip police talk Should also Be tagged.

For The Ref  

1.

You know, Bitcoin's got this whole privacy thing going on, and people are like, Oh, it's a haven for criminals, But let's be real, privacy is a fundamental human right, Bitcoin is all about giving people freedom and access, no matter who you are or where you're from. It's not discriminating, it's just providing a service.

The cryptography behind Bitcoin is amazing, It's like, super safe and encrypted, so you know your transactions are protected. And let's be honest, if Bitcoin didn't have this privacy feature, we'd probably be seeing a lot more cyber attacks and stuff.

People who think that Bitcoin is promoting crime because it's private, they're just not understanding the bigger picture, you know? Crime has been around way before Bitcoin, so Bitcoin is just a tool, it's not the cause of crime. It's for everyone, and it's all about inclusivity, not exclusivity.

So, yeah, Bitcoin's private, and that's a good thing! It's about safety, security, and freedom.

GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated
Sapling Ai: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

2.

You know what's wild? Back in 2009, they mined like 1.1 million Bitcoins, which is like, a tiny 5.25% of the total 21 million possible!  Fast forward the time, and we're already at 19.19 million Bitcoins in circulation, that's like, 91.37% of the total.

So, like, only 1.8 million Bitcoins are left to be mined! I am actually wondering, When will it all end? And the pros are like, "Chill, it's gonna take another 120 years or so.

 what's gonna happen when all the Bitcoins are finally mined? The suspense is killing me.

Sapling Ai: 71% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 80% Confident
GPTZero: 76% Ai Generated

That's 2/3 of his total posts. 66.6%

[Charcol]

Please check this account and send a report to the moderator for each post.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3725863

[AuchanX]

A Copper member with 14 trusted ratings who has given great advice on the Meta board.

His point is to report those who artificially inflate their product prices to the moderators.

But he himself is posting the same thing over and over again with slightly different statements. And he is spamming with AI. It's ridiculous.

User: howardsentell

Report Shill Bidding On The Forum

Shill bidding-where a seller or their associates place fake bids to artificially drive up the price of an item in an auction-is widely regarded as unethical and often illegal because it distorts the natural bidding process and harms genuine participants. It can deceive buyers into paying more than the item's true market value, creating an unfair advantage for the seller while eroding trust in the auction system as a whole. In many jurisdictions, it's classified as fraud, potentially leading to legal consequences like fines or shutdowns for those involved. Even in cases where a form of it might be disclosed, it still raises concerns about transparency and can expose systemic issues in markets like collectibles. Overall, it skews prices, discourages fair competition, and it can damage the entire hobby industry. If you have experienced or witness shill bidding report it to the moderators so they can help maintain a safe community.

“FYI guest moderators have deleted this post twice without an explanation”

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 86% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Report CyberBullying on the Forum

If you have experienced or witness cyberbullying, such as harassment, threats, or abusive content on the forum, report it to the moderators so they can help maintain a safe community.

Shill Bidding Prohibited on Major Platforms

Shill bidding-where a seller or their associates place fake bids to artificially drive up the price of an item in an auction-is widely regarded as unethical and often illegal because it distorts the natural bidding process and harms genuine participants. It can deceive buyers into paying more than the item's true market value, creating an unfair advantage for the seller while eroding trust in the auction system as a whole. In many jurisdictions, it's classified as fraud, potentially leading to legal consequences like fines or shutdowns for those involved. Even in cases where a form of it might be disclosed, it still raises concerns about transparency and can expose systemic issues in markets like collectibles. Overall, it skews prices, discourages fair competition, and it can damage the entire hobby industry.


Stackitup add on this thread where you contacted me first and asked me if I wanted to buy your collectibles and started harassing. I have not bought anything on Reddit.

I look forward to meeting all my new friends at the BTC conference.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 99% AI
Stealthwriter: 70% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Current Technical Levels and Short-Term Outlook

Analysts indicate that Bitcoin is struggling to maintain upward momentum in the immediate short term, trading below major Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs).

Support Zones: Strong support is identified around the $89,400 to $91,000 range. There is significant buying interest near these levels, which may prevent a deeper drop. A potential "final leg down" could test these areas before a sustained recovery begins.

Resistance Levels: The primary overhead resistance zone is between $92,000 and $92,500. A clear breakout above this range is needed to signal renewed bullish strength.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Originality: 100%

[howardsentell]

A Copper member with 14 trusted ratings who has given great advice on the Meta board.

His point is to report those who artificially inflate their product prices to the moderators.

But he himself is posting the same thing over and over again with slightly different statements. And he is spamming with AI. It's ridiculous.

User: howardsentell

Report Shill Bidding On The Forum

Shill bidding-where a seller or their associates place fake bids to artificially drive up the price of an item in an auction-is widely regarded as unethical and often illegal because it distorts the natural bidding process and harms genuine participants. It can deceive buyers into paying more than the item's true market value, creating an unfair advantage for the seller while eroding trust in the auction system as a whole. In many jurisdictions, it's classified as fraud, potentially leading to legal consequences like fines or shutdowns for those involved. Even in cases where a form of it might be disclosed, it still raises concerns about transparency and can expose systemic issues in markets like collectibles. Overall, it skews prices, discourages fair competition, and it can damage the entire hobby industry. If you have experienced or witness shill bidding report it to the moderators so they can help maintain a safe community.

“FYI guest moderators have deleted this post twice without an explanation”

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 86% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Report CyberBullying on the Forum

If you have experienced or witness cyberbullying, such as harassment, threats, or abusive content on the forum, report it to the moderators so they can help maintain a safe community.

Shill Bidding Prohibited on Major Platforms

Shill bidding-where a seller or their associates place fake bids to artificially drive up the price of an item in an auction-is widely regarded as unethical and often illegal because it distorts the natural bidding process and harms genuine participants. It can deceive buyers into paying more than the item's true market value, creating an unfair advantage for the seller while eroding trust in the auction system as a whole. In many jurisdictions, it's classified as fraud, potentially leading to legal consequences like fines or shutdowns for those involved. Even in cases where a form of it might be disclosed, it still raises concerns about transparency and can expose systemic issues in markets like collectibles. Overall, it skews prices, discourages fair competition, and it can damage the entire hobby industry.


Stackitup add on this thread where you contacted me first and asked me if I wanted to buy your collectibles and started harassing. I have not bought anything on Reddit.

I look forward to meeting all my new friends at the BTC conference.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 99% AI
Stealthwriter: 70% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Current Technical Levels and Short-Term Outlook

Analysts indicate that Bitcoin is struggling to maintain upward momentum in the immediate short term, trading below major Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs).

Support Zones: Strong support is identified around the $89,400 to $91,000 range. There is significant buying interest near these levels, which may prevent a deeper drop. A potential "final leg down" could test these areas before a sustained recovery begins.

Resistance Levels: The primary overhead resistance zone is between $92,000 and $92,500. A clear breakout above this range is needed to signal renewed bullish strength.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Originality: 100%

What is more important AI or the topic?

[juttsab@]

Another AI shitppster and BigNoteh registered on 14 DEC and within few days this account have made more than 70 posts. They started their journey on forum with Ai posting.


1.

You're talking about shortcuts. In Bitcoin, almost every "shortcut" is actually a trap for the impatient.
People confuse the financial freedom Bitcoin offers (controlling your own money) with getting rich quick. They are two different things. Bitcoin gives you the tool; the wealth (if it comes) is a result of using it with discipline over a very long time.
Practical example:
The slow path: Using DCA (buying a fixed amount each month) for 4 years, holding in your own wallet. Boring, but effective.
The shortcut: Putting all your savings into a shitcoin because "this time it's different." Usually ends at zero.

Bitcoin doesn't make you rich by magic. It makes you responsible. And that responsibility to educate yourself, protect your keys, and keep your cool is the filter many don't want to pass through. They prefer the shortcut... and usually get lost along the way.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality.ai: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 88% AI

2.

This is the whole domino effect in action, and you see it clearly.

You're right. Bitcoin is the only crypto with this "treasury reserve" status for nations and mega-corps. It's the first domino.

When that first domino tips (a country adds it to reserves, a Fortune 500 company holds it on their balance sheet), it creates a mandate for everyone below them.

Big companies → force their partners/suppliers to interact with it.
Countries → force other nations and institutions to settle in it.

The small shops and restaurants accepting BTC now are the early adopters. But soon, it won't be a cool feature—it'll be a business requirement to plug into the global, Bitcoin-based economy.

You've described the adoption path perfectly: Nations & Corporations → Institutions → Businesses → Everyday People.

That's why we stack. We're getting in before it becomes a standard.

gptzero: 92% AI
Originality.ai: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 67% AI

3.

Truth. You don't get a "Bitcoiner" badge from just buying.

Holding through a few green months is easy. The test comes when it drops 50%+ and the news screams it's dead. That's when tourists sell and Bitcoiners buy more.

It's not about a set time (1 year, 4 years). It's about conviction. Do you understand why Bitcoin exists? Do you believe in that future enough to ignore the price noise for years?

A real Bitcoiner has done the reading (whitepaper, articles), understands the value proposition beyond "number go up," and holds not as a trade, but as a belief in a better system.

gptzero: 100% AI
sapling: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI

4.

Most alts aren't competition; they're distractions. Their purpose is to extract capital from those who think they've "missed" Bitcoin. The volatility isn't excitement—it's manipulation and exit liquidity for founders.
Bitcoin's ETF is a demand shock from the traditional world. It brings in capital that literally cannot buy the asset any other way. It's a bridge, not a threat. Price confirms this.
Altcoin ecosystems are built on promises. Bitcoin's ecosystem is built on proof—proof of work, proof of scarcity, proof of resilience for 15+ years. One is a casino; the other is a savings technology.
Don't compare them. It's like comparing a skyscraper's foundation to a sandcastle. Focus on what's real. Focus on Bitcoin.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 70% AI

[xmrhopium]

My friend "Hero Member" aka Xcode7 being mucho lazy these days is because AI bot slowly draining my friend's brain and just caught out their AI habit while promoting JacksClub.io with verbal Ai garbage in the gambling boards this very fresh morning.

also tagging JacksClub here as a side note to take a look.

for the ref.

Post:1

Villarreal playing at their own home, certainly has a slight advantage with the full support of their fans. However, Barcelona is a strong team, and in the modern era, a team's performance is not heavily dependent on whether they play at home or away, it’s pretty much the same, especially for big teams. 
This will be an important match and a big motivation for both teams. Barcelona wants to get 3 points to maintain their position at the top of the league table, while Villarreal wants to continue their momentum to stay in the race for the title this season. In fact, if we look at Villarreal’s performance this season, it’s very impressive; they even have the potential to put pressure on Real Madrid and Barcelona to win the title this season. 
So for the upcoming match, I hope Villarreal can win the game so the title race will become more intense, even though it will be difficult for Villarreal.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling AI:99.8% AI
ZeroGPT:70% AI

Post:2

I think Manchester United will likely lose, and I see that realistically, considering the strengths of both teams in recent matches. Playing at home, Aston Villa will undoubtedly have more motivation, and Aston Villa's current form is excellent.

Manchester United's problems remain the same, but the Manchester United management must take significant steps to improve them. I don't think Amorim has been able to make a positive difference to Manchester United's performance since his arrival, so there's no need to expect too much going forward. As long as there are no significant changes, Manchester United's performance will likely remain the same.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling AI:100% AI
Stealth writer:20% AI (it's showing some mix results, So checking next with ZeroGPT further...for more clarifications)
ZeroGPT:100% AI

Post:3

Gold investments tend to be very safe, with limited potential returns, so investment choices vary.

Cash is essential because it's what we currently use for transactions, and Bitcoin investments are also crucial for the future, Gold investments tend to be more of a savings strategy, I believe this is the case, so we should have all three, I prioritize Bitcoin for the future, especially after meeting all our needs (keeping a small amount of cash for necessities and transactions) and saving a small amount of gold as savings (a small percentage), I believe this will be very beneficial for the future.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling AI:98% AI
Stealth writer:50% AI

Post:4

Barcelona won and regained three points. However, I was a little disappointed in the match because Barcelona struggled to score. Their first goal came in the 70th minute, followed by another in the 86th minute to double their lead. That was enough, but my bet lost because I had bet on a Barcelona victory in the first half.

Barcelona is currently high on confidence after a series of positive results, and the current competition with Real Madrid in the standings has given Barcelona a strong push to continue winning matches, I see this as a momentum for Barcelona ​​and I'm still quite confident that they can win the La Liga title this season if they can maintain their consistency and capitalize on Real Madrid's slump.

copyleaks:100% AI detected
Sapling AI:99.8% AI
Stealth writer:20% AI

add. & more, this member might be writing all their posts with the help of Aibot and then humanize it later also by ai.

[memehunter]

What is more important AI or the topic?

lol, of course the topic, if it is created by you because of a genuine curiosity/or with a motive to help others. If you are posting AI garbage just to gain merits by misrepresenting your posting abilities (and may be to get in a signature campaign later down the road), it is wrong. Mindless AI posting is cancer to this forum.
IMO, we should issue a negative tag policy for 2nd time offenders.

[lombok]

Found another spammer AI Post.

User : doubleprofit88

Governments need to recognize that normalizing insecurity actually undermines their legitimacy as protectors of citizens. Rather than negotiating without accountability, focus on a holistic terrorism prevention strategy: strengthening intelligence, criminal justice reform, and deradicalization programs. This will reduce the appeal of becoming a terrorist by emphasizing strict legal consequences while offering rehabilitation for those willing to change. This constructive approach builds public trust and prevents the emergence of new groups, making security a sustainable national priority.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 75% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 99% AI

You correctly identified that economic pressures and a crisis of leadership legitimacy pose an existential threat to the viability of international organizations like the European Union today. Sentiments about NATO policies and internal European dynamics create strategic opportunities for Russia and China to expand their influence more effectively. Complex behind-the-scenes negotiations are crucial to prevent political disintegration from turning into open military confrontation, detrimental to all parties. In an interconnected world, the collapse of one major entity will trigger a domino effect, forcing all countries to redefine their bargaining positions. Careful treading and the strength of economic diplomacy will determine whether our future will be characterized by collaboration or prolonged conflict.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 40% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 99% AI

You remind me that money is merely a neutral instrument until humans give it excessive meaning and desire. Negative effects arise when the love of wealth exceeds reasonable limits, triggering unethical behavior that undermines social order and harmony. It is crucial for each individual to redefine the boundaries between functional needs and ambitions that undermine basic human values. Reducing the absolute value we place on money will help us remain grounded in integrity and honesty amidst worldly temptations. This awareness is key to creating a life that is not only materially comfortable but also rich in substantive moral values.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 80% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 99% AI

Your perspective highlights historical complexities often overlooked in modern narratives. Ukraine's decision to relinquish its nuclear arsenal was indeed a crucial turning point in Eastern Europe's security architecture. An analysis of global economic pressures on state sovereignty provides an interesting additional dimension worthy of in-depth discussion. Let us examine how this shift in power continues to shape today's increasingly dynamic and uncertain world order.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 75% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai :99% AI

[LoyceV]

Newbie NefiSwap is using chatbot verbal diarrhea plagiarism to promote themselves:

Over the last few years, many crypto users have started questioning whether traditional exchanges still fit their needs.
Account registration, identity verification, and long onboarding processes can slow down what was originally designed to be a fast and open financial system.

This is where account-free crypto swaps come into focus. These platforms allow users to exchange digital assets directly, without creating profiles or submitting personal information. For many, this approach feels closer to the original philosophy of cryptocurrency — permissionless, efficient, and user-controlled.

Speed is one of the main reasons behind this growing interest. In a market that operates 24/7, users expect swaps to be executed quickly, without unnecessary steps. Removing account creation often reduces friction and makes the process more straightforward.

However, this model also comes with responsibilities. Users need to pay attention to network confirmations, liquidity availability, and transparent rate calculations. While account-free swaps simplify access, informed decision-making is still essential.

Overall, the rise of these platforms reflects a broader trend in the crypto space: users are actively seeking simpler tools that prioritize functionality over bureaucracy. Whether this model will dominate in the long term or remain a niche solution is still open for discussion.

What matters most is choice — giving users multiple ways to interact with crypto based on their preferences, risk tolerance, and values.

[lombok]

Newbie NefiSwap is using chatbot verbal diarrhea plagiarism to promote themselves:

Over the last few years, many crypto users have started questioning whether traditional exchanges still fit their needs.
Account registration, identity verification, and long onboarding processes can slow down what was originally designed to be a fast and open financial system.

This is where account-free crypto swaps come into focus. These platforms allow users to exchange digital assets directly, without creating profiles or submitting personal information. For many, this approach feels closer to the original philosophy of cryptocurrency — permissionless, efficient, and user-controlled.

Speed is one of the main reasons behind this growing interest. In a market that operates 24/7, users expect swaps to be executed quickly, without unnecessary steps. Removing account creation often reduces friction and makes the process more straightforward.

However, this model also comes with responsibilities. Users need to pay attention to network confirmations, liquidity availability, and transparent rate calculations. While account-free swaps simplify access, informed decision-making is still essential.

Overall, the rise of these platforms reflects a broader trend in the crypto space: users are actively seeking simpler tools that prioritize functionality over bureaucracy. Whether this model will dominate in the long term or remain a niche solution is still open for discussion.

What matters most is choice — giving users multiple ways to interact with crypto based on their preferences, risk tolerance, and values.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 93% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 96% AI

[Ultegra134]

New account, first post is to spread AI in Bitcoin discussion thread. Caught before even getting started. Post reported.

User: GAINS HELPER

Post 1.

That’s a tough spot, but you’re right—Bitcoin’s transparency is a double-edged sword.

Once someone knows an address, the whole history is public. For future payments to relatives (or anyone) it’s safest to:

1. Send from an exchange hot-wallet so the tx doesn’t link to your cold stash. 
2. Or create a fresh intermediate wallet, fund it with only the amount you owe, then send from there. 

For the current situation you can’t “hide” the old balance, but you can calmly explain that what he sees is your long-term savings, not extra cash you’re withholding. Transparency ≠ obligation. 

Lesson learned—many of us have been there.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

[JayJuanGee]

What is more important AI or the topic?

lol, of course the topic, if it is created by you because of a genuine curiosity/or with a motive to help others. If you are posting AI garbage just to gain merits by misrepresenting your posting abilities (and may be to get in a signature campaign later down the road), it is wrong. Mindless AI posting is cancer to this forum.
IMO, we should issue a negative tag policy for 2nd time offenders.

It seems to me that @howardsentell is attempting to argue that it is better that he (and other members using AI) are providing more sophisticated posts and better content that present the information in a better way rather than the negative that they happen to be using AI to put together their posts.

It seems that many guys here would prefer to see some kind of human thought going on within the forum posts, so even if some of the underlying content had been gathered through AI or maybe even that the human had read through some AI content in order to understand the topic better, if there is some human thought involved in describing the post or even assessing the substantive contents of the post, then that would be better.

Yet, howardsentell seems to be arguing that the substantive outcome is better than having any human involved that may well end up screwing up the presentation or even screwing up the contents.  So from howardsentell's point of view having a human is not as important as making sure that the contents of the post are good,  yet are humans reading those posts, or maybe it is just bots reading the posts of other bots, so we might not even need a human reader either.. even though surely bots seems to be trying to deceive humans in to their being humans.. even though perhaps howardsentell is proclaiming that it is not even necessary to persuade human's that the bots are human as long as the content and the presentation comes out better, then it does not matter if a human was involved in the post or not.  That seems to part of what howardsentell is trying to argue.

I suppose that many guys participating in a thread like this are also bothered by members trying to pass off the AI contents as if such contents were something that the member had actually written (as a human and not as a bot.. so maybe we are trying to presume that the member making the post is human) - so in some sense it seems that howardsentell is proclaiming that it does not matter whether he (or a human) wrote the contents of the or not, as long as the contents of the post is of a better quality then the better contents triumphs how it was generated and as long as better contents come out then having a human involved does not matter.   Perhaps also, howardsentell, is admitting that he could not have had written such great contents on his own, so any reader of the contents should appreciate the contents rather than caring about whether a human was involved in the post or not.  

Probably it is even more problematic when members are trying to argue that AI content is better than human content and we do not need a human involved as long as the resulting content is good, so then many of the regular (humans) might start to wonder why our ideas even matter, and just let the bots speak back and forth about their ideas, since the bots are able to compile a lot more facts and logic and even write better sentences, paragraphs and format better than many of us mere humans (I am proclaiming myself, at this time, to be in the human group).

It probably is true that some of the bot generated content that also has human improvements to the contents will end up having a lot of informative kinds of ideas put together and perhaps be better than merely having a human and better than merely having a bot.. but then if you let bots carry on for a few paragraphs they seem to frequently devolve into gobbledee gook.

I personally find it quite irritating even if a member posts some content from another person when the posting member does not even seem to have any ability to add one or two sentences to say why they were posting the materials that they got from somewhere else, or if they agree with the contents of what they had posted or not or if there might be some contrary points or supplementary points that could be made in response to the posted materials.. so yeah, perhaps many of us are bothered by posts that seem to have no sign of human intervention.. except maybe a human had asked a question that generated the AI results that ends up getting posted as if such AI results had been written by a human when it had not been.

In recent  times, we seem to come across so many forum posts that have very good grammar that was hardly true even a year ago.  When I see, that a post was very well written, then maybe it is time to wonder whether any human was involved in putting that post together, or not?

[Don Pedro Dinero]

What is more important AI or the topic?

I'll be briefer than JayJuanGee, but everyone has their own style.

The important thing is that if you use AI, don't try to cheat by copying and pasting text that you didn't create as if you had, something that even a child at school understands and you do too, no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.

I have used AI-generated text several times in this forum, but I have quoted it and/or provided a link to where I extracted the text. That's why I haven't been reported in this thread or had my posts deleted by the moderators, and you have.

[memehunter]

Perhaps also, howardsentell, is admitting that he could not have had written such great contents on his own, so any reader of the contents should appreciate the contents rather than caring about whether a human was involved in the post or not.  

What is the need for posting in this forum, go create two (or as many as you like) AI chatbot agents watch their conversation lol (people have different fantasies and I am not against it in any sense, but not the right place). People have AI for all that (which is quite useful and I am not against it).
This place is for human to human conversations, even if those convo look dumb (just read some of my posts lol). BTW just look a at the rate of which the synthetic data is gobbling up the internet, it is high time to protect places like Bitcointalk. 

[HustleZ]

It seems to me that @howardsentell is attempting to argue that it is better that he (and other members using AI) are providing more sophisticated posts and better content that present the information in a better way rather than the negative that they happen to be using AI to put together their posts.

If he thinks that. So he should also think the forum is worthless or not "sophisticated" enough and shouldnt simply join the forum. He should just have a convo with an Ai which for him ahould be more useful and interesting. It is simple that the user is a generic shitposter who thinks he will Just copy/paste from an Ai and will Earn from Signatures without doing something. He thinks we are fools and dont understand anything and he can easily farm an account and Earn.

[Lucius]

User : Mr:Gabby

Lately I’ve been thinking about something and I’d really like honest opinions from people here.
Back in the early days, Bitcoin felt… simple.
You heard about it from a friend, downloaded a wallet, mined on a laptop, or bought a little just out of curiosity. No fancy words, no 40-page whitepaper breakdowns on Twitter, no “macro thesis” threads.
Now fast-forward to today:
• Institutional custody
• ETFs
• Layer 2 debates
• Ordinals
• Fees, mempool charts, halving models
• Everyone suddenly sounds like an economist
Don’t get me wrong  this is growth. This is Bitcoin maturing.
But here’s the question that keeps bothering me:
👉 Has Bitcoin become too technical and intimidating for the average newcomer?
Imagine someone hearing about Bitcoin for the first time in 2025.
They google it and are immediately hit with:
Hardware wallets
UTXOs
Fee markets
“Not your keys” warnings
Scams everywhere
Instead of curiosity, they get fear.
Ironically, the very thing Bitcoin was meant to do financial freedom for regular people  might now feel locked behind knowledge barriers.
So I’m curious:
• Do you think Bitcoin onboarding is getting harder or easier?
• Is complexity a necessary price for security and decentralization?
• Or should the community do more to make Bitcoin “feel simple” again?
This isn’t criticism  I’m genuinely torn.
Would love to hear thoughts from old-timers and newcomers alike.

Copyleaks -> AI Content Found 100%
Stealthwriter -> The vast majority of content is likely AI-generated (94%), with only a small portion (6%) human-written.
GPTZero -> We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%

Let’s talk about a strange Bitcoin habit.

You know Bitcoin doesn’t move just because you looked.
You know you’re holding for the long term.
You know checking won’t change anything.

Yet… you still open your wallet.
Then you refresh.
Then you stare at the balance like it might blink first.

Sometimes it goes up a little and you smile.
Sometimes it goes down and you suddenly remember you’re “in it for the tech.”

Bitcoin really teaches patience in a very funny way.

So I want honest answers from Bitcoiners here:

How often do you check your Bitcoin wallet or price?

Did Bitcoin turn you into a chart-watcher, or did it cure you of that habit?

At what point did you stop caring about daily price and just focus on stacking?


No price predictions, no drama  just real Bitcoin experiences.

Copyleaks -> AI Content Found 100%
Stealthwriter -> ll content appears to be AI-generated. No human-written content detected.
GPTZero -> We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%

[AuchanX]

A legendary story writer. Writes huge, informative stories. No one would suspect that he is using AI. Yet he is a legend and is posting using AI. Most of his posts are created by AI. I have checked three of his posts.

User:abhiseshakana

I don't think the girl's decision was wrong, but it wasn't optimal. Considering it was made by a 20-year-old woman who could be considered newly wealthy, her decision was very smart from the perspective of psychological security and long-term protection. She understood the high risk of behavior and the inability to manage large sums of money. Therefore, her choice was very logical and realistic for the average young person.

However, if we consider it from the perspective of investment mathematics and macroeconomic conditions, and considering that money is safer when it's under our control, the USD 1,000,000 option is much more appropriate. The concern is whether she's confident that the for life payout is 100% guaranteed. It's important to consider that the money is under the control of the lottery company, in the event of a crisis, it could be lost, renegotiated, or cutbacks could occur if the program is discontinued.

But since she's already settled on $1,000 per week, she can budget 40–50% for living expenses (given that young people have very little control over their purchasing decisions). She can create an emergency fund for at least 12 months, save 10–20% in inflation-proof assets like Bitcoin, and invest the rest in productive assets like global stock indices or real-sector businesses. She could also try DCA  from $1,000 per week, setting aside around $400–500 per week. The figure would be quite impressive over the next 30 years.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI

The current rally, even with prices reaching historic highs, reflects a combination of short-term market tensions rather than long-term structural changes. Bloomberg's argument suggests that the current silver rally is driven by short-term cyclical factors, such as speculation about a Fed rate cut, which is driving risk-on in high-beta commodities, momentum from retail and speculative traders, a thin market that easily triggers price movements, and a short-term physical shortage that causes a supply squeeze (a mixed demand structure: industrial + investment). When compared to the long-term fundamental rallies in gold and Bitcoin, the differences are stark.

The silver rally can be interpreted as the market pricing in Fed monetary leeway and increasing demand for anti-dilution assets. Therefore, the bullish sentiment is not just for silver but for all stores of value outside of fiat. While prices are volatile, they are also vulnerable to declines. Furthermore, despite the price explosion, the long-term fundamentals remain unchanged, with silver's structural weaknesses being high storage and transport costs, low per-unit value, making it inefficient for storing large amounts of wealth, its lack of utility as a monetary base, and its industrial dependency making prices highly cyclical. Bitcoin and gold do not face these issues. Although they can outperform tactically, they rarely outperform structurally.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI

Not everyone who enters at a high price is making a mistake. The current problem is that many people misread the adoption curve. Don't forget that technology-based assets and their value networks are non-linear. Valuations are based on future optionality, not current cash flow. Prices often outpace fundamentals, not the other way around. Take Amazon, which has been considered overvalued for over a decade, for example.

In investing, ignoring momentum is as dangerous as chasing hype endlessly. Uptrends often last longer than rational expectations. People who buy when prices rise aren't necessarily FOMO; they could be astutely reading changes in market regimes, liquidity, or institutional adoption. In long-term investing, time in the market often trumps market timing; buying at the top of a small cycle can become the bottom of a large cycle. So, the key issue isn't the entry price, but the time horizon. For example, buying BTC at the top in 2017 lost for 2-3 years, but winning big in 2021.

Winner's Curse is more relevant in mature markets (closed auction markets, assets with stable/mature valuations, zero-sum competition), while crypto is still in the price discovery phase, with massive adoption, ongoing value creation, and an open market).

Not all hype is bad; hype often appears at the beginning of change, when the narrative begins to be heard and enters the mainstream, and before full institutional adoption. Be sure to enter during the initial hype and exit at the peak of the hype. So the problem isn't buying high, but buying without understanding what you're buying and how long you'll hold it.

The winner's curse is often found in the behavior of gambling winners. The winner's curse arises when an early win creates the illusion of skill, when the outcome is purely probabilistic. Winners, believing their strategy is correct, become more confident, increase their bets, and continue playing longer, even though the expected value of gambling is almost always negative; the longer they play, the greater the chance of losing. Early wins are a curse because they prolong participation in a detrimental system, encourage greater risk, and delay the realization that The game is unprofitable. The above also parallels the Winner's Curse in the Market. As in gambling, the winner is not the smartest, but the most aggressive. Prices or bets rise because of emotion, not value; "winning" does not reflect true value. In both gambling and speculative investing, winning early can be the most costly mistake.

The Winner's Curse explains the paradox that a momentary win can be the beginning of a long-term loss. Winning creates bias, not proof of superiority.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 73% AI