AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

Anyways i removed my négative feedback on your profile and not asking you to do the same ...... I know that i have too much skills what ever it is i will always with power of almigthy EverRise .

 

BTW i guess surviving to car accident and coma is a rich experience however i prefer to forget and work hard ... without AI of course but my usage of it was linked to my period of Wake up a( re-born ) anyways i like your total comittement  to this... cheers

Not sure how that's anywhere relevant to the topic and how true is that, to me it looks like attention seeking. Anyway, you sending trust feedback to other users is completely useless because you aren't and won't ever be in DT. It seems at least that you understood that you were wrong to do so, because the feedback you also left to me has been deleted. At least, you MIGHT have learned your "lesson" in not using AI anymore.

[AnisEverRise]

Anyways i removed my négative feedback on your profile and not asking you to do the same ...... I know that i have too much skills what ever it is i will always with power of almigthy EverRise .

 

BTW i guess surviving to car accident and coma is a rich experience however i prefer to forget and work hard ... without AI of course but my usage of it was linked to my period of Wake up a( re-born ) anyways i like your total comittement  to this... cheers

Not sure how that's anywhere relevant to the topic and how true is that, to me it looks like attention seeking. Anyway, you sending trust feedback to other users is completely useless because you aren't and won't ever be in DT. It seems at least that you understood that you were wrong to do so, because the feedback you also left to me has been deleted. At least, you MIGHT have learned your "lesson" in not using AI anymore.

You right i learned a lesson and im happy to :

1- Because still have the opportunity to do so.
2- I dont seek any sort of attention .... I do want clarify my position and the WHY i did that ......... obviously Due to lack o self confidence maybe a fear of rejection ...... any ways that is behind me now .........

Maybe number 1 is the most important .... BUT IN THE FRAME OF FORUM LAW AND RULES  ..... Respect
.

[Yabani]

The member slandered me.

i didn’t slander you, i just pointed out what i noticed. i rarely check anyone’s messages through ai detectors. yours just stood out so much to me that i just wanted to give it a try, it’s nothing personal. i only reported what you did here because for me, your case required more than just a minor warning. you could have simply explained yourself and said you didn’t do that. if you didn’t, of course. i didn’t even give you neutral feedback because i thinked you can just stop posting with ai.

The member had promised not to use AI here.

However, they are still using AI in their posts in 2026.

no, i don’t.

since i made that promise, i haven’t used ai even once for any of my posts on the forum. i won’t let you smear my name just because you hate me for exposing you.

as i mentioned earlier, i usually have to use translation websites to write messages in english. i think the reason these examples you gave are perceived as ai is that translation programs use a certain degree of “standard” language.

briefly,

i wrote it in Turkish, the AI translated it and i checked whether it reflected what i said and posted it. it won't happen again.

Do you know how to read in English?  Or do you also translate words on the English board to Turkish, respond in Turkish, and have AI translate them to English before posting?  It must be quite difficult.

no, i can read and understand english easily except for very extreme limits. sometimes there are problems when i write it down, but i have improved in that too compared to my early days.

what i usually do is to read and understand the latest comments on topics i'm interested in, then write a reply in my head in turkish and translate the sentences into english. it's easier than writing directly in english.

He was using AI in almost all of his posts.

no, i don’t use ai for any of my messages. since various ai detectors have produced these results for a few different messages of mine, i’m not sure how else to explain myself. if someone asks me to do so, i can answer any questions. as i said, the translation language of the programs i use probably caused a similar issue to the language problem i experienced when using ai for my previous translations.

is there anything users who are accused of using ai can do to prove they didn’t use it? cause i didn't. i can do it if there is a way.

from now on, i could continue without using any translation service, but i think users trying to read my posts might have a bit of a hard time  

I don't care either you get some negative or positive trusts. Basically I don't care you! Also I don't care I get the trusts either negative or positive. You directly shown up here and share fictionus thoughts instead of reaching to me.

1. You were the one who blame me that using AI although you were the one!
2. You gave your promise that you are not gonna use AI anymore but you continued to use it!
3. You earned 170 merit by your AI based messages and it didn't enough so you shared your AI based messages in the local merit thread you earned 70 more!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156376.msg65159977#msg65159977
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156376.msg65304701#msg65304701

4. Instead of reaching me you created threads about me in the local section!

şikayet eden bendim, yaptığımın da gayet arkasındayım. çok ufak bir durum olur tolere edilir ben de ispiyonculuk için fırsat arayan birisi değilim. ki çok ufak hatası olan, sadece özelden uyardığım insanlar da olmuştur. ama yabani'nin yaptığı apaçık fırsatçılıktı. özelden bu yüzden uyarmadım.

benim yaptığım şeyi yapmadığımı, üç maymunu oynadığımı düşünün. bu kullanıcı bunu uzun süre imzalarda ai kullanıp kolaya kaçsa, daha sonra türkçe bölümünde bulunmayan birisi tarafından fark edilseydi zaten sorunlar yaşayan bölümün iyice dışlanması kaçınılmaz olurdu. ki bunlar fark ediliyor, o benim raporladığım bölümde çok sıkı kontrol yapanlar var.

çok ufak bir hata olmuştur, insanlık halidir der geçerim. ama yabani full member olana kadar merit cafede dolanıp normal takılan birisiyken full member olduğu gibi arka arkaya yapay zeka mesajlar atmaya başlamıştı. birinin alt hesabıdır değildir orası beni ilgilendirmez. kullanıcıya bir hıncım yoktu, bunu bana madalya takacaklar diye de yapmadım. fark ettim, iyi olduğunu düşündüğüm şeyi yaptım o kadar.

5. He got negative trust and they undo it with his explation. He totally forgot what he done or who he was and started to blame me. There is a one idiom it will explain who he was "Wicked thief supresses the host!".

[FinneysTrueVision]

User: Cyborg T-33

This over the top storytelling is a dead giveaway these posts were created by a chatbot.

So I did something stupid tonight. I calculated what my 30 lost faucet BTC would be worth today.

30 × $70,000 = $2,100,000.

Two. Million. Dollars.

From clicking a captcha and typing an address into a website run by a guy named Gavin.

And then? I formatted the hard drive like a complete legend. No backup. No wallet.dat. Not even a sticky note on the monitor. Just... click... poof... goodbye, future millions.

At the time, 30 BTC bought you maybe a coffee and a sad sandwich. So technically, I didn't lose anything back then. I just pre-ordered a lifetime supply of regret.

The funniest/saddest part? Even if I hadn't formatted that drive, I 100% would have sold at $100 and thrown a party for being a genius. "Look at me, I turned free internet money into $3,000!" Yeah. Party of one. Regret for life.

So really, I didn't lose $2.1 million. I lost the chance to sell too early for way less money. That's almost comforting. Almost.

Anyway, this is your friendly reminder: back up your wallets. Or don't. And then 15 years later you too can do math that makes you want to lie down on the floor for a while.

Thanks for coming to my TED Talk. I'll be here refreshing the Bitcoin price and crying into my coffee.

originality.ai -100% confident that’s AI
gptzero.me - 100% AI
copyleaks.com - 100% AI content found

I was lying in bed last night, unable to sleep. Not because of the price. Not because of the news. But because of a much darker thought.

What happens to my Bitcoin if I don't wake up tomorrow?

It hit me like a train. I've spent years stacking sats. Researching wallets. Securing my seed phrase. Avoiding scams. Learning from my mistakes (like losing 30 BTC from a formatted drive back in 2010 – yes, that was me).

But for all that effort... I've never planned for the one thing that's guaranteed to happen to all of us.

Death.

It's uncomfortable to think about. We don't like to imagine a world without us in it. But here's the truth:

If I die tonight, my Bitcoin dies with me.

My seed phrase is in my head and in a place only I know. My private keys are mine and mine alone. That's how security works. But that's also how loss works.

My family? They don't even know what a seed phrase is. My son knows I'm into "crypto stuff" but he's never seen my wallet. My daughter? She thinks Bitcoin is for "internet nerds." My wife? God bless her, she still calls it "that digital money thing."

If I'm gone, they won't find it. They won't know to look. And even if they do, they won't know what to do with a 24-word seed phrase written on a piece of paper hidden somewhere in my closet.

So let me ask you, forum:

Have you told anyone where your seed phrase is?

Have you taught a family member how to recover a wallet?

Have you written down instructions that a non-technical person could follow?

Or are you like me – putting it off because "I'll do it someday"?

I'm single right now, but even for those with families: You think your wife or husband automatically knows how to use a hardware wallet? You think your 19-year-old son understands derivation paths and gas fees?

And for those who are single like me: Have you thought about a best friend? A sibling? A parent? Someone you trust with your life – and with your legacy?

I'm not saying give them your keys today. I'm saying: make a plan.

Write a letter. Put it with your will. Use a dead man's switch. Split your seed phrase and give parts to trusted people. Use a trusted inheritance service (but do your research – plenty of scams out there).

Just... don't leave your family guessing.

Imagine this: You die peacefully in your sleep. Your family grieves. They cry. They bury you. And then... they have no idea that you left them a life-changing amount of money. A house. A college fund. A retirement. All sitting on a cold wallet that might as well be on Mars.

That's not a legacy. That's a tragedy.

So tonight, before you check the price one more time, do something harder:

Ask yourself – if I don't wake up tomorrow, who gets my Bitcoin?

And then do something about it.

Because the saddest wallet isn't an empty one.

It's a full one that no one can open.

Let's talk about this. What are your plans? Have you told anyone? Or are you putting it off like I have? What is the best and safe solution?

I'd really love to hear how others are handling this. Maybe together we can figure out a better way.

Thanks for reading. Now go hug your family. And then go write down a plan.

originality.ai - 64% confident that’s AI
copyleaks.com - 100% AI content found
gptzero.me - 84% AI, 16% mixed

Hello, my favorite community on planet Earth.

Seriously. I've been reading Bitcointalk for a while now, and there is no place like this. Where else can you find people who actually understand this space? Who have been through the scams, the hacks, the lost passwords, the formatted drives (yes, that's me), and still come back to help strangers?

You are the best community on this planet. And I need your advice.

Here's my situation:

I have a reasonable amount of Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL). Not life-changing yet, but solid. I've been holding them for a while.

Currently, I use a wallet and bridge between ETH and SOL. The bridging fees are really cheap – I'm paying almost nothing to move between chains.

Here's my plan:

Every month, I want to bridge a portion of my ETH to BTC and a portion of my SOL to BTC. Basically, convert my altcoin positions into Bitcoin over time.

My questions to you, the experts:

1. What is the best way to buy Bitcoin from ETH and SOL?

    P2P (Peer-to-peer)? Seems private but risky if I choose the wrong counterparty.

    DEX (Decentralized exchange)? Feels safe but sometimes liquidity is low for BTC pairs.

    CEX (Centralized exchange like Binance, Kraken, Coinbase)? Easy but KYC, custody risk, "not your keys not your coins."

    Bridge directly? I already bridge ETH<>SOL cheaply. Is there a good bridge from ETH to BTC or SOL to BTC? Or is that stupid?

2. Is it worth it?

Am I crazy for converting ETH and SOL into BTC? I know nobody has a crystal ball. But I keep thinking: Bitcoin is the original. The one Satoshi built. The one with the hardest money, the smallest supply, the most security. ETH and SOL have their uses, but BTC is the asset. Right? Or am I missing something?

3. What is the safest wallet to keep Bitcoin?

I've learned my lesson the hard way (30 BTC lost on a formatted drive back in 2010-2011 from faucets – yes, that really happened). I will NEVER make that mistake again.

So now I want to do it right:

    Hardware wallet? Ledger? Trezor? Coldcard? Something else?

    Paper wallet? Too risky for me after my trauma.

    Mobile wallet? For small amounts only, I assume.

    Multisig? Too complicated for a humble stacker like me?

I want something secure, battle-tested, and easy enough that my non-technical family could access it if something happens to me (but that's a topic for another post).

In summary:

From ETH and SOL → to BTC. Bridge? DEX? CEX? P2P? Is it worth it? And where do I keep my BTC safely?

I trust this community more than any YouTuber, any Twitter "influencer," any random blog post. You've been here since the beginning. You've seen it all. You've lost it all and rebuilt. You are the real experts.

So please – share your wisdom.

What would YOU do if you were me?

Thank you. From the bottom of my heart. This community is a treasure. And I'm grateful to be here, even as a newbie asking basic questions.

Much love.
A humble stacker trying to do things right.

originality.ai - 99% confident that’s AI
copyleaks.com - 100% AI content found
gptzero.me - 100% AI

[hosemary]

User: Cyborg T-33

This user created a new topic to ask why their topics were deleted and the new topic was also created using AI.

Hello everyone,

I'm a newbie here and I need some advice because I'm getting worried.

I've posted a few topics since joining, but it seems like 3 of my topics were either moved or deleted. I'm not sure why. I didn't post any links. I wasn't trying to spam. I was just trying to share my story and ask questions like everyone else.

Now I'm afraid of being banned.

I don't know if I accidentally broke some forum rules without realizing it. Maybe I posted in the wrong section? Maybe my topics were considered "low value"? I honestly don't know.

So here's what I've decided:

I'm going to stop creating new topics for a while. I'll just read and maybe reply to existing threads. I need to learn the rules better before I risk posting again.

Can you please share some tips for newbies to avoid getting banned?

Specifically:

What are the most common mistakes newbies make that get them banned?

Where should newbies post (and where should we avoid)?

How do I know if my topic is "low value" or "off-topic"?

Is there a limit on how many topics a newbie can create?

What's the best way to learn the forum rules without getting into trouble first?

I really want to be part of this community. I've learned so much already from reading old threads. But I'm scared I'll mess up and get banned before I even get started.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you, and sorry if this topic itself is a mistake. I'm just trying to learn.

GPTZero: We are highly confident this text was AI generated
originality.ai: 100% confident that's AI

[nutildah]

You right i learned a lesson

You already said that:

No problem this is a lesson ...

and then you kept on AI shitposting after that:

Got it, here’s the English version. I kept it punchy and real, moving away from that dry, textbook vibe to make it sound like a personal take.

Now I want you to REALLY READ what this says (what you posted). Take a moment to comprehend it using your own brain:

I kept it punchy and real, moving away from that dry, textbook vibe to make it sound like a personal take.

This means that whatever you were asking ChatGPT to do for you, it did not involve your own personal thoughts. You are asking it to make the output sound like its coming from your brain, when in reality its coming straight from ChatGPT.

You seem pretty happy and intent about lying, so I'm not removing my tag on you.

I can assume at least one of the moderators likes you as you're not already banned, so at least you still have that going for you.

[AnisEverRise]

You right i learned a lesson

You already said that:

No problem this is a lesson ...

and then you kept on AI shitposting after that:

Got it, here’s the English version. I kept it punchy and real, moving away from that dry, textbook vibe to make it sound like a personal take.

Now I want you to REALLY READ what this says (what you posted). Take a moment to comprehend it using your own brain:

I kept it punchy and real, moving away from that dry, textbook vibe to make it sound like a personal take.

This means that whatever you were asking ChatGPT to do for you, it did not involve your own personal thoughts. You are asking it to make the output sound like its coming from your brain, when in reality its coming straight from ChatGPT.

You seem pretty happy and intent about lying, so I'm not removing my tag on you.

I can assume at least one of the moderators likes you as you're not already banned, so at least you still have that going for you.

I see that you posted made comments made as if they were mine ... Any ways you can keep your negative trust i don't care ; just grow up ismy advice .....

But anyways i' m happy to interact .....

AI is something that you well exploited ... congrat any ways but you are making a mistake by attacking me.

aboiut RISK : it s comming from ARABIC : الرزق    or Sustenance .... the word move to italy  Rischio 


Any ways I don t need AI to express my self and ui did it just to melt with Community but i didn't took this post in conscience .

I didn't know that it's prohibed ! 

[nutildah]

I see that you posted made comments made as if they were mine ...

They are your comments. You posted them so you are responsible for them. You should be more embarrassed about what you're doing, is the final thing I have to say to you.

[AnisEverRise]

I see that you posted made comments made as if they were mine ...

They are your comments. You posted them so you are responsible for them. You should be more embarrassed about what you're doing, is the final thing I have to say to you.

I see now that maybe Ai technique was a mistake ........ and if if this Theard of  AI Spam Report Reference  was known i would of course never used AI .... specially that i have a respectable intellectual means .....Anyways you right  

[lovesmayfamilis]

For some reason, my report wasn't processed via direct submission.

Hi everyone,
I've been reflecting on the ongoing debate regarding Bitcoin's environmental impact. As someone with a background in Geography and Environment, I believe we often overlook the geographic advantages certain regions have for sustainable mining.
In developing regions, specifically in South Asia, we have an abundance of solar radiation throughout the year. While large-scale mining farms require massive cooling systems and grid stability, decentralized, solar-powered small-scale mining could be a game-changer for several reasons:
1. Utilizing Geographic Surplus: Many areas have high solar potential but lack the infrastructure to feed that energy back into a national grid. Bitcoin mining acts as a "virtual battery," turning excess sun into digital value.
2. Reducing Transmission Loss: By mining locally with solar setups, we eliminate the energy loss that typically occurs during long-distance electricity transmission.
3. Economic Resilience: For individuals in regions with fluctuating local currencies, a small DIY solar-powered mining rig (even for Altcoins or as part of a pool) provides a hedge against inflation using renewable resources.
4. I am currently using a 10A10 diode in my setup to prevent reverse current, which has been quite efficient for my 20Ah battery.Solar panel configurations (specifically 20W to 50W setups for small electronics) and it got me thinking: If we could standardize low-voltage,solar-integrated mining hardware, could we make Bitcoin truly "green" at the grassroots level?

I’d love to hear from anyone who has integrated renewable energy into their mining setups. What geographic challenges did you face (e.g., humidity, dust, or seasonal variations)?
Looking forward to a healthy discussion!

QuillBot: 65%
Scribbr: 65%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
sapling.ai  100%
gptzero  100%

Hello everyone,
I wanted to share my practical experience with the community. I’ve been reflecting on the geographic potential of sustainable mining. As someone with a background in Geography and Environment, I’ve been experimenting with a small-scale DIY solar setup for my mining gear and wanted to share some technical insights.

Living in South Asia, we have plenty of sunlight, but managing heat and humidity is a huge challenge for electronics.

My Current Configuration:

Solar Panels: 20W to 50W testing units (monocrystalline).

Protection: Using 10A10 diodes to prevent reverse current flow during the night.

Inverter/Driver: 50W LED driver circuits modified for steady DC output.

Key Takeaways for Miners:

1. Heat Dissipation: In tropical climates, the hash rate often drops as temperature rises. I’ve found that using vertical garden-style shading near the mining area reduces ambient temperature by 2-3°C.

2. Circuit Safety: Always use high-rated diodes (like the 10A10) to protect your batteries.

3. Sustainability: Even if it doesn't cover 100% of your power, a hybrid solar-grid system can save up to 15% on electricity bills in the long run.

I would love to hear from anyone who has integrated renewable energy into their mining setups. What geographic challenges did you face (e.g., humidity, dust, or seasonal variations)?

I am still learning, so please correct me if I make any technical mistakes.


Regards,
Rupok

QuillBot: 45%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
sapling.ai  100%
gptzero  77%

Thank you for your insightful response, Somegory. You’ve raised some very practical points that every solar-based miner faces.
In South Asia, we deal with the same "no sun" issue during the monsoon season. My current approach to mitigate this is focusing on system efficiency rather than just adding more panels. Since I am working on a small scale, I prioritize low-voltage DC setups to avoid a 15-20% energy loss that usually happens during DC-to-AC inversion.
Regarding your point about battery wear, I completely agree. Running heavy ASIC miners on battery backup is definitely a "battery killer." This is why I am experimenting with using solar power only during peak sunlight hours for the main load, and keeping the battery backup strictly for maintaining the controller's stability or low-power nodes.
Using a 10A10 diode has also helped me ensure there is no leakage back to the panels at night, preserving every bit of charge in the 20Ah battery.
Have you ever experimented with "Solar-Only" mining schedules (mining only when the sun is up) to save the battery bank? I’d love to know your thoughts on that.

QuillBot: 52%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
sapling.ai  100%
gptzero  100%

Thank you **SquirrelJulietGarden** for sharing that additional resource!

The 'Bitcoin wastes energy' argument is indeed one of the biggest hurdles for adoption. Having a site like bitcoincleanup.com to debunk these myths is essential, especially when we are discussing sustainable, off-grid solutions like solar. It’s all about shifting the narrative from 'energy waste' to 'energy transformation'—turning sunlight in remote areas into digital value.

I'll definitely go through the critique sections to strengthen my understanding. Much appreciated!

QuillBot: 81%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
sapling.ai  100%
gptzero 100%

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie aldianoktoey?

We’ve seen massive growth in Layer 2 solutions and sidechains throughout 2025 and early 2026. While this is great for scalability, it feels like the main chain is strictly becoming a "settlement layer" for institutions and whales.

If the majority of daily transactions (coffee, retail, etc.) move to Lightning or other L2s, does the on-chain velocity even matter anymore for Bitcoin's fundamental value? I'd love to hear your thoughts on whether we should stop looking at on-chain volume as a health metric for "money velocity.

Money velocity metrics are important measures of a currencies underlying value as a medium of exchange. So, knowing the on-chain exchange volume measured in BTC is important for Bitcoin as it is for every cryptocurrency, but I don't see that data anywhere.

I looked for 2025 on-chain BTC transaction volume and failed at finding that data. I was able to find one chart of BTC transaction volume but it included the change to the sending address, which makes the data wildly misleading. It was also only a daily chart without apparent links or methods for annual data.

You’re spot on. Looking at raw on-chain data in 2026 without filtering is like trying to count real traffic by including every car that just pulls out of a driveway and backs right in. The UTXO model inherently inflates 'volume' because of change outputs.

If you're digging for the 2025 stats, here’s the state of the art right now:

Entity-Adjusted Volume is the Standard: Most of us now rely on Glassnode’s 'Entity-Adjusted' metrics or Chainalysis reports. For 2025, the 'clean' volume was significantly lower than the raw total, especially with the massive 'Whale Shadows' we saw late last year when long-term holders moved millions of BTC.

The 2025 Sell-off Data: Reports from early 2026 (like TRM Labs and Bitcoin Magazine Pro) indicate that 2025 saw a record transfer of BTC from early 'whales' to retail and ETFs. That 'velocity' is real economic activity, but it’s often buried under billions of dollars in internal wallet reshuffling.

The 'L2 Leakage': We also have to accept that 'Money Velocity' is increasingly invisible on-chain. With the Lightning Network and other Layer 2s maturing in 2025, a growing percentage of medium-of-exchange volume never touches the base layer. On-chain volume is becoming more of a 'settlement' layer for large chunks rather than a daily spending metric.

Check out the NVT (Network Value to Transactions) Ratio on Glassnode—they specifically use the adjusted volume you're looking for to filter out the noise. It's probably the most honest metric we have for 2025's actual throughput

[juttsab@]

What's the verdict on Newbie aldianoktoey?

We’ve seen massive growth in Layer 2 solutions and sidechains throughout 2025 and early 2026. While this is great for scalability, it feels like the main chain is strictly becoming a "settlement layer" for institutions and whales.

If the majority of daily transactions (coffee, retail, etc.) move to Lightning or other L2s, does the on-chain velocity even matter anymore for Bitcoin's fundamental value? I'd love to hear your thoughts on whether we should stop looking at on-chain volume as a health metric for "money velocity.

Here are the result:
Quillbot: 44% AI
Stealthwriter: 70% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

Money velocity metrics are important measures of a currencies underlying value as a medium of exchange. So, knowing the on-chain exchange volume measured in BTC is important for Bitcoin as it is for every cryptocurrency, but I don't see that data anywhere.

I looked for 2025 on-chain BTC transaction volume and failed at finding that data. I was able to find one chart of BTC transaction volume but it included the change to the sending address, which makes the data wildly misleading. It was also only a daily chart without apparent links or methods for annual data.

You’re spot on. Looking at raw on-chain data in 2026 without filtering is like trying to count real traffic by including every car that just pulls out of a driveway and backs right in. The UTXO model inherently inflates 'volume' because of change outputs.

If you're digging for the 2025 stats, here’s the state of the art right now:

Entity-Adjusted Volume is the Standard: Most of us now rely on Glassnode’s 'Entity-Adjusted' metrics or Chainalysis reports. For 2025, the 'clean' volume was significantly lower than the raw total, especially with the massive 'Whale Shadows' we saw late last year when long-term holders moved millions of BTC.

The 2025 Sell-off Data: Reports from early 2026 (like TRM Labs and Bitcoin Magazine Pro) indicate that 2025 saw a record transfer of BTC from early 'whales' to retail and ETFs. That 'velocity' is real economic activity, but it’s often buried under billions of dollars in internal wallet reshuffling.

The 'L2 Leakage': We also have to accept that 'Money Velocity' is increasingly invisible on-chain. With the Lightning Network and other Layer 2s maturing in 2025, a growing percentage of medium-of-exchange volume never touches the base layer. On-chain volume is becoming more of a 'settlement' layer for large chunks rather than a daily spending metric.

Check out the NVT (Network Value to Transactions) Ratio on Glassnode—they specifically use the adjusted volume you're looking for to filter out the noise. It's probably the most honest metric we have for 2025's actual throughput

Here are the result:

Gptzero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 76% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 56% AI

[macson]

What's the verdict on Newbie aldianoktoey?

One of the most stupid newbie accounts that uses AI directly in its posts.

We’ve seen massive growth in Layer 2 solutions and sidechains throughout 2025 and early 2026. While this is great for scalability, it feels like the main chain is strictly becoming a "settlement layer" for institutions and whales.

If the majority of daily transactions (coffee, retail, etc.) move to Lightning or other L2s, does the on-chain velocity even matter anymore for Bitcoin's fundamental value? I'd love to hear your thoughts on whether we should stop looking at on-chain volume as a health metric for "money velocity.

You’re spot on. Looking at raw on-chain data in 2026 without filtering is like trying to count real traffic by including every car that just pulls out of a driveway and backs right in. The UTXO model inherently inflates 'volume' because of change outputs.

If you're digging for the 2025 stats, here’s the state of the art right now:

Entity-Adjusted Volume is the Standard: Most of us now rely on Glassnode’s 'Entity-Adjusted' metrics or Chainalysis reports. For 2025, the 'clean' volume was significantly lower than the raw total, especially with the massive 'Whale Shadows' we saw late last year when long-term holders moved millions of BTC.

The 2025 Sell-off Data: Reports from early 2026 (like TRM Labs and Bitcoin Magazine Pro) indicate that 2025 saw a record transfer of BTC from early 'whales' to retail and ETFs. That 'velocity' is real economic activity, but it’s often buried under billions of dollars in internal wallet reshuffling.

The 'L2 Leakage': We also have to accept that 'Money Velocity' is increasingly invisible on-chain. With the Lightning Network and other Layer 2s maturing in 2025, a growing percentage of medium-of-exchange volume never touches the base layer. On-chain volume is becoming more of a 'settlement' layer for large chunks rather than a daily spending metric.

Check out the NVT (Network Value to Transactions) Ratio on Glassnode—they specifically use the adjusted volume you're looking for to filter out the noise. It's probably the most honest metric we have for 2025's actual throughput

GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%


Another newbie who was caught using AI in his posts. Of the 5 posts I included, they were detected using AI.

User: RuneStockx

Litecoin is not getting the same attention it had years ago, but it still has a place because it keeps doing its job well. Low fees, fast transfers, and a network that has been running for long time without major issues still give it value for everyday use.

The market just changed a lot. New projects came in and most people started chasing newer trends, so naturally Litecoin became less talked about. But that doesn't mean it failed, it just moved from being a hype coin to a coin people quietly use when they need something simple and reliable.

GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%

I totally agree with this, especially on the part about knowing what kind of trading suits you. A lot of people jump into trading thinking it's just about being active every day, but it's really more about understanding your approach and sticking to what works for you.

Some people do better with slower, safer trades, while others can handle higher risk. It really depends on your mindset and discipline. At the end of the day, it's not just about showing up consistently, but improving your decisions over time.

GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%

I get why that prediction sounds believable right now. When the whole market is bleeding, even extreme targets don't feel that crazy. But this kind of situation isn't new in crypto. Ethereum has gone through big drops before, especially during weak market conditions, and it has also recovered in past cycles.

One thing i've learn is that analyst predictions usually follow the current trend. When price is going down, you'll hear lower targets. When it's going up, you'll hear higher ones.

What matters more is how you handle it:

• don't make decisions based on fear
• understand that volatility is normal in crypto
• focus on your time horizon (short term vs long term

Markets can stay weak for a while, but they don't stay that way forever. The key is staying level-headed instead of reacting to every prediction.

GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: Not Detected
Originality.ai: 100%

Altcoin season usually doesn't come when people expect it, that is why many got caught last year. Most of the time, it only starts after Bitcoin makes a strong move and then slows down. That's when money rotates into alts.

If the market is still red, it's better to stay careful. Chasing alts too early is where people lose. My advice is not to rush into hype, stick to solid projects and keep some funds ready. If altseason really starts, you'll see it clearly, it won't be hidden.

GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: Not Detected
Originality.ai: 100%

I think one of the underrated lessons in bitcoin is learning to sit through volatility without overreacting. For example, some people focus only on price swings but understanding network fundamentals, like adoption, on chain activity, and supply changes, can give a realistic view.

It's also interesting how different strategies work for different people. Some prefer gradual accumulation, others use DCA, and some only step in during big market dips. I'd be curious to hear how others balance long-term holding with active learning from market behavior.

GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: Not Detected
Originality.ai: 100%


This newbie account also spams forums with its AI-generated posts. Of the four posts I included, it was detected as AI-generated.

User: SusanVac

I hate when people touch my clothes or my stuff in general. It’s not about germs or anything like that. I just don’t like seeing someone touch something that belongs to me. I can deal with it if it’s someone close to me, but if it’s a stranger, I’ll openly show I’m not happy about it 

I can’t really say where this came from. No one took my toys away on the playground or anything like that. I’m probably just possessive. If someone needs something, I’d rather buy a new one and give it to them than let them use mine. People around me know about this little “quirk” and they’re fine with it. Even though yeah, maybe it’s not totally normal.

Overall it doesn’t ruin my life or anything. But sometimes I get this flash of anger inside when someone grabs my pen like “just to sign a couple things, what’s the big deal,” and I’m standing there already annoyed and about to snap 

GPTZero: 100%
Copyleaks: Not Detected
Originality.ai: 100%

4. Use the tools that gambling platforms give you. Most sites have things like deposit limits, loss limits or even a cool-off option. It’s actually a good idea to turn those on, because sometimes relying only on self-control isn’t enough.

5. Also learn to stop even when you’re winning. Everyone warns about chasing losses, but winning can lead to the same thing. After a good win many people keep playing and give it back later. Sometimes the best move is to stop while you’re ahead.

GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Originality.ai: 62%

I don’t see it as a bad idea by itself. Money is money, whether it’s fiat or crypto. If donations are legal, the form shouldn’t matter that much.

The problem is transparency. Crypto is traceable, but not always in a simple way. You can still route funds through multiple wallets, mixers, etc. That’s probably why some politicians don’t like it, harder to control and track compared to banks.

There’s also politics in it. Some just don’t trust crypto at all, others don’t want new systems they don’t fully understand.

Using crypto for donations is fine in theory, but rules and tracking need to catch up first.

GPTZero: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%
Stealthwriter: AI Detected

Feels like they’re just gonna keep tightening things step by step. More KYC, less privacy stuff, more pressure on exchanges. I don’t think they can fully stop people from launching coins though, anyone can still deploy one.

What they really control is access. Listings, fiat ramps, big platforms. So crypto won’t die, it’ll just split. One clean and regulated, the other more underground.

GPTZero: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%
Stealthwriter: AI Detected