✨ Shuffle.com | The next generation of crypto casinos | Sports, Casino + token

[o48o]

Made a small (but important) change to lottery:

- when the Division 1 jackpot is big enough, we’re reducing the weekly allocation to that from 40% to 15%, with the leftover being spread over lower tiers
- it’ll be reset to 40% when jackpot hits, and will remain there until it increases past the jackpot threshold

This means that more people should receive more prizes, while also making sure the jackpot is juicy enough to be a life-changing win when it’s hit.

https://x.com/noahdummett/status/1887765129644671105

While i see high winning jackpots in lottery as a perfect tool to lure in more people, imho this change is more than welcome, as allocating some of that to lower tiers is a good incentive for hodlers.
Depending how beneficial that ends up being, it could actually encourage token holders to buy (or convert) more shuffle tokens with their smaller winnings.

Now i am getting more hopeful again. I just hope that they won't change their minds again radically to something like staking, or other ways to create unnecessary inflation. I don't think so, but i didn't think they would change burning method radically either.

[Wind_FURY]

Made a small (but important) change to lottery:

- when the Division 1 jackpot is big enough, we’re reducing the weekly allocation to that from 40% to 15%, with the leftover being spread over lower tiers
- it’ll be reset to 40% when jackpot hits, and will remain there until it increases past the jackpot threshold

This means that more people should receive more prizes, while also making sure the jackpot is juicy enough to be a life-changing win when it’s hit.

https://x.com/noahdummett/status/1887765129644671105

While i see high winning jackpots in lottery as a perfect tool to lure in more people, imho this change is more than welcome, as allocating some of that to lower tiers is a good incentive for hodlers.

Depending how beneficial that ends up being, it could actually encourage token holders to buy (or convert) more shuffle tokens with their smaller winnings.

Now i am getting more hopeful again. I just hope that they won't change their minds again radically to something like staking, or other ways to create unnecessary inflation. I don't think so, but i didn't think they would change burning method radically either.

"Lure" is, I personally believe, not a good word in this instance. It's a word used for mere services that could either be illegal or a scam. Services like Shuffle, Stake, and the other larger crypto casinos are neither of those.

Plus the change is merely giving a sort of balance when the jackpot is large enough. The change doesn't happen for smaller jackpots.

[o48o]

While i see high winning jackpots in lottery as a perfect tool to lure in more people, imho this change is more than welcome, as allocating some of that to lower tiers is a good incentive for hodlers.

Depending how beneficial that ends up being, it could actually encourage token holders to buy (or convert) more shuffle tokens with their smaller winnings.

Now i am getting more hopeful again. I just hope that they won't change their minds again radically to something like staking, or other ways to create unnecessary inflation. I don't think so, but i didn't think they would change burning method radically either.

"Lure" is, I personally believe, not a good word in this instance. It's a word used for mere services that could either be illegal or a scam. Services like Shuffle, Stake, and the other larger crypto casinos are neither of those.

Plus the change is merely giving a sort of balance when the jackpot is large enough. The change doesn't happen for smaller jackpots.

I used the word lure, because while using high lottery price to attract more people is legal, it's still more or less misleading. And targeting most vulnerable people who lack capacity to understand their lack of changes to win.

And it seems i myself miscalculated the changes to win the top price again, because i didn't include the fact that 18 bonus numbers come from a "separate ball chamber". So changes to win 5 balls and one bonus ball in shuffle is around 1 : 7,000,000,000

To put that in in perspective, if you are playing 1000 tickets weekly, your changes to statistically get the winning ticket would take 100k years
People just see the change existing, not grasping that they aren't winning it with a thousand tickets in a 100k+ years.

This is why i said that putting some of that money to lower tiers is a good idea.

Edit: my math was wrong again 

[poppymerio]

Has anybody had problem withdrawing from shuffle? I got hit with KYC and I provided all the info requested. I don't use a VPN. Don't have multiple accounts. My withdrawal is "under review" for some time. Is  that normal?

[poppymerio]

https://imgur.com/a/BDYa0Kl

Continuing my previous thread. Not sure if I'm just being paranoid. I just read other people have had the same problem. Which made me feel off about the whole situation. I have had multiple withdrawals be successful. Now I get hit with KYC which I don't really mind and my withdrawal is stuck for a while. The support just respond with the same cant give an ETA etc. Just to wait. Maybe I'm just paranoid. Just looking for some reassurance. Don't want to scare anyone off Shuffle. ( for now )

[C0vid19shuffle]

Somehow, my kyc1 info had been changed on my account. My phone got stolen and when I tried to log back in I gave them my info and they said it didn’t match their records… there’s just no way that’s possible, so I asked them if I could see what info they had on me as per their privacy policy) and support has done nothing but ignore me. I’ve gotten zero from this airdrop because of this and it feels like they won’t be willing to reset my 2fa until after the airdrop is over..

[Wind_FURY]

While i see high winning jackpots in lottery as a perfect tool to lure in more people, imho this change is more than welcome, as allocating some of that to lower tiers is a good incentive for hodlers.

Depending how beneficial that ends up being, it could actually encourage token holders to buy (or convert) more shuffle tokens with their smaller winnings.

Now i am getting more hopeful again. I just hope that they won't change their minds again radically to something like staking, or other ways to create unnecessary inflation. I don't think so, but i didn't think they would change burning method radically either.

"Lure" is, I personally believe, not a good word in this instance. It's a word used for mere services that could either be illegal or a scam. Services like Shuffle, Stake, and the other larger crypto casinos are neither of those.

Plus the change is merely giving a sort of balance when the jackpot is large enough. The change doesn't happen for smaller jackpots.

I used the word lure, because while using high lottery price to attract more people is legal, it's still more or less misleading. And targeting most vulnerable people who lack capacity to understand their lack of changes to win.

And it seems i myself miscalculated the changes to win the top price again, because i didn't include the fact that 18 bonus numbers come from a "separate ball chamber". So changes to win 5 balls and one bonus ball in shuffle is around 1 : 7,000,000,000

To put that in in perspective, if you are playing 1000 tickets weekly, your changes to statistically get the winning ticket would take 100k years
People just see the change existing, not grasping that they aren't winning it with a thousand tickets in a 100k+ years.

This is why i said that putting some of that money to lower tiers is a good idea.

Lotteries are always known to have worse probabilities of winning than other casino games like slot machines. Plus there's no luring here with someone inside the casino who's waiting to rape you. Haha. Lotteries promoted by any casino are merely sort of warm-ups or as introductions to the casino itself.

The probabilities might be low, but they are sometimes entertaining to play if you merely want something to wait for during your week.

[dzungmobile]

Lotteries are always known to have worse probabilities of winning than other casino games like slot machines. Plus there's no luring here with someone inside the casino who's waiting to rape you. Haha. Lotteries promoted by any casino are merely sort of warm-ups or as introductions to the casino itself.

The probabilities might be low, but they are sometimes entertaining to play if you merely want something to wait for during your week.

If you lose money to something, it's bad.
If you addict something, it's bad.
Being addictive with something, you are more likely to it, and it's certainly bad.

So lottery, slot games are all possible ways to lose your money but about addictive probability and risk, I think slot games are more addictive than lotteries. You can lose money with slot games faster than with lotteries because with slot games, it's very continuously while lotteries are not and have cooling down time for you.

[DaNNy001]

So lottery, slot games are all possible ways to lose your money but about addictive probability and risk, I think slot games are more addictive than lotteries. You can lose money with slot games faster than with lotteries because with slot games, it's very continuously while lotteries are not and have cooling down time for you.

The difference is too much when it comes to addictiveness. Slots games can get you addicted faster because of the availability to play it always while lotteries are seasonal. If you try out the lottery and you don't win the time space for you to cool and try again is long and limits your losing spree and possibility of being addicted but  with slots you can continually empty your bank role since there are lots of time and games to try.

[avp2306]

So lottery, slot games are all possible ways to lose your money but about addictive probability and risk, I think slot games are more addictive than lotteries. You can lose money with slot games faster than with lotteries because with slot games, it's very continuously while lotteries are not and have cooling down time for you.

The difference is too much when it comes to addictiveness. Slots games can get you addicted faster because of the availability to play it always while lotteries are seasonal. If you try out the lottery and you don't win the time space for you to cool and try again is long and limits your losing spree and possibility of being addicted but  with slots you can continually empty your bank role since there are lots of time and games to try.

Yeah everything you have said is correct and slot games is usual games offered by casino. That's why the addiction level of this type of game is so high since people could always access it and continue to play whenever they want.

Although lotteries have the same level of risk to go in that situation but people could ignore those addictive condition on that option since sometimes enjoyment sometimes not there compare on what slot games could provide to people playing it. So for sure people would agree that if we compare these two options for sure majority of us would point out that slot is more enjoyable compare on betting on lotteries that's why many got addicted on it especially if they don't have good self control.

[Wind_FURY]

Lotteries are always known to have worse probabilities of winning than other casino games like slot machines. Plus there's no luring here with someone inside the casino who's waiting to rape you. Haha. Lotteries promoted by any casino are merely sort of warm-ups or as introductions to the casino itself.

The probabilities might be low, but they are sometimes entertaining to play if you merely want something to wait for during your week.

If you lose money to something, it's bad.
If you addict something, it's bad.
Being addictive with something, you are more likely to it, and it's certainly bad.

So lottery, slot games are all possible ways to lose your money but about addictive probability and risk, I think slot games are more addictive than lotteries. You can lose money with slot games faster than with lotteries because with slot games, it's very continuously while lotteries are not and have cooling down time for you.

Ser, I'm not encouraging anyone to become gambling-addicts. I'm merely stating a fact that lotteries are merely used as introductions/warm-ups to play the other games in the casino.

But if you believe that's actually bad - I don't - then, respectfully, perhaps you should remove that signature of yours and replace it with another signature?

[rammy2k2]

https://imgur.com/a/BDYa0Kl

Continuing my previous thread. Not sure if I'm just being paranoid. I just read other people have had the same problem. Which made me feel off about the whole situation. I have had multiple withdrawals be successful. Now I get hit with KYC which I don't really mind and my withdrawal is stuck for a while. The support just respond with the same cant give an ETA etc. Just to wait. Maybe I'm just paranoid. Just looking for some reassurance. Don't want to scare anyone off Shuffle. ( for now )

did u received it ?
i never had any problems with them

[BitcoinHunt3r]

I would like to share my previous experience here when placing bets on sports, so a few weeks ago bet on Both team to score and I want to choose YES which is generally on the left side of your screen/computer well then I monitored the match via the livescore site and ended with both teams scoring goals but strangely my bet lost after double checking it turns out I chose NO on my bet, of course it lost.

Well today I just realized that the Sportsbook in Shuffle can change the position YES and NO it means there is no guarantee YES on the left or NO on the right even though in other sportsbooks it never change/move. Here I am not blaming anyone but it would be better to place it in a fixed position so there is no way for a gambler like me to get fooled or harmed. I managed to take 2 screenshots on 2 Turkish League matches

Caykur Rizespor vs Galatasaray


Karagumruk vs Sanliurfaspor

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Could be the position depends on the away/home location match.

Those button could be based on those, but TBH still a good position especially for people who doesn't read anythings. However, even a newbie who just try the first time is rare to bet on those section.

Mostly just 1x2 match.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

-snip-

Could be the position depends on the away/home location match.

Those button could be based on those, but TBH still a good position especially for people who doesn't read anythings. However, even a newbie who just try the first time is rare to bet on those section.

Mostly just 1x2 match.

Home / Away should have no impact on the position or move to a stronger team the reason is that some matches are played in other stadiums not Home/Away (neutral) for example the World Cup matches or in the match between Real Madrid vs Barcelona one of them is not called the strongest team because they are both strong, yeah I understand you don't really understand about sports betting and you are a live games specialist.

To make sure you can check it on several sportsbooks like Sta**  Duel** Sports** or Fortu***  (no local sportsbook) I can confirm that YES is on the left side of your screen/computer on Both Team to Score option, therefore I don't think it can move to the other side especially before I also placed the same bet here ( normal position).

[Wind_FURY]

I would like to share my previous experience here when placing bets on sports, so a few weeks ago bet on Both team to score and I want to choose YES which is generally on the left side of your screen/computer well then I monitored the match via the livescore site and ended with both teams scoring goals but strangely my bet lost after double checking it turns out I chose NO on my bet, of course it lost.

Well today I just realized that the Sportsbook in Shuffle can change the position YES and NO it means there is no guarantee YES on the left or NO on the right even though in other sportsbooks it never change/move. Here I am not blaming anyone but it would be better to place it in a fixed position so there is no way for a gambler like me to get fooled or harmed. I managed to take 2 screenshots on 2 Turkish League matches

Caykur Rizespor vs Galatasaray


Karagumruk vs Sanliurfaspor

For the sake of simplicity and a better UI/UX, plus to avoid any confusion, I believe it would be better if the Shuffle front-end developers merely placed the "YES" to the left and the "NO" to the right irregardless of the odds or the home or away team.

I believe you should leave your feedback to the admins through Shuffle's email or chat.

 👍

OR it might merely be a UI bug.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

For the sake of simplicity and a better UI/UX, plus to avoid any confusion, I believe it would be better if the Shuffle front-end developers merely placed the "YES" to the left and the "NO" to the right irregardless of the odds or the home or away team.

I believe you should leave your feedback to the admins through Shuffle's email or chat.

 👍

OR it might merely be a UI bug.

Well I just reported it today and not sure if they will care about this issue because basically this requires precision so they have a reason to ignore it. On live support no response then I send via email + Twitter yeah hope they see one of my reports. For those who don't know this problem, they will definitely be trapped like me especially if they want to place a parlay bet on Both teams to score, you know I almost had it again, luckily before klick the Bet button I double checked   that's why i'm sure there will be some who get trapped too because I who already knew almost got trapped.

[Wind_FURY]

For the sake of simplicity and a better UI/UX, plus to avoid any confusion, I believe it would be better if the Shuffle front-end developers merely placed the "YES" to the left and the "NO" to the right irregardless of the odds or the home or away team.

I believe you should leave your feedback to the admins through Shuffle's email or chat.

 👍

OR it might merely be a UI bug.

Well I just reported it today and not sure if they will care about this issue because basically this requires precision so they have a reason to ignore it. On live support no response then I send via email + Twitter yeah hope they see one of my reports. For those who don't know this problem, they will definitely be trapped like me especially if they want to place a parlay bet on Both teams to score, you know I almost had it again, luckily before klick the Bet button I double checked   that's why i'm sure there will be some who get trapped too because I who already knew almost got trapped.

I'm very confident that every customer feedback sent to Shuffle will not be taken for granted considering that Noah wants his casino and sports-betting product to be as big as Stake and the other larger and more popular crypto casinos. Although, you're also right. There are some UI bugs or more serious security bugs in the site in general that would fixed first before taking care of minor bugs. Patience, ser.

[avp2306]

For the sake of simplicity and a better UI/UX, plus to avoid any confusion, I believe it would be better if the Shuffle front-end developers merely placed the "YES" to the left and the "NO" to the right irregardless of the odds or the home or away team.

I believe you should leave your feedback to the admins through Shuffle's email or chat.

 👍

OR it might merely be a UI bug.

Well I just reported it today and not sure if they will care about this issue because basically this requires precision so they have a reason to ignore it. On live support no response then I send via email + Twitter yeah hope they see one of my reports. For those who don't know this problem, they will definitely be trapped like me especially if they want to place a parlay bet on Both teams to score, you know I almost had it again, luckily before klick the Bet button I double checked   that's why i'm sure there will be some who get trapped too because I who already knew almost got trapped.

I'm very confident that every customer feedback sent to Shuffle will not be taken for granted considering that Noah wants his casino and sports-betting product to be as big as Stake and the other larger and more popular crypto casinos. Although, you're also right. There are some UI bugs or more serious security bugs in the site in general that would fixed first before taking care of minor bugs. Patience, ser.

Yes indeed and there's provably no people would question that especially they are vocal even since before that they want to outshine Stake https://next.io/news/features/shuffle-noah-dummett-plan-to-outshine-stake/ amazing how dedicated they are for saying that and showing their good potential to became one of big casino here.

So provably those bugs or any other issues pointed out by people will be taken care of since they cannot achieve those things they want if people feel that they are not been heard and also their are certain issues exist that bothers people.

[Wind_FURY]

For the sake of simplicity and a better UI/UX, plus to avoid any confusion, I believe it would be better if the Shuffle front-end developers merely placed the "YES" to the left and the "NO" to the right irregardless of the odds or the home or away team.

I believe you should leave your feedback to the admins through Shuffle's email or chat.

 👍

OR it might merely be a UI bug.

Well I just reported it today and not sure if they will care about this issue because basically this requires precision so they have a reason to ignore it. On live support no response then I send via email + Twitter yeah hope they see one of my reports. For those who don't know this problem, they will definitely be trapped like me especially if they want to place a parlay bet on Both teams to score, you know I almost had it again, luckily before klick the Bet button I double checked   that's why i'm sure there will be some who get trapped too because I who already knew almost got trapped.

I'm very confident that every customer feedback sent to Shuffle will not be taken for granted considering that Noah wants his casino and sports-betting product to be as big as Stake and the other larger and more popular crypto casinos. Although, you're also right. There are some UI bugs or more serious security bugs in the site in general that would fixed first before taking care of minor bugs. Patience, ser.

Yes indeed and there's provably no people would question that especially they are vocal even since before that they want to outshine Stake https://next.io/news/features/shuffle-noah-dummett-plan-to-outshine-stake/ amazing how dedicated they are for saying that and showing their good potential to became one of big casino here.

So provably those bugs or any other issues pointed out by people will be taken care of since they cannot achieve those things they want if people feel that they are not been heard and also their are certain issues exist that bothers people.

That article's title is taking what Noah was saying out of context. Noah has very deep respect for Stake,

Dummett admits he took some inspiration from fellow Melbourne-based operator Stake.com.

Analysing Stake.com and its connection to YouTubers, he realised that perhaps 20% of the company’s success was due to the product; the remaining 80% hinged on marketing and distribution.

Moreover, when it came to Stake, identifying flaws proved difficult.

The company’s product is “nearly flawless,” with a smooth user experience, capacity to handle big bets, substantial trust, and a transparent public team.

https://next.io/news/features/shuffle-noah-dummett-plan-to-outshine-stake/

Plus Stake's operator is also from where Noah is from, Melbourne. It's safe to make a presumption that they will compete, but saying "outshine" suggests Noah has no respect for Stake, which is simply not true.