🐳 Whale.io - Casino & Sportsbook 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰

[inspace]

🌟 We are pleased to announce that an exciting new raffle is launching and we invite you to take part in it!

• 🐳 Whale.io 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 Prize 50$!

1️⃣ Pick a slot! You can choose 2 SLOTS if you have shared a screenshot of your bets in the ANN Thread in the last 2 weeks.
2️⃣ 2 Winners, will share a prize of $50 in Free Bets! 🎁
3️⃣ Once a block is selected, we will use bitmover’s tool to determine the winners.



Become a winner with Whale 🐳

[hero_the_bossman]

^ so we need to just pick a slot and play on it, and share a bet on said slot in the attached post?

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Nice to see you guys are finally adding some originals games but one thing is not a good idea, setting the house edge to a whopping 4%, that's actually insane.
Industry standard is 1% and I only know 1 more site that chagres this much, and's that's BC. Not a good idea to follow their example to be honest.
I was happy whan I saw you added dice but when I saw the payouts I immediately chose to not play this game. 1.92x on a 50% win chance is crazy!
WHy would players to choose to play dice on your site while basically everywhere else they will get 6% more money for each bet won, think about it.
I tried dice for a minute and I have only 1 word, it's terrible. It's slow, laggy and I have never seen a dice game that only has even numbers and no number behind the dot. I am honestly disappointed you even send a promotion email for a mess like this. The gameplay is terrible and the 4% house edge just makes it totally unplayable. I thought highly of whale but this kind of destroys everything I have seen so far.

So we are just ignoring this? No statement why you decided to take a 4x higher house edge compared to almost every other site on the internet?
Also the game (dice) is a hot mess, I just checked and it is still the same laggy version, looks like an 8th grader programmed this game actually. And yeah, 1.92 x on a 50/50 chance  .

[examplens]

You were unlucky not to choose Chelsea while I myself was unlucky in the PSG vs Real Madrid match because I chose to bet on BTTS but in reality Real Madrid could not score a single goal... this is a shame.

It's not a shame when you play against someone better than you. RM is not good enough, and I think it will be like that for the whole season. The last couple of seasons have not been particularly convincing. Several spectacular comebacks lulled them into believing that they are strong, but that is not the case.

btw. I had no doubts about the results of these games.

[henry_of_skalitz]

You were unlucky not to choose Chelsea while I myself was unlucky in the PSG vs Real Madrid match because I chose to bet on BTTS but in reality Real Madrid could not score a single goal... this is a shame.

It's not a shame when you play against someone better than you. RM is not good enough, and I think it will be like that for the whole season. The last couple of seasons have not been particularly convincing. Several spectacular comebacks lulled them into believing that they are strong, but that is not the case.

Hard to argue with facts: they rely on their luck and old glory too much sometimes.

[inspace]

🌟 Attention friends, we have great news - a new exciting contest is starting and we invite you to take part!

• 🐳 Whale.io | Sao Paulo & Corinthians ⚽️ $50

📅 Date: 20 July
🎯 Predict the minute of the First Goal Scored!
🏆 Prize Pool: $50 (The prize will be credited to your Whale account in the form of a free bet)!

Don't miss the opportunity to enter this contest and compete for a prize. Come join us!

We wish good luck to all participants!



Best wishes, Whale 🐳

[BABY SHOES]

You were unlucky not to choose Chelsea while I myself was unlucky in the PSG vs Real Madrid match because I chose to bet on BTTS but in reality Real Madrid could not score a single goal... this is a shame.

It's not a shame when you play against someone better than you. RM is not good enough, and I think it will be like that for the whole season. The last couple of seasons have not been particularly convincing. Several spectacular comebacks lulled them into believing that they are strong, but that is not the case.

Hmm... are you sure it will be like this throughout the season? But Real Madrid still has gaps in its defense, and this time many people believe in Xabi... maybe we can say that this is just the beginning, yeah, that's normal, but the defeat has damaged the confidence of many people.

We just have to wait for the season to start to see how Real Madrid will perform throughout the season against Barcelona.

[Lakai01]

My bet for the final on Sunday is as follows:


After the game against Real, PSG are the heavy favorites. I was actually surprised at how clearly PSG won the game, especially despite the red cards from the game against Bayern.

I'll probably even watch the game, it's sure to be an exciting match.

[examplens]

Hmm... are you sure it will be like this throughout the season? But Real Madrid still has gaps in its defense, and this time many people believe in Xabi... maybe we can say that this is just the beginning, yeah, that's normal, but the defeat has damaged the confidence of many people.

We just have to wait for the season to start to see how Real Madrid will perform throughout the season against Barcelona.

There are many reasons for such a thing
The new manager, Alonso, has proven to be good, but it is not the same to lead Bayer, where not much is expected, and Real, where managers suffer the greatest pressure.
In the team, they have superstars who are not known for always submitting to the team. Most often, they are more ballast than advantage, and the best example of that is PSG, which started to play well when they got rid of the 'big' names.
There are no more experienced players, leaders of the game like Modric, Kroos, and I am not convinced that Bellingham is of their caliber. At least not yet.

[Z-tight]

After the game against Real, PSG are the heavy favorites. I was actually surprised at how clearly PSG won the game, especially despite the red cards from the game against Bayern.

Everyone would surely be betting in favor of PSG and i believe they are going to win the game against Chelsea on Sunday. 1.61 odds for a PSG win is not bad, but you need a 'good' stake to get to get something good in terms of possible winnings. Chelsea on the other hand has a winning odd of 5.30, i am sure there would be a few gamblers who would take the risk on them, after all it is a final and anything can happen, right, lol.

[fikrett]

After the game against Real, PSG are the heavy favorites. I was actually surprised at how clearly PSG won the game, especially despite the red cards from the game against Bayern.

Everyone would surely be betting in favor of PSG and i believe they are going to win the game against Chelsea on Sunday. 1.61 odds for a PSG win is not bad, but you need a 'good' stake to get to get something good in terms of possible winnings. Chelsea on the other hand has a winning odd of 5.30, i am sure there would be a few gamblers who would take the risk on them, after all it is a final and anything can happen, right, lol.

I think it's better to play it safe than to await on the miracle.

But I agree - await the unexpected

[tiCeR]

My screenshot.

[examplens]

Everyone would surely be betting in favor of PSG and i believe they are going to win the game against Chelsea on Sunday. 1.61 odds for a PSG win is not bad, but you need a 'good' stake to get to get something good in terms of possible winnings. Chelsea on the other hand has a winning odd of 5.30, i am sure there would be a few gamblers who would take the risk on them, after all it is a final and anything can happen, right, lol.

I think it's better to play it safe than to await on the miracle.

But I agree - await the unexpected

It's a gamble after all. The greater the risk, the greater the gain. It happens that the outsider wins, although it is difficult in this case.

I just saw Sinner vs Djokovic. Is the difference in favor of Sinner that big?
I didn't follow everything, but didn't Sinner complain about some kind of injury, and only with a lot of luck did he make it to the semifinals?

[OcTradism]

It's a gamble after all. The greater the risk, the greater the gain. It happens that the outsider wins, although it is difficult in this case.

I just saw Sinner vs Djokovic. Is the difference in favor of Sinner that big?
I didn't follow everything, but didn't Sinner complain about some kind of injury, and only with a lot of luck did he make it to the semifinals?

Sinner is younger than Djokovic and he is uprising while Djokovic is in downside of his career. Djokovic is experiencing very last Grandslam tournaments in his career and I think he now can understand what Federer and Nadal experienced in latest years. When a legendary tennnis player gets older and especially old enough, he will hit his physical limits and can not beat young tennis players.

I don't say Sinner is better than Djokovic and it's hard for not only Sinner but also any tennis player to win equal total Grandslam trophies like Djokovic. Anyway, in a single direct match, Sinner has big advantage against Djokovic and it's reflected on the given odds.

[SATWAT]

It's a gamble after all. The greater the risk, the greater the gain. It happens that the outsider wins, although it is difficult in this case.

I just saw Sinner vs Djokovic. Is the difference in favor of Sinner that big?
I didn't follow everything, but didn't Sinner complain about some kind of injury, and only with a lot of luck did he make it to the semifinals?

Sinner is younger than Djokovic and he is uprising while Djokovic is in downside of his career. Djokovic is experiencing very last Grandslam tournaments in his career and I think he now can understand what Federer and Nadal experienced in latest years. When a legendary tennnis player gets older and especially old enough, he will hit his physical limits and can not beat young tennis players.

I don't say Sinner is better than Djokovic and it's hard for not only Sinner but also any tennis player to win equal total Grandslam trophies like Djokovic. Anyway, in a single direct match, Sinner has big advantage against Djokovic and it's reflected on the given odds.

Novak Djokovic already done enough and now having time to give up because he is not able to handle big games against top seed players in this game he completely thrashed by Sinner in just three sets which was impressive from young world no 1.
After having shocking result against Dimitrov now things are clearly looking he is unstoppable and fight of titans in final is going to be exciting because both are at his best Alcaraz will try his best for keeping things in control and have another Grand Slam while Sinner will try his best for fight back after having lost in French Open.
In third set I was surprised when Djokovic took 3 points lead, and I was expecting good result with win for him but suddenly he down and out with amazing fight back from Sinner.

[Lakai01]

[...]
Chelsea on the other hand has a winning odd of 5.30, i am sure there would be a few gamblers who would take the risk on them, after all it is a final and anything can happen, right, lol.

The odds for Chelsea are indeed surprisingly high, which - purely in terms of the odds - would suggest a clear win for PSG. Chelsea have not been that convincing in recent games and could just as easily have been eliminated in the semi-finals.

However, a bet on Chelsea would still be worth considering, finals often have their own rules and if PSG are in poor form on the day, Chelsea could well win the game.

[bettercrypto]

After the game against Real, PSG are the heavy favorites. I was actually surprised at how clearly PSG won the game, especially despite the red cards from the game against Bayern.

Everyone would surely be betting in favor of PSG and i believe they are going to win the game against Chelsea on Sunday. 1.61 odds for a PSG win is not bad, but you need a 'good' stake to get to get something good in terms of possible winnings. Chelsea on the other hand has a winning odd of 5.30, i am sure there would be a few gamblers who would take the risk on them, after all it is a final and anything can happen, right, lol.

I think it's better to play it safe than to await on the miracle.

But I agree - await the unexpected

Psg is a strong team, even if I were to bet on Psg against Chelsea, though I'm not saying that Chelsea
is a weak team because they are also a strong team.

But of course I'm more confident in the performance of the Psg players when compared to the Chelsea players,
this is just my personal opinion.

[SamReomo]

But of course I'm more confident in the performance of the Psg players when compared to the Chelsea players,
this is just my personal opinion.

Without any doubt, this time PSG is performing much better than any other clubs and with such performance, it's hard for other teams to win them. Chelsea is a good team too but it will be hard for them to compete against PSG.

[examplens]

But of course I'm more confident in the performance of the Psg players when compared to the Chelsea players,
this is just my personal opinion.

Without any doubt, this time PSG is performing much better than any other clubs and with such performance, it's hard for other teams to win them. Chelsea is a good team too but it will be hard for them to compete against PSG.

It seems like the exact opposite of what you expected, as probably most of us did. Chelsea won easily, 3-0, quite surprisingly.
And I was greedy, so I bet all my previous winnings on PSG and now I'm as low as I was at the start of the tournament 

[Lakai01]

[...]
And I was greedy, so I bet all my previous winnings on PSG and now I'm as low as I was at the start of the tournament 

Oh yes, you can count me in here. I was able to win quite a bit of USDT by betting on PSG in the preliminary rounds, but have now lost some of it again.

However, it was a great game to watch, full of emotion, which Chelsea thoroughly deserved to win. PSG were a shadow of their former selves in the previous rounds, they couldn't have won against Bayern or Real with a performance like that.

Congratulations to everyone who bet on Chelsea, the odds were very good!