🐳 Whale.io - Casino & Sportsbook 💰 Daily Cashbacks 💰

[hero_the_bossman]

[...]
And I was greedy, so I bet all my previous winnings on PSG and now I'm as low as I was at the start of the tournament 

Oh yes, you can count me in here. I was able to win quite a bit of USDT by betting on PSG in the preliminary rounds, but have now lost some of it again.

However, it was a great game to watch, full of emotion, which Chelsea thoroughly deserved to win. PSG were a shadow of their former selves in the previous rounds, they couldn't have won against Bayern or Real with a performance like that.

Congratulations to everyone who bet on Chelsea, the odds were very good!

Sometimes we win, sometimes, we need to go home, not big, that's okay.

Great game! 

[Lakai01]

Haha... Before the match started many predicted PSG would win (including myself. Lol) betting on PSG with the belief that the bet would win, but this is true too greedy which ended up being a failure.

But you also have to say that the odds were very clearly in PSG's favor, the odds for a Chelsea win were 3 to 4 times as high.

But Chelsea's performance was actually very good ... and at the same time PSG's was extremely poor. PSG themselves had probably not expected such a clear rebuff, which you could definitely see in the reactions of the players (and the coach ). It was quite entertaining as a spectator, but the way the PSG team behaved here was very unprofessional.

[SATWAT]

Haha... Before the match started many predicted PSG would win (including myself. Lol) betting on PSG with the belief that the bet would win, but this is true too greedy which ended up being a failure.

But you also have to say that the odds were very clearly in PSG's favor, the odds for a Chelsea win were 3 to 4 times as high.

But Chelsea's performance was actually very good ... and at the same time PSG's was extremely poor. PSG themselves had probably not expected such a clear rebuff, which you could definitely see in the reactions of the players (and the coach ). It was quite entertaining as a spectator, but the way the PSG team behaved here was very unprofessional.

Now after this game I am really suspicious about soccer games in big events because PSG thrashed Inter Milan then Real Madrid with one-sided affair and last night Chelsea give them defeat in one-sided affair even PSG was in all control.
Too much money was put on BTTS and over 3.5 because too many already hyped about this but both gone and Chelsea won with the score of 3–0 which was surprised for me big profit for bookies and FIFA due to this result same happen in UEFA Champions League final where BTTS was backed heavily by punters.
But now all ended and Chelsea grabbed trophy which is big boost for them before new season with this now Premier League and Champions League are going to be more interesting because now peoples will try to go with underdogs instead of favorites.

[DaNNy001]

Haha... Before the match started many predicted PSG would win (including myself. Lol) betting on PSG with the belief that the bet would win, but this is true too greedy which ended up being a failure.

But you also have to say that the odds were very clearly in PSG's favor, the odds for a Chelsea win were 3 to 4 times as high.

But Chelsea's performance was actually very good ... and at the same time PSG's was extremely poor. PSG themselves had probably not expected such a clear rebuff, which you could definitely see in the reactions of the players (and the coach ). It was quite entertaining as a spectator, but the way the PSG team behaved here was very unprofessional.

The results of the game was quite unexpected because even the bookmakers made the odd clearly in favor of the french team because of the past records of their victory against big teams like Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, inter Milan and even the English side arsenal, so clearly everything was pointing at PSG to be victorious but that's not always how football works, if anything it just proves that Chelsea did their assignment well before coming on the pitch to play that game.

[@Whale]

Let me ask you. Are you a PSG fan? It seems that this is not the first time you have bet on this team. 

My bet for the final on Sunday is as follows:


After the game against Real, PSG are the heavy favorites. I was actually surprised at how clearly PSG won the game, especially despite the red cards from the game against Bayern.

I'll probably even watch the game, it's sure to be an exciting match.

[Z-tight]

Congratulations to everyone who bet on Chelsea, the odds were very good!

Yeah, i didn't bet on Chelsea to win, but people who did must have enjoyed the game last night and they deserve it because they went against the crowd, lol. The Club World Cup really did live up to expectations, the only negative side of the tournament is that it has taken a lot out of the players and the football season would start in around 4-5 weeks, hope we don't see many injuries in the first few weeks of the season.

[Lakai01]

Let me ask you. Are you a PSG fan? It seems that this is not the first time you have bet on this team. 

Hehe no, never! For me, PSG is one of the least likeable teams in top European soccer. But I've actually bet on PSG to win more often, including in the Champions League final against Inter and now in the semi-finals and finals of the Club World Cup, that's true ... and PSG haven't disappointed me either

But the reactions to the defeat have also shown nicely why I simply find PSG an unlikeable team.

[famososMuertos]

::/Q:/:::
Now after this game I am really suspicious about soccer games in big events because PSG thrashed Inter Milan then Real Madrid with one-sided affair and last night Chelsea give them defeat in one-sided affair even PSG was in all control.
Too much money was put on BTTS and over 3.5 because too many already hyped about this but both gone and Chelsea won with the score of 3–0 which was surprised for me big profit for bookies and FIFA due to this result same happen in UEFA Champions League final where BTTS was backed heavily by punters.
But now all ended and Chelsea grabbed trophy which is big boost for them before new season with this now Premier League and Champions League are going to be more interesting because now peoples will try to go with underdogs instead of favorites.

When you win it's nice, but when you lose, you start to see "ghosts"... some Casinos gave PSG up to +"@2" and that tells you that the situation was not so easy, I don't know what the surprise is here, in a World Cup that was full of several questionable results, the same PSG lost a match in the qualifying phase that nobody expected. I did well with Chelsea and I'm not saying it today, I've been saying it for 8 days... in fact, you know, I even selected Chelsea-Fluminense

[SATWAT]

::/Q:/:::
Now after this game I am really suspicious about soccer games in big events because PSG thrashed Inter Milan then Real Madrid with one-sided affair and last night Chelsea give them defeat in one-sided affair even PSG was in all control.
Too much money was put on BTTS and over 3.5 because too many already hyped about this but both gone and Chelsea won with the score of 3–0 which was surprised for me big profit for bookies and FIFA due to this result same happen in UEFA Champions League final where BTTS was backed heavily by punters.
But now all ended and Chelsea grabbed trophy which is big boost for them before new season with this now Premier League and Champions League are going to be more interesting because now peoples will try to go with underdogs instead of favorites.

When you win it's nice, but when you lose, you start to see "ghosts"... some Casinos gave PSG up to +"@2" and that tells you that the situation was not so easy, I don't know what the surprise is here, in a World Cup that was full of several questionable results, the same PSG lost a match in the qualifying phase that nobody expected. I did well with Chelsea and I'm not saying it today, I've been saying it for 8 days... in fact, you know, I even selected Chelsea-Fluminense

Man here we can argue about few things but its not right place but still good your have Chelsea-Fluminense and this give you one point and draw congrats because I was expecting win but have ended with draw which is also ok.
As you already mention many questionable results so its mean you also understand how things are going around this event but now its ended and Chelsea is winner which is important and good thing but still I believe many events are having questionable results which make things surprising, but we can't do anything about them just have fun and entertainment which main point of these events if PSG won then surely things are going more problematic for many stakeholders but at the end they manage good.

[Z_MBFM]

::/Q:/:::
Now after this game I am really suspicious about soccer games in big events because PSG thrashed Inter Milan then Real Madrid with one-sided affair and last night Chelsea give them defeat in one-sided affair even PSG was in all control.
Too much money was put on BTTS and over 3.5 because too many already hyped about this but both gone and Chelsea won with the score of 3–0 which was surprised for me big profit for bookies and FIFA due to this result same happen in UEFA Champions League final where BTTS was backed heavily by punters.
But now all ended and Chelsea grabbed trophy which is big boost for them before new season with this now Premier League and Champions League are going to be more interesting because now peoples will try to go with underdogs instead of favorites.

When you win it's nice, but when you lose, you start to see "ghosts"... some Casinos gave PSG up to +"@2" and that tells you that the situation was not so easy, I don't know what the surprise is here, in a World Cup that was full of several questionable results, the same PSG lost a match in the qualifying phase that nobody expected. I did well with Chelsea and I'm not saying it today, I've been saying it for 8 days... in fact, you know, I even selected Chelsea-Fluminense

Chelsea were being offered very high odds which were more than 5x but PSG were offering very low odds because PSG had more supporters. On one hand PSG is a good team on the other hand they were offering low odds, seeing which most of the gamblers got confused and bet on PSG with confidence which led to their loss. Those who bet on Chelsea were lucky to win very well and got 5x+ returns. Winning such a match is a great pleasure because here you can maintain your attitude with high risk and the returns are also very big. While PSG was expected to win among most bettors, PSG 3-0 loss was a sad development.

[tbct_mt2]

When you win it's nice, but when you lose, you start to see "ghosts"... some Casinos gave PSG up to +"@2"

Things are only nice if you have proper risk management and you can afford to lose it in either investment, trading or gambling. Oppositely, things are never nice if you don't have risk management or don't have sufficient risk management, and even you win or win big, it will be lost very easily and fastly later.

Chelsea were being offered very high odds which were more than 5x but PSG were offering very low odds because PSG had more supporters. On one hand PSG is a good team on the other hand they were offering low odds, seeing which most of the gamblers got confused and bet on PSG with confidence which led to their loss. Those who bet on Chelsea were lucky to win very well and got 5x+ returns. Winning such a match is a great pleasure because here you can maintain your attitude with high risk and the returns are also very big. While PSG was expected to win among most bettors, PSG 3-0 loss was a sad development.

It's clearly that gamblers bet on Chelsea by either loving this club, wanting to support the club they love, believing in chances of winning for Chelsea, while less likely making bet by good given odds from sportbook makers.

If you purely bet based on odds, you can be trapped by sport bookmakers and lose your money. Chelsea did played an amazing final just similarly to PSG did two months ago against Inter Milan in UEFA Champions League final. They are all strong teams but it's really hard to repeat such big wins in final matches against strong competitors.

[Lakai01]

Chelsea were being offered very high odds which were more than 5x but PSG were offering very low odds because PSG had more supporters. On one hand PSG is a good team on the other hand they were offering low odds, seeing which most of the gamblers got confused and bet on PSG with confidence which led to their loss.

I don't think it's because of the number of supporters, no (and it wouldn't be very lucrative for the booker to go by this figure either).

PSG had a good preliminary round and excellent quarter-final and semi-final matches, whereas Chelsea were almost eliminated beforehand and also had a much easier draw. PSG are also the current CL winners and dismantled Inter in the final, so they were rightly the (heavy) favorites here too.

[examplens]

Chelsea were being offered very high odds which were more than 5x but PSG were offering very low odds because PSG had more supporters. On one hand PSG is a good team on the other hand they were offering low odds, seeing which most of the gamblers got confused and bet on PSG with confidence which led to their loss.

I don't think it's because of the number of supporters, no (and it wouldn't be very lucrative for the booker to go by this figure either).

PSG had a good preliminary round and excellent quarter-final and semi-final matches, whereas Chelsea were almost eliminated beforehand and also had a much easier draw. PSG are also the current CL winners and dismantled Inter in the final, so they were rightly the (heavy) favorites here too.

I wouldn't say that odds are created based on the number of supporters. Real Madrid certainly has 50x more supporters than PSG, so the odds were still on the side of the Parisians.

It is not uncommon for a team, after easily defeating the 'toughest' opponents, to relax a little because the next game is against an 'outsider'.
Chelsea is one of the most difficult teams to predict. They can beat anyone, even the best teams. They can also lose embarrassingly to anyone.

[shield132]

Chelsea were being offered very high odds which were more than 5x but PSG were offering very low odds because PSG had more supporters. On one hand PSG is a good team on the other hand they were offering low odds, seeing which most of the gamblers got confused and bet on PSG with confidence which led to their loss.

I don't think it's because of the number of supporters, no (and it wouldn't be very lucrative for the booker to go by this figure either).

PSG had a good preliminary round and excellent quarter-final and semi-final matches, whereas Chelsea were almost eliminated beforehand and also had a much easier draw. PSG are also the current CL winners and dismantled Inter in the final, so they were rightly the (heavy) favorites here too.

I wouldn't say that odds are created based on the number of supporters. Real Madrid certainly has 50x more supporters than PSG, so the odds were still on the side of the Parisians.

It is not uncommon for a team, after easily defeating the 'toughest' opponents, to relax a little because the next game is against an 'outsider'.
Chelsea is one of the most difficult teams to predict. They can beat anyone, even the best teams. They can also lose embarrassingly to anyone.

When he said supporters, I think he meant the number of people who placed a bet on PSG. Btw as far as I know, bookmakers have hired people on that position. For example, I know that on the local market, local casinos do not use 3rd party bookmaker providers like many use in crypto casinos, instead, they hire people who know sports very well and have high mathematical and analytical skills. Then these people calculate odds for each game. These people are called oddmakers and they calculate the possible outcome of every match, they have access to lots of information and multiple type of result databases.

To sum up, as far as I know from local market, they do not watch what number of people place a bet on each team, instead, they hire people who carefully calculate odds but I also know that over time, they slightly change their odds according to the statistics they get pre-match.

[Peanutswar]

Seems the market can soar high more with the ATH of 123k and still we have more days left before the bullrun ends, I'm just guessing we can touch with the 130k this time.

Congratulations to our event winners of the last event 🐳 Whale.io | Bitcoin Price Prediction ' July 13 🎁 Prize $100!

🎖️ 1st - tiCeR
🎖️ 2nd - Agbamoni
🎖️ 3rd - bitzizzix-Tim

And new with another set of fun! The price prediction event!

🐳 Whale.io | Bitcoin Price Prediction ' July 27 🎁 Prize $100! is now OPEN 💦!

• Rules/Prizes

➥ Post Bitcoin Price Prediction for July 27 !
➥ The three closest predictions will WIN $50, 2x $25 (Free Bets!). 🎁
➥ The winner will be determined based on the Bitcoin price at 23:59 UTC, July 27 (CMC). 🕐
➥ You can make a Double Prediction if you have shared a screenshot of your bets in the ANN thread in the last 2 weeks. 🌊

Good luck 🌊🌊.

[famososMuertos]

When you win it's nice, but when you lose, you start to see "ghosts"... some Casinos gave PSG up to +"@2"

Things are only nice if you have proper risk management and you can afford to lose it in either investment, trading or gambling. Oppositely, things are never nice if you don't have risk management or don't have sufficient risk management, and even you win or win big, it will be lost very easily and fastly later.

This isn't an investment, it's a bet. I make hundreds of bets every week, my results are not measured because one of my bets loses. Anyway, You can't say a bet is an investment, or I don't know what you're trying to say; you jargon is wrong with you. You're mixing apples and oranges.

:://:::

It's clearly that gamblers bet on Chelsea by either loving this club, wanting to support the club they love, believing in chances of winning for Chelsea, while less likely making bet by good given odds from sportbook makers.
:://::

I don't make bets for love. What are you talking about? I expect a result, that's all.

[bitmover]

This isn't an investment, it's a bet. I make hundreds of bets every week, my results are not measured because one of my bets loses. Anyway, You can't say a bet is an investment, or I don't know what you're trying to say; you jargon is wrong with you. You're mixing apples and oranges.

Money spent in bet is literally fun money.

I try to make some money, like everyone who is playing those bets is. Sometimes we win, sometimes we lose.

One good thing about casinos such as whale are the promotions and contests. I have won several giveways promoted by Whale in the games and round board. This is a good way to make money without any risk. Sometimes I just spend the money in the casino, sometimes I just save the money.

[@Whale]

Hello Whales! 🐳

🔥 Whale Livestream Alert

2 Livestreams today!

🍬 12 UTC: Katja
 - Kick RU 👈
💰 14 UTC: Jimi
 - Kick EN 👈

Choose one, or both😈 https://t.co/CyWpQqixVx

[inspace]

🌟 We are pleased to announce that an exciting new raffle is launching and we invite you to take part in it!

• 🐳 Whale.io 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 Prize 50$!

1️⃣ Pick a slot! You can choose 2 SLOTS if you have shared a screenshot of your bets in the ANN Thread in the last 2 weeks.
2️⃣ 2 Winners, will share a prize of $50 in Free Bets! 🎁
3️⃣ Once a block is selected, we will use bitmover’s tool to determine the winners.



Become a winner with Whale 🐳

[General_Bitcoin]

Today I check and have my second $25 free bet from @Whale.io thanks for this hopefully I will post image of my bet here on this thread but currently just want to ask is there any time limit until I can use my this free bet.

Site doing good work sometime have problem with access through VPN but still all ok.

Thanks again @Whale & @inspace