NA

[Furio]

2015 is the year of action. No excuses anymore and no more complaining. We can decide our future by our actions..... today.

Maybe an open door, but is it an idea to post small actions which community members can do to spread guldencoin.

I would really like to hand out guldencoins in the form of cheap coins, loaded with guldencoin, yet it's to complex for most people. A smart innovations which would make it look more like your doing business on your bank website would help a great deal I think, yet I have no programming skills

[1714783607]

1714783607

[1714783607]

1714783607

[1714783607]

1714783607

[strataghyst]

Below is a copy/paste from the OPAL-team.
I think it's definetaly worth to consider if NLG still likes being listed at coin-swap.

"This morning it came to our attention that Coin-Swap.net had been purchased by GAWMiners, which disturbed me a bit to say the very least.  Coin-Swap’s past owner, Ian, was and is still a great friend of the Opal Team, and we congratulate him that he was able to profit from his exchange, as he deserves it.  However, over the past few days it has come to our attention that Paycoin may not be everything it was claimed to be.  There are multiple reasons people have called Paycoin a scam, and while it is unclear at this point, there are too many red flags for the Opal Team to trust GAW with our communities Opal, no matter how large or small.  These red flags include:
 
- A promise to the community to purchase Paycoin’s at $20/coin (https://i.imgur.com/OVQdmym.png), which is four times the current price of Paycoin.  GAW has tried to hide this promise (https://archive.today/W3OTH), and has shown they cannot be trusted.
 
- In an audit by Opal’s lead dev, Whit Jack, he discovered that special addresses stake at a rate up to 350%, which was never publicly disclosed, again proving they are not trustworthy.  This has been verified by other users.
 
These reasons, plus a few more have caused us to request Coin-Swap delist Opal, as both a protection for our community, and as a stand against GAW and other companies that prey on cryptocurrency users.
 
~The Opal Team".

edit; further did I read on BCT that DOGE and LTC also asked for delisting.

Thank for the heads up this is a very valid excuse to get delisted of coinswap.
Don't think anyone uses it anyway. So I hope the dev team will contact coinswap to get delisted.

[bram_vnl]

http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl/
http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl/betalen.html

[BioMike]

http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl/
http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl/betalen.html

Hoi Bram,

Je site is er al een heel stuk op vooruit gegaan (en ik denk dat je ook een waardevolle bijdrage hiermee levert). Als ikzelf een suggestie mag geven, want in mijn ogen oogt het vrij druk met die achtergrond, zou ik de achtergrond van de inhoud semi-transparant maken. Dan is er beter contrast tussen de inhoud van de site en de grachtengordel achtergrond.

Groeten,

BioMike

[bram_vnl]

hij is nog niet af zitten nog een paar fouten in, met de achtergrond ben ik aan het worstelen sommige zeggen het is druk sommigen zeggen erg mooi, dus daar moet ik nog even over na denken

[RD965]

If you write in Dutch could you please also translate into English so we all can understand? 

[bram_vnl]

sorry, it is about my website the background, some people say it is to havey

[Furio]

hij is nog niet af zitten nog een paar fouten in, met de achtergrond ben ik aan het worstelen sommige zeggen het is druk sommigen zeggen erg mooi, dus daar moet ik nog even over na denken

He is not sure about the background, some say to busy, some say very nice. I find it a bit to busy too

[BioMike]

sorry, it is about my website the background, some people say it is to havey

Sorry for not speaking English. Bram, by using a semi-transparant background it will stay nice and you reduce the "busy-ness" a bit. You can also play a bit with the amount transparency. Also, you will never be able to satisfy everybody.

[Anthony1985]

This is very cool

[bram_vnl]

sorry, it is about my website the background, some people say it is to havey

Sorry for not speaking English. Bram, by using a semi-transparant background it will stay nice and you reduce the "busy-ness" a bit. You can also play a bit with the amount transparency. Also, you will never be able to satisfy everybody.

i'm now looking for a pattern background

[bram_vnl]

This is very cool

Guldencoin is a cool coin my friend

[RD965]

Thanks for translating, remember this is an english forum so if you want to post in any other language you should translate!

example:

Me encanta Guldencoin! Es mi moneda favorita!
I love Guldencoin! Its my favourite coin!


 

[Furio]

sorry, it is about my website the background, some people say it is to havey

Sorry for not speaking English. Bram, by using a semi-transparant background it will stay nice and you reduce the "busy-ness" a bit. You can also play a bit with the amount transparency. Also, you will never be able to satisfy everybody.

Knowing never to be able to satify everyone, takes alot of stress away. Offcourse he's right, but objective arguments are something to think about, then again, you created it, so you decide

[strataghyst]

Clever is hitting us hard again

[ny2cafuse]

Clever is hitting us hard again

Have they ever stopped?

CM is a cancer.  Take a look at the last month or so of their forum thread(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448649.0).  Even the miners there are questioning what is happening with CM.  Missing payouts, Terk being absent, etc.  I don't understand how anyone could run a pool like that and continue to gain miners.


/GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work.  Have you been able complete it yet?  Not rushing, just haven't seen an update.  If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG.  Let me know if you want to go that route.

-Fuse

[/GeertJohan]

/GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work.  Have you been able complete it yet?  Not rushing, just haven't seen an update.  If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG.  Let me know if you want to go that route.

I made great progress on the sim, I have added export to csv (excel) and am working on the simulations (large wave, jump pool).

Implementing Digi in NLG isn't even that much work, no need to ask the Digi dev's to do that for us.
What IS a lot of work is proving that Digi will actually protect us from a jumping pool, that's why we need to run these simulations. We need prove that the algorithm adjusts properly, and we must be able to explain HOW and WHY the algorithm is adjusting properly.

[ny2cafuse]

/GJ, you said the large-wave and DIGI functions of the simulator would be about a day's work.  Have you been able complete it yet?  Not rushing, just haven't seen an update.  If not, my offer is still on the table- I'll contact the DIGI devs and ask them to write the custom DIGI code for NLG.  Let me know if you want to go that route.

I made great progress on the sim, I have added export to csv (excel) and am working on the simulations (large wave, jump pool).

Implementing Digi in NLG isn't even that much work, no need to ask the Digi dev's to do that for us.
What IS a lot of work is proving that Digi will actually protect us from a jumping pool, that's why we need to run these simulations. We need prove that the algorithm adjusts properly, and we must be able to explain HOW and WHY the algorithm is adjusting properly.

Sounds good.

I just want to note though, that while the code I provided wasn't 100% correct, the graphs I provided were 100% typical of a DIGI implementation.  You will always return to a "baseline" difficulty, rather than a false low caused by the averaging equation.  The removal of the false lows are enough to mitigate around 70-80% of CM's influence.

How DIGI works isn't difficult to understand.  If nActualTimespan(actual block time) goes over nTargetTimespan(150 seconds in our case), the difficulty goes down proportionately.  If nActualTimespan is less than nTargetTimespan, difficulty goes up proportionately.  The key difference between DIGI and DGW3, besides the removal of false lows caused by a moving average, is the the immediate retarget instead of a delayed retarget caused by the averaging.  I'm sure you know why and how it adjusts properly though... you had it a better understanding of the code in the 20 minutes we chatted than I will probably ever have.

How much data are you looking to collect before you move forward?  Also, when will the DIGI port and large-wave code be posted to github for community testing?

-Fuse

[BioMike]

Even the miners there are questioning what is happening with CM.  Missing payouts, Terk being absent, etc.  I don't understand how anyone could run a pool like that and continue to gain miners.

CM has a single point of failure (Terk went missing)? Oh, yes, please. Let CM drop from the planet.

[Halofire]

Even the miners there are questioning what is happening with CM.  Missing payouts, Terk being absent, etc.  I don't understand how anyone could run a pool like that and continue to gain miners.

CM has a single point of failure (Terk went missing)? Oh, yes, please. Let CM drop from the planet.

I really wonder: GAW's Clever Hashlet......... Is GAW behind this too?