Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 10:06:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 [384] 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 ... 676 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NA  (Read 893538 times)
Jero
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 17, 2015, 07:07:17 PM
 #7661

@Fuse

Can you take a look at block 185676, there is an enormous timediff between the next one... Is this ok? Think it's not mined by CM...

Last night we had 5 blocks with 'funny' times during like 3 hours I checked.
Wonder what's going on.

And I think I saw what looked like short rows of only a few fast blocks during the last days.

Probably not related.


@Fuse: GNDA5MZW... = http://nlg.hardcoreminers.com (search this thread for it)

Blocks 185117, 185120, 185125, 185161, 185190, 185676, 185924 are all from them and giving negative timediff for the following block.
A little hint to get their pools clock back under control should be enough I think.

The server time was a couple of minutes off, for some reason NTP isnt updating correctly. Correct server time is adjusted now (to dutch time) so if you look at the block overview and compare it to blockchain it should match up.

Thnx! Great service  Cool Another mystery resolved.

https://www.guldenweb.com - Het laatste nieuws over Gulden
1714773968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714773968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714773968
Reply with quote  #2

1714773968
Report to moderator
Activity + Trust + Earned Merit == The Most Recognized Users on Bitcointalk
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714773968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714773968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714773968
Reply with quote  #2

1714773968
Report to moderator
1714773968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714773968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714773968
Reply with quote  #2

1714773968
Report to moderator
ny2cafuse
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002


HODL for life.


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 03:53:01 AM
 #7662

Actually another mystery.....
Its 2 seconds ahead. But the block explorer shows Criptoe & Clever ahead... 

Time on Criptoe is synced via ntpd to time.nist.gov.  If the time is off, then the National Institute of Standards and Technology needs to fix their atomic clock  Wink

Hardcore, can you check your debug.log file on those blocks HCM submitted that are earlier in time than the blocks following them?  I'd like to see what the wallet is outputting to the log about the blocks.

-Fuse

Community > Devs
24Kilo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 08:06:52 AM
 #7663

Can we stop fretting about timestamps?!?!?!

The blockchain does not give a stuff about the timestamps of a block... zip, zilch, zero, nada, nothing... because the blocks have to be in mathematical order and thus are in chronological order regardless of the timestamps.

You could completely remove the timestamps from the blocks and it would make no difference to the order of the blocks or blockchain. Timestamps are only part of the block header for human convenience and calculating difficulty. So stop concerning yourselves with timestamps... the following blocks are in correct order as mathematically hashed(or whatever the technical term is) regardless of the timestamp.

186138 2015-01-17 19:49:39 criptoe
186139 2015-01-17 20:13:09 criptoe
186140 2015-01-17 20:10:53 * hardcore
186141 2015-01-17 20:20:04 criptoe
186142 2015-01-17 20:20:41 clever
186143 2015-01-17 20:17:03 * hardcore
186144 2015-01-17 20:22:14 * hardcore
186145 2015-01-17 20:26:54 clever
186146 2015-01-17 20:27:01 clever

So yes... out-of-order timestamps can cause the diff algo to freak out, but do not determine the order of the blocks, block order is a function of irreversable mathematics and hashing.
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531


yes


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 08:20:18 AM
 #7664

How's the 'kwartje van Kok' action going?

Meije
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 10:28:43 AM
 #7665

On favoring bitcoin over altcoins:



http://www.coindesk.com/11-top-responses-andreas-antonopoulos-reddit-ama/

Well, Andreas Antonopoulos just told everything we need to know. To all those people who say that Altcoins are "Shit" because they don't offer something new, here is Andreas telling you that that does not always matter. Yes Bitcoin is a fantastic digital currency, but that does not mean that it has to be the only fantastic digital currency.
RD965
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 10:32:50 AM
 #7666

On favoring bitcoin over altcoins:



http://www.coindesk.com/11-top-responses-andreas-antonopoulos-reddit-ama/

Well, Andreas Antonopoulos just told everything we need to know. To all those people who say that Altcoins are "Shit" because they don't offer something new, here is Andreas telling you that that does not always matter. Yes Bitcoin is a fantastic digital currency, but that does not mean that it has to be the only fantastic digital currency.

We knew that already, its like having the internet and just 1 provider of something, ridiculous
Dutchyyy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1197
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 18, 2015, 02:45:32 PM
 #7667

Great to see the Digishield update is coming, hoping it makes things more fair for all miners!
c_e_d
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 04:06:11 PM
 #7668

Can we stop fretting about timestamps?!?!?!

The blockchain does not give a stuff about the timestamps of a block... zip, zilch, zero, nada, nothing... because the blocks have to be in mathematical order and thus are in chronological order regardless of the timestamps.

You could completely remove the timestamps from the blocks and it would make no difference to the order of the blocks or blockchain. Timestamps are only part of the block header for human convenience and calculating difficulty. So stop concerning yourselves with timestamps... the following blocks are in correct order as mathematically hashed(or whatever the technical term is) regardless of the timestamp.

Never said the block numbers became unsorted. Never said the blockchain was damaged.
It was about the part above that I marked bold.

So yes... out-of-order timestamps can cause the diff algo to freak out, but do not determine the order of the blocks, block order is a function of irreversable mathematics and hashing.

I know, the order of the blocks is NOT determined by the timestamps.

See the part marked in bold again? So you got what I was talking about.
Instead of only seeing them once in a while with many blocks/hours in between, we have far more now.
Mid of October we had an average of 1 per 143 blocks.
How does it look now? From 2 ranges I checked:
Block 185115 - 185195: 5!
Block 186074 - 186190: 8!
Often 2 or 3 within a few blocks.

Like Fuse said earlier: Single bad timestamps are giving single spikes in diff, leveling out after a few blocks.
I don't want to see the diff algo 'freak out' because the out-of-order timestamps become too many.

Hope you understand my concern now.
/GeertJohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 409
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 04:48:57 PM
 #7669

Hi all,

I'm back Smiley

Looks like the update is converging nicely over the network.

It also looks like the estimated time is changing slowly because (on average) blocks are mined less often than normal.
See: https://digi.guldencoin.com/
This is nothing to worry about though, just a heads up.
RD965
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 05:19:28 PM
 #7670

Hi all,

I'm back Smiley

Looks like the update is converging nicely over the network.

It also looks like the estimated time is changing slowly because (on average) blocks are mined less often than normal.
See: https://digi.guldencoin.com/
This is nothing to worry about though, just a heads up.

Thanks for the update!
pijpenstelen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 407
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 18, 2015, 09:48:59 PM
 #7671

Hi all,

I'm back Smiley

Looks like the update is converging nicely over the network.

It also looks like the estimated time is changing slowly because (on average) blocks are mined less often than normal.
See: https://digi.guldencoin.com/
This is nothing to worry about though, just a heads up.

Thanks for the update!

Good feedback as always Geert Johan. Smiley

        ▄▄███████████▄▄       
     ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄    
    ████▀             ▀████▄  
  ▄███▀    ▄▄▄████▄▄    ▀████ 
 ▐███     ██████████▀     ███▌
 ███▌    ██████▀▀        ▄███▌
▐███    ▐████▄      ▄▄▄██████▌
▐███▌  ▄████████▄▄██████████▀
 ████████▀█████████████▀▀▀    
  ████▌    ▀▀██████▀▀      ▄▄
   ▀████▄              ▄▄████▌
     ▀█████▄▄▄    ▄▄▄██████▀▀
       ▀▀██████████████▀▀     
             ▀▀▀▀▀▀           
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████   READ OUR WHITEPAPER   ██████████
.
CREATE YOUR DECENTRALIZED LIFE
.
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████



        ▄▄███████████▄▄       
     ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄    
    ████▀             ▀████▄  
  ▄███▀    ▄▄▄████▄▄    ▀████ 
 ▐███     ██████████▀     ███▌
 ███▌    ██████▀▀        ▄███▌
▐███    ▐████▄      ▄▄▄██████▌
▐███▌  ▄████████▄▄██████████▀
 ████████▀█████████████▀▀▀    
  ████▌    ▀▀██████▀▀      ▄▄
   ▀████▄              ▄▄████▌
     ▀█████▄▄▄    ▄▄▄██████▀▀
       ▀▀██████████████▀▀     
             ▀▀▀▀▀▀           
24Kilo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 18, 2015, 11:35:18 PM
 #7672

@c_e_d,

Some out of order timestamps may cause a few bumps in the difficulty, but nothing to cause any concern.

And this is one of the reasons that I am recommending that we consider halving the block target time from 150sec to 75sec... this will immediately smooth out any difficulty bumps.

For example... if the diff spikes to 10X... that means a 15 minute block time... where as with a 75sec block time, it is only 7.5 minutes... which is a significant difference.

This would greatly improve wallet to wallet transaction times and make NLG much more user-friendly for micro-transactions.
bram_vnl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 02:10:29 PM
 #7673

Guldencoin Forum

http://www.guldencoinforum.com


http://www.guldencoinforum.com

Guldencoin links

http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl


http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl
bram_vnl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 02:32:11 PM
 #7674

binnenkort weer eens chatten op http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl/chat
soon chat meeting at http://www.guldencoinlinks.nl/chat
bram_vnl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 02:53:22 PM
 #7675

i'm lost my username at https://cryptocorner.nl
yoepie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 04:55:35 PM
 #7676

i'm lost my username at https://cryptocorner.nl

https://cryptocorner.nl/members/guldencoin/ ??
bram_vnl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 05:08:59 PM
 #7677


thx
sven22
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 05:09:59 PM
 #7678

i'm lost my username at https://cryptocorner.nl

Bram your username is Guldencoin

NLG Donations: GarNBSDLovSQgPKqhLSiSwGes85VrESgto
bram_vnl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 05:11:36 PM
 #7679

i'm lost my username at https://cryptocorner.nl

Bram your username is Guldencoin

it was already solved
RD965
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 19, 2015, 06:22:33 PM
 #7680

Glad to be an investor here things look real good  Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 [384] 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 ... 676 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!