[PND]Pandacoin | First Hybrid Wallet | 5000% Faster Blockchain Download | Instant Sync

[donacid]

update to my bonsai tree purchase:

It's illegal to ship the tree from india to my country, so no bonsai for me   .
I will get some Indian Tea instead, lol

Well done gov.

Maybe you could have it shipped from South America? or your local guru?

main issue with purchases like that is that you can't guarantee there is no bug/disease on it that you don't have in your own country so they will not allow it
and from south america it could be a huge spider hidden for example

i could only have it shipped from EU countries, problem with that is that they don't accept PND. I don't want the tree in first case i want to support the PND economy

[1714696187]

1714696187

[1714696187]

1714696187

[VDechand]

 

VDechand, you always post only sad faces, if people want to dump, let them dump, it's their right. Redistribution is great, you will have less idiots (hopefully ) that will dump and it will result in a healthier coin and community.
The devs have always delivered on each of their promises and if that isn't enough or you're hoping for quick profit, then it's better to invest in the next hot scamcoin and hope you get out in time before the dev leaves.
We on the other hand are here to stay.

Another positive thing about the current crypto downwards trend is that people will, hopefully, think twice before investing in some crappy ICO's.

 I have see this and have make a screen, i´m not here for the fast way to get rich   In my opinion is PND one of the best Cryptocoins with a good dev team and a good, fast wallet

[cadexn]

Panda Christmas!

[Pelgoran98]

 

VDechand, you always post only sad faces, if people want to dump, let them dump, it's their right. Redistribution is great, you will have less idiots (hopefully ) that will dump and it will result in a healthier coin and community.
The devs have always delivered on each of their promises and if that isn't enough or you're hoping for quick profit, then it's better to invest in the next hot scamcoin and hope you get out in time before the dev leaves.
We on the other hand are here to stay.

Another positive thing about the current crypto downwards trend is that people will, hopefully, think twice before investing in some crappy ICO's.

Way to be, Ozz!! You should have seen the post I just put up on IRC. Says almost exactly the very same thing you've said here. Like minds, that is for sure. AWESOME OZZSOME!! (Without intending for anybody to hurl, I even went so far as to say that I have this feeling of "ridiculous optimism." You just proved why, Ozz.)

[Tomski]

 

VDechand, you always post only sad faces, if people want to dump, let them dump, it's their right. Redistribution is great, you will have less idiots (hopefully ) that will dump and it will result in a healthier coin and community.
The devs have always delivered on each of their promises and if that isn't enough or you're hoping for quick profit, then it's better to invest in the next hot scamcoin and hope you get out in time before the dev leaves.
We on the other hand are here to stay.

Another positive thing about the current crypto downwards trend is that people will, hopefully, think twice before investing in some crappy ICO's.

Way to be, Ozz!! You should have seen the post I just put up on IRC. Says almost exactly the very same thing you've said here. Like minds, that is for sure. AWESOME OZZSOME!! (Without intending for anybody to hurl, I even went so far as to say that I have this feeling of "ridiculous optimism." You just proved why, Ozz.)

[Pelgoran98]

Thanks so much, Tomski!

[Equate]

awesome pic lol

Great pic , Merry XMAS for Panda

[Tomski]

‘Win Pandacoins Daily & Weekly’ Promotional Draw for Buying from WeSellPND.com!

Check out: http://pandacoinpnd.org/official-partnership-with-wesellpnd-com/

[dicksausage]

 

Official Ghostrider endorsement when? Fuck NASCAR when we have the fastest Swede on two wheels on our team.

is he still around? haven't heard from him in years

He's not dead as far as I know but they stopped making videos because everyone just pirated them instead of buying them.

[minairia3]

Did anything ever happen with that Twitter girl @manelecrypto who said she was using Pandacoin in Romania to pay for taxis? That's a really interesting story that could be true.  Crypto-enthusiasts aren't all fat sweaty guys with erratic facial hair  ... Even if the Twitter account is fake she is definitely a real person and here's my idea:

In a country like Romania for $4 or $5000 US you can hire a major celebrity to be your spokesperson.  They'll come on TV, mention the product at concerts, interviews just everywhere.  They could be contracted to take videos of taxi drivers legitimately taking Panda, bartenders taking it, etc.  $5000 is around P230,000,000.  Not a little but not that much either for that kind of thing.  We'd have to pay in dollars or Euros.

Hiring her there would be like hiring Beyonnce over here. There's 20 million people in Romania.  Get a good number of them into Panda it will get into real news like CNN and wind up on the news over here.  This is publicity it would be impossible to buy stateside. Other than Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies haven't gotten into the mainsteam at all except for Dogecoin and maybe Panda if the taxi stuff is legit.

I wouldn't try to contact her through the Twitter account in-case it is just some lovelorn fan or a random lunatic.  Also, everything entertainers do has to go through their agent so even if it is her we wouldn't get far. I'd find her agent and do a legal deal.  The girl's name is slipping off my tongue I don't have to time to go through Twitter.

Anyway, I'd be willing to lead the charge on this if there was a guaranteed budget.  I wouldn't actually hold any money or take any money from Panda.  Rather if it worked out and a deal was struck then Panda would release the funds to her directly. 

What's my end? Well, I'm a big Panda holder and something like this might make the price skyrocket when people dump out of scammy crap into something legitimate.

[ozzke]

WeSellPND.com is Now Live and Operational!



We have partnered up with the operators of WeSellDoges, WeSellRedd, WeSellDark and WeSellCrypto, to bring our community the now live service, WeSellPND.com! You can now buy Pandacoin easily with Paypal quickly, easily and securely! They are famed for their stable and reasonable margins, and delivery in under 10 seconds! For the next 30 days, you can win 150,000 PNDs daily or 1,000,000 PNDs weekly from placing orders from them!

For more details on the promotional campaign where a pool of 8.2 Million PNDs could be won, visit - http://pandacoinpnd.org/official-partnership-with-wesellpnd-com/


Patch 3.0.1 Patch Released - Mandatory Upgrade from PandaBank v3.0.0 to v3.0.1 Patch Notes

- Fixed an issue for hybrid mode – that was causing invalid stakes for some users. *The nature of this patch is mandatory if you are currently running v3.0.0, to prevent this issue from occurring again*
– Made toolbar menu icons visible on OSX systems.
– Fixed an issue that was leading to small font sizes on some OSX systems.
– Initial translation of UI into zh_CN (Simplified Chinese).
– New command line option -qm that can be used to give an absolute path to a .qm localistation file (generator by qt-linguist) – this is useful for UI translators who want to test their translations.
- Speed improvement for ‘verify’ phase of hybrid syncing.
– Improve some text/messages within UI and ensure text/messages that could not be localist can now be localised, to allow for full localisation by translators.
– Allow translators to select the UI fonts they want used as each language should ideally have its own fonts rather than blindly using the same fonts.
– Fixed a UI issue with transaction grid ‘summary header’ whereby some of the balances would, in some instances, no longer be visible if shrinking a maximized window.
– Replace pandachain.net with pnd.showed.us as blockchain explorer.
– Fixed an issue in ‘transfer pane’ where holding down the mouse over ‘add another button’ would incorrectly perform the action multiple times.
– Fixed some usability issues in transfer pane UI, inform user if trying to make a payment with no from address selected, better error message if balance is short due to staking and other minor changes.

http://pandacoinpnd.org/mandatory-upgrade-from-pandabank-v3-0-0-to-v3-0-1-patch-notes/

[LTListener]

Did anything ever happen with that Twitter girl @manelecrypto who said she was using Pandacoin in Romania to pay for taxis? That's a really interesting story that could be true.  Crypto-enthusiasts aren't all fat sweaty guys with erratic facial hair  ... Even if the Twitter account is fake she is definitely a real person and here's my idea:

In a country like Romania for $4 or $5000 US you can hire a major celebrity to be your spokesperson.  They'll come on TV, mention the product at concerts, interviews just everywhere.  They could be contracted to take videos of taxi drivers legitimately taking Panda, bartenders taking it, etc.  $5000 is around P230,000,000.  Not a little but not that much either for that kind of thing.  We'd have to pay in dollars or Euros.

Hiring her there would be like hiring Beyonnce over here. There's 20 million people in Romania.  Get a good number of them into Panda it will get into real news like CNN and wind up on the news over here.  This is publicity it would be impossible to buy stateside. Other than Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies haven't gotten into the mainsteam at all except for Dogecoin and maybe Panda if the taxi stuff is legit.

I wouldn't try to contact her through the Twitter account in-case it is just some lovelorn fan or a random lunatic.  Also, everything entertainers do has to go through their agent so even if it is her we wouldn't get far. I'd find her agent and do a legal deal.  The girl's name is slipping off my tongue I don't have to time to go through Twitter.

Anyway, I'd be willing to lead the charge on this if there was a guaranteed budget.  I wouldn't actually hold any money or take any money from Panda.  Rather if it worked out and a deal was struck then Panda would release the funds to her directly. 

What's my end? Well, I'm a big Panda holder and something like this might make the price skyrocket when people dump out of scammy crap into something legitimate.

I really like your idea, so let's go with $4 instead of $5000.

I really don't think it's actually her behind that twitter account, but it seems like someone with some know how of recent crypto happenings, and someone who knows what PND is about. Also, have you looked into her youtube videos? Doesn't seem like an A-list celeb to me, but oh well, what do I know. Good idea, good thinking anyway.

[Pelgoran98]

Did anything ever happen with that Twitter girl @manelecrypto who said she was using Pandacoin in Romania to pay for taxis? That's a really interesting story that could be true.  Crypto-enthusiasts aren't all fat sweaty guys with erratic facial hair  ... Even if the Twitter account is fake she is definitely a real person and here's my idea:

In a country like Romania for $4 or $5000 US you can hire a major celebrity to be your spokesperson.  They'll come on TV, mention the product at concerts, interviews just everywhere.  They could be contracted to take videos of taxi drivers legitimately taking Panda, bartenders taking it, etc.  $5000 is around P230,000,000.  Not a little but not that much either for that kind of thing.  We'd have to pay in dollars or Euros.

Hiring her there would be like hiring Beyonnce over here. There's 20 million people in Romania.  Get a good number of them into Panda it will get into real news like CNN and wind up on the news over here.  This is publicity it would be impossible to buy stateside. Other than Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies haven't gotten into the mainsteam at all except for Dogecoin and maybe Panda if the taxi stuff is legit.

I wouldn't try to contact her through the Twitter account in-case it is just some lovelorn fan or a random lunatic.  Also, everything entertainers do has to go through their agent so even if it is her we wouldn't get far. I'd find her agent and do a legal deal.  The girl's name is slipping off my tongue I don't have to time to go through Twitter.

Anyway, I'd be willing to lead the charge on this if there was a guaranteed budget.  I wouldn't actually hold any money or take any money from Panda.  Rather if it worked out and a deal was struck then Panda would release the funds to her directly. 

What's my end? Well, I'm a big Panda holder and something like this might make the price skyrocket when people dump out of scammy crap into something legitimate.

I really like your idea, so let's go with $4 instead of $5000.

I really don't think it's actually her behind that twitter account, but it seems like someone with some know how of recent crypto happenings, and someone who knows what PND is about. Also, have you looked into her youtube videos? Doesn't seem like an A-list celeb to me, but oh well, what do I know. Good idea, good thinking anyway.

I do like your idea. No, it is more accurate to say that I love it.

[dave111223]

Keep getting this message when using the sendmany in pandacoind:

Code:

Invalid sender Pandacoin address

This seems to have only started occurring since upgrading from version 2.1.2 to 3.0.1

NOTE that my account is "" (empty) so the send from account is "" in the sendmany call for example:

Code:

pandacoind sendmany '' '{"PKkrcH8dfiNAxwKsM9TJfLeDYcjjRNRs2e":1000}'

Looking at the source in version 3.0.1 it has been updated to validate the first parameter as an address; so how it is possible to send from an unlabeled account?
https://github.com/pandacoin-official/pandacoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L723

[Joori]

Keep getting this message when using the sendmany in pandacoind:

Code:

Invalid sender Pandacoin address

This seems to have only started occurring since upgrading from version 2.1.2 to 3.0.1

NOTE that my account is "" (empty) so the send from account is "" in the sendmany call for example:

Code:

pandacoind sendmany '' '{"PKkrcH8dfiNAxwKsM9TJfLeDYcjjRNRs2e":1000}'

Looking at the source in version 3.0.1 it has been updated to validate the first parameter as an address; so how it is possible to send from an unlabeled account?
https://github.com/pandacoin-official/pandacoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L723

By using the address associated with the empty account name. Example: pandacoind getaddressesbyaccount "" will show you the address for the empty account name or comment out lines #723 & #724, rebuild and relaunch the daemon. The latter is much of a muchness so i'd stick with the first option.

[dave111223]

By using the address associated with the empty account name. Example: pandacoind getaddressesbyaccount "" will show you the address for the empty account name or comment out lines #723 & #724, rebuild and relaunch the daemon. The latter is much of a muchness so i'd stick with the first option.

getaddressesbyaccount shows all the addresses associated with the account (1000s)...and the point is, a sendmany can come from many addresses (usings multiple unspend outputs from different addresses), it makes no sense to have a single "fromaddress" field.

I'm not sure that just commenting out the "isValid" is a good idea, as there are significant other code changes within the sendmany function.  I've rolled my version back to 2.1.2 until hopefully this is fixed in a later version.

[cadexn]

[MaNI]

getaddressesbyaccount shows all the addresses associated with the account (1000s)...and the point is, a sendmany can come from many addresses (usings multiple unspend outputs from different addresses), it makes no sense to have a single "fromaddress" field.

If you give it a main wallet address it will automatically include the change addresses as well.

Note that as in changelog "CORE: Change console command(s) "sendfrom" and "sendmany" to reuse new codebase and work in a more correct manner. They were incorrectly taking money from accounts other than the one specified in the command line." i.e. previously sendmany was completely ignoring the from address and would take from any account it felt like.

[dave111223]

getaddressesbyaccount shows all the addresses associated with the account (1000s)...and the point is, a sendmany can come from many addresses (usings multiple unspend outputs from different addresses), it makes no sense to have a single "fromaddress" field.

If you give it a main wallet address it will automatically include the change addresses as well.

What is this "main wallet address" that you are referring to?  I have ~5,000 addresses in the wallet and 10,000 in the keypool, which is the "main" one?

Note that as in changelog "CORE: Change console command(s) "sendfrom" and "sendmany" to reuse new codebase and work in a more correct manner. They were incorrectly taking money from accounts other than the one specified in the command line." i.e. previously sendmany was completely ignoring the from address and would take from any account it felt like.

It is better to have the account field ignored than try to restrict sending to be "from" a specific address, which does not make any sense.

For example: if in my wallet i have 1 account, with 5 addresses.  I receive payments from 5 different friends for 1PND to each address.

My wallet now has 5PND balance, my 'account' has 5PND balance, and each address has 1 unspent output of 1PND.

Now I should be able to do a sendmany of 2PND to a friend, and 3PND to another friend (i have 5PND in my wallet after all)

With the new code this is now broken.  I would only be able to do a sendmany for a max. of 1PND, because the most any single address has is 1PND.

[MaNI]

What is this "main wallet address" that you are referring to?  I have ~5,000 addresses in the wallet and 10,000 in the keypool, which is the "main" one?

Any address that isn't a change address. i.e. The ones actually registered with the wallet as being primary addresses, the ones that list in the wallet and aren't hidden from the user. (You may know them as an account)

It is better to have the account field ignored than try to restrict sending to be "from" a specific address, which does not make any sense.

That is of course completely a matter of opinion, many people need to control the address in order to automate services they build properly.
If a user asks to send money from account 'a' and it sends it from account 'z' thent his behaviour is completely broken and he has a right to be thouroughly annoyed about this, it also makes writing many services properly impossible.
In my opinion you are completely wrong, the old behaviour was an utter disaster.

For example: if in my wallet i have 1 account, with 5 addresses.  I receive payments from 5 different friends for 1PND to each address.
My wallet now has 5PND balance, my 'account' has 5PND balance, and each address has 1 unspent output of 1PND.
Now I should be able to do a sendmany of 2PND to a friend, and 3PND to another friend (i have 5PND in my wallet after all)
With the new code this is now broken.  I would only be able to do a sendmany for a max. of 1PND, because the most any single address has is 1PND.

As stated before you can sendmany with the main account and all the coins inside the change addresses will also be included.