|
|
|
Newton90
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 04:40:40 AM |
|
hello.i have error when boolbd.exe trying connect to seeds:
2016-Nov-14 08:03:08.558575 [P2P6]Connecting to x.x.x.x:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... ... ... 2016-Nov-14 08:03:23.129052 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
what can i do?thanks.
try to add --add-priority-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --add-priority-node 59.120.166.36:10101 --add-priority-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --add-priority-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --add-priority-node 107.170.97.197:10101 --add-priority-node 107.170.228.11:10101 --add-priority-node 180.97.28.56:10101 --add-priority-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --add-priority-node 5.9.38.137:10101 --add-priority-node 81.39.24.26:10101 --add-priority-node 106.185.46.152:10101 --add-priority-node 128.204.214.119:10101 --add-priority-node 1.155.235.8:10101 but result is same.just disappeared line "Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds" . what could be the reason?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redni
|
 |
November 15, 2016, 12:10:43 PM |
|
We know maybe something about the exchange in the near future?
|
|
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
November 17, 2016, 07:34:38 AM |
|
hello.i have error when boolbd.exe trying connect to seeds:
2016-Nov-14 08:03:08.558575 [P2P6]Connecting to x.x.x.x:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... ... ... 2016-Nov-14 08:03:23.129052 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
what can i do?thanks.
I've been having the same issue on different development environments, looking into it
|
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
November 17, 2016, 07:34:59 AM |
|
We know maybe something about the exchange in the near future?
what is the question?
|
|
|
|
javajared
Newbie

Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 17, 2016, 02:54:25 PM |
|
hello.i have error when boolbd.exe trying connect to seeds:
2016-Nov-14 08:03:08.558575 [P2P6]Connecting to x.x.x.x:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... ... ... 2016-Nov-14 08:03:23.129052 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
what can i do?thanks.
try to add --add-priority-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --add-priority-node 59.120.166.36:10101 --add-priority-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --add-priority-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --add-priority-node 107.170.97.197:10101 --add-priority-node 107.170.228.11:10101 --add-priority-node 180.97.28.56:10101 --add-priority-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --add-priority-node 5.9.38.137:10101 --add-priority-node 81.39.24.26:10101 --add-priority-node 106.185.46.152:10101 --add-priority-node 128.204.214.119:10101 --add-priority-node 1.155.235.8:10101 but result is same.just disappeared line "Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds" . what could be the reason? This is likely occurring because the daemon only has two seed nodes to connect to by default. If these nodes are not online then your node doesn't know who to connect to the first time you run the daemon. Therefore a long term solution to this will be to change the hard-coded seed nodes in the code repository. A short term solution for you and others would be to specify a seed node manually. This can be done by doing the following: boolbd --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101 This command tells your daemon to treat the bbr.mbkpool.info node as a seed node. As a result, your node will connect to it and download its list of active peers. I got this to overcome the error on my end so I hope it works for others as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newton90
|
 |
November 18, 2016, 08:04:21 AM Last edit: November 18, 2016, 12:07:33 PM by Newton90 |
|
javajared thank you very much.all work fine.
|
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
 |
November 21, 2016, 11:01:11 AM |
|
What clear advantages does XMR have over BBR and is is possible to rectify these? or have their coders that have been working on the project for over a year really put them in a clear position of domination over BBR that is pretty difficult to null without employing people like fluffy and the guy who cracked sdc for a year on BBR? I did hear CZ may be returning but these wild whispers surface now and then a produce nothing.
Does BBR have any advantages over XMR at all?
Is xmr really worth the 160x mc over bbr?
|
|
|
|
Coinopoly
Newbie

Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 21, 2016, 08:07:43 PM |
|
Greetings, We've published our latest Boolberry market analysis. The downtrend presents a great buying opportunity for those who haven't entered the market. It also presents a great exit opportunity for those who have large holdings on Poloniex. Once the market has a trend reversal, funds will be much harder to withdraw given Poloniex's strict currency control policy. We advise large stakeholders to take this opportunity to withdraw their holdings from Poloniex. https://coinopoly.xyz/boolberry-bbrbtc-struggle-continues/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no-ice-please
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 02:16:52 AM |
|
What clear advantages does XMR have over BBR and is is possible to rectify these? or have their coders that have been working on the project for over a year really put them in a clear position of domination over BBR that is pretty difficult to null without employing people like fluffy and the guy who cracked sdc for a year on BBR? I did hear CZ may be returning but these wild whispers surface now and then a produce nothing.
Does BBR have any advantages over XMR at all?
Is xmr really worth the 160x mc over bbr?
BBR has one advantage. First was bytecoin which mysteriously conjured a couple years worth of coins overnight, or somehow managed to completely stay off the net except darkweb until suddenly appearing. Then Monero popped up and started a massive spam campaign with an obnoxious tone that alienated a lot of people. - BBR, aside from the optional 1% tax does not really have any baggage like that. Monero was very aggressively pumped at the start. They did not get their marketcap from anything good, they used a lot of offensive marketing to push their way up. If this were the early 20th century automobile industry that wouldn't matter but in the internet age Monero will probably get a lot of negative press when crypto goes more mainstream.
|
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary

Activity: 3416
Merit: 1127
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 02:34:24 AM |
|
...
BBR, aside from the optional 1% tax does not really have any baggage like that. Monero was very aggressively pumped at the start. They did not get their marketcap from anything good, they used a lot of offensive marketing to push their way up. If this were the early 20th century automobile industry that wouldn't matter but in the internet age Monero will probably get a lot of negative press when crypto goes more mainstream.
no-ice-please, I appreciate you bringing an outside perspective to the huntercoin thread, but I totally disagree with you here. What kind of offensive marketing are you referring to? I agree that it was pumped at the beginning, and iCEBREAKER is a douchebag, and maybe a few others, but I don't think there's any real concerted effort to market the coin at all, let alone offensively market it. And what do you mean the didn't get marketcap from anything good? Monero has the best database solution of all cryptonotes, BBR has none, and Monero has developed RingCT which will allow for non-zero mixin ring signatures, something that no other cryptonote has. No offense, but I don't think you know what the fuck you're talking about here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
boolberry
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 04:41:16 AM |
|
Please do two things going forward if you want to earn trust from more of the community 1. Post all updates in this thread (not just links) 2. If you want to continue using your own repo, fine, but please keep making pull requests to the original repo even if cryptozoidberg decides not to merge them. cryptozoidberg may or may not return, but splintering the community by only providing detailed updates in another thread and not making pull requests to the original repository is not helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoRambler
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 01:25:48 PM |
|
...
BBR, aside from the optional 1% tax does not really have any baggage like that. Monero was very aggressively pumped at the start. They did not get their marketcap from anything good, they used a lot of offensive marketing to push their way up. If this were the early 20th century automobile industry that wouldn't matter but in the internet age Monero will probably get a lot of negative press when crypto goes more mainstream.
no-ice-please, I appreciate you bringing an outside perspective to the huntercoin thread, but I totally disagree with you here. What kind of offensive marketing are you referring to? I agree that it was pumped at the beginning, and iCEBREAKER is a douchebag, and maybe a few others, but I don't think there's any real concerted effort to market the coin at all, let alone offensively market it. And what do you mean the didn't get marketcap from anything good? Monero has the best database solution of all cryptonotes, BBR has none, and Monero has developed RingCT which will allow for non-zero mixin ring signatures, something that no other cryptonote has. No offense, but I don't think you know what the fuck you're talking about here. Don't forget about Monero's much larger community and infrastructure, the Kovri protocol for stealth nodes, XMRs community crowdfunding, open alias, larger dev teams, integration into 3rd party apps and dapps, first to market, XMRs integration into online marketplaces, the XMR polo exchange, and use as currency to buy goods and services including darknet and gambling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DonYo
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 01:53:13 PM |
|
Don't forget about Monero's much larger community and infrastructure, the Kovri protocol for stealth nodes, XMRs community crowdfunding, open alias, larger dev teams, integration into 3rd party apps and dapps, first to market, XMRs integration into online marketplaces, the XMR polo exchange, and use as currency to buy goods and services including darknet and gambling.
And mother of dragons Sorry i couldn't resist
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 02:06:59 PM |
|
...
BBR, aside from the optional 1% tax does not really have any baggage like that. Monero was very aggressively pumped at the start. They did not get their marketcap from anything good, they used a lot of offensive marketing to push their way up. If this were the early 20th century automobile industry that wouldn't matter but in the internet age Monero will probably get a lot of negative press when crypto goes more mainstream.
no-ice-please, I appreciate you bringing an outside perspective to the huntercoin thread, but I totally disagree with you here. What kind of offensive marketing are you referring to? I agree that it was pumped at the beginning, and iCEBREAKER is a douchebag, and maybe a few others, but I don't think there's any real concerted effort to market the coin at all, let alone offensively market it. And what do you mean the didn't get marketcap from anything good? Monero has the best database solution of all cryptonotes, BBR has none, and Monero has developed RingCT which will allow for non-zero mixin ring signatures, something that no other cryptonote has. No offense, but I don't think you know what the fuck you're talking about here. Don't forget about Monero's much larger community and infrastructure, the Kovri protocol for stealth nodes, XMRs community crowdfunding, open alias, larger dev teams, integration into 3rd party apps and dapps, first to market, XMRs integration into online marketplaces, the XMR polo exchange, and use as currency to buy goods and services including darknet and gambling. Damn it seems xmr has moved on quite a bit since BBR stopped developing. I was hoping the 160x price was just a pump or better still BBR was just grossly undervalued in comparison. Are any of these clear advantages that xmr has open source and can be ported over to BBR? If cz does not return to BBR do we have anyone here with the skills to take BBR anywhere near where XMR is now? From my limited understanding of all of this fluffy and shen and of course smooth are some of the best coders on this forum so unless BBR can import these features if they are open source then really we have no chance of being comparable to XMR as we were initially.
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoRambler
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 02:27:34 PM Last edit: November 24, 2016, 02:54:13 PM by CryptoRambler |
|
<<Damn it seems xmr has moved on quite a bit since BBR stopped developing. I was hoping the 160x price was just a pump or better still BBR was just grossly undervalued in comparison. Are any of these clear advantages that xmr has open source and can be ported over to BBR?
If cz does not return to BBR do we have anyone here with the skills to take BBR anywhere near where XMR is now? From my limited understanding of all of this fluffy and shen and of course smooth are some of the best coders on this forum so unless BBR can import these features if they are open source then really we have no chance of being comparable to XMR as we were initially.>>
1blockologist and javajared are working on the RPC API and dB rebase, and it has yet to be determined how difficult porting XMR src will be - since BBR uses wild Keccak PoW and XMR uses cryptonight PoW. wild Keccak could be more botnet and asic resistant than cryptonight, but it has yet to be vetted due to db and daemon disrepair. CZ says he is testing a new GUI and will port his LUI dB work over to BBR at some point, he hopes to be involved in BBR before yr end.
|
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary

Activity: 3024
Merit: 1246
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 02:28:59 PM |
|
Is there a method to consolidate the wallet ? I'm having issues with a dusted pool wallet currently, lots of small transactions which make sending bigger amounts of coins almost impossible because they get rejected with "transaction too large".
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
 |
November 24, 2016, 02:57:17 PM |
|
<<Damn it seems xmr has moved on quite a bit since BBR stopped developing. I was hoping the 160x price was just a pump or better still BBR was just grossly undervalued in comparison. Are any of these clear advantages that xmr has open source and can be ported over to BBR?
If cz does not return to BBR do we have anyone here with the skills to take BBR anywhere near where XMR is now? From my limited understanding of all of this fluffy and shen and of course smooth are some of the best coders on this forum so unless BBR can import these features if they are open source then really we have no chance of being comparable to XMR as we were initially.>>
1blockologist and javajared are working on the RPC API and dB rebase, and it has yet to be determined how difficult porting XMR src will be - since BBR uses wild Keccak PoW and XMR uses cryptonight PoW. wild Keccak could be more botnet and asic resistant than cryptonight, but it has yet to be vetted due to db disrepair. CZ says he will port his LUI dB work over to BBR at some point, he hopes to be involved in BBR before yr end.
Thanks for that information. Very interesting news. Would it be worth considering forking to cryptonight. Then again i guess it isn't or else they would have done it by now. Anyway good news about CZ possibly getting involved again. A friend of mine (who is much smarter than myself and knows some thing about this at a deeper level than I do) once told me he suspected that CZ was one of the very smartest devs on this board.
|
|
|
|
|