[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[jwinterm]

How much of your 1% ongoing premine have you been holding? Dumping all the time, or just socking it away?

Unless he owns 1% premine of Bitcoin, I don't think that is enough to be "dumping all the time" for the past 2 years...

Just curious if he's holding or selling his founder's rewards. Of course whatever he soaks up is enough for him to be "dumping all the time".

[SDFG]

Other workers pools except http://bbr.mbkpool.info/#     

[jd1959]

Hey there folk!
How's it going ?

Zoidberg

good to hear from you.....wish you good things with your new project

Cheers Jon

[@bb]

Hey there folk!
How's it going ?

Zoidberg

Hi Boss,

The BBR is under attack, all pools ddosed, I can't mine BBR unless solo mining, right now selling my etc to buy BBR.

[boolberry]

had BBR devs kept at least a minimum of development effort, this would be their time to shine too but now I have to agree with this tweet: https://twitter.com/BBRcurrency/status/770149257705721856

#Boolberry development is non existent. If you are looking for a #Monero alternative with #pruning and an active developer look at #Aeon.

Pump other coins under their thread/ twitter handles. These kind of posts/ tweets only serve to undermine the coin you're trying to promote... particularly if they are sent from twitter accounts that are falsely representing themselves as being associated with Boolberry.

Before you criticize me for that Tweet or lethos for sharing it here please try to understand my perspective. I spent a lot of time trying to build interest in Boolberry and grow its community but ultimately abandoned it after not seeing the level of interest I had hoped for. GitHub has not been active for a long time.

I have never claimed to officially represent Boolberry in any capacity. The Twitter account was made in attempt to revive the community (largely unsuccessful unfortunately) because this original account was abandoned 2 years ago. Speaking of Twitter @damashup I believed in the potential of your creation popboolr. What happened to it?

Before the crypto_zoidberg post I had no reason to believe the recent increase in BBR price and trading volume was not just a spillover in interest from Monero. If crypto_zoidberg, the 1blockologist or someone else starts developing BBR then I may be willing to become more active again. For now I share the caution or the ph4nt0m and plan on taking a wait and see approach.

I and my organization Blockchain Development Company will be taking over development of Boolberry.

https://github.com/BlockchainDevelopmentCompany/boolberry

Announcement thread incoming, the tl;dr is that I am a moderator of cryptonote, redditor for 2 years, never made a bitcointalk account as bitcointalk became irrelevant for blockchain projects sometime mid 2014 at the height of the altcoin mania, but now that cryptonote is gaining market attention I need to reach out to you all.

Spread the news, in the mean time I'll work on getting my post count up on bitcointalk so my legitimacy goes unquestioned.

What's your real account on GitHub to see your commits and evaluate your coding skills?

[windjc]

had BBR devs kept at least a minimum of development effort, this would be their time to shine too but now I have to agree with this tweet: https://twitter.com/BBRcurrency/status/770149257705721856

#Boolberry development is non existent. If you are looking for a #Monero alternative with #pruning and an active developer look at #Aeon.

Pump other coins under their thread/ twitter handles. These kind of posts/ tweets only serve to undermine the coin you're trying to promote... particularly if they are sent from twitter accounts that are falsely representing themselves as being associated with Boolberry.

Before you criticize me for that Tweet or lethos for sharing it here please try to understand my perspective. I spent a lot of time trying to build interest in Boolberry and grow its community but ultimately abandoned it after not seeing the level of interest I had hoped for. GitHub has not been active for a long time.

I have never claimed to officially represent Boolberry in any capacity. The Twitter account was made in attempt to revive the community (largely unsuccessful unfortunately) because this original account was abandoned 2 years ago. Speaking of Twitter @damashup I believed in the potential of your creation popboolr. What happened to it?

Before the crypto_zoidberg post I had no reason to believe the recent increase in BBR price and trading volume was not just a spillover in interest from Monero. If crypto_zoidberg, the 1blockologist or someone else starts developing BBR then I may be willing to become more active again. For now I share the caution or the ph4nt0m and plan on taking a wait and see approach.

I and my organization Blockchain Development Company will be taking over development of Boolberry.

https://github.com/BlockchainDevelopmentCompany/boolberry

Announcement thread incoming, the tl;dr is that I am a moderator of cryptonote, redditor for 2 years, never made a bitcointalk account as bitcointalk became irrelevant for blockchain projects sometime mid 2014 at the height of the altcoin mania, but now that cryptonote is gaining market attention I need to reach out to you all.

Spread the news, in the mean time I'll work on getting my post count up on bitcointalk so my legitimacy goes unquestioned.

What's your real account on GitHub to see your commits and evaluate your coding skills?

I know it's hard to believe and I know how you feel as I feel the same but I remain optimistic. If deving starts again then BBR will rise fast. It still has a following among JL777 supporters as well. It just a matter of having devs to move it along.

[ph4nt0m]

How much of your 1% ongoing premine have you been holding? Dumping all the time, or just socking it away?

Unless he owns 1% premine of Bitcoin, I don't think that is enough to be "dumping all the time" for the past 2 years...

Just curious if he's holding or selling his founder's rewards. Of course whatever he soaks up is enough for him to be "dumping all the time".

I don't think one block a day is a big deal at the prices we saw this year. I recall miners can vote to reduce Zoidberg's reward down to 0% if they really want to.

[solid12345]

I don't think one block a day is a big deal at the prices we saw this year. I recall miners can vote to reduce Zoidberg's reward down to 0% if they really want to.

I haven't followed BBR in over a year, so not sure what the 1% business is about, but to me a 1% stake of a coin is an entirely FAIR reward for someone who actually develops the coin. I swear people in btctalk expect developers to work for free just to make traders money. Lack of funding is usually the number 1 reason honest coin devs leave their project. What gets sticky with the issue of premines is when devs reward themselves obscene amounts like 50% for instance.

But like you said, at these prices I don't see how a 1% cut of a 400k marketcap is debilitating.

[frankstine]

well keeping a close watch

[bitcoinwonders010]

did this just rise because monero did. boolberry should be where monero is

[jwinterm]

How much of your 1% ongoing premine have you been holding? Dumping all the time, or just socking it away?

Unless he owns 1% premine of Bitcoin, I don't think that is enough to be "dumping all the time" for the past 2 years...

Just curious if he's holding or selling his founder's rewards. Of course whatever he soaks up is enough for him to be "dumping all the time".

I don't think one block a day is a big deal at the prices we saw this year. I recall miners can vote to reduce Zoidberg's reward down to 0% if they really want to.

I don't think this is correct, in fact, there was quite a bit of discussion about it a year or more ago. I think they can vote to delay them, or something, but I believe in the end it always comes out to 1%. Anyway, I guess miners can vote to reduce Zoidberg's rewards by just hardforking his ongoing mine dev address out of the source code if they were so inclined.

[ph4nt0m]

How much of your 1% ongoing premine have you been holding? Dumping all the time, or just socking it away?

Unless he owns 1% premine of Bitcoin, I don't think that is enough to be "dumping all the time" for the past 2 years...

Just curious if he's holding or selling his founder's rewards. Of course whatever he soaks up is enough for him to be "dumping all the time".

I don't think one block a day is a big deal at the prices we saw this year. I recall miners can vote to reduce Zoidberg's reward down to 0% if they really want to.

I don't think this is correct, in fact, there was quite a bit of discussion about it a year or more ago. I think they can vote to delay them, or something, but I believe in the end it always comes out to 1%. Anyway, I guess miners can vote to reduce Zoidberg's rewards by just hardforking his ongoing mine dev address out of the source code if they were so inclined.

That's also true. If Zoidberg says bye to us all and takeover happens, this will be one of the first things to do. No problem paying for the work done, but there wasn't much of it in the past year or so.

[sussex]

That's also true. If Zoidberg says bye to us all and takeover happens, this will be one of the first things to do. No problem paying for the work done, but there wasn't much of it in the past year or so.

This coin's biggest asset and it's greatest headache has been the talented, but mercurial dev.

Zoidberg should definitely be chief coder (if he wants to), but someone else should take over the day to day running of it, someone less ephemeral.  

The Louisd'or project that Zoidberg was working on also seems to be dead in the water with a beta release promised six months ago and, since then, nothing at all. I'm sensing deja vu here.

If some set-up could be organised where Zoidberg was overseeing BBR, but still be able to come and go as he pleases whilst others take care of the stuff he finds boring... we might be on to something and the prospects for BBR could only improve.

As for the 1% dev fee, I'm happy for Zoidberg to keep what he has (it's well deserved) and he should continue getting it if he can find a way to become involved again. Otherwise, I think the fee should be raised to 2% and used for the betterment of BBR, be it promotion, buying in expertise, whatever.

Finally, before anyone starts again, the name is cool.  

[VultureFund]

So after all that shit, we can see a perfect true that anyone realises:

A BIG COMMUNITY OR A TALENTED DEV, DOESN'T CARE AT ALL IF THERE'S NOT A WHALE BEHIND  


BBR was dead just a week ago, and now everyone wants to restart with it and become illusional.

Me and other large holders have injected a lot of $$$ here, we expect you to put BBR where it belongs and everyone will be happy.


And then, people saying that we are the cancer of crypto...

[Xdragon]

Pools are under constant DDoS attacks. And this situation lasts for over a year.... Shame 

[jwinterm]

That's also true. If Zoidberg says bye to us all and takeover happens, this will be one of the first things to do. No problem paying for the work done, but there wasn't much of it in the past year or so.

This coin's biggest asset and it's greatest headache has been the talented, but mercurial dev.

Zoidberg should definitely be chief coder (if he wants to), but someone else should take over the day to day running of it, someone less ephemeral.  

The Louisd'or project that Zoidberg was working on also seems to be dead in the water with a beta release promised six months ago and, since then, nothing at all. I'm sensing deja vu here.

If some set-up could be organised where Zoidberg was overseeing BBR, but still be able to come and go as he pleases whilst others take care of the stuff he finds boring... we might be on to something and the prospects for BBR could only improve.

As for the 1% dev fee, I'm happy for Zoidberg to keep what he has (it's well deserved) and he should continue getting it if he can find a way to become involved again. Otherwise, I think the fee should be raised to 2% and used for the betterment of BBR, be it promotion, buying in expertise, whatever.

Finally, before anyone starts again, the name is cool.  

I know 1% isn't a huge amount, especially in dollar terms for a low market cap coin, but it just smells bad, imo. I also think Monero has pretty conclusively demonstrated that their voluntary contribution forum funding system is a better model for getting shit done.

[DieJohnny]

Huge opportunity, anon coins are getting serious traction. Trump may win and suppress remittance in formal ways, anon coins are poised for a huge uptick.... bitcoin is may die in 2017....

[ph4nt0m]

Huge opportunity, anon coins are getting serious traction. Trump may win and suppress remittance in formal ways, anon coins are poised for a huge uptick.... bitcoin is may die in 2017....

Most people in the world don't give a shit if Trump wins or loses. They also don't give a shit WTF is going on in the United States at all. Bitcoin is larger than their local issues. It's glory days are yet to come.

[DieJohnny]

Huge opportunity, anon coins are getting serious traction. Trump may win and suppress remittance in formal ways, anon coins are poised for a huge uptick.... bitcoin is may die in 2017....

Most people in the world don't give a shit if Trump wins or loses. They also don't give a shit WTF is going on in the United States at all. Bitcoin is larger than their local issues. It's glory days are yet to come.

Well if you don't think banning remittance to mexico will have an impact on crypto ($25 billion in 2015), then you and I think completely differently.

[shojayxt]

Huge opportunity, anon coins are getting serious traction. Trump may win and suppress remittance in formal ways, anon coins are poised for a huge uptick.... bitcoin is may die in 2017....

Most people in the world don't give a shit if Trump wins or loses. They also don't give a shit WTF is going on in the United States at all. Bitcoin is larger than their local issues. It's glory days are yet to come.

Well if you don't think banning remittance to mexico will have an impact on crypto ($25 billion in 2015), then you and I think completely differently.

Banning remittance to Mexico would have a big impact on bitcoin but since Trump has no path to the 270 electoral votes he needs to win that isn't something that will have any impact on the price of bitcoin or any of the altcoins who's value is closely associated to the value of bitcoin.

But to get on the topic of this thread, I am happy to see that some development is coming to Boolberry.