[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[bitcoinuserz]

Nice, so the development is ON?

[1blockologist]

Hi all,

I've got a number of private messages lately. I don't like private chats. It's better to give all answers here in public.

I'm trying to keep my pool online all the time cause I use it myself a bit. All pending payments are sent in all case. The only real DDOS attack was this August. It finished about a week ago. All connection issues should be resolved.

If you have problems with pool/miner apps post it here so you can get help from other guys who mine as well.

Regarding new development activities. You can count on me if some updates need to be deployed on the pool. Just keep development open so everybody can evaluate your proposals/code and give a feedback. Have any ideas how to handle possible forks? Post it here. Let's keep this discussion as open as possible.

I'm not going to actively participate in current discussion but I'll read all feedback.

You have 75% of the network and I have made the first commit the Boolberry project has seen in a year.

You are the longest chain, you can build from my source or not. At this point in time I am open to accepting pull requests from Zoidberg into the Blockchain Development Company repository, and further collaboration as he also understands the cryptonote codebase, but make no mistake, the choice is completely yours.

I have been attempting to reach out to all of the infrastructure of Boolberry, including your pool, to establish confidence in the project. A further announcement is incoming, but for now, I need all participants in the Boolberry project to understand their role in the network and work together, and you have a greatly disproportionate influence on the direction of the network. The code is on github.

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

I'm actually pursuing an intermediary system: hosting a remote synced client and allowing people to connect their simplewallet to that. Can you help with that since you are already hosting a node server and full mining node, people need to understand that this still gives them no perks to privacy.

We will be promoting more decentralized efforts, but our immediate goal is getting BBR off of the exchanges, and we will upgrade that to promoting greater decentralized after.

[crypto_zoidberg]

....

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

DB is really important task, and idea was to quickly implement basic db support in BBR using level_db, but to go forward problem is that level_db doesn't have transactions support, so we need to go with something like LMDB, which means to rewrite current code in db branch.

I guess this gonna take about 1 month of hard work. (but not a hard fork! don't be confused)

So if 1blockologist is about to implement something useful for BBR - implement working daemon with suitable memory consumption using LMDB would be good move. 

Zoidberg

[1blockologist]

....

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

DB is really important task, and idea was to quickly implement basic db support in BBR using level_db, but to go forward problem is that level_db doesn't have transactions support, so we need to go with something like LMDB, which means to rewrite current code in db branch.

I guess this gonna take about 1 month of hard work. (but not a hard fork! don't be confused)

So if 1blockologist is about to implement something useful for BBR - implement working daemon with suitable memory consumption using LMDB would be good move. 

Zoidberg

You're right, that would be a good move to do now instead of later. Monero team spent forever working on extra code to help people transition their current blockchain download into the database version, after having working database code for new users for months. Doing the LMDB stuff now while Boolberry doesn't have many users on the client would be ideal

[@bb]

....

Thanks for your work. Let's continue moving this way. Make commits to your repository so I and everybody else can review them. The most urgent task for me is to merge DB branch from the original repository to master. Daemon needs a lot of memory to run right now. That's not good for a decentralized system. I would prefer you to checkout DB branch and commit on top to make the review process simpler.

DB is really important task, and idea was to quickly implement basic db support in BBR using level_db, but to go forward problem is that level_db doesn't have transactions support, so we need to go with something like LMDB, which means to rewrite current code in db branch.

I guess this gonna take about 1 month of hard work. (but not a hard fork! don't be confused)

So if 1blockologist is about to implement something useful for BBR - implement working daemon with suitable memory consumption using LMDB would be good move.  

Zoidberg

You're right, that would be a good move to do now instead of later. Monero team spent forever working on extra code to help people transition their current blockchain download into the database version, after having working database code for new users for months. Doing the LMDB stuff now while Boolberry doesn't have many users on the client would be ideal

But actually In later month there is a new KryptonotE coin alReady implement database COde, I thINk it would be good comparison to look at how the database implementation done.

[.m.]

Nice, so the development is ON?

Seems like 1blockologist has something useful to contribute.

[V3n0m]

Can Somebody clarify for me what this means when using the open cl miner  - GPU  (Share doesn't validate on CPU) are these being accepted or is there something I need to be doing

[@bb]

Can Somebody clarify for me what this means when using the open cl miner  - GPU  (Share doesn't validate on CPU) are these being accepted or is there something I need to be doing

Seems you use wrong cuda toolkit version to compile or wrong kernel, default build is for maxwell architecture, if your gpu is kepler then use "make kepler",  other architecture should use opencl version.

[V3n0m]

I am using AMD card - Guess I should have included that as well.

2 x R7370

GPU is Pitcairn


Also here is command line :

minerd -a wildkeccak_ocl -o stratum+tcp://bbr.mbkpool.info:7777 -u 1H8mNqUhDvm7NmwwbrvWba58ZWjixMrsuATZe5Mo9bPyGWMUbcghXacLijbLGzdCjW5CJfEvApzND8i 1vKCg7ezB3cifWzV -p x -k http://bbr.mbkpool.info/scratchpad.bin -l scratchpad.bin
pause

[forzendiablo]

dev left this but pumpers still pumping

[windjc]

dev left this but pumpers still pumping

New developer. New thread. Read.

[Filin4eg]

still probably want a new pool, or working old, no difference

[ph4nt0m]

Can Somebody clarify for me what this means when using the open cl miner  - GPU  (Share doesn't validate on CPU) are these being accepted or is there something I need to be doing

That's a hardware error. When a GPU finds a share, it gets verified by a CPU before sending to a pool.

[krjalone]

still probably want a new pool, or working old, no difference

This +1 

Can we get working pool 

[1blockologist]

IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Boolberry Opportunity & Roadmap Paper

Translate this into your respective community's languages

[ocminer]

still probably want a new pool, or working old, no difference

This +1 

Can we get working pool 

I can set one up - MPOS based - can someone point me to the latest sources ? There seems to be some confusions and several forks out there.. ??!

[1blockologist]

still probably want a new pool, or working old, no difference

This +1 

Can we get working pool 

I can set one up - MPOS based - can someone point me to the latest sources ? There seems to be some confusions and several forks out there.. ??!

MBK's mining pool uses node-cryptonote-pool

https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool

[shojayxt]

still probably want a new pool, or working old, no difference

This +1 

Can we get working pool 

I can set one up - MPOS based - can someone point me to the latest sources ? There seems to be some confusions and several forks out there.. ??!

This is a cryptonote coin.  I don't think you're going to be able to set up an MPOS based pool.  If you do that would be a first.

[ocminer]

still probably want a new pool, or working old, no difference

This +1  

Can we get working pool  

I can set one up - MPOS based - can someone point me to the latest sources ? There seems to be some confusions and several forks out there.. ??!

This is a cryptonote coin.  I don't think you're going to be able to set up an MPOS based pool.  If you do that would be a first.

Seems like you don't know what I'm able to do and you're underestimating me a bit

I've got my MPOS Cryptnote implementation ready and it would be a good test for it, I've already have a Karbowanec Pool up which is also Cryptonight/Cryptonote: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1491747.0)

https://krb.suprnova.cc


This was the coin I used for developing/testing as it has/had quite low diff and it was easy to find some blocks with a few CPU/GPU's

[shojayxt]

still probably want a new pool, or working old, no difference

This +1  

Can we get working pool  

I can set one up - MPOS based - can someone point me to the latest sources ? There seems to be some confusions and several forks out there.. ??!

This is a cryptonote coin.  I don't think you're going to be able to set up an MPOS based pool.  If you do that would be a first.

Seems like you don't know what I'm able to do and you're underestimating me a bit

I've got my MPOS Cryptnote implementation ready and it would be a good test for it, I've already have a Karbowanec Pool up which is also Cryptonight/Cryptonote: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1491747.0)

https://krb.suprnova.cc


This was the coin I used for developing/testing as it has/had quite low diff and it was easy to find some blocks with a few CPU/GPU's

Actually I'm quite aware of what you can do.  I was thinking if anyone could get an MPOS pool set up for cryptonote it would be you.  I didn't know you already had a pool for Karbowanec.  What miner is needed?  Boolberry uses the Keccak algo and a scratchpad so it is different than other cryptonote coins.  I hope you can get a pool running for Boolberry.