[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[Mexican]

i tried compiling this last night on 12.04 precise, but i'm having troubles. Later this evening i will post the error information. I hope someone can help me because i like cpu only coins and my interest is genuine, no attempt at fud. FWIW, i tried to compile aeon as well and it wouldn't compile either.

[33zer0w0lf]

i tried compiling this last night on 12.04 precise, but i'm having troubles. Later this evening i will post the error information. I hope someone can help me because i like cpu only coins and my interest is genuine, no attempt at fud. FWIW, i tried to compile aeon as well and it wouldn't compile either.

apt-get install libboost1.55-all-dev
apt-get install gcc-4.8
apt-get install cmake

then try again

[Trollollo]

Guys,best pool I found on OP has only 30 MH/s,and this pool founds only 1 block in 6-10 hours...Devs are using  closed pool for this coin and they have another(not announced miner)Please do not be fools.Try to think critically.

[veritasBS]

(d)  A growing bounty for stratum support, which was the prerequisite to cbuchner1 open sourcing his miner.

This one's the most obvious one, and I encourage you and anyone else who already has a significant amount of BBR to contribute to the bounty.  It will leave BBR in a very healthy position from a technical standpoint - an open source GPU miner, which is more than is available for the other cryptonotes at this point.

As you probably gathered from my grumpy and hasty response to the previous post, I'm annoyed about this situation mostly because it seems like it provides the FUD machine with a lot of ammunition.  If you have other suggestions for things, please do chime in - I will try to find time to implement some more.

Thx for the response...i am interested in helping...

how much is needed for the bounty? how much do we have? how long will it take to build? what is the bounty addy?

[btc-mike]

(d)  A growing bounty for stratum support, which was the prerequisite to cbuchner1 open sourcing his miner.

This one's the most obvious one, and I encourage you and anyone else who already has a significant amount of BBR to contribute to the bounty.  It will leave BBR in a very healthy position from a technical standpoint - an open source GPU miner, which is more than is available for the other cryptonotes at this point.

As you probably gathered from my grumpy and hasty response to the previous post, I'm annoyed about this situation mostly because it seems like it provides the FUD machine with a lot of ammunition.  If you have other suggestions for things, please do chime in - I will try to find time to implement some more.

Thx for the response...i am interested in helping...

how much is needed for the bounty? how much do we have? how long will it take to build? what is the bounty addy?

Bounty is here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657484.0

[cubydu]

Guys,best pool I found on OP has only 30 MH/s,and this pool founds only 1 block in 6-10 hours...Devs are using  closed pool for this coin and they have another(not announced miner)Please do not be fools.Try to think critically.

)))

I use my private pool with 30 MH/S and found 1 block per ~1, 1.5 hours.
You can do it too.

[cbuchner1]

*almost* started to get excited about this coin, until I did a quick Google search and remembered this is the one that Christian @ ccminer is "closed source" GPU mining. He claims to be making 12 BTC per day, and understandably will not open his mining source to anyone.

*** citation needed.

I never stated BTCs per day and the BBR exchange rate then isn't the BBR rate now. And the difficulty now is 3-4 times higher as it was then.

[emontmon]

I think it is perfectly acceptable to fork coin. If christian wNts to maintain current fork then good for him. The coin remains an experiment. If you believe in the developer than you will follow the developer.

[cbuchner1]

I think it is perfectly acceptable to fork coin. If christian wNts to maintain current fork then good for him. The coin remains an experiment. If you believe in the developer than you will follow the developer.

I believe in the developer. My GPUs will follow the developer. There you have it.

[Mexican]

i tried compiling this last night on 12.04 precise, but i'm having troubles. Later this evening i will post the error information. I hope someone can help me because i like cpu only coins and my interest is genuine, no attempt at fud. FWIW, i tried to compile aeon as well and it wouldn't compile either.

apt-get install libboost1.55-all-dev
apt-get install gcc-4.8
apt-get install cmake

then try again

i installed boost 1.55, then listed the packages of the boost lib folder to make sure all of them were installed. when i try to get gcc and g++ 4.8 it says no package by regex. i ran it with sudo make -j 16 and it gets to compiling a c extension for miniupnc, says some giberish about an unrecognized command line option and exits and it also shows that -WmaybeUnused is an unregcognized flag. if i am understanding this correctly it means that i don't have gcc installed fully, though explain shows i have 4.8 installed. any ideas?

[dga]

i tried compiling this last night on 12.04 precise, but i'm having troubles. Later this evening i will post the error information. I hope someone can help me because i like cpu only coins and my interest is genuine, no attempt at fud. FWIW, i tried to compile aeon as well and it wouldn't compile either.

apt-get install libboost1.55-all-dev
apt-get install gcc-4.8
apt-get install cmake

then try again

i installed boost 1.55, then listed the packages of the boost lib folder to make sure all of them were installed. when i try to get gcc and g++ 4.8 it says no package by regex. i ran it with sudo make -j 16 and it gets to compiling a c extension for miniupnc, says some giberish about an unrecognized command line option and exits and it also shows that -WmaybeUnused is an unregcognized flag. if i am understanding this correctly it means that i don't have gcc installed fully, though explain shows i have 4.8 installed. any ideas?

Did you:

apt-get install build-essential

?

[YoyodyneSystems]

It's highly likely Mintpal will list BBR within the week or so.
They are going to want to get a second note coin up on their exchange.

BBR should be able to breathe a little more being on 3 major exchanges.

[Mexican]

i tried compiling this last night on 12.04 precise, but i'm having troubles. Later this evening i will post the error information. I hope someone can help me because i like cpu only coins and my interest is genuine, no attempt at fud. FWIW, i tried to compile aeon as well and it wouldn't compile either.

apt-get install libboost1.55-all-dev
apt-get install gcc-4.8
apt-get install cmake

then try again

i installed boost 1.55, then listed the packages of the boost lib folder to make sure all of them were installed. when i try to get gcc and g++ 4.8 it says no package by regex. i ran it with sudo make -j 16 and it gets to compiling a c extension for miniupnc, says some giberish about an unrecognized command line option and exits and it also shows that -WmaybeUnused is an unregcognized flag. if i am understanding this correctly it means that i don't have gcc installed fully, though explain shows i have 4.8 installed. any ideas?

Did you:

apt-get install build-essential

?

hmm, i may not have. its a fairly new install so it only has boost 1.48 and the basic deps. i'll fire it up later and give it a try. thanks

[emontmon]

I think it is perfectly acceptable to fork coin. If christian wNts to maintain current fork then good for him. The coin remains an experiment. If you believe in the developer than you will follow the developer.

I believe in the developer. My GPUs will follow the developer. There you have it.

And the experiment would continue. No malice directed at christian. I just argue for continued experimentation. The intent was never to have gpu mining perhapse an impossible goal but worthy of effort. And I am sure the challange will be welcomed by christian and profitable and a lot of learning will be achieved advancing cryptocurrency forward

[cbuchner1]

I think it is perfectly acceptable to fork coin. If christian wNts to maintain current fork then good for him. The coin remains an experiment. If you believe in the developer than you will follow the developer.

I believe in the developer. My GPUs will follow the developer. There you have it.

And the experiment would continue. No malice directed at christian. I just argue for continued experimentation. The intent was never to have gpu mining perhapse an impossible goal but worthy of effort. And I am sure the challange will be welcomed by christian and profitable and a lot of learning will be achieved advancing cryptocurrency forward

I would advise against experimentation in the 2nd best established Cryptonote currency. Experiments in newcomers are always highly interesting. Examples for noteworthy experiments are: Auroracoin, Jackpotcoin, Talkcoin...

[shojayxt]

*almost* started to get excited about this coin, until I did a quick Google search and remembered this is the one that Christian @ ccminer is "closed source" GPU mining. He claims to be making 12 BTC per day, and understandably will not open his mining source to anyone.

*** citation needed.

I never stated BTCs per day and the BBR exchange rate then isn't the BBR rate now. And the difficulty now is 3-4 times higher as it was then.

This has already been debated. 

Anyone that wants to mine with the GPUminer needs to donate to the Stratum Pool bounty.  When that's completed cbuchner1 has stated that he'll open source the miner.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657484

[33zer0w0lf]

*almost* started to get excited about this coin, until I did a quick Google search and remembered this is the one that Christian @ ccminer is "closed source" GPU mining. He claims to be making 12 BTC per day, and understandably will not open his mining source to anyone.

*** citation needed.

I never stated BTCs per day and the BBR exchange rate then isn't the BBR rate now. And the difficulty now is 3-4 times higher as it was then.

This has already been debated. 

Anyone that wants to mine with the GPUminer needs to donate to the Stratum Pool bounty.  When that's completed cbuchner1 has stated that he'll open source the miner.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657484

there is already a stratum pool up and running.. http://bbr.extremepool.org supports stratum, there just isn't a stratum miner!

[shojayxt]

It's highly likely Mintpal will list BBR within the week or so.
They are going to want to get a second note coin up on their exchange.

BBR should be able to breathe a little more being on 3 major exchanges.

Mintpal is irrelevant.   BBR doesn't need Mintpal.  It needs better pools and miners so that the network is more decentralized.  Forget about mintpal.  Monero just got listed on Mintpal and it tanked.  Mintpal is over rated.  I don't understand what the fascination with mintpal is.  

[Mexican]

i tried compiling this last night on 12.04 precise, but i'm having troubles. Later this evening i will post the error information. I hope someone can help me because i like cpu only coins and my interest is genuine, no attempt at fud. FWIW, i tried to compile aeon as well and it wouldn't compile either.

apt-get install libboost1.55-all-dev
apt-get install gcc-4.8
apt-get install cmake

then try again

i installed boost 1.55, then listed the packages of the boost lib folder to make sure all of them were installed. when i try to get gcc and g++ 4.8 it says no package by regex. i ran it with sudo make -j 16 and it gets to compiling a c extension for miniupnc, says some giberish about an unrecognized command line option and exits and it also shows that -WmaybeUnused is an unregcognized flag. if i am understanding this correctly it means that i don't have gcc installed fully, though explain shows i have 4.8 installed. any ideas?

Did you:

apt-get install build-essential

?

hmm, i may not have. its a fairly new install so it only has boost 1.48 and the basic deps. i'll fire it up later and give it a try. thanks

tried but didn't solve the issue

[shojayxt]

*almost* started to get excited about this coin, until I did a quick Google search and remembered this is the one that Christian @ ccminer is "closed source" GPU mining. He claims to be making 12 BTC per day, and understandably will not open his mining source to anyone.

*** citation needed.

I never stated BTCs per day and the BBR exchange rate then isn't the BBR rate now. And the difficulty now is 3-4 times higher as it was then.

This has already been debated.  

Anyone that wants to mine with the GPUminer needs to donate to the Stratum Pool bounty.  When that's completed cbuchner1 has stated that he'll open source the miner.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657484

there is already a stratum pool up and running.. http://bbr.extremepool.org supports stratum, there just isn't a stratum miner!

So we're just waiting for a cpuminer update for cbuchner1 to dump his GPU code in?  That's my understanding.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Found the link
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657484.msg7476159#msg7476159

That's what I am going off of.