Bitcoin Forum
January 25, 2020, 11:26:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 484 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1183869 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 511


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 04:49:34 PM
 #1241


I am testing to see if this resolves the error.

If you have an easy way to reproduce it, I can test too.  I don't have my own pool set up, so I was just testing on extremehash.  I didn't see the bug before or after the fix, but...

1579994760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579994760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579994760
Reply with quote  #2

1579994760
Report to moderator
1579994760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579994760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579994760
Reply with quote  #2

1579994760
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1579994760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579994760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579994760
Reply with quote  #2

1579994760
Report to moderator
1579994760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1579994760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1579994760
Reply with quote  #2

1579994760
Report to moderator
cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 04:55:40 PM
 #1242


I am testing to see if this resolves the error.

If you have an easy way to reproduce it, I can test too.  I don't have my own pool set up, so I was just testing on extremehash.  I didn't see the bug before or after the fix, but...

You can test with my pool http://79.135.200.108/ . I got errors  with this pool.
And I can give you shell access to pool if you need.

btc-mike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 05:24:29 PM
 #1243

After about 45 minutes, I get continuous authentication errors and low-diff errors. But the jobs are still coming. Restart simpleminer resolves.
cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 05:33:40 PM
 #1244

After about 45 minutes, I get continuous authentication errors and low-diff errors. But the jobs are still coming. Restart simpleminer resolves.
these are old errors

btc-mike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 05:36:31 PM
 #1245

After about 45 minutes, I get continuous authentication errors and low-diff errors. But the jobs are still coming. Restart simpleminer resolves.
these are old errors

Were these already resolved? How to fix?
cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 05:41:15 PM
 #1246

After about 45 minutes, I get continuous authentication errors and low-diff errors. But the jobs are still coming. Restart simpleminer resolves.
these are old errors

Were these already resolved? How to fix?

I wrote dga only about a time to get new job.

And open ticket about low-diff https://github.com/LucasJones/node-boolberry-pool/issues/1

cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 05:47:52 PM
 #1247


I am testing to see if this resolves the error.

If you have an easy way to reproduce it, I can test too.  I don't have my own pool set up, so I was just testing on extremehash.  I didn't see the bug before or after the fix, but...

I changed some parameters in config. Maybe it matters for errors .
Code:
"varDiff": {
            "minDiff": 50000,
            "maxDiff": 10000000,
            "targetTime": 50,  # from 100
            "retargetTime": 30,
            "variancePercent": 30,
            "maxJump": 150000
        },


tc61
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 494
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 06:45:12 PM
 #1248

hi all, newb to berry, mining on a pool. how long does it take to find a block, been on a while blocks found never..am I doing something wrong?
c18machine
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 06:47:34 PM
 #1249

hi all, newb to berry, mining on a pool. how long does it take to find a block, been on a while blocks found never..am I doing something wrong?

dont pool mine for now.
cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 06:48:51 PM
 #1250

hi all, newb to berry, mining on a pool. how long does it take to find a block, been on a while blocks found never..am I doing something wrong?

dont pool mine for now.

Why ?

cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 06:50:54 PM
 #1251

hi all, newb to berry, mining on a pool. how long does it take to find a block, been on a while blocks found never..am I doing something wrong?

 (Pool hash rate * 86400) / current diff = blocks per day

tc61
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 494
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 06:51:05 PM
 #1252

Any newb tutorial on how to solo mine
pt7
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 06:52:02 PM
 #1253

hi all, newb to berry, mining on a pool. how long does it take to find a block, been on a while blocks found never..am I doing something wrong?

dont pool mine for now.

Why ?
Pools are not yet ready for prime time.  Unfortunately they are bodly listed at the top of the OP page.   I think they should be be moved to near the bottom, and with a disclaimer.
cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 06:55:52 PM
 #1254

hi all, newb to berry, mining on a pool. how long does it take to find a block, been on a while blocks found never..am I doing something wrong?

dont pool mine for now.

Why ?
Pools are not yet ready for prime time.  Unfortunately they are bodly listed at the top of the OP page.   I think they should be be moved to near the bottom, and with a disclaimer.

http://bbr.extremepool.org/ found 8 blocks

http://79.135.200.108/ found 4 blocks (1 I deleted)

Solo mining profitable only if you have cpu farm.

crypto_zoidberg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 946
Merit: 559



View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 07:22:28 PM
 #1255

Please all pool owners and solo miners, check your daemon logs now, we stuck again.
It seems that some bug in miner.

dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 511


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 07:46:33 PM
 #1256

Please all pool owners and solo miners, check your daemon logs now, we stuck again.
It seems that some bug in miner.

Might be coincidence -

I restarted my mining daemon to be able to print_block and see what was going on, and found the next block very shortly thereafter.

I'm *sure* that the latter part was luck - it's a very fast machine but not *that* fast - but I wonder if there was something about the restart that triggered some updates.

The only things I notice about the blocks:

The "extra" field in 16755 is larger than any of the previous several blocks;
16756 included two tx hashes, which none of the previous blocks did.

Code:
16756   "timestamp": 1402428976,
16755   "timestamp": 1402425579,   <- last block found before the gap
16754   "timestamp": 1402425570,
...

And extra fields:
Code:
16756    "timestamp": 1402428976,

  "tx_hashes": [ "9d0367bd319b128856c4b5c0039d81d77da14594753f849a4b2cff25642e43b2", "5f52cc1f3922edaaccac6a226b0c1db4981952c2ead97550c80ba27d8a4bf031"

    "extra": [ 1, 12, 170, 236, 106, 246, 128, 1, 64, 237, 160, 188, 139, 26, 60, 183, 2, 138, 33, 11, 78, 91, 223, 3, 160, 14, 147, 223, 31, 190, 15, 162, 14, 2, 22, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49, 46, 57, 40, 48, 46, 49, 45, 103, 101, 54, 50, 50, 99, 97, 48, 41, 124

16755   "timestamp": 1402425579,
    "extra": [ 1, 254, 90, 32, 214, 169, 66, 142, 107, 82, 112, 69, 141, 195, 9, 6, 153, 36, 236, 134, 174, 29, 214, 163, 233, 119, 179, 189, 81, 22, 225, 246, 0, 2, 32, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49, 46, 49, 49, 40, 51, 48, 49, 55, 52, 102, 50, 45, 100, 105, 114, 116, 121, 41, 0, 0, 0, 0, 7, 89, 162, 98, 0

16754   "timestamp": 1402425570,
    "extra": [ 1, 28, 48, 231, 241, 73, 242, 252, 185, 15, 227, 86, 12, 140, 79, 7, 171, 166, 109, 180, 100, 186, 97, 81, 74, 6, 20, 191, 82, 131, 53, 136, 111, 2, 22, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49, 46, 57, 40, 48, 46, 49, 45, 103, 101, 54, 50, 50, 99, 97, 48, 41, 124

The second of those two tx hashes was a pretty large transaction.

crypto_zoidberg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 946
Merit: 559



View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 08:19:31 PM
 #1257

Please all pool owners and solo miners, check your daemon logs now, we stuck again.
It seems that some bug in miner.

Might be coincidence -

I restarted my mining daemon to be able to print_block and see what was going on, and found the next block very shortly thereafter.

I'm *sure* that the latter part was luck - it's a very fast machine but not *that* fast - but I wonder if there was something about the restart that triggered some updates.

I agree with you. I guess in some situations on_block_chain_update() is not called for miner and scratchpad becomes invalid, that's why we have seen wrong PoW hashes. It's just guess, it's hard to reproduce it.
I've pushed hotfix with regular scratchpad update, once 30 sec, for first time it's ok, but it will become expensive when scratchpad will be more than 10-20 MB, hope we gonna find bug by then.

The only things I notice about the blocks:

The "extra" field in 16755 is larger than any of the previous several blocks;
16756 included two tx hashes, which none of the previous blocks did.

Code:
16756   "timestamp": 1402428976,
16755   "timestamp": 1402425579,   <- last block found before the gap
16754   "timestamp": 1402425570,
...

And extra fields:
Code:
16756    "timestamp": 1402428976,

  "tx_hashes": [ "9d0367bd319b128856c4b5c0039d81d77da14594753f849a4b2cff25642e43b2", "5f52cc1f3922edaaccac6a226b0c1db4981952c2ead97550c80ba27d8a4bf031"

    "extra": [ 1, 12, 170, 236, 106, 246, 128, 1, 64, 237, 160, 188, 139, 26, 60, 183, 2, 138, 33, 11, 78, 91, 223, 3, 160, 14, 147, 223, 31, 190, 15, 162, 14, 2, 22, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49, 46, 57, 40, 48, 46, 49, 45, 103, 101, 54, 50, 50, 99, 97, 48, 41, 124

16755   "timestamp": 1402425579,
    "extra": [ 1, 254, 90, 32, 214, 169, 66, 142, 107, 82, 112, 69, 141, 195, 9, 6, 153, 36, 236, 134, 174, 29, 214, 163, 233, 119, 179, 189, 81, 22, 225, 246, 0, 2, 32, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49, 46, 49, 49, 40, 51, 48, 49, 55, 52, 102, 50, 45, 100, 105, 114, 116, 121, 41, 0, 0, 0, 0, 7, 89, 162, 98, 0

16754   "timestamp": 1402425570,
    "extra": [ 1, 28, 48, 231, 241, 73, 242, 252, 185, 15, 227, 86, 12, 140, 79, 7, 171, 166, 109, 180, 100, 186, 97, 81, 74, 6, 20, 191, 82, 131, 53, 136, 111, 2, 22, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49, 46, 57, 40, 48, 46, 49, 45, 103, 101, 54, 50, 50, 99, 97, 48, 41, 124

The second of those two tx hashes was a pretty large transaction.
I thought about some combinations of transaction that broke create_block_template(), but since there are no errors in log about this i guess transactions is not related. Not sure about this.



cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 08:35:15 PM
 #1258


http://79.135.200.108/ updated.

surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:43:37 PM
 #1259

PoolBerry.org updated.

cubydu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 08:44:28 PM
 #1260




Please update daemon to version v0.1.1.12(90ec703) (miner hot fix)!!!



Is this update only for pool/solo daemons ?

Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 484 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!