|
clintar
|
 |
September 22, 2014, 10:46:47 PM |
|
If we were voting now I would vote
BBR Ciphers
we are voting! Who is? What is this vote? |
|
|
|
|
twistelaar
Legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 22, 2014, 10:50:32 PM |
|
does somebody now when the 72 hour is over with that Attack from BitcoinEXpress?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
twistelaar
Legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 22, 2014, 10:56:05 PM |
|
lol. So what do you think, will he kill it? And will it have influence on BOOL?? |
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:01:55 PM |
|
it's goin down  did we ever decide on a name? I sold my boolberries 'till after bcx ... figure he might come after it but i might buy some back if we keep boolberry name. ruins - i'm not so sure about |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1127
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:31:24 PM |
|
I feel like there's no point, obviously there will be more votes, ad infinitum. |
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:35:47 PM |
|
I feel like there's no point, obviously there will be more votes, ad infinitum. why? this method works. sockpuppets have no point to vote, only people that are known will have impact it is an advisory vote to let CZ know what the community (and individually) wants Then I think we can all agree that as the creator and dev of the coin, he should be able to decide based on the voting details So, the process I proposed has been accepted by the vocal critics, at least I hear no screaming or calling me the devil. Speak up now and post your vote. After some reasonable period, it will be tallied by handle/name and posted for accuracy. Then CZ decides Process Defined. Now we just need more than the three votes! Boolberry Rune BBR Ciphers <you can also post any name you feel is right> James |
|
|
|
_Flop
Newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:37:13 PM |
|
i vote for boolberry
|
|
|
|
|
|
tifozi
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:37:34 PM |
|
Hey guys, let's wait for mktg2009 to speak about the process.
Edit: sorry James, just saw your post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
matrix961
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:39:43 PM |
|
I like BBR Ciphers. I've always just called it bbr anyways.
I currently have all my hashing power on this. Does a rename necessarily change the mining software right away? Just looking to be ready just in case I need to recompile stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
pt7
Member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:44:07 PM |
|
I will vote for just part of this name: Cipher. Without a name/phrase next to BBR, it could be mocked as "broken beyond repair". My new concern with my original vote "Rune" is there is a "runecoin", which has been brought up. Otherwise, I could care less if a game or comic is also using this name. This name thing is blown out of proportion. There have been much input that CZ and windjc can consider, only if helpful in making the final call. And we should respect that decision and refocus on the tech. |
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:45:03 PM |
|
I feel like there's no point, obviously there will be more votes, ad infinitum. why? this method works. sockpuppets have no point to vote, only people that are known will have impact it is an advisory vote to let CZ know what the community (and individually) wants Then I think we can all agree that as the creator and dev of the coin, he should be able to decide based on the voting details So, the process I proposed has been accepted by the vocal critics, at least I hear no screaming or calling me the devil. Speak up now and post your vote. After some reasonable period, it will be tallied by handle/name and posted for accuracy. Then CZ decides Process Defined. Now we just need more than the three votes! Boolberry Rune BBR Ciphers <you can also post any name you feel is right> James Booli |
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1127
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:47:53 PM |
|
This name thing is blown out of proportion. There have been much input that CZ and windjc can consider, only if helpful in making the final call. And we should respect that decision and refocus on the tech.
Agreed. With that being said, I vote for boolberry. |
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 23, 2014, 12:01:24 AM |
|
boolberry my 1st choice
bbr ciphers my 2nd
|
|
|
|
|
|
clintar
|
|
September 23, 2014, 12:25:43 AM |
|
I'm confused. Are we submitting names, or picking from a list? Seems pretty unorganized. If I can submit, I vote CEZIUM, or CZM. It has crypto_zoidberg's initials in it  Cesium explodes when mixed with water. How cool is that? |
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
September 23, 2014, 12:52:50 AM |
|
I'm confused. Are we submitting names, or picking from a list? Seems pretty unorganized. If I can submit, I vote CEZIUM, or CZM. It has crypto_zoidberg's initials in it Cesium explodes when mixed with water. How cool is that? it is unorganized, but it will terminate once everybody posts their name then someone gathers all the votes in one post review then CZ can decide we all agree to honor his decision regardless of what we feel |
|
|
|
|
jd1959
|
|
September 23, 2014, 12:55:57 AM |
|
I give my proxy vote to CZ. I like happy Devs, I think it helps them focus. Jon  |
|
|
|
|
dga
|
|
September 23, 2014, 01:09:00 AM |
|
I give my proxy vote to CZ. I like happy Devs, I think it helps them focus. Jon +this. I hold BBR for one reason only: I'm placing a bet on the developer team. I don't want a coin designed by committee, or we'd end up with another stupid bitcoin clone. The world has more than enough of those. I want a coin designed by a strong developer who wants to get awesome stuff incorporated into an experimental coin that doesn't have the shackles of success that Bitcoin already does. That's BBR. Or Rune. (I like the name, myself.) Or whatever. As the saying goes, everyone has an opinion about what color to paint the fence, and half of these posts are either a deliberate attempt to sabotage the process or people blissfully ignorant that they're not helping anything. This coin is about more strongly secure ring signatures. It's about a solution for ring signature pruning. It's about trying out some interesting ideas in an alt-coin. It's about *the things zoidberg has added that move it beyond the base of cryptonote*. Consensus be damned. There's a lot of room for that later once the coin and technology are mature. None of you are reading these posts because you want a mature, boring non-anonymous cryptocurrency. XMR isn't mature. BBR isn't mature. That's why they're exciting. Take the committee consensus approach and stuff it back where it belongs so that all of these coins can continue to be interesting. |
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
September 23, 2014, 01:43:24 AM |
|
Hey guys, let's wait for mktg2009 to speak about the process.
Edit: sorry James, just saw your post.
Aha, I see that my Skype handle has made it into the discussion  CZ is currently locked away in a small room coding surprises I think he may have even swallowed the key. But rumor has it he is reading this thread and the current discussions in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
