Bitcoin Forum
November 07, 2024, 01:47:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 [1080] 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 ... 2126 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency  (Read 4670881 times)
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
March 23, 2015, 11:42:41 PM
 #21581

which cpu miner is recommended these days? still yam m7v?

tia

----
i7 4770

somebody for sure knows what cpu miner is best

You answered your own question. YAM M7V is the miner I run, with the exact same CPU as yours.
(YAM version 8 is less stable and slower on my particular machine and OS, so I stick with m7v)

ty
what is the lowest donation interval that can be set?

I'm pretty sure there is a readme file that comes with YAM, and the info is probably in there. At least there was the last time I tried it.
villabacho
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 23, 2015, 11:44:51 PM
 #21582


I'm interested about what did you already improved over the basic CN different than some bug fixes here and there and some other "minor" modifications ?
You should provide also a peer review of the Moneros implementation of CN ? Level of resistance for the different attack vectors and etc ...



The monero codebase is diverging from the original CN code at a fast rate:

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/network

If you don't have the time to look at the many commits in that repository,
the missives or GingerAle's great digests are an excellent source of information
to answer your question.
qvan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 23, 2015, 11:56:39 PM
 #21583


How do you ever attract new users? Or is it okay to attract new users but not new critics?


Nope, I'm just a little curious about the sudden interest of your community  Cool . What was the reason behind this ?

Not that I know of, particularly, although I did take note of the aggressive and arrogant attitude of DRKers your developer decided to shit over another coin community (dashcoin) by paying its developer to abandon it without so much as even addressing them directly, and didn't like the whole vibe of it one bit. That encouraged me to a closer look at what other shadiness is going on over there.

I can't speak for others.

 

yeah. they are silent on dashcoin issue..the ony thing they are spitting is "go talk to you dev" (fucking pricks)

DRK are claiming to be genius on masternode and anonymous tech stuff but cannot figure a good name for their darkcoin  Grin

btw do not steal dash the cash...dashcoins mascot (paper cash)
whocares
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:04:42 AM
 #21584


I'm snipping all the nonsense you posted about the darkcoin instamine scam because its not relevant here. There are threads for that (including one I created), you are welcome to post there instead of spamming.


It's not nonsense if you cannot defend your claims. I'll wait for clear evidences in the relevant thread then..

Quote
Not a whole lot, because the system is very well designed to begin with. What would be the purpose to change that  other than to play the altcoin feature pumping game, which doesn't interest us. We are focusing on incremental improvements, greater robustness, improved APIs, etc.

From what I saw from PeterTodd's comments about CN and ring signatures, I'm not sure that your very well designed system is not full of exploits because its origin BCN was a scam and probably has a numerous backdoors inside..
Because of that I would like to see a complete peer review of Moneros implementation of CN from an independent cryptographer/security professional.

Quote
No thank you. I find these altcoin "peer review" efforts to be a little more than marketing for pumpers.

You should talk with a little more respect to other's work.

Joshuar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


eidoo wallet


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:09:08 AM
 #21585


I'm snipping all the nonsense you posted about the darkcoin instamine scam because its not relevant here. There are threads for that (including one I created), you are welcome to post there instead of spamming.


It's not nonsense if you cannot defend your claims. I'll wait for clear evidences in the relevant thread then..

Quote
Not a whole lot, because the system is very well designed to begin with. What would be the purpose to change that  other than to play the altcoin feature pumping game, which doesn't interest us. We are focusing on incremental improvements, greater robustness, improved APIs, etc.

From what I saw from PeterTodd's comments about CN and ring signatures, I'm not sure that your very well designed system is not full of exploits because its origin BCN was a scam and probably has a numerous backdoors inside..
Because of that I would like to see a complete peer review of Moneros implementation of CN from an independent cryptographer/security professional.

Quote
No thank you. I find these altcoin "peer review" efforts to be a little more than marketing for pumpers.

You should talk with a little more respect to other's work.


Well, a exploit in Darkcoins darksend/anon system was found by a amateur coder a few hours after it was open sourced(And this was after Kristov Atlas supposedly peer reviewed darkcoins code) ...So I think that comment  of ,"No thank you. I find these altcoin "peer review" efforts to be a little more than marketing for pumpers." is pretty spot on especially since Monero has always been open source.

██
█║█
║║║
║║║
█║█
██

                    ▄██▄
                  ▄██████▄
                ▄██████████
              ▄██████████▀   ▄▄
            ▄██████████▀   ▄████▄
          ▄██████████▀    ████████▄
         ██████████▀      ▀████████
         ▀███████▀   ▄███▄  ▀████▀   ▄█▄
    ▄███▄  ▀███▀   ▄███████▄  ▀▀   ▄█████▄
  ▄███████▄      ▄██████████     ▄█████████
  █████████    ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
   ▀█████▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
     ▀▀▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ▀███████▀      █████████▀
            ▀███▀   ▄██▄  ▀█████▀
                  ▄██████▄  ▀▀▀
                  █████████
                   ▀█████▀
                     ▀▀▀
e i d o o
██


                    ▄██▄
                  ▄██████▄
                ▄██████████
              ▄██████████▀   ▄▄
            ▄██████████▀   ▄████▄
          ▄██████████▀    ████████▄
         ██████████▀      ▀████████
         ▀███████▀   ▄███▄  ▀████▀   ▄█▄
    ▄███▄  ▀███▀   ▄███████▄  ▀▀   ▄█████▄
  ▄███████▄      ▄██████████     ▄█████████
  █████████    ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
   ▀█████▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
     ▀▀▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ▀███████▀      █████████▀
            ▀███▀   ▄██▄  ▀█████▀
                  ▄██████▄  ▀▀▀
                  █████████
                   ▀█████▀
                     ▀▀▀
██
█║█
║║║
║║║
█║█
██
whocares
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:14:18 AM
 #21586


Well, a exploit in Darkcoins darksend/anon system was found by a amateur coder a few hours after it was open sourced(And this was after Kristov Atlas supposedly peer reviewed darkcoins code) ...So I think that comment  of ,"No thank you. I find these altcoin "peer review" efforts to be a little more than marketing for pumpers." is pretty spot on.

Perfect point about technology that is in development stage.  Wink .
You probably not aware of the risks that hide the early development stages and releases of the code.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:14:37 AM
 #21587

From what I saw from PeterTodd's comments about CN and ring signatures

How about instead of basing your opinion on "what you saw" (individual comments taken out of context by DRK supporters), you should read the entire context, including where he said he should buy some XMR (and never retracted that as far as I know), and also try to understand what is meant when someone with a lot of knowledge says that Monero has such-and-such an issue that is better solved by Zerocash (hint: it does not mean that Zerocash doesn't have problems of its own).

As far as the issues he pointed out with ring signatures generally, those were identified by us in MRL-0001 and addressed in MRL-0004. If you are interested and not trolling you might want to read those.

Quote
I'm not sure that your very well designed system is not full of exploits because its origin BCN was a scam and probably has a numerous backdoors inside..

It is reasonable to be skeptical about these things.

Quote
Because of that I would like to see a complete peer review of Moneros implementation of CN from an independent cryptographer/security professional.

Cool. You should pay for it then. The community would appreciate your contribution just as it appreciates others'

Quote
Quote
No thank you. I find these altcoin "peer review" efforts to be a little more than marketing for pumpers.

You should talk with a little more respect to other's work.

I call it as I see it, and I was not referring in particular to any individual's work.
Johnny Mnemonic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 795
Merit: 514



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:18:36 AM
 #21588

If you're really concerned you might want to take a look at these papers:

https://lab.getmonero.org/

Oh, and here's what Peter Todd has recently said about Monero:

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/579092073875308545
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:22:36 AM
 #21589

If you're really concerned you might want to take a look at these papers:

https://lab.getmonero.org/

I seriously doubt that he is really concerned, but if so then those papers are no good because they aren't independent.

The only way for him to know that reviews are done independently is to have his own performed.

This is not entirely facetious as I know of at least one large Bitcoin investor who has done this.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ItsTheOnlyWayToBeSure

whocares
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:40:21 AM
 #21590


I seriously doubt that he is really concerned, but if so then those papers are no good because they aren't independent.


If I was interested in some kind of attack like your puppets I would do it ..
You probably not aware but I was mined your coin during the summer of 2014 with my farm and already hold some coins ..
I'll look over the documentation to see what are you already improved.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:45:36 AM
 #21591


I seriously doubt that he is really concerned, but if so then those papers are no good because they aren't independent.


If I was interested in some kind of attack like your puppets I would do it ..

Your puppets? Sorry I didn't follow that.

Quote
You probably not aware but I was mined your coin during the summer of 2014 with my farm and already hold some coins ..
I'll look over the documentation to see what are you already improved.

Ok then. We're certainly interested in your feedback on the reports. If you also are looking for code improvements and work in progress as opposed to review and analysis you should also check the extended github (the monero-project master and also the various developer and contributor forks).

The year-in-review thing might be helpful, though of course that only covers 2014

BlockaFett
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 255


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 12:58:13 AM
 #21592


I seriously doubt that he is really concerned, but if so then those papers are no good because they aren't independent.


If I was interested in some kind of attack like your puppets I would do it ..

Your puppets? Sorry I didn't follow that.

Quote
You probably not aware but I was mined your coin during the summer of 2014 with my farm and already hold some coins ..
I'll look over the documentation to see what are you already improved.

Ok then. We're certainly interested in your feedback on the reports. If you also are looking for code improvements and work in progress as opposed to review and analysis you should also check the extended github (the monero-project master and also the various developer and contributor forks).

The year-in-review thing might be helpful, though of course that only covers 2014



Smooth, are these all your Monero commits or are there more? https://github.com/iamsmooth/bitmonero/commits/master?author=iamsmooth

smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:01:40 AM
 #21593


I seriously doubt that he is really concerned, but if so then those papers are no good because they aren't independent.


If I was interested in some kind of attack like your puppets I would do it ..

Your puppets? Sorry I didn't follow that.

Quote
You probably not aware but I was mined your coin during the summer of 2014 with my farm and already hold some coins ..
I'll look over the documentation to see what are you already improved.

Ok then. We're certainly interested in your feedback on the reports. If you also are looking for code improvements and work in progress as opposed to review and analysis you should also check the extended github (the monero-project master and also the various developer and contributor forks).

The year-in-review thing might be helpful, though of course that only covers 2014



Smooth, are these all your Monero commits or are there more? https://github.com/iamsmooth/bitmonero/commits/master?author=iamsmooth



this guy really loves you smooth: https://twitter.com/BlockaFett/status/580102058365362177

Cheesy

He's not my type.
BlockaFett
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 255


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:08:30 AM
 #21594


I seriously doubt that he is really concerned, but if so then those papers are no good because they aren't independent.


If I was interested in some kind of attack like your puppets I would do it ..

Your puppets? Sorry I didn't follow that.

Quote
You probably not aware but I was mined your coin during the summer of 2014 with my farm and already hold some coins ..
I'll look over the documentation to see what are you already improved.

Ok then. We're certainly interested in your feedback on the reports. If you also are looking for code improvements and work in progress as opposed to review and analysis you should also check the extended github (the monero-project master and also the various developer and contributor forks).

The year-in-review thing might be helpful, though of course that only covers 2014



Smooth, are these all your Monero commits or are there more? https://github.com/iamsmooth/bitmonero/commits/master?author=iamsmooth



this guy really loves you smooth: https://twitter.com/BlockaFett/status/580102058365362177

Cheesy

He's not my type.

(github question still unanswered...) Smiley
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:08:48 AM
 #21595


I seriously doubt that he is really concerned, but if so then those papers are no good because they aren't independent.


If I was interested in some kind of attack like your puppets I would do it ..

Your puppets? Sorry I didn't follow that.

Quote
You probably not aware but I was mined your coin during the summer of 2014 with my farm and already hold some coins ..
I'll look over the documentation to see what are you already improved.

Ok then. We're certainly interested in your feedback on the reports. If you also are looking for code improvements and work in progress as opposed to review and analysis you should also check the extended github (the monero-project master and also the various developer and contributor forks).

The year-in-review thing might be helpful, though of course that only covers 2014



Smooth, are these all your Monero commits or are there more? https://github.com/iamsmooth/bitmonero/commits/master?author=iamsmooth

There definitely more than that. Off the top of my head I can think of several checkpoint updates, implementing code to verify checkpoints at startup, and merging a bug fix from BBR. None of that is there, so that's a bit strange. I'm not sure where they all went

If you are looking for lots of code though, you won't find it, that's not my primary role on the project.
whocares
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:12:00 AM
 #21596


(github question still unanswered...) Smiley

Let's represent the full picture  Wink .

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/graphs/contributors

5 commits ..

smooth What's your current role then ?
Lebubar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:14:35 AM
 #21597


(github question still unanswered...) Smiley

Let's represent the full picture  Wink .

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/graphs/contributors

5 commits ..

smooth What's your current role then ?
Trolling DRK/Dash thread.
BlockaFett
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 255


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:17:57 AM
 #21598


(github question still unanswered...) Smiley

Let's represent the full picture  Wink .

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/graphs/contributors

5 commits ..

smooth What's your current role then ?
Trolling DRK/Dash thread.

Ironically he actually is trolling Drk/Dash right now lol https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10866180#msg10866180

just nuts....
Brilliantrocket
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:19:20 AM
 #21599

Can someone explain whether Peter Todd's concerns from the Reddit post a few days ago are valid? What is the plan as far as mixins go?
Lebubar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:20:44 AM
 #21600


(github question still unanswered...) Smiley

Let's represent the full picture  Wink .

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/graphs/contributors

5 commits ..

smooth What's your current role then ?
Trolling DRK/Dash thread.

I know your kind really likes to lie and scam but you promised just one page back:

First and last post here, bye...

lol, I was sure about this.

Only stupid people don't change their mind!
Pages: « 1 ... 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 [1080] 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 ... 2126 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!