[ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet

[SpringfieldM1A]

LOL omg that is just so awesome!

[mannie]

OK here are the issues I have with XC right now. I hope the dev can shine some light on these:

1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?

Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.

[yuchengTec]

love xc pls fly

[DjstarX]

Last Call!! get your cheap coins now , while dark is frozen , cause when they unfreeze it ...IT Will be a black friday at wallmart.

[nanoprobe]

Can someone pass along some cudminer settings for XC? Would be much appreciated.

[atcsecure]

OK here are the issues I have with XC right now. I hope the dev can shine some light on these:

1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?

Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.

#1 - x30 seems pretty high, can you send me a screenshot?

#2 - Valid points and completely agree somewhat, yes the goal is move to a more decentralized solution leveraging the new encrypted application protocol layer

#3 - There are some key points, the mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...

[fearcoka]

So reducing the amount of total coins is gonna spike the price high and it should be stable. Less coins the better

Hold ur coins, this is just the start fellas.

[Pizpie]

XC is now flying

[AlexGR]

#3 - There are some key points, the mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...

Keep in mind you'll need a lot of DDOS protection and fault tolerance. Back in Feb-March, the first DRK's nodes were being DDOSed to "halt" anonymous transactions.

[wevus]

Last Call!! get your cheap coins now , while dark is frozen , cause when they unfreeze it ...IT Will be a black friday at wallmart.

Wow, Aprrox. 1.5k BTC volume for XC @ Mintpal.

[CorneliusDeLaPampa]

Man that UFH (Unidentified Flying Hashrate) is making mining really difficult.
500Ghs of Nethash and we can link only ~40Ghs to pools   But where is waldo?

[nrg_wolf]

Man that UFH (Unidentified Flying Hashrate) is making mining really difficult.
500Ghs of Nethash and we can link only ~40Ghs to pools   But where is waldo?

possibly a solomine setup..... i highly doubt FPGA as there is no proof such a thing is real yet.

[mannie]

OK here are the issues I have with XC right now. I hope the dev can shine some light on these:

1. An example of a mixed transaction shows x30 denomination inputs for the one output logged in the blockchain. That seems to be the original transaction being split up and moved through pools. Will this create bloat?
2. Currently the dev, by his own admission, operates the masternodes. That makes the trust centralized and the coin far from anonymous, if the trust is broken. Will the dev be moving to decentralized nodes and how does he plan to create incentives for others to host?
3. How is this currently any better than DarkWallet, which mixes coins through a central server?

Hoping for an answer here. Thanks.

#1 - x30 seems pretty high, can you send me a screenshot?

#2 - Valid points and completely agree somewhat, yes the goal is move to a more decentralized solution leveraging the new encrypted application protocol layer

#3 - There are some key points, the mixer technology will be multi-path across a cluster of xnodes which runs over the encrypted protocol, so it won't be a central server, it would be similar to a distributed cluster, and the data is encapsulated inside that encrypted tunnel to prevent off-the wire sniffing (or off-the-air* for the mobile platform)...

OK thanks for this. #2 is a very important next step.

re #1 this is the transaction I was going off:

i don't know how exactly it works.

but at first it split 1 xc  into 2 sending to 2 different address, then on the receiving address it show exactly as the screenshot.

it works. legit.

the receiving address is here  XJnHZUaD95mdPDrjXJXLU7vuAC9PVcmomW

you can check on explorer

[fearcoka]

stop shorting guys. Hold dont make the same mistakes 90% of the darkcoin early buyers did.

[SpringfieldM1A]

stop shorting guys. Hold dont make the same mistakes 90% of the darkcoin early buyers did.

This +1

Check out the diminishing supply on Poloniex, people are heeding this advice.

[jakecrow]

stop shorting guys. Hold dont make the same mistakes 90% of the darkcoin early buyers did.

This +1

Check out the diminishing supply on Poloniex, people are heeding this advice.

Interesting only 29k left on Polo sell orders.

[provenceday]

15    X11Coin   $ 4,954,645   $ 0.928953   5,333,579 XC   $ 1,300,781   +97.63 %

[AlexGR]

Man that UFH (Unidentified Flying Hashrate) is making mining really difficult.
500Ghs of Nethash and we can link only ~40Ghs to pools   But where is waldo?

Is there a chart or something?

[Coindacioius]

Show some love for coinmarketcap.com changing the name to "XC" !

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.msg6959840#msg6959840

[Pizpie]

Mining pool advertisers: Please post on http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26jjg4/mining_pools/  so we can keep an updated list that is easily visible to everyone wishing to mine. Thank you!