cygnusxi (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2017, 09:51:39 PM |
|
Team Curecoin delivers over 25% of total 24H Avg PPD and as much as the 5 following best teams together +50% increase of PPD in the last one month... Currently also holding 40 of the top 100 folders by 24 hour average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
cygnusxi (OP)
|
|
June 20, 2017, 10:04:22 PM |
|
From a post on the curecoin forum: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Times are changing in this internet ultra connected world, where everybody wants everything and wants it now.
Wire transfer and card payment, once regarded as innovative and reliable payment methods, are now slow and take up days to complete, and there is always the risk of fraud or identity theft.
We, at BelCloud Hosting Corporation, are a big fan of cryptocurrencies and we have been behind this movement from the start.
With instant, secure, anonymous and permanent transfers, they represent next-generation payments and maybe the currencies of the future.
Because we want cryptocurrencies to grow and become a bigger part of what people use on the internet to make payments, we are now accepting 30 new cryptocurrencies on all our websites.
You can now use CureCoin directly to purchase dedicated and hybrid servers, shared web hosting and VPS.
Because we believe in CureCoin, we are now offering a promotion for the following month:
Every product bought using CureCoin will get 50% discount for the first month if purchased until 20 July 2017. Just contact our support team through live-chat/ticket or e-mail with the link to this page and ask for the discount before you order. That’s all!
Our products are listed on the following websites:
Host.AG – Dedicated Servers and Complex Hosting Solutions
VPS.ag – VPS and Containers starting at 2 EURO per month
TrueHoster.com – Unlimited Web Hosting Solutions at 12 EURO per year.
Best regards,
BelCloud Hosting Corporation
|
|
|
|
yavuzc78
|
|
June 20, 2017, 10:21:43 PM |
|
From a post on the curecoin forum: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Times are changing in this internet ultra connected world, where everybody wants everything and wants it now.
Wire transfer and card payment, once regarded as innovative and reliable payment methods, are now slow and take up days to complete, and there is always the risk of fraud or identity theft.
We, at BelCloud Hosting Corporation, are a big fan of cryptocurrencies and we have been behind this movement from the start.
With instant, secure, anonymous and permanent transfers, they represent next-generation payments and maybe the currencies of the future.
Because we want cryptocurrencies to grow and become a bigger part of what people use on the internet to make payments, we are now accepting 30 new cryptocurrencies on all our websites.
You can now use CureCoin directly to purchase dedicated and hybrid servers, shared web hosting and VPS.
Because we believe in CureCoin, we are now offering a promotion for the following month:
Every product bought using CureCoin will get 50% discount for the first month if purchased until 20 July 2017. Just contact our support team through live-chat/ticket or e-mail with the link to this page and ask for the discount before you order. That’s all!
Our products are listed on the following websites:
Host.AG – Dedicated Servers and Complex Hosting Solutions
VPS.ag – VPS and Containers starting at 2 EURO per month
TrueHoster.com – Unlimited Web Hosting Solutions at 12 EURO per year.
Best regards,
BelCloud Hosting Corporation
Good job DEV
|
|
|
|
shaka256
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2017, 12:21:27 AM |
|
Looks like EdOlkkola isn't anymore Folder #1 in terms of PPD. Somebody in Taiwan beats him by the equivalent of one 1070...
The #1 Folder in terms of PPD is member of Taiwan Team and is called msi_TW. Knowing that MSI is a company from Taiwan, could it be that somebody at MSI wants to fight EVGA in terms of company image? Wouldn't it be an opportunity to contact MSI and ask if they wouldn't be ready to accept Curecoin/FLDC to purchase their GPUs?
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
June 21, 2017, 07:14:03 AM |
|
ed is also getting challenged the last couple weeks by 2 other Team Curecoin members, and longtime folder "war".
NONE of his challengers are going to pass his total production anytime soon though.
Also, it looks like Team Curecoin is going to pass Team EVGA sometime late THIS year, if the current trends continue.
In personal news, I finally have gotten settled into the new place enough to get all but one of my folding rigs back up (the one rig is a single-card rig that I'll probably get up and running again tomorrow, though I'm *thinking* about consoladating that card into another multi-card rig instead) - got the "bought parts a week and a half ago" rig put together, only to find that it's Intel CPU couldn't handle the load (moved those cards to a spare AM3+ motherboard, where the AMD CPU is also overloaded but not QUITE as badly and will be a LOT cheaper to upgrade to one that WILL handle the load), and have put parts on order for my next 3-card rig.
One quarter of an Ed I have achieved, now time to aim at a third. 9-)
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
FifthGhostbuster
|
|
June 22, 2017, 03:29:39 AM |
|
ed is also getting challenged the last couple weeks by 2 other Team Curecoin members, and longtime folder "war".
NONE of his challengers are going to pass his total production anytime soon though.
Also, it looks like Team Curecoin is going to pass Team EVGA sometime late THIS year, if the current trends continue.
In personal news, I finally have gotten settled into the new place enough to get all but one of my folding rigs back up (the one rig is a single-card rig that I'll probably get up and running again tomorrow, though I'm *thinking* about consoladating that card into another multi-card rig instead) - got the "bought parts a week and a half ago" rig put together, only to find that it's Intel CPU couldn't handle the load (moved those cards to a spare AM3+ motherboard, where the AMD CPU is also overloaded but not QUITE as badly and will be a LOT cheaper to upgrade to one that WILL handle the load), and have put parts on order for my next 3-card rig.
One quarter of an Ed I have achieved, now time to aim at a third. 9-)
Congrats on the new place, I hate it when my rigs have to go down for some reason.
|
Go CureCoin!
|
|
|
NxtGenCowboy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 2
|
|
June 22, 2017, 02:39:15 PM |
|
ed is also getting challenged the last couple weeks by 2 other Team Curecoin members, and longtime folder "war".
NONE of his challengers are going to pass his total production anytime soon though.
Also, it looks like Team Curecoin is going to pass Team EVGA sometime late THIS year, if the current trends continue.
In personal news, I finally have gotten settled into the new place enough to get all but one of my folding rigs back up (the one rig is a single-card rig that I'll probably get up and running again tomorrow, though I'm *thinking* about consoladating that card into another multi-card rig instead) - got the "bought parts a week and a half ago" rig put together, only to find that it's Intel CPU couldn't handle the load (moved those cards to a spare AM3+ motherboard, where the AMD CPU is also overloaded but not QUITE as badly and will be a LOT cheaper to upgrade to one that WILL handle the load), and have put parts on order for my next 3-card rig.
One quarter of an Ed I have achieved, now time to aim at a third. 9-)
Congrats on the new place, I hate it when my rigs have to go down for some reason. What are you going to be running in your 3-card rig?
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
June 22, 2017, 05:29:21 PM |
|
Most recent one (GPUs arrived yesterday, the rest of the parts are due "any hour now") will be a pair of Gigabyte 3-fan Windforce GTX 1080 and a Zotac "mini" GTX 1080. So far the thermals look good in the rig I temp set the cards up last night - but they're not working at anywhere near full PPD, the "temp home" only has a dual-core G4600 in it and it's CPU limiting out hard.
I was having the same issue on that particular rig running 3 x 1070 in it, so I'm eventually going to make it a crypto-mining or MooWrapper host rig when I get the chance to "shuffle" some of my cards around in my planned "rationalization of rigs" over the next couple months.
GTX 1070 have gotten almost as insane as the RX 470/570/480/580 over this last week - checked NewEgg an hour ago, they had one of the MSI Gaming models listed at $700 - SAME as the lowest-cost GTX 1080 ti at the time. They did have 3 other 1070 models for less - but only one under $500 and one of the others was $6something.
Even the lowely GTX 1060 is getting into the "price gouge" act, though it's not having severe availability problems - YET.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
hakanf
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Altcoin Enthusiast
|
|
June 23, 2017, 06:49:31 AM |
|
do you guys think CURE should follow PTOY's success
|
|
|
|
shaka256
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
June 23, 2017, 05:26:15 PM |
|
500,580,770 points on the 24H sliding window.
We have therefore just broken the half-billion PPD barrier!!!
By the end of this summer we'll be Team #1!
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
June 24, 2017, 01:20:51 AM |
|
New Curecoin client out v1.9.2.1....
OK, for the 1st time in forever, I tried a clean install (instead of a refresh of a saved image) of Debian. I can't get it to build in Debian 9. In file included from src/main.h:8:0, from src/wallet.h:13, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/curecoin.cpp:11: src/bignum.h:51:24: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ class CBigNum : public BIGNUM ^~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/openssl/bn.h:32:0, from src/bignum.h:10, from src/main.h:8, from src/wallet.h:13, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/curecoin.cpp:11: /usr/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:80:16: note: forward declaration of ‘BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}’ typedef struct bignum_st BIGNUM; ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from src/main.h:8:0, from src/wallet.h:13, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/curecoin.cpp:11: src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum()’: src/bignum.h:56:21: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope BN_init(this); ^ src/bignum.h: In copy constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:61:21: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope BN_init(this); ^ src/bignum.h:62:30: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘BIGNUM* BN_copy(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_copy(this, &b)) ^ src/bignum.h:64:31: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘void BN_clear_free(BIGNUM*)’ BN_clear_free(this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::operator=(const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:71:30: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘BIGNUM* BN_copy(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_copy(this, &b)) ^ src/bignum.h: In destructor ‘CBigNum::~CBigNum()’: src/bignum.h:78:27: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘void BN_clear_free(BIGNUM*)’ BN_clear_free(this); ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(signed char)’: src/bignum.h:82:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(signed char n) { BN_init(this); if (n >= 0) setulong(n); else setint64(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(short int)’: src/bignum.h:83:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(short n) { BN_init(this); if (n >= 0) setulong(n); else setint64(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(int)’: src/bignum.h:84:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(int n) { BN_init(this); if (n >= 0) setulong(n); else setint64(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(long int)’: src/bignum.h:85:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(long n) { BN_init(this); if (n >= 0) setulong(n); else setint64(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(int64)’: src/bignum.h:86:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(int64 n) { BN_init(this); setint64(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(unsigned char)’: src/bignum.h:87:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(unsigned char n) { BN_init(this); setulong(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(short unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:88:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(unsigned short n) { BN_init(this); setulong(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:89:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(unsigned int n) { BN_init(this); setulong(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(long unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:90:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(unsigned long n) { BN_init(this); setulong(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(uint64)’: src/bignum.h:91:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope CBigNum(uint64 n) { BN_init(this); setuint64(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(uint256)’: src/bignum.h:92:47: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope explicit CBigNum(uint256 n) { BN_init(this); setuint256(n); } ^ src/bignum.h: In constructor ‘CBigNum::CBigNum(const std::vector<unsigned char>&)’: src/bignum.h:96:21: error: ‘BN_init’ was not declared in this scope BN_init(this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘void CBigNum::setulong(long unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:102:33: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_set_word(BIGNUM*, long unsigned int)’ if (!BN_set_word(this, n)) ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘long unsigned int CBigNum::getulong() const’: src/bignum.h:108:32: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘long unsigned int BN_get_word(const BIGNUM*)’ return BN_get_word(this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘unsigned int CBigNum::getuint() const’: src/bignum.h:113:32: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘long unsigned int BN_get_word(const BIGNUM*)’ return BN_get_word(this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘int CBigNum::getint() const’: src/bignum.h:118:43: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘long unsigned int BN_get_word(const BIGNUM*)’ unsigned long n = BN_get_word(this); ^ src/bignum.h:119:33: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_is_negative(const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_is_negative(this)) ^ In file included from src/main.h:8:0, from src/wallet.h:13, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/curecoin.cpp:11: src/bignum.h: In member function ‘void CBigNum::setint64(int64)’: src/bignum.h:165:37: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘3’ to ‘BIGNUM* BN_mpi2bn(const unsigned char*, int, BIGNUM*)’ BN_mpi2bn(pch, p - pch, this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘uint64 CBigNum::getuint64()’: src/bignum.h:170:50: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ unsigned int nSize = BN_bn2mpi(this, NULL); ^ src/bignum.h:174:32: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ BN_bn2mpi(this, &vch[0]); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘void CBigNum::setuint64(uint64)’: src/bignum.h:207:37: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘3’ to ‘BIGNUM* BN_mpi2bn(const unsigned char*, int, BIGNUM*)’ BN_mpi2bn(pch, p - pch, this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘void CBigNum::setuint256(uint256)’: src/bignum.h:235:37: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘3’ to ‘BIGNUM* BN_mpi2bn(const unsigned char*, int, BIGNUM*)’ BN_mpi2bn(pch, p - pch, this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘uint256 CBigNum::getuint256()’: src/bignum.h:240:50: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ unsigned int nSize = BN_bn2mpi(this, NULL); ^ src/bignum.h:244:32: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ BN_bn2mpi(this, &vch[0]); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘void CBigNum::setvch(const std::vector<unsigned char>&)’: src/bignum.h:266:46: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘3’ to ‘BIGNUM* BN_mpi2bn(const unsigned char*, int, BIGNUM*)’ BN_mpi2bn(&vch2[0], vch2.size(), this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘std::vector<unsigned char> CBigNum::getvch() const’: src/bignum.h:271:50: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ unsigned int nSize = BN_bn2mpi(this, NULL); ^ src/bignum.h:275:32: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ BN_bn2mpi(this, &vch[0]); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::SetCompact(unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:289:44: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘3’ to ‘BIGNUM* BN_mpi2bn(const unsigned char*, int, BIGNUM*)’ BN_mpi2bn(&vch[0], vch.size(), this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘unsigned int CBigNum::GetCompact() const’: src/bignum.h:295:50: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ unsigned int nSize = BN_bn2mpi(this, NULL); ^ src/bignum.h:298:32: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_bn2mpi(const BIGNUM*, unsigned char*)’ BN_bn2mpi(this, &vch[0]); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘std::__cxx11::string CBigNum::ToString(int) const’: src/bignum.h:343:35: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘void BN_set_negative(BIGNUM*, int)’ BN_set_negative(&bn, false); ^ src/bignum.h:346:29: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (BN_cmp(&bn, &bn0) == 0) ^ src/bignum.h:348:32: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ while (BN_cmp(&bn, &bn0) > 0) ^ src/bignum.h:350:54: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_div(BIGNUM*, BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, BN_CTX*)’ if (!BN_div(&dv, &rem, &bn, &bnBase, pctx)) ^ src/bignum.h:356:32: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_is_negative(const BIGNUM*)’ if (BN_is_negative(this)) ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘bool CBigNum::operator!() const’: src/bignum.h:389:31: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_is_zero(const BIGNUM*)’ return BN_is_zero(this); ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::operator+=(const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:394:35: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_add(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_add(this, this, &b)) ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::operator*=(const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:408:41: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_mul(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, BN_CTX*)’ if (!BN_mul(this, this, &b, pctx)) ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::operator<<=(unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:427:41: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_lshift(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, int)’ if (!BN_lshift(this, this, shift)) ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::operator>>=(unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:438:28: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (BN_cmp(&a, this) > 0) ^ src/bignum.h:444:41: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_rshift(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, int)’ if (!BN_rshift(this, this, shift)) ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::operator++()’: src/bignum.h:453:47: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_add(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_add(this, this, BN_value_one())) ^ src/bignum.h: In member function ‘CBigNum& CBigNum::operator--()’: src/bignum.h:470:45: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_sub(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_sub(&r, this, BN_value_one())) ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘const CBigNum operator+(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:495:27: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_add(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_add(&r, &a, &b)) ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘const CBigNum operator-(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:503:27: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_sub(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ if (!BN_sub(&r, &a, &b)) ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘const CBigNum operator-(const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:511:43: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_is_negative(const BIGNUM*)’ BN_set_negative(&r, !BN_is_negative(&r)); ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘const CBigNum operator*(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:519:33: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_mul(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, BN_CTX*)’ if (!BN_mul(&r, &a, &b, pctx)) ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘const CBigNum operator/(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:528:39: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_div(BIGNUM*, BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, BN_CTX*)’ if (!BN_div(&r, NULL, &a, &b, pctx)) ^ In file included from src/bignum.h:10:0, from src/main.h:8, from src/wallet.h:13, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/curecoin.cpp:11: src/bignum.h: In function ‘const CBigNum operator%(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:537:10: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘2’ to ‘int BN_div(BIGNUM*, BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, BN_CTX*)’ if (!BN_mod(&r, &a, &b, pctx)) ^ In file included from src/main.h:8:0, from src/wallet.h:13, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/curecoin.cpp:11: src/bignum.h: In function ‘const CBigNum operator<<(const CBigNum&, unsigned int)’: src/bignum.h:545:33: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_lshift(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, int)’ if (!BN_lshift(&r, &a, shift)) ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘bool operator==(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:557:83: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ inline bool operator==(const CBigNum& a, const CBigNum& b) { return (BN_cmp(&a, &b) == 0); } ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘bool operator!=(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:558:83: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ inline bool operator!=(const CBigNum& a, const CBigNum& b) { return (BN_cmp(&a, &b) != 0); } ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘bool operator<=(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:559:83: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ inline bool operator<=(const CBigNum& a, const CBigNum& b) { return (BN_cmp(&a, &b) <= 0); } ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘bool operator>=(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:560:83: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ inline bool operator>=(const CBigNum& a, const CBigNum& b) { return (BN_cmp(&a, &b) >= 0); } ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘bool operator<(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:561:83: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ inline bool operator<(const CBigNum& a, const CBigNum& b) { return (BN_cmp(&a, &b) < 0); } ^ src/bignum.h: In function ‘bool operator>(const CBigNum&, const CBigNum&)’: src/bignum.h:562:83: error: cannot convert ‘const CBigNum*’ to ‘const BIGNUM* {aka const bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_cmp(const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*)’ inline bool operator>(const CBigNum& a, const CBigNum& b) { return (BN_cmp(&a, &b) > 0); } ^ In file included from src/walletdb.h:9:0, from src/wallet.h:19, from src/init.h:8, from src/qt/curecoin.cpp:11: src/base58.h: In function ‘std::__cxx11::string EncodeBase58(const unsigned char*, const unsigned char*)’: src/base58.h:51:48: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_div(BIGNUM*, BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, BN_CTX*)’ if (!BN_div(&dv, &rem, &bn, &bn58, pctx)) ^ src/base58.h: In function ‘bool DecodeBase58(const char*, std::vector<unsigned char>&)’: src/base58.h:98:42: error: cannot convert ‘CBigNum*’ to ‘BIGNUM* {aka bignum_st*}’ for argument ‘1’ to ‘int BN_mul(BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, const BIGNUM*, BN_CTX*)’ if (!BN_mul(&bn, &bn, &bn58, pctx)) ^ Makefile:1122: recipe for target 'build/curecoin.o' failed make: *** [build/curecoin.o] Error 1
Any ideas?
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
darval
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2017, 09:37:48 AM |
|
Check which version of gcc you are using. I have found that there are a lot of packages out there that don't compile with the latest gcc (5.x series) and you have to roll back to the 4.x versions. I only compiled curecoind since I don't use the gui wallet and it compiled with gcc 5.4 so I never ran into a problem with it.
Rick..
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
June 24, 2017, 11:04:52 AM Last edit: June 24, 2017, 01:22:18 PM by ComputerGenie |
|
Check which version of gcc you are using. I have found that there are a lot of packages out there that don't compile with the latest gcc (5.x series) and you have to roll back to the 4.x versions. I only compiled curecoind since I don't use the gui wallet and it compiled with gcc 5.4 so I never ran into a problem with it.
Rick..
Debian 9 has gcc 6.3.0 and building the daemon yields basically the same results (as does 5.4.1 & 4.9.2 - I managed to grab and default them out of "unstable" and "oldstable"). So if gcc is the issue, I guess that server doesn't get a node, because I'm way too lazy to change apt sources and fix all that's going to break rolling it back any further. Edit: FWIW, I rolled back gcc and OpenSSL (only reference I could find to similar issue was an old Bitcoin, so I gave it a try) to no avail. computergenie@debian9Vm:~$ strings /usr/lib/libcrypto.so | grep "^OpenSSL \S\+ [0-9]\+ \S\+ [0-9]\+" OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010 computergenie@debian9Vm:~$ gcc --version gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Edit2: Also FWIW, Bitcoin Core versions v0.14.2 and v0.14.99 (current pull) both build fine.
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
June 24, 2017, 08:30:53 PM |
|
i like the idea of reward top 1000 we see less BTC owners claim BTX that we would like to see but this top1000 game take care that in the end not only the miners get the shared BTX but also active and clever community guys so lets play the top1000 game! a guarantee win as long as ur addresses are inside the top1000
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
June 24, 2017, 09:32:08 PM Last edit: June 24, 2017, 09:44:18 PM by ComputerGenie |
|
i like the idea of reward top 1000
we see less BTC owners claim BTX that we would like to see but this top1000 game take care that in the end not only the miners get the shared BTX but also active and clever community guys
so lets play the top1000 game!
a guarantee win as long as ur addresses are inside the top1000
Methinks PoS must stop driving the PoW diff from 135,808,546 up to 372,250,720 (in ~60 minutes) before any mention of miners claiming anything.
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
loveinberlin
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
June 27, 2017, 04:09:24 PM |
|
do you guys think CURE should follow PTOY's success
Likely.
|
|
|
|
loveinberlin
Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
|
|
June 27, 2017, 04:12:31 PM |
|
i like the idea of reward top 1000
we see less BTC owners claim BTX that we would like to see but this top1000 game take care that in the end not only the miners get the shared BTX but also active and clever community guys
so lets play the top1000 game!
a guarantee win as long as ur addresses are inside the top1000
A really good idea.It will encourge people to trade Curecoin.
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
June 27, 2017, 05:56:35 PM |
|
do you guys think CURE should follow PTOY's success
Never heard of "PTOY", can't be all THAT successful (unless it's an acronym I'm not parsing correctly).
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
June 27, 2017, 06:03:19 PM |
|
Never heard of "PTOY", can't be all THAT successful (unless it's an acronym I'm not parsing correctly).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1886446.0It had a lot of "out of the gate hype", but has since dropped to like 17¢ (almost 1/3rd of what it was last week).
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
June 28, 2017, 02:49:22 AM |
|
How does one calculate the folding difficulty for use in the merge folding calculator?
|
|
|
|
|