Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2017, 06:53:17 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 [164] 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 ... 221 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN]CureCoin - CURECOIN TEAM HAS TAKEN RANK 1 ON FOLDING@HOME!!!  (Read 665915 times)
cygnusxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396


CureCoin Lead Dev


View Profile WWW
March 22, 2016, 08:50:55 PM
 #3261

While waiting for the update, may I suggest taking a go at some folding if you have not already. With an effiecient GPU folding for cure is currently profitable (especially if you merge fold with foldingcoin) and the recent increase in buy support seems to be sticking around. Great time to earn some cure and also get your stake in curecoin 2.0 and sigmaX  Cool

Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757 MergeFold with FoldingCoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781352.0
1512975197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512975197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512975197
Reply with quote  #2

1512975197
Report to moderator
1512975197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512975197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512975197
Reply with quote  #2

1512975197
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1512975197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512975197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512975197
Reply with quote  #2

1512975197
Report to moderator
1512975197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512975197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512975197
Reply with quote  #2

1512975197
Report to moderator
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799


View Profile
March 22, 2016, 08:55:43 PM
 #3262

getinfo returns nothing just a blinking cursor, win7 x64 java 1.8.0_73-b02
and this shows up in daemon
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
        at java.util.ArrayList.elementData(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.ArrayList.get(Unknown Source)
        at net.curecoin.sigmax.Blockchain.getBlock(Blockchain.java:495)
        at net.curecoin.sigmax.MainClass.main(MainClass.java:368)


I deleted all data and started from scratch, still I get the above when calling getinfo additionally the miner does not run just sits there like so:

How many threads would you like to run?
2
Connecting to SigmaX daemon on 127.0.0.1:8026...
Connected to daemon successfully!
SigmaX 1.0.0b1 daemon RPC

The miner will how ever run if i dont call getinfo.
This is what i see in the miner when its running:

386473 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
386846 hashes per second...
386846 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
PBH: 0667A9D4590D7B54CA97355EF27B1AA4998136510438F38A87B06E88A29B96B3
TXMKL: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
ADD: S1QJTZISIIWKY737MKBDSUFQWPD6OLLNKXUEQH
DIFF: 125000000
BN: 0

Always the TXMKL is 0000000 etc

cygnusxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396


CureCoin Lead Dev


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2016, 12:26:22 AM
 #3263

getinfo returns nothing just a blinking cursor, win7 x64 java 1.8.0_73-b02
and this shows up in daemon
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
        at java.util.ArrayList.elementData(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.ArrayList.get(Unknown Source)
        at net.curecoin.sigmax.Blockchain.getBlock(Blockchain.java:495)
        at net.curecoin.sigmax.MainClass.main(MainClass.java:368)


I deleted all data and started from scratch, still I get the above when calling getinfo additionally the miner does not run just sits there like so:

How many threads would you like to run?
2
Connecting to SigmaX daemon on 127.0.0.1:8026...
Connected to daemon successfully!
SigmaX 1.0.0b1 daemon RPC

The miner will how ever run if i dont call getinfo.
This is what i see in the miner when its running:

386473 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
386846 hashes per second...
386846 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
386473 hashes per second...
PBH: 0667A9D4590D7B54CA97355EF27B1AA4998136510438F38A87B06E88A29B96B3
TXMKL: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
ADD: S1QJTZISIIWKY737MKBDSUFQWPD6OLLNKXUEQH
DIFF: 125000000
BN: 0

Always the TXMKL is 0000000 etc



Looks like your daemon did not sync after deleting the old files, BN 0 is block number 0. Right now the networking code is one of the things that is not anything like what the full version will be, Im going to talk to Vorksholk about setting up an seed node or two for the test and hard coding them for quick connections. Just a suggestion,  keep those files for debugging purposes,  and copy the 3 jar files into a new directory and let us know if it syncs.

Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757 MergeFold with FoldingCoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781352.0
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 04:15:51 AM
 #3264

No joy seems client wont sync at all. I can upload the previous files to dropbox and pm link if required.
huffnpuff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 05:48:59 AM
 #3265

The 3 test crowd sales will be for the following items;

1. Overall development of Curecoin including websites, social media, promotional materials (pretty much everything already listed in the uses for the developer fund)

2. Fundraisers that have curecoins already donated to them, including
     a.ANTRUK: Learn More on the ANTRUK homepage. http://www.antibioticresearch.org.uk/
     b.Bonfils: Learn More on the Bonfils Blood Center homepage. http://www.bonfils.org/index.cfm/medical-services/research/

One thing that may help convince potential crowd fund participants ... these coins are coming from funds donated by PS3EdOlkkola.

Ed donates ALL his coins back to the team to split between funding development and marketing of CureCoin to the causes listed on our homepage. Ed is ranked #3 on Folding@Home of all time folders in FAH's 15+ year history. He folds more proteins than the next 7 folders on our team combined. His facility is a data-center located in a hospital building he owns. Ed probably folds more than the bottom 70% of our team of 6000 user accounts COMBINED. Chances are, if you purchased coins on the exchange, they included some of Ed's donation.

So these coins are "special"; they are not "Dev Funds", they are not coins that were purchased from the exchange at a fraction of the actual production costs. These coins represent FAH research. I hope that helps clarify where these coins originated, and the reason we are reluctant to dump them on the exchanges for a mediocre payout after months of work required to sell them without negatively impacting the price. Consider these Crowd Sale coins as a nod to Ed's generous contribution to the team.
BTCTT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 07:41:21 AM
 #3266

Sad to see the price hype didn't stick and more importantly Folding didn't increased, I guess a lot of more work are needed.

Only think that worries me is CC 2.0 doesn't add much to the table, so I'm not sure it will be enough to bring people to folding
assistresearch
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 10:11:29 AM
 #3267

Sad to see the price hype didn't stick and more importantly Folding didn't increased, I guess a lot of more work are needed.

Only think that worries me is CC 2.0 doesn't add much to the table, so I'm not sure it will be enough to bring people to folding

Right now, the majority of viable high-end GPU mining power is pointed at Ethereum which has had over $17 million invested in it, along with recent Microsoft certification.

IMHO CC 2.0 / SigmaX, despite delays, both have the potential to bring a lot of unique features to crypto other blockchain technologies simply don't offer - beyond DCN research.

Staying diversified eliminates un-necessary anxiety :-)

simfony
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 10:13:56 AM
 #3268

Where is the active crowdsale ?
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 10:21:23 AM
 #3269

Sad to see the price hype didn't stick and more importantly Folding didn't increased, I guess a lot of more work are needed.

Only think that worries me is CC 2.0 doesn't add much to the table, so I'm not sure it will be enough to bring people to folding

Unfortunately the only thing that will bring more folders is if/when the price gives a sufficient profit margin above that of what ever other coin is most profitable at the time. This goes back to an earlier post i made about the need to incentivize the work done for DCN's, whether that is achieved by DCN's becoming actively involved in supporting the price of curecoin to attract more people to the network or by some other means. One idea i did have which might be controversial, what if there was a fee either in $ or btc for issuing certificates on the CC2.0 network. For example a DCN could be licensed for a fee to issue x amount of certificates once all those certificates have been issued they would need to buy another license. The price of certificates could be done on a bidding system where by the amount of computational power a particular DCN would receive would be proportional to their bid and the bids of other DCN's. A dev fee could be deducted from proceeds of certificate auctions and the remainder would go directly to supporting the price of CC2.0.
BTCTT
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 10:38:13 AM
 #3270

Sad to see the price hype didn't stick and more importantly Folding didn't increased, I guess a lot of more work are needed.

Only think that worries me is CC 2.0 doesn't add much to the table, so I'm not sure it will be enough to bring people to folding

Unfortunately the only thing that will bring more folders is if/when the price gives a sufficient profit margin above that of what ever other coin is most profitable at the time. This goes back to an earlier post i made about the need to incentivize the work done for DCN's, whether that is achieved by DCN's becoming actively involved in supporting the price of curecoin to attract more people to the network or by some other means. One idea i did have which might be controversial, what if there was a fee either in $ or btc for issuing certificates on the CC2.0 network. For example a DCN could be licensed for a fee to issue x amount of certificates once all those certificates have been issued they would need to buy another license. The price of certificates could be done on a bidding system where by the amount of computational power a particular DCN would receive would be proportional to their bid and the bids of other DCN's. A dev fee could be deducted from proceeds of certificate auctions and the remainder would go directly to supporting the price of CC2.0.

I think its a good idea but would any DCN's be ready to do that?
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 11:10:48 AM
 #3271

Likely not lol maybe its more of an idea of CC3.0   Cheesy
yofevo1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 174


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 11:26:05 AM
 #3272

when to the moon  Huh
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 11:52:14 AM
 #3273

when to the moon  Huh

Maybe after we get some rocket pics?Huh U cant go to the moon without a rocket right?!
cygnusxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396


CureCoin Lead Dev


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2016, 12:40:27 PM
 #3274

Sad to see the price hype didn't stick and more importantly Folding didn't increased, I guess a lot of more work are needed.

Only think that worries me is CC 2.0 doesn't add much to the table, so I'm not sure it will be enough to bring people to folding

Unfortunately the only thing that will bring more folders is if/when the price gives a sufficient profit margin above that of what ever other coin is most profitable at the time. This goes back to an earlier post i made about the need to incentivize the work done for DCN's, whether that is achieved by DCN's becoming actively involved in supporting the price of curecoin to attract more people to the network or by some other means. One idea i did have which might be controversial, what if there was a fee either in $ or btc for issuing certificates on the CC2.0 network. For example a DCN could be licensed for a fee to issue x amount of certificates once all those certificates have been issued they would need to buy another license. The price of certificates could be done on a bidding system where by the amount of computational power a particular DCN would receive would be proportional to their bid and the bids of other DCN's. A dev fee could be deducted from proceeds of certificate auctions and the remainder would go directly to supporting the price of CC2.0.

This is an idea for CC2.0 that will be discussed with the team and kept for future possibilities... This is a good solution to an idea given to us by an AI dev ( the neureal project , check it out if you have not already ).

PM me your Curecoin address this kind of proactive thinking deserves a little tip!

Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757 MergeFold with FoldingCoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781352.0
cygnusxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396


CureCoin Lead Dev


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2016, 12:43:27 PM
 #3275

Where is the active crowdsale ?


You can be a part of the crowd sale here
https://www.curecoin.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3902

Some further explanation on the crowd sale usage
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg14276360#msg14276360

Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757 MergeFold with FoldingCoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781352.0
simfony
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 12:51:09 PM
 #3276

Where is the active crowdsale ?


You can be a part of the crowd sale here
https://www.curecoin.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3902

Some further explanation on the crowd sale usage
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg14276360#msg14276360

I still don't get it, this is for a different coin? SigmaXcoin? curecoin 2.0? Or simply for the normal curecoin?

10,000 curecoin on market now cost about 0.6 bitcoin. Here you are asking for 5 bitcoins (max) for the same 10,000 coins?
cygnusxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396


CureCoin Lead Dev


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2016, 01:07:42 PM
 #3277

Where is the active crowdsale ?


You can be a part of the crowd sale here
https://www.curecoin.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3902

Some further explanation on the crowd sale usage
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg14276360#msg14276360

I still don't get it, this is for a different coin? SigmaXcoin? curecoin 2.0? Or simply for the normal curecoin?

10,000 curecoin on market now cost about 0.6 bitcoin. Here you are asking for 5 bitcoins (max) for the same 10,000 coins?

Yes you can buy them currently off an exchange for cheaper, there are some reasons stated in the 2nd post. Basically this is a chance to support curecoin and its endeavors while getting curecoins at the same time. That said, if you take another look at the markets you will see to buy 10k cure at once you will end up in the 8-9k sat range, and price has spiked to 20k sats with decent buy support. So all in all its a fair deal to also support coin development. If you are just looking for the cheapest price than by all means just browse the exchanges, thats what they are there for  Wink

Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757 MergeFold with FoldingCoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781352.0
SalimNagamato
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924



View Profile
March 23, 2016, 01:43:56 PM
 #3278

maybe lets just stay with CC1 ? its a good coin... and i love it as is:)
if its too outdated maybe we could fork to POS 3.0 ? (Blackcoin's code)

not hashing, folding and curing (check FLDC merged-folding! reuse good GPUs)
SalimNagamato
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924



View Profile
March 23, 2016, 05:24:13 PM
 #3279

Sad to see the price hype didn't stick and more importantly Folding didn't increased, I guess a lot of more work are needed.

Only think that worries me is CC 2.0 doesn't add much to the table, so I'm not sure it will be enough to bring people to folding

Right now, the majority of viable high-end GPU mining power is pointed at Ethereum which has had over $17 million invested in it, along with recent Microsoft certification.

IMHO CC 2.0 / SigmaX, despite delays, both have the potential to bring a lot of unique features to crypto other blockchain technologies simply don't offer - beyond DCN research.

Staying diversified eliminates un-necessary anxiety :-)



and what is better than Folding@home with GPUs... ?
after Ethereum goes POS (if they ever do), or if GPU mining ETH stop being profitable... we might have more folders
IMHO only ASICs should secure a chain.
CPU miners will always have centralization of mining by Botnets/hackers/linux farms
GPU miners will always deal with GPU farms... so on

i know if i mined ethereum since its GPU mining started i could make a lot profit. with folding@home i think its more useful

I did see new folders joining the team, if you look at entire list.. some medium folders (~200k ppd) joined


about moving to POS 3. if we do it. we can set a static block reward
like 1 coin go to staker, 20 coins to dev's distribution wallet (calculate it to create daily distribution amount, and halve dev's part ever X years)
with lower staking time and no max time
this way we could burn the permine from of current distribution wallet (to send to counterparty style address) and stay on the same blockchain + make burning address tx rejected/banned in the coin's code

of course the DCN CA idea sounds nice once its ready. i think no university will want to mess with it. so curecoin's team will probably always need to be part of the distribution

about SigmaX... seems also very not-ready
blockchain database is actually a json text file ??
wallet can't sync past few blocks... (right now only block 32)

not hashing, folding and curing (check FLDC merged-folding! reuse good GPUs)
cryptonit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456


CVO Diamond Foundation (Visionary)


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2016, 11:45:03 PM
 #3280

ok looks like better back into laboratory with that code only have a few selected alpha testers

u scare people away with actual state of software

this open testnet now do more harm than good

any testing feedback u need like 20 selected tester can give u too

without losing reputation as happens now

normal crowd have difficulties to see a alpha testnet as what it is

i would only go open in  a very stable close to release beta  stage

Pages: « 1 ... 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 [164] 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 ... 221 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!