Bitcoin Forum
December 17, 2017, 03:02:15 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 [195] 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN]CureCoin - CURECOIN TEAM HAS TAKEN RANK 1 ON FOLDING@HOME!!!  (Read 668216 times)
AndreyNag
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2017, 03:53:52 PM
 #3881

Edit: as for tracking down your issue of you not seeing information about CureCoin blocks, a 1 minute long multi-mining stratum log, from some random point in time, isn't enough information to give you any accurate advice.
Here you are. It`s logs from unomp and curecoin daemon.
https://yadi.sk/d/ve7JD9H33DwYG3
https://yadi.sk/d/KzxplFNZ3DwYGB
Thank you for attention.

1513522935
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513522935

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513522935
Reply with quote  #2

1513522935
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 04:18:53 PM
 #3882

Here you are. It`s logs from unomp and curecoin daemon.
...
Thank you for attention.

Quote
[36m[2017-02-12 14:45:31.988] [DEBUG] [default] - [39mPool curecoin Thread 2 rpc error with daemon instance 0 when submitting block with submitblock {"code":-22,"message":"Block decode failed"}
The short answer is that your stratum is not set up properly to work for either CureCoin or PeerCoin.
The long answer (which is not within the scope of this type of forum) is that you'd have to understand the code behind stratum to fix it (as it involves coding edits where stratum submits the block info).

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
AndreyNag
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2017, 06:36:32 PM
 #3883

Quote
[36m[2017-02-12 14:45:31.988] [DEBUG] [default] - [39mPool curecoin Thread 2 rpc error with daemon instance 0 when submitting block with submitblock {"code":-22,"message":"Block decode failed"}
The short answer is that your stratum is not set up properly to work for either CureCoin or PeerCoin.
The long answer (which is not within the scope of this type of forum) is that you'd have to understand the code behind stratum to fix it (as it involves coding edits where stratum submits the block info).
Please answer me shortly. What can i do wrong if just download from github unomp, source-code curecoin daemon and compile it by manual? Why universal currency are mining properly with the same pool settings?
How i can get more information for debugging?
Thank you.

This is i'm found in the merged-pooler/lib/pool.js
Am i right? Whats wrong here?
Code:
    /*
    Coin daemons either use submitblock or getblocktemplate for submitting new blocks
     */
    function SubmitBlock(blockHex, finishedCallback){

        var rpcCommand, rpcArgs;
        if (options.hasSubmitMethod){
            rpcCommand = 'submitblock';
            rpcArgs = [blockHex];
        }
        else{
            rpcCommand = 'getblocktemplate';
            rpcArgs = [{'mode': 'submit', 'data': blockHex}];
        }


        _this.daemon.cmd(rpcCommand,
            rpcArgs,
            function(results){
                for (var i = 0; i < results.length; i++){
                    var result = results[i];
                    if (result.error) {
                        emitErrorLog('rpc error with daemon instance ' +
                                result.instance.index + ' when submitting block with ' + rpcCommand + ' ' +
                                JSON.stringify(result.error)
                        );
                        return;
                    }
                    else if (result.response === 'rejected') {
                        emitErrorLog('Daemon instance ' + result.instance.index + ' rejected a supposedly valid block');
                        return;
                    }
                }
                emitLog('Submitted Block using ' + rpcCommand + ' successfully to daemon instance(s)');
                finishedCallback();
            }
        );

    }


yavuzc78
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 06:46:38 PM
 #3884

Maybe you didnt download %100 of blocks

AndreyNag
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2017, 07:10:57 PM
 #3885


Maybe you didnt download %100 of blocks
No. Blockchain was full downloaded.
Quote
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  21ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  24ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  23ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  33ms
ResendWalletTransactions()
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  27ms
received block 81d4bf4d073a4805212b
SetBestChain: new best=81d4bf4d073a4805212b  height=157327  trust=1250672134659373  date=02/12/17 19:02:25,block hash= 81d4bf4d073a4805212b8c68bd7ca2a9e06880ba0445b4e21a3eeaeb13cdb9ed
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  29ms
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 8f42a16ef0 (poolsz 1)
ThreadRPCServer method=getaccount
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  30ms
received block 7914baea094338fdce3d
SetBestChain: new best=7914baea094338fdce3d  height=157328  trust=1250695136214898  date=02/12/17 19:04:21,block hash= 7914baea094338fdce3dfecebd5ebbbf5fedc3063dea5bc76dfce6ada335ee07
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 482e251ab0 (poolsz 1)
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  29ms
received block 32626301d8ff4c24d314
SetBestChain: new best=32626301d8ff4c24d314  height=157329  trust=1250719724542538  date=02/12/17 19:06:42,block hash= 32626301d8ff4c24d31454dd8c95bbb30ceaee95c96736b58651f428ce569b7d
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 3ms
received block 83a6335ca9cfc2db8747
SetBestChain: new best=83a6335ca9cfc2db8747  height=157330  trust=1250745915779861  date=02/12/17 19:06:52,block hash= 83a6335ca9cfc2db87479df6632e03f0487af33a765b17a64aade83feec59ddd
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms
getblocks 157330 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 9a6c2fdad4 (poolsz 1)
Flushed 13091 addresses to peers.dat  27ms
received block 692531ff622ca93518cd
SetBestChain: new best=692531ff622ca93518cd  height=157331  trust=1250774343322137  date=02/12/17 19:08:44,block hash= 692531ff622ca93518cd376143669f2d54a026232791a14112161419ca0069fe
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 4ms

ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 12, 2017, 11:14:37 PM
 #3886

Off the top of my head, the getblocktemplate has to be [] (without args) and there's some other settings that need changed/set. As I said, it's not a "simple" fix.

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
AndreyNag
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2017, 09:23:48 AM
 #3887

Thank you for your attention.
I understand that it is difficult to alter unomp under curecoin.
Tell me please, are there any other platforms that no improvements will be compatible with curecoin?
For Example CoiniumServ?

fred96002001
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 08:11:22 PM
 #3888

i need some help with this folding.

i got the account set up and it said

1,534 go to Team Curecoin's total of 74,137,172,960
it has been 3 days and i do not see credits in my account at cryptobullionpools i was told the team # is Team 224497 and i set up a user name at cryptobullionpools. i have the  folding@home client set up with the same info but i do not see any credits or ppd at cryptobullionpools.  how do i fix this? or should i jsut wait more time. it has been 3 days now.
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 13, 2017, 10:29:05 PM
 #3889

https://www.cryptobullionpools.com/support

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
cygnusxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396


CureCoin Lead Dev


View Profile WWW
February 16, 2017, 04:17:09 AM
 #3890


FifthGhostBuster can be found often in our slack or irc, we are moving over to slack currently. The curecoin.net/forum is a much better spot to get a quick response from one of the team members. I do have someone that watches the facebook and twitter accounts quite actively also. The large single thread here is tricky for support issues.

Join link for our slack http://slack.curecoin.net:30000

As to a previous comment yes it gets pretty tricky to catch up on posts here. Since most of the last 5 pages is talk about PPD I have a few items to share

1- I have a 1070 evga hybrid getting 750k ppd solid under ubuntu 16.04 headless
2- I have a couple 1080 evga hybrids that bounce wildly from 800k to 1.2 million PPD on a similar setup.
3- I finally messed with the setup enough to be able to control fan and clock speed on a headless system and plan on seeing if the 1080s will fold stable at the same clock as the 1070 (its a pretty big difference in default clock on those 2 cards)
4- It could be argued in high electric cost the 1080 is better, but I think it needs a little tweaking
5- Ive spent way too much time rebuilding my folding machines looking for the best builds. In summary, use linux, its much faster.
6- The linux install guide on foldingcoin.net is pretty good, I was referring to it as a baseline build until I started to use 16.04, I will share my findings in an easy copy paste format to make it easier for others to crank out every last bit off PPD possible without crude tactics like a large overclock which can cause your folding to fail.
7- Folding is simple at face value, rather easy to get going. Fine tuning though can be turned into a career. Brands, ambient temps, drivers etc etc etc all make a big difference. I think we have a lot more research to do before we can officially crown the 1070 or the 1080 the king of folding.

Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757 MergeFold with FoldingCoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781352.0
kopija
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 272


View Profile
February 16, 2017, 09:51:02 AM
 #3891


7- Folding is simple at face value, rather easy to get going. Fine tuning though can be turned into a career. Brands, ambient temps, drivers etc etc etc all make a big difference. I think we have a lot more research to do before we can officially crown the 1070 or the 1080 the king of folding.

Thanks, looking forward to Linux folding insights.
16.04 is the way to go since graphics-drivers ppa works only on that version and is also the way to go for gpu driver installation.
Headless system is PITA on Linux, but at least it works. On Windows one needs a dummy plugs to make it work.
Regarding PPDs, Watts and $: 1070 and 1060 3G are definitely folding kings while PPD/$ King is: (surprise, surprise) used/refurbished GTX 970 at 200$.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1v5gXral3BcFOoXs5n1M6l_Uo3pZpQYogn6gVlxRPnz0/edit#gid=0
Cant wait to buy a couple of used 1070s when they drop to something reasonable like 250$.

we are nothing but a smart contracts on a cosmic blockchain
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 16, 2017, 12:51:58 PM
 #3892

...
Regarding PPDs, Watts and $: 1070 and 1060 3G are definitely folding kings while PPD/$ King is: (surprise, surprise) used/refurbished GTX 970 at 200$.
...
Cant wait to buy a couple of used 1070s when they drop to something reasonable like 250$.
As I've said before, and I'll repeat until people actually read the words, you're using something for a base that has less than a single day of data for one 1080.
17 WUs in nowhere near enough data to make an informed opinion.

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
huffnpuff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
February 16, 2017, 08:28:13 PM
 #3893

SigmaX/CureCoin 2.0.0b3 beta schedule announcement (plan of record 02/16/17).

Vorksholk has submitted a new SigmaX build to CureCoin's internal beta team with updated features* (below)


Approximate Timeframe

1. Begin private testnet on 02/16/17 for a duration of ~two weeks (accessible by core beta team only)
2. Analysis and debugging phase for ~two weeks
3. Announce preliminary results (go to step 4, OR begin new internal testnet with new bug fixes - consider expanding internal beta test team).
4. Begin public testnet for ~one month IF build is ready
5. Final debugging and analysis phase for ~two weeks  
6. Announce results from public testnet (how many blocks mined, number of transactions, etc).      
7. Set official GA date, or go back thru step 4 for further refinement.

* updated features - compared to previous SigmaX beta versions:

   1. Now Using a hash-based radix tree for storing balance
   2. Expanded RPC functionality (enough to make a basic block explorer or exchange)
   3. Various networking code fixes (better peer discovery is a work in progress based on testnet results)
   4. Miscellaneous smaller changes
      Block header format is easier to work with and includes more data
      PoW now includes ledger hash
      Fixes for signature index ordering/recall in the mempool to handle multiple transactions from one address at a time

The CureCoin team reserves the right to modify schedules and beta release versions as required.
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 16, 2017, 09:29:03 PM
 #3894

....

So, in short, what you're saying is I'm going to have to recode my pool?
 Undecided

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 17, 2017, 03:41:36 AM
 #3895

....
3. CureCoin will be moving closer to pure POS asap in prep for CureCoin 2.0
....
Well, at least I know in advance to pull the plug on my $15k investment. :/

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
bardacuda
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 402


View Profile
February 17, 2017, 04:05:00 AM
 #3896

I knew I should have bought those nvidia cards back in the fall...

Great news about Stanford wanting to integrate!
cygnusxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 396


CureCoin Lead Dev


View Profile WWW
February 17, 2017, 04:09:52 AM
 #3897

....
3. CureCoin will be moving closer to pure POS asap in prep for CureCoin 2.0
....
Well, at least I know in advance to pull the plug on my $15k investment. :/

You stand to make more from gpus per watt even if you have an s9 or 15k$ worth of them. Also asics are good for a lot of other coins too, like bitcoin. If your serious about your investment you should know this and have thought this out. I highly recommend looking through the asic mining guide on coinwarz if you are serious about asics. I dont think Ive ever heard of anyone else buying asics just for curecoin.

Also, the move is "closer" to pure pos.. next phase for 1.x is still a hybrid. Also Asic hardware gets outdated faster than gpus and then becomes worthless unlike gpus when the next model comes out, so figure in extra hardware deprecation.  Just my 2 cents.

I think last poster bardacuda agrees with this - "I knew I should have bought those nvidia cards back in the fall..."


Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757 MergeFold with FoldingCoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781352.0
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 17, 2017, 04:15:48 AM
 #3898

...
Not all of that number is ASICs. But much of the appeal to cc was the ability to be on all sides. Like I said, at least now I know in advance the best thing to do is just mine/fold and dump.

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Vorksholk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624



View Profile WWW
February 17, 2017, 04:38:17 AM
 #3899

...
Not all of that number is ASICs. But much of the appeal to cc was the ability to be on all sides. Like I said, at least now I know in advance the best thing to do is just mine/fold and dump.

We are still planning to launch SigmaX which will share a common codebase with cc2.0 and provide pure-PoW functionality. It won't be SHA256D for ASICs, but it will still support "traditional" mining and the accompanying security model.

Fold Proteins, earn cryptos! CureCoin.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.0
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
February 17, 2017, 05:51:48 AM
 #3900

... I dont think Ive ever heard of anyone else buying asics just for curecoin...
And shit like this is why; 20% of 20% was bad enough to begin with.
Edit: and I guess you forgot:
Would you mine for a "CureCoin" ?
With 100% of your hashing power    45 (47.4%)

...I highly recommend looking through the asic mining guide on coinwarz if you are serious about asics...
If you think that anyone with my altcoin hashrate hasn't already done so, then you're as dumb as anyone willing to stick with this mess. This is almost as bad as the shit the devs did to Neoscoin. Angry

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Pages: « 1 ... 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 [195] 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!