Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2024, 06:19:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 [333] 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 ... 1627 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1484180 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Profetu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:25:43 PM
 #6641

snip

No, we can't move on.  Trolls from the DRK thread have been all over the fact that Chaeplin can backtrace the address.  I won't stop until someone folds.

I wasn't suggesting like other speculators here to burrow our heads and move on like there is no issue here. I was suggesting that dev should do whatever so there is proof before submission. If not, there will always be a doubt and that's all what a FUDer needs.
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:26:06 PM
 #6642

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it




Agree. Let's stop all testing and wait until it's finalized and in actual use. More exciting to find holes then.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:27:58 PM
 #6643


I wasn't suggesting like other speculators here to burrow our heads and move on like there is no issue here. I was suggesting that dev should do whatever so there is proof before submission. If not, there will always be a doubt and that's all what a FUDer needs.

did you see that, dev will disclose transaction detail after Chaeplin post address.

simple. if dev do not post transaction details after that. most ppl will lose patience and confidence.
brother3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:29:49 PM
 #6644



yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

your theory apply to any coin. btc ltc xc drk  and any coin

Herd mentality...

Same with stocks too

Edit: I actually got 1K of XCs at ~ 93K level and people have always been buying - Otherwise we would not be at this level now
520Bit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 252



View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:30:18 PM
 #6645

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it




Agree. Let's stop all testing and wait until it's finalized and in actual use. More exciting to find holes then.

This is just REV1 release, REV2 release will be more exciting.
Artoodeetoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:30:55 PM
 #6646

Expecting this to leg up again tonight... Great progress dev, thanks for the further updates today... Remember this is a young coin...

DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
addergebroed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 309
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:31:31 PM
 #6647

Should we be worried about X11 mining in the near future and the XC price (let's say it will work) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7252546#msg7252546
SushiChef
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:34:25 PM
 #6648

While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/
phosphorush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 503
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:36:39 PM
 #6649

While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Blacksteel

Your account locked, please contact support.
hunterwolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1108
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:37:35 PM
 #6650

XC is a great coin. I've got lots, but want more.  Grin

When do you think is a good time to buy more?

Do you think it will drop in price a little?

best time is now. Grin

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

You can always wait to see if it goes down but I suggest you buy now and keep an eye on it, plus we been in the 90ks for to long even with some good progress from ATC. Lets not forget that right now there is no marketing done so when that kicks in we should make some progress price wise.  

no, you wrong. İ bought 400K, i bought 20K a lot. And i sold  145K a part now. if go down i buy again. if  go up, i sell again, you understand?
but wee need truth. No good time for buy, i dont like scam. is my opinion offcourse.

 
Thrash
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519
Merit: 253



View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:41:05 PM
 #6651

While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Just wanted to let everyone know I am still around and we are working hard on the branding to go with the XC logo. While it takes some time to get it right, it will be worth it in the long run. Our goal is to provide the branding at a professional level that matches the work that atcsecure has been bringing to the table. 

It is great to be invested in a coin that delivers what they promise. I look forward to what the future holds for XC. 
yoo10
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:42:04 PM
 #6652

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it




I think we all need to face this test.

dev can give a md5(real_address_A + salt), salt can be any string and needn't post here. Just md5 hash C

the tester give address B

then dev give A and salt, the rest can verify it.

because if B=A, dev cannot find a A',  md5(A' + salt') = C

Hey, if chaeplin could trace the address, what we need to do is just fix it before the boat sails to the sea, isn't it?
evtrmm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250

So much for "Community"


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:46:37 PM
 #6653

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.
SushiChef
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:51:22 PM
 #6654

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.
hoertest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:57:12 PM
 #6655

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history
phosphorush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 503
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 04:59:35 PM
 #6656

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

that's why i asked if someone looking for a transaction would have access to it, but nobody replied... if they can't have access to it, then it doesn't make sense to give it to chap.

Your account locked, please contact support.
hoertest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 05:01:15 PM
 #6657

While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo Tongue

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Just wanted to let everyone know I am still around and we are working hard on the branding to go with the XC logo. While it takes some time to get it right, it will be worth it in the long run. Our goal is to provide the branding at a professional level that matches the work that atcsecure has been bringing to the table. 

It is great to be invested in a coin that delivers what they promise. I look forward to what the future holds for XC. 

best news of the day. this is getting really good.
the_game1224
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 05:01:37 PM
 #6658

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls
Coindacioius
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 05:01:41 PM
 #6659

HODL!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG1qooBzE2w
hoertest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 05:07:47 PM
 #6660

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop. 
Pages: « 1 ... 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 [333] 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 ... 1627 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!