[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[randomm00nwalk]

lol, seeing these posts, i am wondering if atcsecure and chaeplin were currently in the middle of cold war of a relationship. can you guys just stop calling each other "he"...

[520Bit]

ATCSecure?

Yes, which reminds me.

Paging, paging Dr Chaeplin.  Please report to the nearest XC thread at once.

Mixer Test using v1.42


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.
Keep saying " ~ is not the address".

Not interested in.

+ tell dev, change address is yours.

WRONG - that change address is not related to the real source address


here is another one....


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

same tx

sender -------- > mixer ----> payee
change<--------|

 


First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.

If he knows the address he should post it...

ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5.
With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy.

If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password.

there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong

that's great!

Agree.

[hunterwolf]

XC is a great coin. I've got lots, but want more. 

When do you think is a good time to buy more?

Do you think it will drop in price a little?

best time is now.

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

[jaft16]

ATCSecure?

Yes, which reminds me.

Paging, paging Dr Chaeplin.  Please report to the nearest XC thread at once.

Mixer Test using v1.42


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.
Keep saying " ~ is not the address".

Not interested in.

+ tell dev, change address is yours.

WRONG - that change address is not related to the real source address


here is another one....


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

same tx

sender -------- > mixer ----> payee
change<--------|

 


First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.

If he knows the address he should post it...

ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5.
With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy.

If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password.

there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong

Yet, Cheaplin keeps insisting for the MD5, makes me wonder how he got his answers  on earlier tests.

+1

[cyberhacker]

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

your theory apply to any coin. btc ltc xc drk  and any coin

[Profetu]

ATCSecure?

Yes, which reminds me.

Paging, paging Dr Chaeplin.  Please report to the nearest XC thread at once.

Mixer Test using v1.42


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.
Keep saying " ~ is not the address".

Not interested in.

+ tell dev, change address is yours.

WRONG - that change address is not related to the real source address


here is another one....


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

same tx

sender -------- > mixer ----> payee
change<--------|

 


First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.

If he knows the address he should post it...

ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5.
With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy.

If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password.

there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong

Yet, Cheaplin keeps insisting for the MD5, makes me wonder how he got his answers  on earlier tests.

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

[cyberhacker]

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

simple.

Chaeplin post address, and Dev will post transaction details.  any thing wrong about this?

[JakeThePanda]

ATCSecure?

Yes, which reminds me.

Paging, paging Dr Chaeplin.  Please report to the nearest XC thread at once.

Mixer Test using v1.42


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.
Keep saying " ~ is not the address".

Not interested in.

+ tell dev, change address is yours.

WRONG - that change address is not related to the real source address


here is another one....


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

same tx

sender -------- > mixer ----> payee
change<--------|

 


First tell dev to post md5 of  whateverattached_senderaddress.

If he knows the address he should post it...

ATC is right not to post the MD5, someone could write a scrypt scanning the blockchain for all used addresses & checking there MD5.
With both start & begin addresses finding the route between is easy.

If md5 posted it should be in a encrypted file we can all download first. After the answer has been given, release the password.

there is no need, when/if somebody posts the address, I will provide the details to the other side of the transaction which will either prove they are correct or prove they are wrong

Yet, Cheaplin keeps insisting for the MD5, makes me wonder how he got his answers  on earlier tests.

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

No, we can't move on.  Trolls from the DRK thread have been all over the fact that Chaeplin can backtrace the address.  I won't stop until someone folds.

[mav137]

is there a bounty out for this at the moment? Could be a nice carrot..

[jaft16]

XC is a great coin. I've got lots, but want more. 

When do you think is a good time to buy more?

Do you think it will drop in price a little?

best time is now.

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

You can always wait to see if it goes down but I suggest you buy now and keep an eye on it, plus we been in the 90ks for to long even with some good progress from ATC. Lets not forget that right now there is no marketing done so when that kicks in we should make some progress price wise.  

[cyberhacker]

is there a bounty out for this at the moment? Could be a nice carrot..

if dev request.

[KimmyF]

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

yes hear myself loud & clear, just go back from the given block, desc. order. Sounds easy enough for me. Not even needed to scan all addresses.
Also please read back about previous tests, MD5 was online

[atcsecure]

Yes he reverse MD5 every address on the block chain. Do you hear yourself?

Also dev never posted a MD5 before. Not sure why is he dogging now. Can we get over this already and move on?

yes hear myself loud & clear, just go back from the given block, desc. order. Sounds easy enough for me. Not even needed to scan all addresses.
Also please read back about previous tests, MD5 was online

exactly...

[520Bit]

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

And every time I sent my XC, there is an error:

Code:

Error: The transaction was rejected. This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

[myelbow4]

This is just the beginning. Prepare for .01

[atcsecure]

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

do they show up in the block explorer?  if not you may need to rescan w/ fresh wallet using private key imports

[JakeThePanda]

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

[atcsecure]

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it

[520Bit]

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

do they show up in the block explorer?  if not you may need to rescan w/ fresh wallet using private key imports

And every time I sent my XC, there is an error:

Code:

Error: The transaction was rejected. 
This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, 
such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and 
coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here.

[phosphorush]

someone looking for a transaction would have the md5 or sha? if not that's part of the privacy features and should not be required to track it if it's possible to do so? Am I wrong? (I'm very ignorant on these things )