cryptico
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:42:38 PM |
|
Ok I saw how it works in the team viewer and for what I saw the transaction was split into 4 different ones with the same receiver address and that was pretty impressive but then it was cut down due to the guy not sure about oine thing about tracing back the address in the long line of code that was put into the console. So for what I understand the splitting of the transactions proves that what they were saying about changing the code to Show Unkown in the GUY is unduable? Thank you
|
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:42:51 PM |
|
teamviewer was interesting. AlexGR... did you participate?
Did Propulsion see this? For some reason, and I don't know what it is, I'm very interested in what he/she has to say.
|
|
|
|
c-cex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
CryptoCurrency EXchange: https://c-cex.com
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:43:01 PM |
|
Free trading weekend! 0% fee for 2 days!
https://c-cex.com
|
|
|
|
Grifftech
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:43:10 PM |
|
Darkcoin got banned on btc-e What happened?
|
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:43:34 PM |
|
I'm guessing that the dev outsourced the basic coin creation to loljosh but he is not on the team and has nothing to do with the xcode. Would that be such a big deal?
|
|
|
|
ballzdeep
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:46:06 PM |
|
If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.
from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn? yowzers.... Honestly some of the hate you are getting is from xc holders who don't want to toyed with and the rest is from some darkcoin holders. And I understand them, here you have a pre alpha anonymity release with no proof of it working apart from sketchy screenshots. And people are saying it's way better than darksend already (which actually works right now), and they actually have no idea how it works. Burden of proof is on xc, not dark. Can I see in teamview how darksend work ?
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:46:31 PM |
|
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer. normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out. now. here is the transaction from my end.  { "txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71", "version" : 1, "time" : 1401481973, "locktime" : 0, "vin" : [ { "txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38", "vout" : 0, "scriptSig" : { "asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6", "hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6" }, "sequence" : 4294967295 } ], "vout" : [ { "value" : 176.96700500, "n" : 0, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m" ] } }, { "value" : 5.86236100, "n" : 1, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j" ] } } ], "amount" : -5.86236100, "fee" : -0.00001000, "confirmations" : 4, "blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8", "blockindex" : 2, "blocktime" : 1401482018, "txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71", "time" : 1401481973, "timereceived" : 1401481973, "comment" : "", "message" : "", "details" : [ { "account" : "[color=yellow]main", "address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color] "category" : "send", "amount" : -5.86236100, "fee" : -0.00001000 } ] }
As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85 the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow Which again does not show up in the tx Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident. Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.
|
|
|
|
dida
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:48:29 PM |
|
Darkcoin got banned on btc-e What happened? I dont know but I just receive that information...you can check for your self it is no longer on https://btc-e.com/
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:48:59 PM |
|
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer. normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.
now. here is the transaction from my end.
As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85 the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow Which again does not show up in the tx
Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.
Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.
i second that. this feature works well.
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:49:19 PM |
|
I'm guessing that the dev outsourced the basic coin creation to loljosh but he is not on the team and has nothing to do with the xcode. Would that be such a big deal?
Apparently is it to some people... Dunno why it should be even if its true
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:49:32 PM |
|
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer. normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out. now. here is the transaction from my end.  { "txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71", "version" : 1, "time" : 1401481973, "locktime" : 0, "vin" : [ { "txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38", "vout" : 0, "scriptSig" : { "asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6", "hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6" }, "sequence" : 4294967295 } ], "vout" : [ { "value" : 176.96700500, "n" : 0, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m" ] } }, { "value" : 5.86236100, "n" : 1, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j" ] } } ], "amount" : -5.86236100, "fee" : -0.00001000, "confirmations" : 4, "blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8", "blockindex" : 2, "blocktime" : 1401482018, "txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71", "time" : 1401481973, "timereceived" : 1401481973, "comment" : "", "message" : "", "details" : [ { "account" : "[color=yellow]main", "address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color] "category" : "send", "amount" : -5.86236100, "fee" : -0.00001000 } ] }
As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85 the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow Which again does not show up in the tx Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident. Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand. I was on the session and can confirm all of this. Very exciting stuff! Thanks again for hosting.
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:50:00 PM |
|
So now we have had two successful peer reviews, a potential peer review from rat4 and the proof of concept has been demonstrated on teamviewer. And we have the test net demo up and running.
How much peer review has DRK had.
The DRK trolls will still find something to complain about, but serious investors who can think for themselves will reach their own conclusions.
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:50:22 PM |
|
just so you all know, I accept tips
|
|
|
|
choose-username
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:50:30 PM |
|
Darkcoin got banned on btc-e What happened? I dont know but I just receive that information...you can check for your self it is no longer on BTC-e Do you mean the trollbox? I haven't heard btc-e ever including DRK for trade. Also apologies for DRK discussion here.
|
|
|
|
Propulsion
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:51:02 PM |
|
teamviewer was interesting. AlexGR... did you participate?
Did Propulsion see this? For some reason, and I don't know what it is, I'm very interested in what he/she has to say. Unfortunately, I missed it. At the moment I'm more interested in getting a Testnet Abe Explorer running. https://github.com/bitcoin-abe/bitcoin-abe Since this will prove without any doubt if the anonymity works or not. Was the teamview recorded by any chance?
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:51:37 PM |
|
should have recorded it.
I will do that later.
|
|
|
|
solid12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:52:26 PM |
|
I'm a layman so alot of this tech stuff goes over my head, but what my impression is so far is alot of the FUD flying has been countered very well.
In order this is my experience over the last week
OMG this dev is fake, he'll never have a wallet by Sunday!
- check, wallet on Sunday
then
OMG this guy is not Dan Metcalfe, that is just speculation, he is probably some kid
- check, Dan Metcalfe updates his linkedin
OMG there is a one line mention of fedoracoin, sell, sell, sell!
- check, Mindfox looks at the code and confirms it's not fedora's.
I believe in solid, honest questions but after being inundated with scam coins for months now, this is one of the most transparent devs i've come across and frankly his age and resume give me more confidence than alot of these 20 year-old copy paste kids. Do I still hold out the possibility he can't pull it off? Sure, but I do think if there is ANY coin that can compete with Dark, this is it, no other comes close except MRO which has issues of its own as well.
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:52:32 PM |
|
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer. normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out. now. here is the transaction from my end.  { "txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71", "version" : 1, "time" : 1401481973, "locktime" : 0, "vin" : [ { "txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38", "vout" : 0, "scriptSig" : { "asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6", "hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6" }, "sequence" : 4294967295 } ], "vout" : [ { "value" : 176.96700500, "n" : 0, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m" ] } }, { "value" : 5.86236100, "n" : 1, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j" ] } } ], "amount" : -5.86236100, "fee" : -0.00001000, "confirmations" : 4, "blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8", "blockindex" : 2, "blocktime" : 1401482018, "txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71", "time" : 1401481973, "timereceived" : 1401481973, "comment" : "", "message" : "", "details" : [ { "account" : "[color=yellow]main", "address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color] "category" : "send", "amount" : -5.86236100, "fee" : -0.00001000 } ] }
As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85 the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow Which again does not show up in the tx Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident. Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand. I was on the session and can confirm all of this. Very exciting stuff! Thanks again for hosting. I was on the session too I remember you sending coin to this address mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j am I wrong? Sorry I really did not get what you have stated in your post but this just of my ignorance in the matter Please could you clarify a bit better for me? Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
tat123
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:54:51 PM |
|
Propulsion and AlexGR... YOU both missed the team viewer?
|
|
|
|
|