[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[dida]

Darkcoin got banned on btc-e   

[the_game1224]

Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI?  Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?

the receiver can not see the original wallet address

BIG Shout Out to evtrmm for hosting the teamviewer!  I can confirm running the gettransaction command with the Transaction ID DOES NOT show the origin address.  So that post saying all he was doing was "replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI" was completely FALSE.

[Grifftech]

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

you moron, lol it is "scapegoat" and that is not the correct usage of the term. Hurry catch that "escape goat"!!

[tat123]

teamviewer was interesting. AlexGR... did you participate?

[Grifftech]

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

it's you

There might be a reason for it:

There has been controversy lately regarding the true origins of XC. You can see clearly at this page after you login and press 'Show ratings'. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=249302 that the XC coin "developer", atcecure has paid loljosh 0.7 BTC.

atcsecure 0: -0 / +0(0) 2014-05-09 0.70000000 Very trustworthy and put in the extra effort as needed.. very fast service and highly recommended

Loljosh is a person who offers custom made alt-coins for BTC. You can see loljosh's thread where he offers his services at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.0
Loljosh started offering a PoS and X11 custom made alt-coin on 9th of May: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.msg6625004#msg6625004 which has the exact same features as XC.
9th may was also the very same day the X11Coin launched and the payment was made to Loljosh from atcecure. The date of the launch can be looked up in the original thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.0
To this moment the X11Coin "developer" is very vague about the transaction and hasn't even explained what was the payment for. We can only assume it was a payment for the creation of X11Coin since it's Loljosh expertise field. The evidence above is a strong indication that this is the case

Since we have developer's attention it would be nice to have it addressed since it hasn't been.

He addressed that pages back and said he has not had loljosh involved in this.

[cyberhacker]

Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI?  Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?

the receiver can not see the original wallet address

BIG Shout Out to evtrmm for hosting the teamviewer!  I can confirm running the gettransaction command with the Transaction ID DOES NOT show the origin address.  So that post saying all he was doing was "replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI" was completely FALSE.

i also take part in the teamview. everything is going well. so what are they trolling about?

seriously i have no idea what they are talking about.

[cryptico]

ok.

3:25 transaction will be executed

Please join the meeting, by clicking on this link:
http://go.teamviewer.com/v9/m86948676

Meeting ID: m86-948-676

that is 4 minutes

Ok I saw how it works in the team viewer and for what I saw the transaction was split into 4 different ones with the same receiver address and that was pretty impressive but then it was cut down due to the guy not sure about oine thing about tracing back the address in the long line of code that was put into the console.

So for what I understand the splitting of the transactions proves that what they were saying about changing the code to Show Unkown in the GUY is unduable?

Thank you

[JakeThePanda]

teamviewer was interesting. AlexGR... did you participate?

Did Propulsion see this?  For some reason, and I don't know what it is, I'm very interested in what he/she has to say.

[c-cex]

Free trading weekend! 0% fee for 2 days!

https://c-cex.com

[Grifftech]

Darkcoin got banned on btc-e   

What happened?

[Conurtrol]

I'm guessing that the dev outsourced the basic coin creation to loljosh but he is not on the team and has nothing to do with the xcode. Would that be such a big deal?

[ballzdeep]

If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.

from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development

what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn?

yowzers....

Honestly some of the hate you are getting is from xc holders who don't want to toyed with and the rest is from some darkcoin holders.

And I understand them, here you have a pre alpha anonymity release with no proof of it working apart from sketchy screenshots. And people are saying it's way better than darksend already  (which actually works right now), and they actually have no idea how it works. Burden of proof is on xc, not dark.

Can I see in teamview how darksend work ?

[evtrmm]

thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.

Code:


{
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401481973,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6",
"hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 176.96700500,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 5.86236100,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 4,
"blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1401482018,
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"time" : 1401481973,
"timereceived" : 1401481973,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "[color=yellow]main",
"address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color]
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000
}
]
}

As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.

[dida]

Darkcoin got banned on btc-e  

What happened?

I dont know but I just receive that information...you can check for your self it is no longer on https://btc-e.com/  

[cyberhacker]

thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.



As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.

i second that. this feature works well.

[brother3]

I'm guessing that the dev outsourced the basic coin creation to loljosh but he is not on the team and has nothing to do with the xcode. Would that be such a big deal?

Apparently is it to some people...

Dunno why it should be even if its true

[the_game1224]

thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.

Code:


{
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401481973,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6",
"hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 176.96700500,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 5.86236100,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 4,
"blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1401482018,
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"time" : 1401481973,
"timereceived" : 1401481973,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "[color=yellow]main",
"address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color]
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000
}
]
}

As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.

I was on the session and can confirm all of this.  Very exciting stuff!  Thanks again for hosting.

[greyskies]

So now we have had two successful peer reviews, a potential peer review from rat4 and the proof of concept has been demonstrated on teamviewer. And we have the test net demo up and running.

How much peer review has DRK had.

The DRK trolls will still find something to complain about, but serious investors who can think for themselves will reach their own conclusions.

[evtrmm]

just so you all know, I accept tips   

[choose-username]

Darkcoin got banned on btc-e   

What happened?

I dont know but I just receive that information...you can check for your self it is no longer on BTC-e 

Do you mean the trollbox? I haven't heard btc-e ever including DRK for trade.

Also apologies for DRK discussion here.