[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[Minotaur26]

^^ Whatever, you were all celebrating, going to publish the success of your experiment because your anon was working, it only took one person who actually has a clue to prove you wrong, now you are coming up with excuses. Lame.

[evtrmm]

 Transaction 1 - http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/1fc7f91683c47e0c5085a6b2d0204ae7bdc34400d302f7fbc9023c261200bfa9  (2014-06-02 04:29:02)

your alleged
 http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/c6c9e757332829e1f1d7ef52de10acd99238e6218cdd1e8c9d4b70418495b779                       (2014-06-03 09:54:30)


wow.  that took forever

quite the time difference.

Show a transaction in the right time frame.

not trying to be a dick, but what you showed proves nothing.  We really want serious investigation.  And it will not harm community or coin, only make it stronger.

also remember, this is less than a month old and not yet a finished product.

but keep digging

I do get it.

but did you use send from mixer


You don't get it ?

I sent him 1.234.

did you use "sendfrommixer" label sendtoaddress?

and if so where are the screenshots. 

video shortly

[studio1one]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

[evtrmm]

If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ?
After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty.
Lets wait and see IF this is true at all

No luck, pattern.

XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine.

The main point though is 2 things

1.  This XNode was setup before v1.35
2.  XNodes require a fresh wallet, with 1 address, and then make deposit to that new wallet

and this is the first public release of the code, to get feedback from the community and testers on potential bugs.


Lets have another bounty/test on the v1.35 code...

ATCSECURE

If you say so, I will post my test result.
to mixer + 3, done ?

Proceed ?

give a half hour.

Video, plus needed info and let's pull it from code

[studio1one]

6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f

well done. You deserve the bounty.

did he use sendfrommixer command?

and he did not identify his wallet prior to release of actual wallet anyhow.

HE posted the MD5 hash of the receive address hours before it was released.

The challenge was 'what is the receive address'

As far as I see he cracked it. He should be rewarded, not only that but it helps the development process to have people trying this.

[evtrmm]

6a39f4f9744d83dc5de9c14d87914c0f

well done. You deserve the bounty.

did he use sendfrommixer command?

and he did not identify his wallet prior to release of actual wallet anyhow.

HE posted the MD5 hash of the receive address hours before it was released.

The challenge was 'what is the receive address'

As far as I see he cracked it. He should be rewarded, not only that but it helps the development process to have people trying this.

did he use sendfromixer?

[520Bit]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

[chaeplin]

I have tipped him



http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?c6c9e757332829e1f1d7ef52de10acd99238e6218cdd1e8c9d4b70418495b779.htm

[chaeplin]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

I don't need bounty.

Do test.


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8.htm is me.

[kewlya]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

I don't need bounty.

Do test.

add the first bounty to the new bounty 100XC. ill add another 20 XC from me. so far bounty is 0.1 BTC, and 120 XC, what do you say guys ?

[bitcad4u]

just out of curiosity...and im  not trying to start FUD... but has anyone run test like this on drk ?

[evtrmm]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

I don't need bounty.

Do test.

did you use
"sendfrommixer" label receiveraddress?

[chaeplin]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

I don't need bounty.

Do test.

add the first bounty to the new bounty 100XC. ill add another 20 XC from me. so far bounty is 0.1 BTC, and 120 XC, what do you say guys ?

I don't need it.

post tx

[chaeplin]

Anyone ?

Post tx

[Reese212]

I'm sorry I need to move away from computer and I public this post a little earlier

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7090442#msg7090442

ok time is up...
and winner is: NO ONE

sender (wallet and transactions):[/b]

snip

---

to haters:
if you think it's fake then just try to use the mixer yourself

ATCsecure can u plz explain how it is prevented from a mixer stealing coins during this beta wallet? 

a mixer on its own can't steal coins, but with out the REV2 trust system and multi-path there is a potential risk of loosing coins through a bad node.  I have setup "hardened" servers for testing, PM for details

Is a "bad node" one that has a technical malfunction, or one that is operated with evil intent ?

Either one, as I stated I have setup some secure servers for testing and personally guarantee that those servers work as advertised, PM me for details

No thanks I'll never try it if I can loose my coins.

"this is beta, use at your own risk" is something EVERY good Software developer says about his product IF it is not finished yet.
and it Looks like he is located in Boston, USA. where it is a normal Thing that on a packet of Chips have to be the words "These Chips are smaller than the Pictures on the package".

so don't worry, that he says that, that he warns us, only Shows that he's not en avil guy but a legit one.

[chaeplin]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

I don't need bounty.

Do test.

did you use
"sendfrommixer" label receiveraddress?

Yes.

[studio1one]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

I don't need bounty.

Do test.

add the first bounty to the new bounty 100XC. ill add another 20 XC from me. so far bounty is 0.1 BTC, and 120 XC, what do you say guys ?

I don't need it.

post tx

I'm at work, don't have a wallet here. Will do it when I get home.

[JakeThePanda]

I will be home in an hour.

I will set another one using 1.35 from my wallet.

I will post the TX ID

I will want both send and receive address.

Bounty will be 100 XC to anyone who can provide both send and receive address.

I will post MD5 in original post of both send and receive address.


Everyone agree?

Agree, my client is v1.35 and set up the xnode, waiting for your test.

I don't need bounty.

Do test.

add the first bounty to the new bounty 100XC. ill add another 20 XC from me. so far bounty is 0.1 BTC, and 120 XC, what do you say guys ?

I don't need it.

post tx

I'm at work, don't have a wallet here. Will do it when I get home.

Can someone else do the test?  

[kewlya]

I'm sorry I need to move away from computer and I public this post a little earlier

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7090442#msg7090442

ok time is up...
and winner is: NO ONE

sender (wallet and transactions):[/b]

snip

---

to haters:
if you think it's fake then just try to use the mixer yourself

ATCsecure can u plz explain how it is prevented from a mixer stealing coins during this beta wallet?  

a mixer on its own can't steal coins, but with out the REV2 trust system and multi-path there is a potential risk of loosing coins through a bad node[/b].  I have setup "hardened" servers for testing, PM for details

Is a "bad node" one that has a technical malfunction, or one that is operated with evil intent ?

Either one, as I stated I have setup some secure servers for testing and personally guarantee that those servers work as advertised, PM me for details

No thanks I'll never try it if I can loose my coins. From de dev himself[/b]

we dont need you to try it because we already know you are all in DRK and u have 0 balance XC , youre here only to spread stupid FUD and doing nothing constructive for XC community. Go back to your forum you dont belong here.

[chaeplin]

If he found out the correct address ofc he deserves the bounty. However he should share HOW he found out ? Was it just ... a lucky guess ( even if that sounds pretty strange ), or he actually found a whole in the process ?
After he give's out HOW he found out the transaction and that gets proven he should get 100% his bounty.
Lets wait and see IF this is true at all

No luck, pattern.

XSps9KGhNr8L7SK5NyTSbTQBZ48Ewkwvq8 is mine.

The main point though is 2 things

1.  This XNode was setup before v1.35
2.  XNodes require a fresh wallet, with 1 address, and then make deposit to that new wallet

and this is the first public release of the code, to get feedback from the community and testers on potential bugs.


Lets have another bounty/test on the v1.35 code...

ATCSECURE

If you say so, I will post my test result.
to mixer + 3, done ?

Proceed ?

Dev ?