cryptico
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 07:42:36 PM |
|
Mega Teeeeeaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 07:44:24 PM |
|
holy crap and im not even top100, rip top spots :/
|
|
|
|
|
GameStarter
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 07:48:40 PM |
|
Good timing XC already start to obtain a lot of attention ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
XChat adress + Key: XVgjcg7tnFgkthL2hi4yvXiU66FWkZ Key: bjmK3SsiNEUC2VJkcEGTMRBmqYx3rXhxRh39BvbtpAof
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 07:49:47 PM |
|
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fe57511af299c0d9490d0f23bce7fde57.png&t=665&c=G7yDW1stOzNwwA)
|
|
|
|
CryptoChronic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 07:51:38 PM |
|
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fe57511af299c0d9490d0f23bce7fde57.png&t=665&c=G7yDW1stOzNwwA) All honesty.... dosent look so hot ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 07:51:58 PM |
|
Once we have a generalised content service based purely on Xnodes, I don't think we'd need to centralise voice chat to any extent.
Cool. I wonder if Dan will want to look into any of the tech that MAIDsafe will be using. They seem to have a fair amount of stuff on their wiki - https://github.com/maidsafe/MaidSafe/wikiI know what we're doing is from a different angle since we focus on privacy. And we're also building directly upon the Bitcoin blockchain technology. But it might save some time and give Dan ideas. Actually, I was thinking a few days ago how the fragmenting of transactions is very similar to how Maidsafe is fragmenting files for their decentralized internet. I agree that the two are awesome projects and could compliment each other... Maidsafe is a fascinating project. Wildly ambitious. Bitcoin devs should be cheering Dan on that he is advancing the Bitcoin tech to compete with them. When you look at Web 3.0 and blockchain 2.0 concepts that have been hinted at by the XC team there are definitely parallels between what maidsafe want to do and what we are doing. Except we are doing it in the here and now.
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 07:56:13 PM |
|
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept? [snip]
All honesty.... dosent look so hot ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Thanks for the feedback.
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 08:03:40 PM |
|
Once we have a generalised content service based purely on Xnodes, I don't think we'd need to centralise voice chat to any extent.
Cool. I wonder if Dan will want to look into any of the tech that MAIDsafe will be using. They seem to have a fair amount of stuff on their wiki - https://github.com/maidsafe/MaidSafe/wikiI know what we're doing is from a different angle since we focus on privacy. And we're also building directly upon the Bitcoin blockchain technology. But it might save some time and give Dan ideas. Actually, I was thinking a few days ago how the fragmenting of transactions is very similar to how Maidsafe is fragmenting files for their decentralized internet. I agree that the two are awesome projects and could compliment each other... Maidsafe is a fascinating project. Wildly ambitious. Bitcoin devs should be cheering Dan on that he is advancing the Bitcoin tech to compete with them. When you look at Web 3.0 and blockchain 2.0 concepts that have been hinted at by the XC team there are definitely parallels between what maidsafe want to do and what we are doing. Except we are doing it in the here and now. Is made safe not based on the blockchain? I don't know anything about that project..
|
|
|
|
jibble
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 08:05:20 PM |
|
Once we have a generalised content service based purely on Xnodes, I don't think we'd need to centralise voice chat to any extent.
Cool. I wonder if Dan will want to look into any of the tech that MAIDsafe will be using. They seem to have a fair amount of stuff on their wiki - https://github.com/maidsafe/MaidSafe/wikiI know what we're doing is from a different angle since we focus on privacy. And we're also building directly upon the Bitcoin blockchain technology. But it might save some time and give Dan ideas. Actually, I was thinking a few days ago how the fragmenting of transactions is very similar to how Maidsafe is fragmenting files for their decentralized internet. I agree that the two are awesome projects and could compliment each other... Maidsafe is a fascinating project. Wildly ambitious. Bitcoin devs should be cheering Dan on that he is advancing the Bitcoin tech to compete with them. When you look at Web 3.0 and blockchain 2.0 concepts that have been hinted at by the XC team there are definitely parallels between what maidsafe want to do and what we are doing. Except we are doing it in the here and now. Is made safe not based on the blockchain? I don't know anything about that project.. I know quite a bit, very interested in it and believe it will see massive market cap increases once it is actually released. But no not based on blockchain, the coins will act almost like real money, you can see who the previous owner was before you, and that's about it
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 08:42:16 PM |
|
I know quite a bit, very interested in it and believe it will see massive market cap increases once it is actually released. But no not based on blockchain, the coins will act almost like real money, you can see who the previous owner was before you, and that's about it
Exactly...I edited my comment above to reflect that it sounds similar from a layman's explanation...the technical details are completely different. That said, I am excited for what Tuesday has to bring.... Question - Has the final Rev 2.0 release been completed or is it still going through some fine tuning?
|
|
|
|
Dungor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 08:53:45 PM |
|
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fe57511af299c0d9490d0f23bce7fde57.png&t=665&c=G7yDW1stOzNwwA) I like the in/out icons.
|
XChat XZFT9YxW9Uhv4R5yoWgUmYhAzqP5qVuZp8 Public Key 288p7Jom8LvQ1UNVgc7H7wzpZoQkqLdtqfR7Ls4Bgo3Mz
|
|
|
pookielax31
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 08:56:16 PM |
|
Like I said before we would either break down in the cloud or up....we broke down... Now we have a cloud forming above us after the kumo twist(THE WHITE LINE OF THE CLOUD TURNING DOWN)... Which means we have to fight the cloud to start and uptrend again... this is ugly situation ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) ..... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoYedxXZ.png&t=665&c=qw2nt7yVyyv13Q)
|
|
|
|
CryptoChronic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 09:06:05 PM |
|
This idiot troll may have a point ^^^ Edit: Its not exactly a reality...yet
|
|
|
|
onealfa
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 09:11:24 PM |
|
Do you really believe, guys, that you can rely on TA in this shallow market, with these tiny small volumes??? (MINTPALL) Even I'm a big fan of TA myself, & used a lot of it in FOREX - I dont count much on it here. One "baby-whale" comes with 100 BTC - and all your TA "clouds" becomes just a plain joke.
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 09:13:00 PM |
|
So nobody wants to give their opinion about this concept?
I like the in/out icons. Agreed, the In and Out icons. I would like to see the Decentralized XC/Altcoin Exchange icons, Decentralized Marketplace exchange icons, Decentralized Internet icons, Encrypted cloud File storage icons,
|
|
|
|
pookielax31
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 09:15:54 PM |
|
Do you really believe, guys, that you can rely on TA in this shallow market, with these tiny small volumes??? (MINTPALL) Even I'm a big fan of TA myself, & used a lot of it in FOREX - I dont count much on it here. One "baby-whale" comes with 100 BTC - and all your TA "clouds" becomes just a plain joke.
Hasnt failed yet, for any coins I have been trading ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) ... BTW if ur using Bitcoinwisdom for charts... the magic EMA Parameters are 21 50 100 200 use that with the 4hr chart..... thats a winning combo for any security in the world
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 09:27:16 PM |
|
Guys, look on what page we are on. :3
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 09:38:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 20, 2014, 09:42:37 PM |
|
To be able to send private transactions/collect fees you will need to set up your router opening port tcp 32348 and be sure you firewall allows xc app trough port 32348. If one of those is set up wrongly your private transactions/mixer fee will not work there is a readme file as well where it explains it in ver 2.49.02
According to portcheckers.com, port 32348 is open and my Windows Firewall allows the XC app. Not sure if there is anything else I should be checking.... ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) If you are on Windows can you try the following command in a cmd box? netstat -an | find "32348"It will show all in & out connections your wallet has. example from my own setup: (192.168.0.49 is my local ip) TCP 192.168.0.49:32348 178.221.54.98:62146 ESTABLISHED this is a connection to my wallet from the outside and this are some outgoing connections to other Xnode/Xmixers TCP 192.168.0.49:50000 81.82.165.203:32348 ESTABLISHED TCP 192.168.0.49:50079 78.108.54.193:32348 ESTABLISHED if you see no connections and only a line like this: TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING then you still have a firewall or nat problem Hi kimmy hope you are still here.. I see the connections that you said in many lines that are between two lines the first one is like your: TCP 0.0.0.0:32348 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING the last one is TCP [::]:32348 [::]:0 LISTENING Is that ok? In Edge Traversal Settings I have "allow edge traversl" is that ok?
|
|
|
|
|